response is possible. Simulation toolsprovide a convenient way to visualize the dynamics of differential equations, but they are not asubstitute for experiencing with your own eyes and hands how the dynamic stiffness of a controlsystem can be changed with feedback gain or how the stabilization of a control system can belimited by sensor noise or actuator power supply limits. For some learners, the kinestheticexperience is essential to deeply grasping the concepts of control systems.Educational theory of engineering laboratoriesIn this section, the literature on engineering labs and remote labs is briefly reviewed.Feisel [1] identified 13 learning objectives for labs. These include traditional objectives such asinstrumentation, models, experiment
of women in mining and metallurgy professions. We interviewed professionals inthe industry and the university to obtain their perceptions of activities or initiatives that willincrease the percentages of women in mining fields. The study consisted of semi-structuredinterviews with professionals to learn how they entered their professions and what can be done toincrease the participation of women in the mining industry. The interviewees were primarily 1)mining industry professionals, 2) academic program managers, and 3) part-time academicians andindustry workers. The study results yielded initiatives and actions to be implemented by theindustry, academia, and joint efforts. The action plans will promote the integration of women intothe
given the limits imposed by social distancing, andwhether these workarounds reveal unexpected strategies which might be applicable to futureremote learning, and to community-based learning even when physical reconnection is allowed.IntroductionCritical of traditional textbook-focused teaching strategies, universities are exploring ways toprepare engineering students to develop more open-ended problem-solving skills. [1]. Buildingon the ideas of learning through practice [2], engineering programs are developing alternativemodels for teaching and learning, in which creative exploration, and broader human-centeredaspects are introduced as early stages of the research process, preceding the definition andresolution of the typical engineering
’ cyber capabilities, preparedness and resilience [1]. This makes it morechallenging to develop and operate educational programs that effectively train cybersecuritytalent, which is able to take on and perform in multiple roles and responsibilities, withouttailoring the program to be very specific to such roles. Hence, cybersecurity educationalprograms must train professionals that can stand the test of time, in a fast-paced and quicklychanging career [2].Educators are quickly recognizing that the curriculum structure and delivery modalities must bedeveloped to ensure foundational concepts and frameworks are clearly comprehended andtranslated into practice. This has motivated several efforts at different levels to outline theexpected skillsets
studyAbstractAs a highly interdisciplinary industry, architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) requireeffective and seamless collaboration to deliver projects timely and with high quality. To betterprepare students with the demanding cooperative skill, collaborative learning has always been anintegral part of the education of undergraduate students. Augmented reality (AR) technology hasmatured rapidly in recent years and has been widely used in various fields such as medical,manufacturing, entertainment, and education. The seamless combination of the real world andvirtual environment is one of the most important characteristics of AR technology [1]. In thisstudy, we utilized this characteristic to develop a multi-user design application in
accidents might have been caused by human factors. In this aspect,autonomous driving, in some cases, could save lives. For the safety and functionality ofautonomous driving, there have been active R&D (Research and Development) projects inacademia and industry. To target autonomous car research, a capstone project with fourundergraduate engineering students at Texas A&M University was created in Fall 2020. By themotivation of creating a capstone project that is related to the development of an educationalautonomous car simulator. As a phase 1, four Engineering Technology (ET) students haveformed a team in Fall 2020 and one ET faculty member advised this team, they concluded theirwork in Spring 2021. The task for this capstone project was to
: Redesigning an Introductory Mechanics Course to Include Meaningful Design Experiences Damon Kirkpatrick1 and Michael Anderson1 1 United States Air Force Academy Department of Mechanical Engineering 2354 Fairchild Hall, Ste 6L-121 USAFA, CO 80840AbstractThe United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) is a commissioning source for the U.S. AirForce, and as such, it strives to provide each graduate a well-rounded undergraduate education,grounded in a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) curriculum, in addition tomilitary officership
) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Scaffolding reflection across the design curriculum: Triangulating Student, Alumni, and Faculty Perspectives of the Role of Design within an Engineering Science Program1.0 IntroductionHigher education institutions regularly make significant investments to promote a high-qualityundergraduate experience [1]. Curriculum design in higher education is localized, andstandardization of higher education curricula mainly targets meeting specific accreditationbodies' requirements [2]. As such, little relational emphasis is placed on how the plannedcurriculum is enacted by instructors and experienced by students
and services include perspectives of the project leadership, andfeedback from the participating scholars collected as part of program evaluation. This feedbackhelped fine-tune the partnership model to provide participating scholars with the mostmeaningful support possible.Findings suggest three design features of successful support: 1. While general training and support such as those offered by career service centers are useful, specific support by STEM faculty with real-time efforts in applying for academic positions was more timely and valuable for URM scholars. 2. Transition support is critical as scholars’ needs shift from dissertator to postdoctoral researcher to early career faculty. For example, requests to review
. This study analyzes the results of the three cohorts to understand the effects ofusing the PSS approach for teaching this subject.Key Words: Problem-Solving Studio, classroom research, learning outcomes assessment1. IntroductionThe problem-solving studio (PSS) is a pedagogical technique that focuses on problem-basedlearning. Because of PSS’s features, instructors can adjust the level of support they provide inreal time, as well as the difficulty level of the problems, to ensure that each student is challengedat a level that is beyond what they could achieve on their own, but at the upper end of what theycan achieve in a PSS setting [1]. This approach was initially implemented in the BiomedicalEngineering program at Georgia Institute of
Resources Engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Monitoring the Attainment of ABET Student Outcomes and Projected Achievement of Program Educational Objectives by CohortAbstractIn this study, a systematic methodology is proposed to 1) monitor progress in program-levelattainment of ABET Student Outcomes and Program Educational Objectives using the collectedassessment data, 2) relate the projected Program Educational Objectives achievement with alumniand senior student surveys for closure and evidence-based revision of Program EducationalObjectives and curriculum improvement. The proposed method aggregates
prepare studentsfor structural design. In particular, the design of bolted steel connections requires numerouschecks using both the tension member limit states of AISC Chapter D and the bolted connectionlimit states of AISC Chapter J [1]. Students often end up confused about the limit statecalculations, unable to connect the written mathematical formulas to physical behavior.On assessments, the instructor requires the students to sketch failure paths for the various modesof failure. However, students seemingly have difficulty identifying where the basic tensionmember limit state failures occur, let alone the more complex connection limit states. As can beseen in Figure 1, the student has placed the yielding limit state towards the rear of the
), core and discipline-specific components define the roadmap.Professional accreditation standards recognize this composition and establish their standardswithin these parameters. In the last 80 years, the professional degree programs experienced adecrease in total credit hours in their curriculum, including the architecture, engineering, andconstruction programs (AEC) [1]. It is possible to find examples of program requirementsreduced from over 210 credit hours to 120 credit hours [2]. In this evolutionary process, thecredit hour reductions are usually in the discipline-specific coursework while the core curriculumcomponents remain relatively intact. In this context, some AEC programs explored thepossibility of offering courses within the core
. IntroductionToday, one of the most critical decisions is the lifetime career choice, or at least an essential part.Given the above, students are influenced by different factors when choosing a program of study,and it does not necessarily have a direct relationship with their aptitudes. The student's decision toselect a college goes through different stages, and various studies have attempted to model thisprocess [1-5]. Moreover, universities worldwide try to attract as many students as possible to theirprograms, offering various benefits [6,7] and competing with other universities offering the sameprogram [8,9].Most studies aiming to understand the factors that influence students' decisions when choosing anacademic program are conducted at the university
Model to Prepare Pre-Service Teachers to Teach Engineering in K-12 (Work in Progress)Background and Motivation:Providing K-12 students with the opportunity to engage in engineering practices is critical toincrease engineering literacy, diversify the engineering workforce, and provide the skills andencouragement necessary for students to pursue careers in engineering [1]. The need to includeengineering in the K-12 classroom is also heavily emphasized in the Next Generation ScienceStandards, as well as the standards of many states [2]. Many schools are attempting to meet thesegoals both by incorporating engineering into the existing mathematics and science curriculumand developing standalone engineering courses, which were offered by 46% of high
systems. STS Postures integrate three modes of doing: 1) Body/Mind fusion; 2)Data collection techniques; and 3) Systems thinking skills. STS postures takes a traditionallypassive educational environment and introduces movement and change making to theengineering curriculum. Instead of sitting in seats in the classroom, we encourage students tomove about. We try out different ways of holding ourselves and moving (literally our bodies) inrelation to each other, STS, engineering, education, and technological artifacts. This change inposture is key to having agency in directing the future of science and technology, whether intheir own education, their extracurricular work, or their careers. Body/Mind fusion is a correctiveto thinking in science and
Chile to collect the data. The results showthat the acceptance given by students to the use of AutoCAD as a design and three-dimensionalmodeling tool is very favorable. AutoCAD tools facilitate students' management and constructionof knowledge since they can progress at their own pace. Course results show a lack of training intechnological skills by students. We recommend strengthening students' digital literacy withactivities in previous courses.Keywords: AutoCAD, collaboration, learning, educational innovation, higher education, STEMeducation.IntroductionAutoCAD is a professional tool used by engineers, architects, designers, and other professionalsworldwide [1]. Particularly in mining engineering, AutoCAD has been used to facilitate
retention rate is 69% [1] which means almost one-third ofstudents leave college just after one year. Most engineering students do not even experience anycore engineering courses during their first year at college. The average graduation rate fortraditional students attending classes full-time is 35.8% after four years, 46.4% after six years,and 47.8% after eight years [1]. There is no single factor that makes students leave college andsuch a decision is influenced by inter-related factors. However, among academic, personal, andfinancial factors, academic success is reported to be the best predictor of student retention andthe most important factor in the graduation rate [2]. The first step in developing a successfulstrategy to improve student
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Future Career Pathway Perceptions of Lower-Income Computing Students Through the Lens of Capital Exchange1. BackgroundWhile significant broadening participation efforts in computing higher education have focusedon gender and race [1]-[3], the experiences of lower-income students in undergraduatecomputing education are as yet underexplored. One major effort focused on lower-incomestudents is the National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program, a funding program designed to supportlower-income students to persist and succeed in STEM fields. The
project and how it helps overcome the onlineteamwork challenges will be discussed. We will also describe a team formation process, wherestudents are allowed to select their own teams and have control over the membership as theproject progresses. Plans for future work to assess the efficacy of this project structure and teamformation process will be discussed as well.IntroductionTeamwork is an important part of engineering and an integral part of project-based learning.While incorporating team projects in face-to-face engineering courses is commonplace,implementing a team project in an online course has its own unique challenges [1]. One obviousdifficulty is collaborating on a project whose components are handled by students in differentphysical
www.slayte.com Sustainability Inclusion Efforts in Three Unique First-Year Engineering CoursesAbstractThroughout the world, various institutions and programs are working to integrate sustainabilityinto engineering education. University engineering programs can be a pivotal place for futureengineers to gain understanding of sustainability and its importance, including in first-yearcourses. At the University of Colorado Boulder, three courses for first year engineering studentsare uniquely integrating sustainability. The courses selected for this study are 1) First-YearEngineering Projects, 2) Introduction to Civil Engineering, and 3) Introduction to GlobalEngineering. First-Year Engineering Projects provides
introducing industry mentors to students.Through this proposed intervention, we explore the broad research question: How effective is theproposed approach in impacting professional identity formation and promoting industry-relatedcompetencies? Doing so involves addressing related questions such as: (1) what is theunderstanding of these applications and their impact on students in terms of interest, knowledgeof applications, and professional identity formation? (2) What is the relationship betweenstudents’ identity and course performance and assessments? (3) Is there a significant impact ofthe proposed approach on underrepresented groups especially women?We worked with four industry mentors from various areas of chemical engineering to design up-to
more often, and graduate at slower rates, than thestudents that enrolled directly at the 4-year institution [1, 2]. In addition, studies have shown that thesetransfer students have more difficulty establishing their social network and navigating the 4-yearinstitution system [3,4]. To improve the matriculation rates of transfer students, the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) allows transfer students to be supported through their Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) program.The Student Pathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA) program is a newlyfunded S-STEM program in South Carolina, expected to run through 2026. The program is envisioned toprovide a streamlined academic pathway for
resources needed for positive and long-lasting COIL implementations here. In addition, we offer a plan to implement a short-term COIL-based project in a chemical engineering course with faculty participants from the US and ElSalvador. Any engineering educators planning to implement COIL activities can use thesesuggestions. Ultimately, this low-cost pedagogy could significantly aid in promoting cultural,technical, and global competence in engineering students in the next post-pandemic years.A. Introduction and BackgroundA.1 What is COIL? An introduction to the reviewCollaborative Online International Learning (COIL) aims to connect students and faculty indiscussions, teaching, or collaborative learning projects with higher education
efforts on the project and lessons learned by the project team thus far.Project Background The project as a whole includes several experiential learning modules covering fourcourses: structural analysis, reinforced concrete, steel design, and geotechnical engineering (soilmechanics and foundations) as described by Carroll et al. [1]. This paper is the fourth in a series[2-4] and focuses on the design and implementation of three experiential learning modules forsteel design. Two of the three steel design modules require a structural testing facility, while thethird simply consists of models easily handled in class. The steel design modules could beimplemented at universities with smaller programs that do not have structural
properties.1. IntroductionLithium-ion batteries are used in various applications ranging from consumer electronics,transportation and aerospace applications [1]. The growing number of industry applications forLIBs has led to an increased to develop clean and sustainable energy storage systems with higherstorage capacity and power density. However, current design and manufacturing technologiespresents restriction in the size and shape of batteries in different packages [1], [2]. In other words,there are limitations in the rapid design batteries of complex shapes and structures.Several groups have reported on the use of additive manufacturing or 3D printing in the preparationand manufacturing of complex 3D objects for battery applications. It is
half, a final product was refined with the students’ success in mind. Hands-on experienceplays a key role in a student’s comprehension of a topic, as many authors have shown [1] - [14].The overwhelming number of positive results shown reinforced this concept, and a Kit toenhance student learning in Statics was created. Group projects were also demonstrated to helpstudents better understand certain topics in Statics as shown in [4] - [7]. These group projectsallow students the chance to get feedback from their peers in a way that might spark a newunderstanding of a topic. This was important to incorporate into a new activity and design.Both force and equilibrium analysis of a system play a large role in Statics and beyond.Developing a Kit or
techniques, as well as interpretresults in basic professional forms and conventions and offer conclusions that are meaningful forboth a technical audience and as a demonstration of their own learning [1-3].The instructional modules presented in this paper build on research involving writing transferconcepts that address the transfer source (prior writing experience) and the transfer target (writingin a new situation, in this case an engineering laboratory). In this situation, the transfer can beconsidered “far transfer” because the writing skills in English and engineering disciplines containfew similar general features [4-5]. Effective transfer requires the use of shared language andeffective review of prior knowledge to form a basis for the
inclusion efforts in STEM programs in higher education are widespread enoughthat engineering educators will be familiar with how their institutions do or do not implementthem. Gonzales et al. argue that diversity and inclusion efforts often “stem from a desire not totransform, but to implement small changes around the edges that will not disrupt the status quo”[1, p. 457]. Often these efforts are focused on how many members of marginalized andminoritized communities are invited into our institutions as students and faculty, but diversity isnot just about numbers of people. Diversifying curriculum and practicing inclusive pedagogiesoffers a direct route to reform that can impact learning outcomes for students and distribute theworkload of these
. A previous study at North Carolina State University showed thatstudents with a lower GPA in an active learning sophomore chemical engineering course weremore likely to remain in the chemical engineering program (1). The active learning caused asignificant difference in retention of students with lower GPA while students with higher GPAwere unaffected by classroom pedagogy. Studies have also shown that different prior knowledgelevels can affect the final conceptual understanding of topics (4). A study done in middle schoolsshowed that an animated pedagogical agent helped low prior knowledge students increasecognitive gains. The high prior knowledge students exposed to the same pedagogy did not showthe same cognitive gains as the other