continuous improvement process for the curriculum. Assessments can eitherindirect or direct measures of student achievement; direct measures are preferred.SE Graduate Program Alignment with GRCSEA program that adopts or chooses to align with GRCSE will go through several phases. Thesephases reflect the maturity of the program, from the initial planning through to a matureprogram. Existing programs will align to GRCSE in varying degree. To aid universities indetermining the degree of alignment, assessment rubrics are provided in Table 2. Theassessment categories can also be used to provide a basis for program improvement. Forexample, a program can use the categories initial, emerging, developed, and highly developed, asa basis to develop a strategy
and desired knowledge outcomes are described here. This step also allows forpre-assessment and serves as a benchmark for self-assessment in the Reflect Back step.Challenge 1 (shown in Figure 1)The first challenge is a lower difficulty level problem dealing with the topic. The student isprovided with information needed to understand the challenge. The steps shown below representthe remainder of the cycle, which prepares the students to complete the challenge. Note thatformative instructional events can and probably should occur in each step of the cycle. Thefollowing LC steps are to motivate and engage the students: Generate ideas: Students are asked to generate a list of issues and answers that they think are relevant to the
curriculum elements, and this benefit can extend beyondthose students directly associated with the SE capstone projects. The program has received positivefeedback from most of the graduates that have participated on these projects, and the influence ofthe SE program has grown far beyond the number of students entering the graduate school forSE.Introduction The US Department of Defense (DoD) is facing major challenges associated with theirScience, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) workforce. This problem goes beyond theneeds of the core acquisition workforce that comprise only 40% of the overall STEMworkforce1, and in fact is a reflection of shortages of engineers throughout defense industries and
tochange their business plan, before a second year of simulation was run. Again, each airline wasgiven their ranking and their profit/loss statement after the second year of simulation.Each group was required to produce several deliverables. First, the groups were required todocument their business decisions. Groups were then asked to reflect on how they did after ayear of simulation. In instances in which groups succeeded at making a profit, they were askedto comment on why they thought they were successful. In instances in which groups were not assuccessful, they were asked to comment on what they thought could have hindered their abilityto make a profit. Groups were then asked to document any changes they made before the secondyear of
not effective to keep students’ interest in their majors. This is particularlytrue for the engineering majors.There are efforts to cultivate more student-centered learning pedagogies in higher education(Bransford, Brown, and Cocking, 2000; McKenna, Yalvac, and Light, 2009). Transformingengineering education context from a teacher-centered orientation to a learner-centeredorientation is a common interest in engineering education research. Group work, formativeassessment, contextualized instruction, use of peer review and self-reflective tools, and out-ofclass collaborations are some learning-centered instructional strategies (Bransford, Brown, andCocking, 2000; Yalvac, Smith, Hirsch, and Troy, 2007; Yalvac, Smith, Hirsch, & Birol, 2006
, unfortunately, and this is reflected in the rather highrate of mistakes per student.It is ill-advised to draw firm conclusions on the effect of this prerequisite skills testing on finalexam outcomes; however, from this simple analysis there is unfortunately no apparent trend thatshows students achieving a higher level of competency. Page 22.88.8Qualitative evaluationWhile the meager analysis above does not show an obvious quantitative benefit to students, theauthor nevertheless believes there are certain qualitative benefits to administering the PSE,which compel him to continue administering the exam in solid mechanics. First, many studentscome to the
American Society for Engineering Education. Austin, TX, June, 2009.21. Downey, Gary Lee, Juan C. Lucena, Barbara M. Moskal, Rosamond Parkhurst, Thomas Bigley, Chris Hays, Brent K. Jesiek, Liam Kelly, Johson Miller, Sharon Ruff, Jane L. Lehr, and Amy Nichols-Belo, “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2006.22. Carlsen, Christopher R, “Reflection #2,” Globalhub, Page 22.131.12 http://globalhub.org/members/3531/blog/2010/8/reflection-2---carlsen, August 4, 2010, Accessed March 7, 2011.
and reflect on the how it might work. Faraday’s law and examples ofsome applications are discussed. Students then examine the ring thrower from the point of viewof Lenz’s law. Next students are given a copper pipe and a very strong magnet that fits insidethe pipe. When the magnet is dropped inside the pipe it falls more slowly than a magnet fallingthrough a non-conducting pipe. This difference is to the magnetic field caused by the currentinduced in the pipe by the field of the falling magnet. Students are asked to explain the reasonfor the slower rate of falling. The principle is the same as the ring throwing device but this notrevealed to the students initially. Figures 9 and 10 are photographs of these two devices.Figure 11 shows a sample
currently found in major standards documents as well as what may be missing." (2) In 2008, Brophy et al. reflected the direction of the engineering community whencreating the widely cited report, “Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms,” byoutlining a path for further integration of engineering into the science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) curricula. The report summarized efforts in P-12 engineering being made atthe time then and took a look forward to the prospects of the spread of engineering education. Inaddition to its own call for the creation of standards, the Brophy report discusses efforts by theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) at promoting standards-based instructionin P-12 engineering (11
spends an entire introductory lesson planning the labwork for the rest of the week. Teachers and students use the verbalizations and gestures ofprojection, along with representations, objects, and the environment itself, both to reflect upon ahistory of a concept as it unfolds in their classroom, and to plan for future manifestations of theconcept in different modal engagements. Ecological shifts – common as they appear to be –make it challenging for participants to preserve a sense of the cohesion and continuity of themathematical ideas. Projections serve to construct connections over time and help to establishthat sense of cohesion for students.A third transition process is coordination, which involves the juxtaposition and linking ofdifferent
to the Three Gorges Dam in China. In that way, all students were required to thinkabout an international project to some degree. This was another suitable model to teach studentsabout globalization. The older Three Gorges Dam assignments were no longer available forcontent analysis as part of this research. Final Reflective EssaysIn the first part of the final essay assignment, students were required to write about oneprofessional society meeting (such as ASCE, AGC, SWE, etc.) or professional developmentactivity (such as the career fair, design expo, civil engineering graduate seminar) that they hadattended during the semester. Of these options, EWB represents the opportunity that is the mostobviously global in nature. The percentages
all the questions are more than 4. The results are favorable andindicate that the LITEE Workshops were acceptable to the participants and were perceived tobe beneficial. We used SPSS 10.0 to do principal analysis. Through factor analysis, in the RotatedComponent Matrix as the Table 2 shows, there are 3 Components that are abbreviated Ci(i=1, 2, 3). C1 includes 29 VARs that are VAR 8-36, which can be called “Expectations toMIS” because from the meanings of these questions they reflect the expectations to MIS andhope to improve the skills from the learning of MIS; C2 includes 4 VARs that are VAR 2, 3,5, 6, which can be called “Attitude to MIS ” for the four questions show the perception oflearners about learning MIS and imply the difficulty
system comprised of these structures: ―And, if enoughpeople or even a few people who are powerful enough act in innovative ways, their action mayhave the consequence of transforming the very structures that gave them the capacity to act‖ (p.4).17The research question we focus in this paper is: how do institutionally generated texts shapeSTEM faculty and staff members’ experiences in ways that prescribe their ways of being? Theparental leave policy is our main social system, situated along with the other systems that worktogether with it (such as FMLA, sick leave, unpaid leave, etc.). These systems seem to be rigid,but actually they reflect a series of processes in a state of change.As an example, Kirby and Krone11 conducted a discursive study of
. Page 22.1082.3Table 1: Characteristics of Mentoring Relationships (based on Jacobi6)Acceptance/support/EncouragementAdvice/guidanceBypass bureaucracy/access to resourcesChallenge/opportunityClarify values/clarify goalsCoachingInformationProtectionRole modelSocial status/reflected creditSocialization/”host and guide”Sponsorship/advocacyStimulate acquisition of knowledgeTraining/InstructionVisibility/exposureA commonly measured outcome, particularly of studies of peer mentoring, was increasedknowledge or academic performance in the tutoring content area7,8. In addition to benefitsgained from developing a relationship while mentoring, the act of studying and organizingknowledge with the expectation of teaching can also lead to measurable gains
per se and more of a way to provide both theproject team and the DoD advisors with information about project teams’ progress. It was alsohoped that the DoD advisors would use the blogs as one means of communicating with thestudents. The prompts for the final blog prompt, at the end of the course, were more elaborateand reflective. They were: What were the most important system-level trade-offs you had to consider during this project? If you were to start this project over again, what would you do differently?However, the only school to complete the project in one semester and therefore the first to finishwanted the final blog to be more comprehensive and so replaced the above with the following setof questions, which we may
Foundation under GrantDUE-0939823. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1 Pimmel, Russ and Sheryl Sorby, “Writing Proposals to Meet NSF’s Expectations,” Workshop at 2008 ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22, 2008.2 Olds, Bar: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94,No. 1, pp. 13-25 (2005)3 National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Scientific Research in Education, Richard Shevelson and Lisa Towne, Editors, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2002)4 National Research Council
? How far from home do we really feel? How different is the country and thearchitecture we are visiting and viewing?This paper explores the lessons learned, and often missed, with respect to witnessing teaching ina foreign country. It examines, describes, and reflects upon the value of experiential education,community engagement, in-classroom techniques, as well as unique S.E. Asian teachingpractices and celebrations that forge initial bonds between students and their teachers. Theseteaching lessons learned through study abroad are compared to the architectural engineeringeducation practices in North America. This paper examines methods for developing respect forteachers, for engaging in the architectural creative process and for paying respect
that “no researcher is neutral because language confersform and meaning on observed realities. Specific use of language reflects views and values…Wemay think our codes capture empirical reality. Yet it is our view: we choose the words thatconstitute our codes. Thus we define what we see as significant in the data and describe what wethink is happening (italics in original, p. 46-47).”30 What is important is not that we get the codes“right”, that it matches someone else’s codes, but that the description rings true, that it has good“fit” with the data. As such, the concept of inter-rater reliability has no meaning in aconstructivist study. Codes are situated in time, within a particular context, and based on aparticular researcher’s construction
‘Contribution to independent learning’ is constructed in the two semesters of the academic year 2006-2007, based on the items ‘Through the teamwork I learned to work more independently.’ and ‘Through the teamwork I learned how to master new information independently.’ The reliability coefficients indicate a good scale and the mean scores reflect that the students feel they are able to learn more independently through the P&O courses. 5) The next scale ‘Transfer of competencies beyond introductory seminar’ is based on the statements: ‘What I learned during the introductory lecture about the design Page 22.1150.7
termed this approach “traditional engineering design”(TED) because it reflects a common pattern for such projects across programs in the U.S. In thispaper, we report the outcomes from interviews with PBL team members from U1 and designteam members from U2 to address the research question: How do first-year engineeringstudents in two different types of design approaches (PBL and traditional design) perceivethe role of facilitators, and how does this perception influence these students’ motivation?To address this question we examine how students describe the role of their facilitator for PBL,and correspondingly, their workshop leader in a TED environment. Based on this description,we consider how students’ experiences with facilitators impact
experiences. Explanations of isolation and other aspects of the “chilly climate” have todate been highly abstract and theoretical.Over the past several years, researchers with the CareerWISE program, supported by theNational Science Foundation, have worked to understand and develop interventions to helpmitigate common discouragers for women enrolled in doctoral programs in STEM. CareerWISEfocus groups of graduate student women 33 and interviews with non-completers reflecting ontheir graduate student experiences 34 revealed that dissatisfaction with the departmental climate(such as experiences with isolation) was one of several major discouragers reported by the
makesthem, more than ever to us, what Seymour calls “partners in innovation”18. Their reflections onteaching through MEAs will likely lead to transformations in MEA implementation, TAprofessional development, TA mentoring, and MEA generic and task specific support materials -all to the benefit of students’ learning through open-ended problems.II. Research QuestionsIn this study, we examine UGTAs’ experience with assessing student team work on MEAs. Theevaluation tool used by all TAs is the four-dimension MEA Rubric which assesses the studentteams’ mathematical model and its generalizability (i.e. share-ability, re-usability andmodifiability).The research questions guiding this study are: 1) What are UGTAs’ self-reported ability to apply the four
needed for making connections betweendisciplines and from faculty’s primary discipline to innovation. Other goals require increasingfaculty understanding of the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration, the power of reflection and Page 22.725.13other pedagogies used in the liberal arts. Examples of practical skills are recognizingopportunities for innovative curricular, co-curricular and/or civic activities, and using modernsoftware to build case study scenarios. Several of the integrated project examples used in thefaculty development work connect to the environmental and community issues that appeal tounderrepresented groups of students. All
(verbal, written, electronic) 5) Reinforce and improve CAD/Solid Modeling skills 6) Develop and practice skills in project planning, budget management, resource allocation and scheduling 7) Instill a philosophy of professional and ethical behavior 8) Provide guidance in applying engineering principles to open‐ended problems 9) Provide an introductory knowledge of business practices, economic viability, environmental sustainability, and the social consequences of technology Most of our students are not as abstract or reflective as the typical professor, and learn moreeffectively in more active modes. Dale 6 reports that after two weeks, people generallyremember 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear, 30% of
informants begin with “lay” myths about engineering. Asthey progress through their engineering programs, their experiences raise questions about thecore values of engineering. For some, these questions lead to critiques of engineering and itsorganizing values. Through their diary entries we learn that many question whether engineeringis in fact committed to meaningful social change and humanitarian work; in their experiences atwork sites during internships, they reflect on whether engineering tasks are often too mundanewhere one only has the opportunity to focus on a small, technical problem of a larger and oftenuninteresting project; others describe a workplace dominated by men who display a tendency tobe dismissive toward (particularly young
design the experiments.These grades reflect how grading was done on the project. If the students failed to develop acomprehensive experimental program for the project, the design portion of the grade was heavilyimpacted while the experimental procedure and data analysis and interpretation were notimpacted. Page 22.42.9Figure 1. ANOVA test results for students’ ability to design an experiment, conduct an experiment and, analyze and interpret data.Grades for the open-ended solar design project were also compared to the grades assigned to thefully structured/step-by-step laboratories assigned as part of the course. A
engineering design process in addition to listing them.At any rate, these observations can help improve the curriculum design process and theclassroom process to improve internalization or better learning.Perception of learning vs. results. The results show that students' perception about how muchthey learned do not always align with the picture emerging from their responses about theirunderstanding of concepts. However, their perceptions are correct because they reflect theirexperience. For example, most, students in Groups 1 and 2 learned about maglev transportationsystems for the first time this summer. For them this was a great learning experience. Thus,while their responses to specific questions showed they had difficulties grasping the
to group participants[29].Co-op work term reports from IEEQ participants fulfill a written requirement of the IEEQprogram and are submitted to the program director upon completion of the work term. Theydescribe the nature of the work carried out and are also a reflective account from the student’sperspective of how the term fulfilled their professional and personal goals. Four of the sixparticipants submitted co-op reports for our analysis. This study complied with the university’sethics review process ensuring respondents’ anonymity, confidentiality and opportunity towithdraw without penalty, and was approved by the university’s human ethics committee. Eachparticipant in the research group has been assigned a pseudonym. For the purposes of
BOLD/GoldShirt studentsin Andrews Hall. These mentors have collaborated with other student leaders in the hall as wellas BOLD team leaders to introduce new culturally diverse activities. The cultural relevance ofthe artwork in of Andrews Hall became an issue on the radar to address. Student mentorsselected artwork for study lounges and common areas which reflect the cultures of students whoreside there. Other activities, such as a Mardi Gras celebration, are planned for the springsemester. These enhancements to the appearance of and activities in Andrews Hall will create amore welcoming environment for diverse students and an opportunity to share diverse cultureswith all students in Andrews Hall.Peer Mentoring ProgramA new peer mentoring
% 20% 10% 0%Figure 7. Adoption of textbooks. For a particular author, multiple editions may berepresented.The changes in course topics are reflected in changes in textbook coverage and the use of thosechapters. Figure 8 shows the usage of particular chapters in Fogler in both 1991 and 2010amongst those institutions reporting adoption of the text.There is general satisfaction with existing texts on the subject, though some would like to see amore concise textbook containing one semester’s coverage. Some express an interest inadditional coverage of safety topics and bioreactors. Some cite weak areas in specific textbooksin coverage of mixing, reaction kinetics, and non