practicesand shift institutional culture, the research team hosted a symposium focused on theimportance of teaching at the core of an institution. The attendees included 98 STEMfaculty from several universities all interested in the topic of reflective teaching. Many ofthe participants had been trained in evidence-based instructional practices and faculty peerobservation. A survey of participants asked these faculty to reflect on the idea of a T1classification and how it might be framed in the broader conversation about enhancingSTEM teaching. The survey responses were grouped based on change quadrants. Theresponses indicated alignment around reflective teaching, inclusive classroom practices,and recognition of excellence in pedagogy.Introduction and
projects.Dr. Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons at the University of Cali- fornia, San Diego. She earned a PhD in Adult Education-Human Resource Development. Her research interests include adult learning and development, faculty development, qualitative methods of inquiry, and social justice education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Integration of Weekly Reflections in an Introductory Design Class to Assess Experiential Learning OutcomesI. Introduction Hands-on design courses, particularly at the introductory level, have gained popularity in engineering
communication skills via dialog with peers and facilitators (giving and receiving feedback, active listening, collaborative learning). • Practice compassionate behaviors towards oneself and others. • Develop and evaluate a plan for maintaining a balance of both reflection and action for future advocacy efforts.Guiding FrameworkThe course is built from a guiding framework for effective and enduring advocacy, which we havedefined as the work we do to transform our world’s systems and cultures in ways that we believewill make life, love, and liberation more possible. Inspiration for the framework comes from ourown experiences, current leaders [9], and past advocates for social change through education[10, 11]. The four steps that make up
- pedagogic training of academic teachersAbstractThe following report explains, why it is necessary, to train academic teachers by using a“competence-oriented” curriculum. That means, to give the teachers the chance, to workproject-oriented and to learn to reflect their own working and problem-solutions in teaching.To demonstrate the possibility of such curriculum, a prototype was developed by using themethods of vocational-science. That means to analyze the work-processes of academicteachers about their core work-tasks and to transfer this to project-based modules ofengineering education.Keywords: PBL, PBE, TVET, Bachelor, educationProblem in brief: About the duality of engineering BA Courses of studyConcept of
, and theengaging process of curating learning experiences and artifacts, we hypothesize that students willcome to perceive their classroom learning experience as being multi-dimensional and immersive.Teaching students about meta-learning and requiring them to reflect on their learning viaePortfolios should further support a holistic learning experience. For the instructor and teachingassistants, ePortfolio-based projects will provide a good catalog of work for assessing studentmastery as well as the opportunity to make meta-learning and reflective practice part of theassessment process. As students will also have the opportunity to give and receive feedback fromtheir peers, they will have the benefit of incorporating other views and
students and professionals ought tobe concerned with ethics, and highlights its importance and relevance in core classes.Shortcomings include: a sense of disjointedness when ethics is added rather than fully integratedinto a course; the perceived challenge of connecting certain ethics topics with certain engineeringsubjects; and a lack of deep reflection or critical thinking on the part of students when notsufficiently supported.In seeking to address the drawbacks of the ethics across the curriculum approach at ourinstitution, we implemented an ethics weblog (blog) in the core engineering thermodynamicscourse. Previously, ethics had been taught in this course through the use of case analyses thatdealt nominally with thermodynamics topics. In order
AC 2012-4670: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF EMPATHY IN ENGINEER-ING COMMUNICATION THROUGH A TRANSDISCIPLINARY DIALOGUEDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Joachim Walther is an Assistant Professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is Co-director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work. His research interests span the formation of students’ pro- fessional identity, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methods in en- gineering education. He was the first international
The first ePortfolio was implemented in Fall 2015. The associated activities wererequired in the course and were part of the grading criteria:a. 1st test (including HW) 20%b. 2nd test (including HW) 20%c. 3rd test (including HW) 20%d. Course project 30%e. Peer review assignment 5%f. ePortfolio 5% The ePortfolio activities consisted in 4 main activities: 1) Setup google drive folders, 2)Upload artifacts to folders as they were produced, 3) Develop a showcase ePortfolio with links toarchived artifacts, and 4) Complete ePortfolio reflective assignment. These general activitieswere kept unchanged throughout the whole implementation in the 2 years period, but their sub-activities were adjusted
Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a
assessment format, instructors were able to identify studenthesitations and conflicts while solving the problem and determine whether they were a result ofconceptual or non-conceptual errors. Following the assessment, the researchers asked each studyparticipant questions to prompt reflection on why certain errors were made. This papersummarizes the assessment and reflection procedure used, a small sample of students’performance on a traditional paper-based assessment compared to the interview assessment, andthe reasons for errors. Recommendations for future research and improving course delivery toprevent misconceptions are provided.IntroductionStrong knowledge of fundamental mechanics is essential for success in undergraduateengineering curricula
replace one of the three midterm exam grades with the final exam.• Alternate exam modalities were made available: oral exam, take home exam, design project exam.• Videos showcasing the laboratory experiments being conducted were produced and captioned.• Qualitative assessment of student performance was provided in narrative form as a supplement to quantitative marks for all course components.• Students wrote two reflection pieces, one after each course unit, discussing challenges and how they address them; these provided suggestions on how the instructor could address their needs.Despite the major changes effected in the course delivery, which always induces someanxiety, overall feedback from students through the Student
the design of a first-year seminar (FYS) course and itsimpacts on student self-assessments and measures of retention among first year undergraduatestudents in engineering and mathematical sciences programs. Student self-reflections and self-assessment of learning were used to gain insight to students’ personal definitions of success,sense of preparedness, and sense of belonging, as well as the influence of the course activities onkey learning outcomes and student decision making after the first semester of college. The goalof this work is to evaluate the impact of a college-wide FYS course on student self-assessment,student flow, and one-year retention rates for the first three years that the course has been offered(Fall 2020, Fall 2021. Fall
the content using a number ofdifferent strategies including peer to peer instruction, active learning and online resources andweekly quizzes to facilitate self-assessment and reflection.In this paper, we describe initial efforts to incorporate one type of metacognitive strategy (i.e.prompt students to think about and reflect on their learning and understanding of the content taughteach week) in the General Chemistry course. Key questions of interest include: What is the natureof student responses (conceptual or procedural)? Do responses vary by course week and/or gender?What is the relationship between student response (conceptual or procedural) and theirperformance on the exam?Research has demonstrated that active and collaborative
appendix. The teachers were able to engage in the unit asstudents and were given time for reflection and discussion after each lesson within the unit. Teachers were first introduced to a multi-meter and were asked to measure the voltage ofseveral batteries. The unit had an inquiry-based focus; instead of telling the teachers how to use amulti-meter they were allowed to explore and discover how to measure voltage on their own. Asthe unit progressed, the teachers were introduced to each separate component of a circuit in asimilar way. After the battery was the resistor, then the LED, then the switch and finally thebreadboard. As each component was introduced the teachers were given a loosely structuredactivity that allowed them to explore the
Session 3530 Portfolios: An Effective Assessment Strategy for First Year Engineering Students Carl A. Erikson, Jr., Randall L. Ness Messiah College Grantham, PA 17027Abstract A portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that tells the story of the student’sefforts, progress and/or achievement in given areas. It can be used as a vehicle for demonstratingknowledge, understanding and performance, as a personal reflective tool, and as an assessmenttool. Why use portfolios? They 1] Are
placerepresents an essential role in narrative inquiry with the reflection that events impact in eachplace.” Critical because the narratives confront social realities. Akin to critical pedagogy datingback to Dewey and Paulo Freire or critical theory associated with the Frankfurt school, criticalnarratives encourage students to think of power dynamics. Critical also relates to thinking aboutmoral judgment, when moral judgment is defined as issues related to fairness and justice [4].Narrative because if students are going to transfer the problem-solving skills they gained in theclassroom to considering their impact on a variety of stakeholders, they need an intervention thatgoes beyond the traditional case study or a module built around memorizing
bringchildren in for daily activities. This project is a first-time collaboration between University X andthe Town YWCA, and focused on a building a lasting relationship. The faculty advisors used acombination of assignments to evaluate the evolution and to track growth of students: equitytraining modules from an instructor handbook and self-reflection assessments based on Edutopia[1]. These assignments were given to the students on a per-term basis to track changes ortransformations in student behavior as they discover and address resource limitations, uniquedesign constraints, and working with team members from different disciplines. Morespecifically, these assessment measurements were: asset maps; changes to interpersonal teamdynamics from strangers
– those thatdiscussed fostering critical thinking at the level of a single class (or at most as aninterplay between two classes) – two distinct themes emerged: improving criticalthinking through writing for reflection, and improving critical thinking through problem-based learning.WRITING FOR REFLECTIONWriting for reflection promotes critical thinking by challenging students to make andarticulate value judgments about data, problems, and possible solutions. Furthermore, thewriting process, approached systematically, can be used to support and develop problem-solving skills.Hierarchical Classification Of Critical and Reflective ThinkingOne theme that emerged from the recent literature was assessing student writing aboutopen-ended problems using a
experiences around LGBTQ+ advocacy in STEM. Dr. Tsugawa uses mixed-method approaches with a social constructivist paradigm. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Working Full Time and Earning an Engineering Degree: Wellbeing in a Co-Op-Based Engineering ProgramAbstractThe purpose of this research paper is to describe how stress manifests in undergraduateengineering students who are working in paid engineering positions while completing theirupper-division coursework, through the analysis of reflective prompts on wellbeing, andengineering belongingness. Previous research has identified the culture of “suffering
rulesOne element that we believe helps us at different times in the year (especially when things getbusy) is a set of ground rules that we created as a group. From the onset of starting our virtualcommunity of practice, we thought it was important to establish a structure to ensure that eachmember of our community was accountable and prioritized their participation in the weeklymeetings. To create this structure, we co-constructed a set of rules of conduct and operatingprocedures. These rules include: information on reflections that we would complete as part of our participation the platform we would use for meetings how we would develop an agenda for the meeting when/how it would be determined if a meeting needed
this end, we gathered andanalyzed student reflections on their learning experiences in a collaborative engineering projectbetween the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the University of KwaZulu-Natal inSouth Africa.BackgroundThe Association of American Colleges and Universities’ LEAP (Liberal Education forAmerica’s Promise) initiative (2007) emphasizes global awareness and experience within its foursets of Essential Learning Outcomes that are critical for preparing university students for thetwenty-first century. The “personal and social responsibility” domain includes:• Civic knowledge and engagement—local and global• Intercultural knowledge and competence• Ethical reasoning and action• Foundations and skills for lifelong
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Online Course for Professional Development of Chemical Engineering COOPs and InternsAbstractAn online course was created for professional development of chemical engineering studentsparticipating in industrial cooperative education and internships. The course guides studentsthrough a series of exercises each designed to cycle through the four stages of Kolb’s learningtheory: experience, reflection, generalization, and experimentation. Students naturally acquireconcrete professional experience while practicing in an industrial setting. Instead of a traditionalapproach to coop education that concludes the industry experience with a reflective report
care with highest device and technology utilization. Additionally,these programs utilize a predefined framework of lectures, training, observation, reflection and afinal deliverable not incorporating student insights into the overall program design2-11.To address the inequities in pediatric healthcare innovation, we utilized an inclusive co-production model approach. This model involves equal partnership between student andteachers, to identify and develop key deliverables thereby fostering novel and strategicconceptualization and solutions12. In our model, undergraduate students and faculty fromengineering, humanities and medicine were brought to the bedside of a pediatric critical careunit, with the goal of identifying targets for innovation
understanding of global and societal contexts in orderto solve some of the grand challenges facing humanity. This task is made no less difficult by thenecessity of multidisciplinary teams, diverse stakeholders, and innovative communicationmethods in an increasingly complex world. This vision for a modern engineer is reflected in the2004 and 2005 National Academies publications of “The Engineer of 2020” [1] and “Educatingthe Engineer of 2020” [2]. For historical context, Figure 1 showcases the call for action assummarized in the Grinter Report of 1955 [3] to the call of action as summarized in the Engineerof 2020 reports of 2004 and 2005. Ultimately, all of these reports (starting in 1955) urged for amore well-rounded engineer. The Engineer of 2020
. He received a BSE in biomedical engineering from the University of Michigan in 2018. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing and Communicating Professional Competency Development through Experiential LearningThis is a work-in-progress paper submitted to the ASEE Cooperative & Experiential EducationDivision.AbstractA new experiential learning initiative at a large R1 institution seeks to provide students with aframework to intentionally explore learning opportunities, meaningfully engage in experiences,iteratively reflect on their learning, and clearly communicate their development of one or morekey professional competencies
Learn” framework. The course, “EffectiveTeaching of Engineering: Linking Theory to Practice,” was first implemented in fall2007, at a large Midwestern Research I university to provide engineering graduateteaching assistants an opportunity to extend their teaching professional development. Thecourse learning objectives include developing knowledge of effective teaching practices,establishing an engineering “community of teachers” during interactions withengineering faculty and peers, producing personal deliverables that allow reflection uponrelationships between pedagogy and engineering, and receiving formative feedback aboutteaching within engineering courses.Some of the topics in this one-credit graduate level seminar included “How PeopleLearn
Page 26.886.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impact of reflective learning practices on students' learning of engineering dynamicsIntroductionEngineering is known as a challenging major that many students withdraw because of lowacademic achievement 1. Component Display Theory defines learning in two dimensions:content and performance 2-4. Content includes accepting facts, concepts, procedures, andprinciples; while performance refers to three phases of learning including remember, application,and generalities. Higher levels in both dimensions suggest a higher understanding degree anindividual gains. However, students’ feedback and assessment results suggest
, 2020Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning Academy Workshop to Promote an Asset-based Mindset among STEM facultyAbstractThis lessons learned paper describes the strategies in planning, organizing, and delivering aTeaching and Learning Academy Workshop that focused on bridging the cultural and perceptiongap between faculty and students in math and engineering classrooms. Grounded in Yosso’sCommunity Cultural Wealth model, the workshop was designed to engage participants in asequence of reflective and conversational activities that allowed the faculty to connect their owneducational experiences with their expectation towards the students, and recognize the strengthof the students in terms of their cultural wealth in Aspirational
Experiential Learning: A Handbook of Best Practice for Educators andTrainers: This type of learning occurs when students participate in some activity, reflect upon the activity, use their analytical skills to derive some useful insight from the experience, and then incorporate their new understanding(s) into their daily lives. What experiential learning does best is capture the interest and involvement of the participants, but most importantly it contributes significantly to the transfer of learning.Instructional InterventionTo implement EL learning in a degree program, faculty need to be made aware of theexperiential criteria so they can design an appropriate and effective EL course. Faculty at ourinstitution gain
History and assessment of student learning outcomes in higher education. Page 13.841.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Professional Education and General Education Join Forces?AbstractThe rapid pace at which technology is changing makes it imperative that students developthe skills that will enable them to be proactive and reflective rather than reactive. Thiswill require them as professionals and responsible citizens to integrate the contentknowledge that they have learned in their professional education with the abilities valuedin general education and by employers. These include critical thinking