Asee peer logo
Displaying results 5461 - 5490 of 12604 in total
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Luis Delgado Jr., Penn State University; Stephanie Cutler, Penn State University; Sarah E Zappe, Penn State University; Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, Penn State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
Engineering Education, 2024 Lessons Learned: Faculty Development Book Club to Promote Reflection among Engineering Faculty on Mental Health of StudentsIntroductionIt is a real difficult challenge walking through this world full of monsters when our own bodies and minds can be monstrous. - Sarah Rose CavanaghIn universities around the U.S., mental health issues are on the rise [1], [2], [3]. College studentsare at increased mental health risks due to major mental health problems manifesting during earlyadulthood [4], and significant life changes (e.g., changes in independence, environment, and socialsupport, academic pressures/competition) [5], [6]. While
Conference Session
Technological Literacy and K-12 Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Faik Karatas, Purdue University; George Bodner, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
instruction may either generatenew alternative frameworks for the students or support the old ones. As a result, attempts tochange students’ conceptions of a particular phenomenon using conceptual change strategiesmay not be as fruitful as we would either hope or expect because, in the end, teachers deliver theinstruction we design.10 Teachers who have naïve or alternative frameworks or conceptions of asubject may not teach them well or they may produce ill-structured schema in students’ minds. Unlike the well-established field of the philosophy of science, no equivalent study of thephilosophy of engineering exists.13 However, inasmuch as engineering and engineering artifactsare part of our everyday life, elementary school students and their
Conference Session
Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
, he would not go so far as to say that the needs of society are overruled bythe needs of the individual or even in continuous conflict. Vygotsky’s observations stemmedfrom cultural change in Russia during his lifetime. He noticed change in what would then becalled the developmental learning pathways of individuals based on grand scale societal changes.Thus, the societal impetus was responsible for changing lifelong learning habits and the minds ofindividuals. In the engineering education community, many efforts are spent on developingphenomenographical approaches to problems, but almost none are spent on phenomenological orexistential approaches to problems. The issue at hand may be two-fold: first, phenomenographyas a research
Conference Session
Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) Technical Session: Innovative Approaches to Teaching & Developing Engineering Leadership
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University; Sumita Ambasta; Vinayak Krishan Joshi, Plaksha University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)
skills taught.Additionally, students rated the effectiveness of research pedagogy in teaching the skills ofcritical thinking and decision-making significantly higher than expected. The study resultsprove that decision-making and leadership skills can be organically brought into engineeringwhen research design is used as a pedagogical tool for teaching about decision-makingexplicitly.IntroductionEngineering education in the 21st century needs to consider the future of work, which takesinto account the aspects of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the role of automation [1].Educators need to keep in mind the rapid technological changes that are happening in ourworld today to align the engineering curriculum to real-world requirements. Learning
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 4 - Engineering for One Planet & Sustainability Innovation
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University; SIDDHARTH SIDDHARTH, Plaksha University; Rukmani Keshav, Plaksha University
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)
,and society.A key characteristic of traditional humanities courses is their reliance on teacher-directedcurriculum and lecture-based instruction [15]. This approach, while familiar to many humanitiesprofessors who report spending a significant amount of time on teaching [16] can be lessengaging for engineering students. More importantly, these traditional methods of lecturedelivery often fail to cultivate the essential “Engineering Habits of Mind (EHoM)” required forsuccess in the modern engineering landscape. EHoM represents a set of core skills and mindsetssuch as systems thinking, adapting, problem-finding, and creative problem-solving thatdistinguishes engineers from other professions [17].Therefore, the use of PBL in teaching humanities
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 9: Practices of Mentorship & Liaisons
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington; Karen Miel, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington; Merredith D Portsmore, Tufts University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
majors and careers. Based on interviews with and surveys offourth- and fifth-grade girls participating in an engineering outreach program, we questionwhether youth are looking for career role models, and we challenge the assumption that youthwill take up an adult as a role model simply because the adult is presented as such. We questionwhat role these “models” play in the minds and lives of youth and argue that it may differ fromwhat we expect. To be clear, we are not arguing that engineering role models are not importantor not influential. Rather, we think it is important to gain a better understanding of how youth,particularly girls, view these potential engineering role models, which will allow us to optimizethe significance of these adults
Conference Session
Minorities in Research
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Mohammad Karim; Ardie Walser
Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and the Acting Associate Dean of theSchool of Engineering at the City College of the City University of New York. Dr. Walser is presently theDivision Chair of the Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND) of the American Association ofEngineering Education (ASEE). He was the treasurer of MIND from 1996 to 1998, and the MIND ProgramChair from 1999 to 2000. He has collaborated in the creation and direction of numerous facultydevelopment workshops that have been held through out the country. Dr. Walser is the recipient of severalfaculty awards including the faculty of the year award from the Eta Kappa Knu engineering honor society.He has given numerous workshops and lecture demonstrations at grades schools
Collection
2015 ASEE Workshop on K-12 Engineering Education
Authors
William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette
“Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M. Sheraton Seattle | Seattle | WAAuthentic Engineering Connection- Identify and describe how you will explicitly address theways in which your lesson or activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields.i At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: Use of an engineering design process that has
Collection
ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference
Authors
Bradley J. Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University; Arun Srivats Mohan, Pennsylvania State University; Frank Christopher Barber
within the academy takes on acertain familiar cadence over time. One enjoyable part of this project was the opportunity totranscend familiar professional boundaries and to creatively engage with one’s stakeholders. Thedistributed workflow presented some challenges, as Mr. Barber noted in his commentary, andone thing to keep in mind is that students like Mr. Mohan likewise often have multiplecompeting demands on their time. A co-creation model requires patience, good humor, andsufficient “drawer time” to allow the product to germinate into an integrated whole.When adopting co-creation curricular development models, engineering faculty need to beprepared to check their biases and assumptions at the door. In my case, for example
Collection
15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)
Authors
Adithya Jayakumar, The Ohio State University; Raymond Smith Brooks
tools. Contrary to my expectations, however, the experience turned out to be not onlyfun but also surprisingly informative, especially in terms of safety information that had nevercrossed my mind before.’In responding to the question, ‘Now that you have completed the lab – in what ways do you thinklearning how to use hand tools will benefit you in the future as an engineer?’Beginner:B2 – ‘As an engineer, sometimes I will have to design a physical object. Knowing how to use ahand tool could help me with design and actually building my idea out.’Expert:E1 - ‘Knowing how to use hand tools will be important for me as an engineer because it enablesme to bring my projects to life, allowing for me to create prototypes and ensuring precision. Andof
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
making under control. Petroski’s response was that predicting the strength andbehavior of engineering structures is not always so simple and well-defined an undertaking as itseems, which he later admitted didn’t seem to change his neighbor’s mind about anything.Petroski then observes that “Engineering has as its principle object not the given world but theworld that engineers themselves create.” suggesting the need to extend the understanding oftechnological literacy / philosophy of engineering to a much broader community.So, what should we do; why should what we do be taken seriously; how can a uniformtechnological literacy / philosophy of engineering message be broadcast; how can we identifyour real audience and influence policy; how does this
Conference Session
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John J. Classen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Alison V. Deviney, Biological and Agricultural Department, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 495–512, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0312896218823831.[14] J. W. Budd, “Mind Maps As Classroom Exercises,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 35– 46, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46.[15] J. Tranquillo, W. Kline, and C. Hixson, “Making Sense of Canvas Tools: Analysis and Comparison of Popular Canvases,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016, p. 26211, doi: 10.18260/p.26211.[16] J. F. DeFranco, C. J. Neill, and R. B. Clariana, “A cognitive collaborative model to improve performance in engineering teams-A study of team outcomes and mental model sharing,” Syst. Eng., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 267–278, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1002/sys.20178.[17
Conference Session
Design Pedagogy 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jarod White, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
versus tomorrow is aninteresting framing that deserves more exploration.With the findings in mind the team was able to form conclusions and possible theories about theway engineering students specifically prototype for the future. Please note most conclusions areabout the future since most of the prototyping had to do with the present which acted as abaseline and the average person prototypes for present times were nearly identically to another.SummaryStudents often use existing commonly available technologies and/or methods to prototypepresent items. For near future things they may use existing less cost-efficient technologies, suchas an iPad carrying drone, seen in the Results section, to do novel activities. For the far futurestudents
Conference Session
Student Teams, Groups, and Collaborations
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University; Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University; David E. Hall, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #16789Social Consciousness in Engineering Students: An Analysis of Freshmen De-sign Project AbstractsMaya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University Maya Rucks is an engineering education doctoral student at Louisiana Tech University. She received her bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Louisiana at Monroe. Her areas of interest include, minorities in engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Associate Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at
Conference Session
Technical Issues in Architectural Engineering I
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Phillips, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
2006-1448: ASSESSING THE COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN STUDIO COURSETHROUGH ALTERNATE METHODSJohn Phillips, Oklahoma State University John Phillips, an assistant professor of architectural engineering, is one of four faculty members teaching in the comprehensive design studio, where his expertise is structural design. He also teaches Analysis I, Foundations, Structures: Timber Steel & Concrete, Steel II, and Steel III courses. Professor Phillips is a registered engineer in the state of Texas, and a structural consultant for Brown Engineering, P.C., in Stillwater, Oklahoma. Page 11.244.1© American
Conference Session
Faculty Involvement in International Engineering Education
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yuko Hoshino, Nihon University; Wayne Sanders, Rose Hulman Institute Of Technology
Tagged Divisions
International
2006-2416: DIFFERENCES IN CULTURAL EXPECTATION BETWEEN FACULTYAND STUDENTS IN AN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONYuko Hoshino, Nihon University Education: 2003-, Ph.D. candidate, Nihon University; 1994, M.A., Asian Studies, University of Oregon; 1980, B.S., Clinical Pharmacology, Kyoritsu College of Pharmacy. Professional Experience: 1980-87 in Industry; 1987-1989 and 1994-1996, Harvard University; 1990, 1992, 1994, Engineering Alliance for Global Education Japan Program; 1996-, Kanazawa Institute of TechnologyWayne Sanders, Rose Hulman Institute Of Technology Education: 1975, Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, Southern Methodist University; 1970, M.E.S., Lamar University; 1960, B.S.M.E., Texas A
Conference Session
College Engineering K-12 Outreach III
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Neha Goel; Johnathan King; Ellen Chen; Danny Le; Alene Harris; Ragu Vijaykumar; Cordelia Brown, Purdue University; Monica Cox, Purdue University
workedclosely with students in the Chicago and Evanston Public Schools. In Austin, the University ofTexas’s SLC partnered with the Austin Children’s Museum to inform the local K-12 communityabout biomedical engineering through hands-on experiences. In Boston, Harvard/ MIT’s SLCstudents worked closely with several schools and a Boys & Girls Club.5 In developing science and engineering-based workshops for students and teachers and indisseminating outreach through local agencies, the VaNTH SLC developed and implementedcurriculum informed by the National Research Council’s monograph, How People Learn: Mind,Brain, Experience, and School. Materials and learning activities were designed to be knowledge-centered, learner-centered, assessment
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
which Hofstede [28] generallyrefers to as “the collective programming of the mind” (p. 1). These links between diversity, earlysocialization, and culture provide credible avenues for exploring attitudes in workplaces that maypositively or negatively efforts to increase organizational diversity.This paper, therefore, examines engineers’ acculturation attitudes about their workplace culture.We define acculturation attitudes as individuals’ preferences for what should happen whendifferent individuals or groups within a given culture interact [29]. Our research questions are:RQ1 What are the acculturation attitudes exhibited by working engineers?RQ2 How are engineers’ demographic characteristics related to these attitudes?We answered these
Conference Session
Career Advancement Through Engineering Leadership Development
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Gregg Morris Warnick, Micron Technology Inc.; Blandon Prowse, Micron Technology Inc.; Wai-Leong Mook, Micron Technology Inc.; Arthur Beng Chuan Lam, Micron Semiconductor Asia
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Gregg previously worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medical Technology fortune 500 Company in various engineering and leadership positions. Gregg is currently the Past Division Chair within the Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) within the
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Ville M. Taajamaa, City of Espoo; Mona Eskandari, University of California, Riverside
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Paper ID #33509To Inhibit or Invite: Collaboration from Far AwayDr. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four ar- eas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work with the intent to do something new; 3) shifting norms of leaders involved in entrepreneurial-minded
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Panel on Advocacy and Allyship by Men for Women
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brian Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University; Lisa Abrams, The Ohio State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Lyndsey McMillon-Brown, NASA Glenn Research Center; Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Washington Bothell; Philip Ritchey, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
such a way as to mitigate or eliminate them. to me, there is nomiddle ground. I am either part of the problem or part of the solution. I can be an opponent ofwomen in engineering or I can be an ally. I choose to try to be an ally. I choose to try, inwhatever ways I can, to break down the systems of inequality that prevent all people fromattaining the fullness of their possibilities.Another moral take (it's the right thing to do, part 2): were the tables turned and engineering wasdominated by women, I would want women to be allies and advocates for me. there's plenty ofmoral philosophy that would generally agree that, if I would want women in engineering to bemy ally, then I should be an ally to women in engineering. several that come to mind
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kairys Grasty, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Shivani Sakri, Arizona State University; Amanda C. Arnold, Idaho State University; Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University; Kerrie G. Wilkins-Yel, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Madison Natarajan, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University; Ashley K. Randall, Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
experiences, Kairys’ research interests lie in working to understand the systemic barriers, biases and insensitivities that underlie many racially and ethnically diverse people’s inability or general aversion to seeking mental health support.Ms. Shivani Sakri, Arizona State University Shivani Sakri (she/her/hers) is a first-year doctoral student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program at Arizona State University. Prior to joining this program, Shivani pursued Me- chanical Engineering from the University of Pune in India and completed her Master’s in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Shivani’s research interests lie in engineering control systems, experiences of women in
Conference Session
Designing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Programs
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ronald J. Bennett F.ABET, University of St. Thomas; Eugene Joseph Audette, University of St. Thomas; Elaine R. Millam, WorkWise Coaching & Consulting; Alanna K. Moravetz JD, Alanna Consulting LLC; Sheryl Niebuhr, University of St. Thomas and Sheryl Niebuhr Consulting LLC
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
respondents the opportunity to reflect on the impact of the courses overtime. They perceived that the course series had benefited them both in their personal andorganizational lives. “It challenged my view toward my career in general.” “The course helpedme drive change in my organization….” “This is something that will stick with students for theirentire career. While you might think that some of this will be forgotten it will always be in theback of your mind.” “A major life changer.”Though all respondents valued the first course, one comment was that the second and thirdcourses were not as useful.One person believed that the first course should be taken by undergraduate engineering students.Question 5 The three courses were separated so that there
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sara Hillman, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Ghada Salama, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Emilio Ocampo Eibenschutz, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Saly Mohamed Ali Awadh, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Lara El Said, Texas A&M University at Qatar
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
challenges throughout the world, more research isneeded when it comes to understanding the role and presence of women in different contexts.The Middle East, in general, and the Gulf region, in particular, represent an exciting opportunityfrom this perspective. On the one hand, the scarcity of previously conducted research on thistopic has opened a niche for this type of work. On the other hand, studying the region’s rapidsocio-economic transformations may shed some light regarding the vital role of women in non-Western contexts, particularly when it comes to encouraging participation in traditionally male-dominated fields.Attracting “every young mind to engineering” is, for UNESCO, closely related to achieving theMillennium Development Goals
Conference Session
NAFP Panel Discussion
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Louis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso; Paul Racette, NASA; Scott Askew, NASA; Rafic Bachnak, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi; Belay Demoz; Paul Mogan, NASA
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
AC 2007-504: NASA OPPORTUNITIES FOR FACULTY AT MINORITYINSTITUTIONS: REFLECTIONS OF NASA ADMINISTRATOR FELLOWSLouis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis J. Everett is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and has research interests in the use of technology in the classroom. His technical research interests include robotics, machine design, dynamics and control systems. He began his NAFP tenure in 2006 and is presently with the Mobility and Manipulation group at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena California. leverett@utep.edu http://research.utep.edu/pacelabPaul Racette, NASA
Conference Session
Entrepreneurial Leadership and Non-traditional Ways to Engage Students in Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wilburn Clouse, Vanderbilt University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
AC 2007-788: LEARNING IN ACTION! (LIA): A PROBLEM-BASED LEARNINGEXPERIENCE FOR DEVELOPING THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRITWilburn Clouse, Vanderbilt University R. Wilburn Clouse is Assocoate Professor at Vanderbilt University with interest in creativity and entrepreneurship education. His work is centered on the development of learning environments that cut across disciplines and universities. Page 12.1010.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007Learning in Action! (LIA): A Problem Based Learning Experience forDeveloping the Entrepreneurial SpiritR. Wilburn Clouse, Vanderbilt UniversityJoseph Aniello, Francis
Conference Session
Successful Outcomes of Student Entrepreneurship
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Khanjan Mehta, Pennsylvania State University; Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
AC 2008-1422: CHAMPIONING HIGH-TECH RENAISSANCE: SENSOR ANDCONTROLLER SYSTEM INTEGRATION COURSEKhanjan Mehta, Pennsylvania State University KHANJAN MEHTA is a Senior Research Associate in the College of Engineering at Penn State. His professional interests include Innovative System Integration, High-Tech Entrepreneurship and International Social Entrepreneurship. He is an amateur photographer, cook, bartender, poet, traveler, adventurer and proud generalist.Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University SVEN G. BILÉN is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Electrical Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering at Penn State. His educational research interests include developing techniques
Conference Session
Innovative Methods to Teach Engineering to URMs
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Gordon Skelton, Jackson State University; HuiRu Shih, Jackson State University; Evelyn Leggette, Jackson State University; Tzusheng Pei, Jackson State University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
AC 2009-1201: NURTURE MOTIVATED, CONFIDENT, AND STRATEGICLEARNERS IN ENGINEERING THROUGH COGNITIVE ANDPSYCHOLOGICAL INSTRUCTION FOR AN ENTRY-LEVEL COURSEWei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over 10-year industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum. He serves as a freshmen advisor for the First Year Experience Program at JSU and is the Principle Investigator for
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William Easley, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Erin Buehler, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Gabrielle Salib, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Amy Hurst, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
campus’ postsecondaryprogram. The course has many goals, chief among them to promote awareness of students withID on campus, dispel misconceptions about the abilities of these students, and to promote aninterest in STEM fields for all students involved. Persons with disabilities are vastlyunderrepresented in engineering disciplines and people with ID experience unemploymentgreater than 60% [8]. With this in mind, we designed this course to both promote an interest inSTEM for all students involved, and we also introduced the idea of self-employment by way ofentrepreneurship as another avenue toward employment and self-determination.Undergraduate students in this course came from several different STEM fields includinginformation systems, business
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eric Michael Schearer, Cleveland State University; M. Ann Reinthal, Cleveland State University; Debbie K. Jackson, Cleveland State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
significant pieces of it are and what it all means. And being able to think through a problem very critically and they just retrained my mind on how to think about a problem. Whereas before I was less efficient on how I was solving problems.She continues to describe engineering items she learned including optimization and problemsolving on her own.In addition to the confidence statements, cohort two students responded to statements indicatingtheir plans to pursue a degree in rehabilitation engineering. At the beginning and end of theprogram Erica strongly agreed or agreed with the following statements: • I plan to continue to pursue opportunities to learn more about engineering and computing in rehabilitation and assistive