Conference Session

ERM: Conceptualizations of Engineering and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto; Amy Bilton; Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto

Conference Session

Centering Black Experiences in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Merriweather, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Marah Lambert, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Shaunelle Casey; Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Niesha Douglas

found to be critical to successful doctoral degreematriculation and academic progress [14], [15], [16].McGee et al.’s [13] review mirrors others [11], [12], [17] who have explored the experiences ofBlack STEM doctoral students at HWIS. but what surprised the researchers was that BlackSTEM doctoral students from HBCUs had similar experiences. What was most telling was thesimilarity between experiences of Black STEM students at HBCUs and HWIS. HWIS are oftencastigated for their racially inhospitable environments and anti-Black racism attitudes which arevisible in their practices, policies, and dispositions, both institutionally and personally. In spite ofthe overall student body and faculty “looking like them” their departments did not

Conference Session

Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Hector Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue Engineering Education

, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) STEM PractitionersIntroduction Where are the gays in engineering? LGBTQ+ people have always existed, but ourvisibility in society has ebbed and flowed across civilizations. Our presence has not changed inthe U.S.’s recent history, but our visibility has increased over time [1]. Some pridefully exclaimtheir presence in English and Spanish: “I’m here, I’m queer, get over it!”; “¡Estoy aquí, soy de lacomunidad, y no vas a definir quién seré!” Employee Resource Groups (ERG’s) withincorporations, groups such as the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists andTechnical Professionals (NOGLSTP), Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (oSTEM), and Out for Undergrad (O4U

Conference Session

LEAD Tech Session #2: Assessing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Development.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Volpe; Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Simmons, University of Florida; Danielle Weisenfeld, University of Florida; Jackson Carcaba, University of Florida

traditional engineering programs arehistorically rooted in the military developed engineering education from the early 1800’s [34],[35]. Though the profession has adapted and evolved greatly over the past 200 years, with thedevelopment of new technologies and roles for engineers, little in the core engineering curriculahas changed. Many engineering education programs are already struggling to stick to the originaldesign of a rigorous and technically focused curriculum, while simultaneously attempting tointegrate the use of new engineering technology into a brief 4-5 year time frame.Understandably, there then remains little room for the integration of leadership skills and coursesinto the curricula as it is already seeking to cover an abundance of

Conference Session

ERM: Mentoring for Everyone! And Let's talk about Graduate Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Catherine Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Monique Ross, Florida International University

amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monique S. Ross (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Bork, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Nicholas Young, University of Michigan

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming; Andrea Burrows, University of Wyoming; Shawna Wolf, University of Wyoming; Shaya Wolf, University of Wyoming; Hui Hu, University of Wyoming

and much more consistent than in 2020. Thelowest number of unique views in 2021 was 23 for Activity 4. Despite having the lowestunique viewers for 2021, this video still had a similar number of views as video two in2020, and had more views than 2020’s video three, four, and five. While unique views alsodropped throughout the 2021 camp, a higher of number of camp attendees were maintainedthroughout all five activities; the 2021 camp finished with 25 unique views of the final video,five times more than in 2020.4.1.4 Watch TimeNext consider the watch time, describing the total hours per day the videos were watched(across all viewers). The watch time of each video per day shows that camp attendees in2020 watched each video according to the camp

Conference Session

PCEE Session 3: Robotics and Design Competitions

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University; Amanjeet Bagga, Stony Brook University; Cynthia Colón, Stony Brook University; Imin Kao, Stony Brook University

follow-on research and development of the SnappyXODesign has been supported by an NSF I-Corps award (#1823736) to SBU and STTR Phase andPhase 2 awards (awards #2126882) to the startup. All opinions and conclusions presented in thispaper are those of authors only and not of funding agencies.References [1] S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1980. [2] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984. [3] R. D. Beer, H. J. Chiel, and R. F. Drushel, “Using robotics to teach science and engineering,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, no. 6, p. 85–92, 1999. [4] A. Eguchi, “Robotics as a

Conference Session

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hao He, University of Missouri - Columbia; Heather Hunt; Suzanne Burgoyne; Joshua Saboorizadeh

. 2016, doi: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1026943.[12] A. N. N. Hui and S. Lau, “Formulation of Policy and Strategy in Developing Creativity Education in Four Asian Chinese Societies: A Policy Analysis,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 215–235, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01334.x.[13] A.-T. Koh, “Linking Learning, Knowledge Creation, and Business Creativity: A Preliminary Assessment of the East Asian Quest For Creativity,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 85–100, May 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00075-X.[14] K. So and Y. Hu, “Understanding creativity in an Asian school context: Korean teachers’ perspectives,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 33, p. 100573, Sep. 2019, doi

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azadeh Bolhari, University of Colorado Boulder; Shelby Tillema, University of Colorado Boulder

provided for in-depth informationon the platform. Additionally, the authors would like to thank the teaching assistants in the targetcourses: Nadia Jorgenson, Lauren Magliozzi and Ayush Shahi who assisted Dr. Bolhari in thisproject.References [1] N. Anderson, K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou, “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Management, 40(5), pp. 1297–1333, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 [2] K. M. Y., Law, and S. Geng, “How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), pp. 897–914, 2019

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Nagel, James Madison University; Melissa Aleman, James Madison University; Kelly Sadel

Students interacting with professors 4 Routine and Schedule Student discussion of utilizing a schedule, having a routine, or having a schedule. 5 Project Changes Student notation of changes with respect to projects as a result of the transition(s) induced by the pandemic. 6 Space Use with Respect Student discussions of the link between the use of space to Community and community. 7 Professor’s Reaching Any discussion of how professors connected with students Out / Adaptability / remained in contact with students / helped students with the

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johanna Acosta, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Jacoba Ubidia, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Miguel Andrés Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Vanessa Guerra, University of Virginia; Cristina Gallardo, Universidad San Francisco de Quito

, 2015.[8] D. M. Richter y M. C. Paretti, "Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom", Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29-45, mar. 2009, doi: 10.1080/03043790802710185.[9] M. A. Guerra y Y. Abebe, "Pairwise Elicitation for a Decision Support Framework to Develop a Flood Risk Response Plan", ASCE- ASMEJournalofRiskandUncertaintyinEngineeringSystems, jul. 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4040661.[10] P. W. Holley y C. Ben Farrow, "Expanding collaboration in academia: case study of the development of construction products", J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 139, n.o 2, pp. 139-147, 2013.[11] R. E. Davis, S. Krishnan, T. L. Nilsson, y P. F. Rimland, "IDEAS

Conference Session

LEES 4: Understanding and Disrupting Engineering Cultures

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Tomblin, University of Maryland College Park; Nicole Mogul, University of Maryland College Park

preliminaryexperience is showing that the three weeks of training, the self-reflection and the observationsare creating a more collaborative environment for the teaching fellows. They are quicker toadjust their classroom practices and seem more flexible in the classroom (e.g., the projectorwasn’t working at the beginning of class, so we just did the AV Scenarios handout untilclassroom support arrived). Importantly, using tools of mindfulness, our UTFs now approachstudents with increased patience, humility, and curiosity, which seems to result in improvedstudent engagement with both activities and their debrief.Literature Cited[1] D. Riley, Engineering and Social Justice, San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool, 2008.[2] K. Moore, D. L. Kleinmann, D. Hess, S

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 4 Best in DEED

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Corey Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

also be the instructor(s) or the students.Criteria will often reflect the goals or outcomes the client(s) hope to achieve through the course.Learning outcomes are clear outcomes for many courses, however there could be other targetedoutcomes such as changing student motivation, preparation for future courses, remediation forlearning gaps, identity building, or acquainting students with certain ideas or professional fields(e.g., from practicing engineers).A course will have constraints placed on it. These will need to be identified by the client or thedesigner(s), i.e., instructor(s), as limits placed on the course. Some constraints may be externallydefined or mandated, such as course duration and timing, location, and eligible

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3 - Humanitarian Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Awatef Ergai, Kennesaw State University; Shane Peterson; Ginny Zhan, Kennesaw State University; Sabine Smith

/mentalhealth/stress-coping/parental-resources/young-adulthood/index.html [Accessed: January 27, 2022][2] L. Bland, “Impact of cross cultural study experiences on cultural sensitivitydevelopment,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/16409[3] K. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Impact of a global engineering course on student culturalintelligence and cross-cultural communication,” Journal of International Engineering Education,vol. 1, pp. 1-38, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jiee/vol1/iss1/4[4] G. L. Downey, J. C. Lucena, B. M. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. K. Jesiek, L.Kelly, J. Miller, S. Ruff, J. L. Lehr, and A. Nichols‐Belo, “The globally competent

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Osazuwa Okundaye, Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Francis Quek, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sharon Lynn Chu, University of Florida; Qing Li; Shaoping Qiu, Texas A&M University

of the commission expert group on taxation of the digital economy, chaired by vitor gaspar,” Brussels: European Commission, 2014. [3] G. McKinsey, “Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation,” tech. rep., McKinsey Global Institute, 2012. [4] P. Nunnenkamp et al., “Determinants of fdi in developing countries: has globalization changed the rules of the game?,” tech. rep., Kiel working paper, 2002. [5] C. Anderson, The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hachette Books, 2006. [6] J. Pihlaja et al., “Learning in and for production: An activity-theoretical study of the historical development of distributed systems of generalizing,” 2005. [7] O. Okundaye, S. Chu, F. Quek, A

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Josiam, University of Texas at Austin; Taylor Johnson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Janice Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Crystal Pee

, elevating participants’ voices, mitigating bias in data collection, analysis andinterpretation, establishing credibility, building claims of transferability, and managing powerdynamics. Tracy (2010) proposes eight universal criteria for assessing quality in qualitativeresearch: 1) worthy topic, 2) rich rigor, 3) sincerity, 4) credibility, 5) resonance, 6) significantcontribution, 7) ethical, and 8) meaningful coherence. A worthy topic is one that is relevant,timely, significant, and/or interesting. Rich rigor involves using sufficient theoretical constructs,time in the field, sample(s), and/or context(s). Tracy views self reflexivity as a part of sincerity,which also includes transparency about methods and challenges. Credibility involves

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Design and Labs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Wickenheiser, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Marcia Gail Headley, University of Delaware

, significant material is added to address the needs of the projectspecifically and the aforementioned learning objectives generally, as described below. Coursecontent is delivered through videos released on a weekly basis, with the following exceptions.The last two weeks of the fall semester are devoted to proof-of-concept fabrication and reviewfor the final exam, so no new content is presented. The final four weeks of the spring semesterare self-guided: each team must select three different parts within their project (e.g., gears, bolts,springs, belts), fully analyze the dynamics and loading condition(s) of each part, and determineits factor of safety for static and fatigue failure. In this way, students can practice using thetextbook as a reference

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 4 Best in DEED

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University; Sindia Rivera-Jimenez, University of Florida; Anastasia Hauser, University of Kentucky

effective team requires the inclusion of individual members' contributions to supportthe team's objectives. This definition of team building can support engineering educators in developingactivities and evaluation s that foster collaborative and inclusive environment environments thatencourage the collective understanding of the complexities of the engineering curriculum.This research paper will be grounded on the theoretical framework proposed by Van den Bossche andcollaborators (2006) for building high performance teams by identifying social and cognitive factors incollaborative learning environments [13]. This framework has been used to describe engineering teams.The dimension of this model permits the analysis of what type of activities can be

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Paul, University of Manitoba; Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Sherry-ann Ram, University of Toronto; Mandeep Pandey, University of Calgary; Victoria Thomsen, University of Manitoba; Reed Forrest, University of Manitoba; Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Renato Alan Bezerra Rodrigues; Nicholas Rupar; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary

(s) for a given research situation. EER engaged mebecause it is the integration of three rich and diverse professional traditions (engineers,educators, and researchers), and because I believed my own undergraduate learning could havebeen managed more efficiently and effectively.Mandeep: I have been to three different countries and as many education systems for my highschool (Nepal), engineering degree (India), and current PhD degree (Canada). There areunconcealable differences when it comes to Education in different regions and more so inengineering, and this realization makes EER more intriguing for me. I have been fortunate totransition successfully through the challenges of each system, and now I want to explore this ideaof ‘Global

Conference Session

Thinking Outside the STEM Box: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Talamantes; Susan Rowe Rowe; Emily Nicholson; Renee O'Neill, Oregon State University

: Empathetic problem-solving is used to support the identification and definition of a real-world problem and to guide the collaboration between the inventor(s) and a user and/or community. 3. Problem Solving: The problem is solved through the creation of a prototype that is novel, unique, and has value to the user and/or a community. 4. Continuous Learning: Invention requires that self-directed learners navigate networks, learn from experts, and collaborate with users throughout the invention process. 5. Iteration: The iteration of the prototype is guided through ongoing collaboration with the user or community. 6. Sustainable Innovation: Inventors need to understand the environmental impact

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Skromme, Arizona State University; Srividya Bansal, Arizona State University; Rishabh Gupta, Arizona State University; Tariq M Nasim, Arizona State University; Caleb Redshaw; Benjamin Miller, Arizona State University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Hector Erives, University of Texas at El Paso; Deanna Bailey, Morgan State University; Gregory Wilkins, Morgan State University; Megan O'Donnell, Arizona State University; Wendy Barnard, Arizona State University

x′(0+), students are led to solve a “first-derivative circuit” that makes thisprocess more systematic than that used in most textbooks [30-34].4. Laplace transform circuit analysisPreliminary work has been performedto enable analysis of transient circuitsusing Laplace transforms. Anexample of a randomly generatedcircuit is shown in Fig. 2 in both theoriginal time domain and afterautomatic conversion to the Laplacedomain. The solution process willuse the exact same procedures as inDC or AC circuits, where the objectin the program that normallyrepresents a complex number hasbeen generalized to alternatively be arational function of the Laplacevariable s. The routines to add,subtract, multiply, divide, andsimplify such rational functions

Conference Session

Computers in Education 11 - Modulus 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Gillen, Northeastern University; Ruiqiu Yao, University College London; Zheng Chen, University of Hong Kong

documentation. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from https://VADERsentiment.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Retrieved July 3, 2021, from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14550Huxham, M., Laybourn, P., Cairncross, S., Gray, M., Brown, N., Goldfinch, J., & Earl, S. (2008). Collecting student feedback: A comparison of questionnaire and other methods. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773000Jacobi, C., van Atteveldt, W., & Welbers, K. (2015). Quantitative

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Campbell Bego, University of Louisville; Pamela Thomas; Xiaomei Wang, Texas A&M University; Arinan Dourado, University of Louisville

financial aideligibility, as is being researched concurrently with this paper. Either way, students who earn a Cin math are an interesting population for targeted interventions. Insights from the early semesterSEVT survey could likely be use to identify such students and properly design better approachesto reach this population.References [1] N. S. Board, “Revisiting the stem workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014,” 2015. [2] B. Hofstra, V. V. Kulkarni, S. M.-N. Galvez, B. He, D. Jurafsky, and D. A. McFarland, “The diversity–innovation paradox in science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 17, pp. 9284–9291, 2020. [3] National Science Foundation [NSF], “NSF, National Center for Science and

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yalda Afshar, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Emily Marasco, University of Calgary; Jalal Kawash, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat, University of Calgary; Mahmood Moussavi, University of Calgary

studies will focus on how software engineering courses should be taught in classrooms.As future work, we would like to expand our work by integrating multiple courses in softwareengineering curriculum such as software architecture, requirements engineering, testing, anddatabases together. We would also like to investigate the effect of providing the problem area tothe students before they even start the project on project’s efficiency.References [1] E. L. Ouh, B. K. S. Gan, and Y. Irawan, “Did our course design on software architecture meet our student’s learning expectations?” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–9. [2] V. H. Subburaj, A. S. Subburaj, and J. E. Urban, “Introduction to computing

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Rios, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Benjamin Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Reflection model to include LAs would aid in further improving preparation forLAs, and by extension, student course outcomes.References [1] J. A. Jaramillo, “Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula,” Education, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 1996. [2] P. C. Hamerski, P. W. Irving, and D. McPadden, “Learning assistants as student partners in introductory physics,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 020107, 2021. [3] M. E. Emenike, C. P. Schick, A. G. Van Duzor, M. S. Sabella, S. M. Hendrickson, and L. S. Langdon, “Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants to engage students during remote instruction: strategies and lessons learned from four

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 3- Multi- and Inter-disciplinary, Collaboration, and Engagement in Practice

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andres Bello; Ruben Bustamante-Encina, Universidad Andres Bello; Marcela Silva, Universidad Andres Bello; Nivia Diaz, Universidad Andres Bello

geological sciences workshops. s. In the future I would like my son/daughter to have a university education related to science. t. I think it's good that students from the Faculty of Engineering share their knowledge and experiences with my son/daughter through workshops. u. Science is interesting.At the end of the survey they were asked to make comments using the following instruction:We would like to know your opinion about the workshops carried out these last four weeks.The relevance that these types of activities may have for your child's learning, what do youthink about students and teachers from the Engineering Faculty of the Andres Bello Universitybeing interested in promoting the study of geological sciences through

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Jennifer Tygret; Jasmine White; Valerie Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Comas Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kinnis Gosha

Design andDevelopments Launch Pilot award (14-44500). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations are those of only the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNSF.ReferencesAlvarado, C., Mirza, D., Gray, A., & Tjoa, M. (2021, March 13–20). The role of mentoring in a dual-mentored scalable CS research program [Conference session]. SIGCSE ’21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Virtual. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432364Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020). “Looking at myself in the future”: How mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented

Conference Session

WIED: Partnering with and Supporting the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kayla Kummerlen; Gretchen Dietz, University of Florida; Elliot Douglas, University of Florida

Engineering Education, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.[7] A. Huynh and N. T. Buswell, “How was your internship? Stories about the engineering internship experi-ence from five female engineering students,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2019, pp. 1–9.[8] D. J. Bayless, “Using Industrial Summer Intern Programs as a Tool for Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 465–469, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1999.tb00475.x.[9] M. Seevers, W. Knowlton, P. Pyke, C. Schrader, and J. Gardner, “Improving Engineering Undergraduate Retention via Research and Internships,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., pp. 1–9, 2006.[10] S. Haag, E. Guilbeau, and W. Goble, “Assessing Engineering Internship Efficacy: Industry’s

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Innovative Changes to the Typical Civil Engineering Coursework.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jakob Bruhl, United States Military Academy; Andrea Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; James Klosky, United States Military Academy

. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–171, 2015, doi: 10.1037/aca0000008.[10] S. B. Niku, Creative Design of Products and Systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2009.[11] S. G. Walesh, Introduction to Creativity and Innovation for Engineers. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2017.[12] S. J. Shin, T. Y. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and L. Bian, “Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 197–212, 2012, doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0270.[13] K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, “Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 761–768, 2007