experience (i.e., apprehension). They later transformthese experiences through internal reflection (i.e., intention) or manipulation of externalphenomena (i.e., extension). In our courses, we use case studies and simulation/game-likeactivities. Prado et al. [15] found that both simulations and case studies as pedagogical toolsworked well to convey the main ideas in a course on sustainable development.In this paper, we describe our approach within a Civil and Environmental Engineeringdepartment, where we have developed two policy-oriented courses for upper-level undergraduateand graduate students. The primary questions we answered when developing the policy forengineers courses were 1) what learning objectives to prioritize and 2) what teaching and
happens to the power of various elements in a resistivecircuit as the value of one of the resistors decreases. The second exercise has students considersituations in which the ideal independent voltage and current source models might fail. Bothwriting exercises are built from a template that includes several metacognitive prompts to spurself-reflection on the part of the user. A rule-based approach was taken to detect evidence ofcommon misconceptions [2] and errors in student responses, as well as to identify sentences thatrevealed the student was correctly addressing the problems. Based on identified misconceptionsor correct concepts in a student’s writing, the web-based application selects appropriate directedline of reasoning (DLR) feedback
course content – redesign of a local food system – was not a “favoritetopic” of some of the students.A further detailed analysis of Figure 2 shows that for Spring 2021, the same five questions wereadministered during the fifteenth week of the course. The response rate (N=9) was equal to one-third of the full course enrollment (N=30), and again reflects the poor rate of response typicallyobserved on our campus. As mentioned above, in Spring 2022, only three of the same fivequestions were administered during the fifteenth week of the course (i.e., question 1 and question2 are no longer included in the campus-wide instrument). The response rate (N=6) represented aminority of the enrollment (N=28). While the overall response reported in Figure 2 was
intentional choice made after pilot testing the protocol. We were interested in howparticipants’ perceived the role of topical expertise because research suggests engineering faculty see it ascritically important [15]. When asked about the role and importance of a teacher's topical knowledge, participants’consensus was that it could be assumed, rather than being something that differentiated good or bad teaching. Wesee this as important, and likely contextual. Upon reflection, we see it as unsurprising for participants in ourinstitutional context to see faculty as inherently experts to the point that it can be unspoken. To many participants,assumed expertise is reputational and a motivation for attending their institution.The second theme was the
projectreports on dedication, contributions, and reflections. It is intended to replicate an annualperformance evaluation in job environments.Table 1 reports the average grades for the two projects in one section of 35 students. The resultsshow significant improvements in the grades for the second project grades over the first project,which is attributed to better training and expertise in the lab and assignments as a result ofincreasing experience. Presentations resulted in the lowest grades as the panel of four membersidentified weaknesses in procedures, results, and performance at presenting, followed closely byreport grades. The averages compounded by the instructor are lower than the self-evaluationwhere some students honestly reflected some
necessarily adisciplinary norm but could be seen because of lack of policy that provides clear guidelines onwhat is required of the individual researcher or research team.Considering the Tri-Agency’s Research Data Management policy and as [18] concludes in hisreport based on the 2015 UBC survey, “understanding the particular needs or habits withinspecific research areas can provide insight into how disciplines think about and work with data[18, p. 14].” This study’s focus on engineering is intended to consider the research data sharingpractices since the 2015 UBC study and provide further insight to assist the subject librarian’sunderstanding of the data sharing behaviour of engineers while reflecting on what supports couldbe adopted into their
., vertical versus lateral reading), but also toevaluate and incorporate sources written by non-subject-matter experts (e.g., how one mayutilize research journalism and news reporting versus scientific and technical publications).Natural language processing (NLP) models such as ChatGPT are also included in the sourceevaluation exercises, reflecting emerging concerns about how they will affect research andwriting.This paper argues that source evaluation is a skill that must be taught in all STEM classrooms;the stakes for society of producing STEM graduates with a poor research foundation are simplytoo high. Just as STEM students learn to flex their critical-thinking skills to make reason-basedprofessional judgments, they can apply those same critical
student reflections, authentic learning assignments, ad the use of technology in the classroom. Boni hopes to pursue a career in academia with a focus on teaching and engineering education.Adam Steinberg ˜ Sullivan, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Carol Subino Carol Subi˜no Sullivan is the assistant director of faculty teaching and learning initiatives for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). In this role she supports educators through workshops, short courses, consultations, faculty learning communities and fellows groups, special events, scholarship of teaching and learning, digital resources awards and recognitions, and partnerships. In all of her efforts, her goal is to support educators in
, p. 3] Firstly, we chose to conduct single two-hour longinterviews (rather than employing quantitative or psychometric instrumentation or collectingother forms of qualitative data). We iterated on the interview protocol by developing an initialdraft of a protocol, having one interviewer practice it with another, revising the protocol,implementing pilot interviews with three graduate students with workforce experiences, revisingthe protocol again, soliciting feedback from our advisory board (who brings expertise in ethicsand DEI), revising yet again, implementing initial interviews, writing reflective memos aftereach interview, and continuously asking which aspects of the interview process were workingwell or needed revision. We were thus
topics of ethics and sustainability, as well as being a stand-alonetopic in 2020-2022. Each of these three topics had an associated individual homeworkassignment supported by readings and/or online videos. The specific prompts and readings/videos changed over time. The DEI teaching practices aligned with self-determination theory(e.g., autonomy). Evidence of the effectiveness of the DEI integration approaches is provided viacontent analysis of a homework assignment and the final reflective essay. In addition, there wasno evidence of student resistance to DEI topics in the course. The results provide specificexamples that can support civil engineering programs in fulfilling the new proposed ABET civilengineering program criterion related to
interests inengineering, (4) students’ choices and intentions to persist, (5) final reflection, and (6) end/signoff. Interviews were conducted via Zoom and audio recorded. Interviews ranged in length from30-to-90 minutes.The four graduate students (SMC, SJB, BAC, KM) were responsible for conducting theinterviews. Their positionalities, identities, and lived-experiences influenced how they interactedwith the participants. Each interviewer was first interviewed by another member of the team tobetter understand the personal experiences and biases that were elicited by the interviewprotocol. This provided insight into the experiences the interviewer would be likely to try andconfirm in the data collection process, and could therefore be mindful of
4Dignity and well-being: Narratives of modifying the culture of engineering education to improve mental health among underrepresented STEM studentsown individual findings and how they were interpreted to form the study’s overall findings, but they alsoreviewed and approved this conference paper. The framework also required deep ongoing self-reflectivity by the primary investigator about how her own myriad identities, including being an adjunctfaculty member, affected her perception and interpretation of the participants’ own emerging newknowledge about their experiences in engineering education (Nodelman, 2013). Arts-based research(ABR) methods (Leavy, 2017) use creative practices in social research because of their
. That systems thinking perspective can be applied to anything, really, including social problems.”The first offering of introduction to sustainability challenges course was in the Fall 2015semester. Metrics for the engineering sustainability designation as a whole, such as participationand placement, indicated some positive results (for example, see above) but assessments of thelearning outcomes for the introductory seminar class (see Table 2 below for learning outcomesand current assessment plan) also indicated some areas where we fell short of learning targets inthe initial years of the designation. For instance, students’ ability to describe sustainability wasrather anemic.For example, D.T. (2018) wrote in a final reflection paper (see
1.8 67 5.2 Women 28 1.6 32 1.8 101 5.6 161 8.9 * Average number of excerpts per interview in each categoryConsidering the three needs separately revealed important nuance about what types ofexperiences seem most salient to faculty when reflecting on positive and negative workexperiences. Relatedness needs were addressed by far the most often, accounting for two-thirdsof all the fulfillment reflections and over half of all the need frustration comments. Of theremainder, competence needs (both fulfilled and frustrated) were identified slightly morefrequently than autonomy. When analyzed by gender, even more striking patterns emerged. Menand women described
relationshipswith these students and enhance the quality of education for everyone. 3. Theoretical Framework: Intercultural communication competenceICC is a crucial skill that researchers have been exploring for the last two decades. A review ofthe literature reveals a multitude of definitions of ICC [14]. This variability in the content ofICC models and dimensions presents several challenges. For this reason, Griffith and others[14] propose a framework and operational definition to serve as the basis for the developmentof the concept of ICC in higher education research. This operational definition is based onprior research and states that ICC “reflects a person’s capability to gather, interpret, and actupon these radically different cues to function
the data" (p.56). However, engineers are often more familiar with quantitative methods and summarizingtheir findings using numbers [2], which substantially limits the use of qualitative methods.According to Jackson, Drummond, & Camara [3], the goal of qualitative research involves"understanding human beings' richly textured experiences and reflections about thoseexperiences" (p. 22). As engineers have become familiar with qualitative methodologies [1-2],researchers have begun to explore different types of approaches to illuminate the humanexperience. It is clear that different engineers, engineering students, and engineering facultyexperience their education and careers differently, which modern studies have only begun todescribe [4-6
yearsafter graduation) of an undergraduate engineering program in the United States to investigatehow the program’s teaching and learning of metacognitive skills through reflective activitiestranslated to lifelong learning in the workplace context [24]. They found that in connection to thecourse projects that emulated the self-directed learning common in workplace environments,being comfortable with uncertainty and confident and resilient in the face of overwhelmingchallenges were important dispositions that enabled lifelong learning in the workplace aftergraduation [24]. The researchers also distinguished between alumni who saw metacognition ashaving a narrower role specifically for engineering problem solving activities, and those whoused it in
begun modifyingexisting project spaces and creating new makerspaces to reflect the developing pushes ineducation [3,4]. However, the ongoing initiatives to reflect the more creative and less rigidlydesigned nature of making can be challenging to implement since many ideas are, or seem to be,counterintuitive to existing organizational structures within traditional academia. This difficultyis especially true in engineering-focused entities where the parties that have historically managedexisting workspaces and their resources may not be as familiar with the pedological approachesand philosophies behind these areas. In addition, by the very nature of making, many commontrends in makerspaces present unique challenges for the management; often, they
Management (EM), Industrial Management (IM), Engineering TechnologyManagement (ETM), and Operations Management (OM)) and 40 programs were in MechanicalEngineering (ME). The EM sample was retrieved from the ABET website list of EngineeringManagement related accredited programs. The ME sample includes institutions that conferred1,000 or more degrees in the years 2009-2021 based on the ASEE ‘Engineering by Numbers’report [17, 39].Analysis FrameworkWe considered seven components of the ABET student outcomes [37] that support the programeducational objectives and reflect professional skills sets: professionalism, ethics, oralcommunication, written communication, teamwork/collaboration, and leadership. Otherprofessional skills which do not fall in any of
all SBP participants were asked to complete and a majority of the participants (n =54) submitted a response. The purpose of the questions we analyzed from the exit survey was touncover how students anticipate the SBP experience will compare to a school semester ofengineering and students’ interpretation of what the SBP prepared them for. As we created theexit survey after interviewing SBP participants, we were specifically interested in understandingmore about how students thought the SBP prepared them, which are reflected in the questions weasked them, provided in the next section. We thematically analyzed the responses to the exitsurvey. 5.1.1. Workshops Response We hosted a workshop with students during their
demographics. This lens will allow the research team to dive deeper into the phenomenon that is the transition itself, and the contexts in which they occur provide invaluable knowledge on how institutions can better prepare for students of color, rather than applying a monolithic, “one-size-fits-all” mentality towards it. As a part of the utilizing the phenomenological lens, each student transcript was initially read through looking for instances of the participant reflecting on their transition to their graduate institution. Structural coding was utilized for the first-cycle coding method. Structural coding applies a content-based or conceptual phrase representing a topic or inquiry to a segment of data that
the only person in a computing class who has my racial identity.3. *I am comfortable discussing topics related to race and racial discrimination with computing department faculty and/or staff who: a. *Have the same racial identity as me b. *Do not have the same racial identity as me4. *I feel like people assume my performance in class reflects my racial group.5. *I feel like I must suppress aspects of myself to be successful in my computing department.Construct 4: Perceptions of Race1. *I consider myself very knowledgeable about topics related to race.2. *Black, Native/Indigenous, and Latinx people are underrepresented in computing majors. Depending on who you ask, some people think it is because of one or more of the
situations to help lead to problem Proficiency 5 resolution and objectively determine a design solution from a set of design solutions which best meets a given set of requirements. Develop physical and/or virtual prototypes using engineering tools which are tested to evaluate candidate designs, then apply the results back into the design Proficiency 6 process to develop improved design solutions, inform the decision making process, and improve the final product. Evaluate test results and determine if a solution meets given requirements and Proficiency 7 draw conclusions. After solving a problem, students will reflect to comprehend
Committee on Personnel Methods (Eds. C.R. Mann, D.A. Robertson, M.E. Haggerty, J. B. Johnson; American Council on Education) (1930) Federal Relations to Education (American Council on Education) (1930) Manual for Teachers of Classes of Illiterate Adults: Tentative Suggestions (with National Advisory Committee on Illiteracy; American Council on Education) (1938) Living and Learning (American Council on Education)This list of publications and the range of subjects on which Mann published present aformidable challenge to any researcher who seeks to understand Mann’s career, but theyalso reflect the breadth of perspective that equipped Mann to be a systems thinker whograsps the intricacies of what
importance ofnon-technical, professional skills; (d) Learning to manage one’s education; and (e) Reflecting onone’s passions that include becoming an engineer. Each learning process is described in moredetail below (also see Table 1 in the appendix).Learning the science and application of engineering. Generally, students were aware of andexpecting to learn technical knowledge and skills. Their learning and experiences ranged frombroader abstract knowledge of engineering fundamentals (e.g., engineering science) to specificsfocused on their personal interests (see Table 1 in the appendix). Even those with more exposureto the nature of engineering practice, meaning they realized there were differences between“book” knowledge and “practical” knowledge
Lab [DEL] at Stanford University. The participant group had a diverse set of educational and professional backgrounds and included undergraduates (N=3), graduate students and postdoctoral scholars (N=4), visiting student researchers (N=5), academic staff (N=1), and experienced faculty members (N=3). As a part of the session, the participants were asked to reflect and respond to two questions: 1) As an instructor, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you use to create a more inclusive and equitable classroom (i.e., to help students feel like they belong and are supported)? 2) As a student, what is a teaching strategy or practice that you wish your instructors used to create a better
studentsthe ability to reflect upon their learnings and leads to a general increase in self-motivation and self-efficacy. UBD or understanding by design models help students inrelating what they learn in a course to the real world, and thus deepening theirunderstanding. But given the limitations of these and other models, there is always someimportant piece of experience or learning that is left out. For that very reason, designthinking is one of the most renowned educational models. The model incorporates notonly the self-motivation and reflection of project-based learning, and the real-lifeassociation of concepts as seen in UBD models, but goes a step further and grantsstudents the freedom of exploration to truly expand their horizons
over others. We live andwork in a culture that tips strongly towards work on the work life balance scale andembraces burnout behaviour.1.2 Co-contraries and change in engineering education.Change in engineering programs is a balance between those who are driving change andthose who resist change. These tensions can often be seen in the form of co-contraries [1]which are founded in the concept of polarities [2]. Co-contraries may be in apparentopposition but are actually interdependent pairs that exist on opposite ends of a spectrum.For example, work-life balance could be thought of as a co-contrary. It is not workagainst life but rather a mix that needs to be managed as the dynamic between work andlife demands ebb and flow. To reflect this, co
in collaboration with a community oreven international partner and give students the opportunity to interact with people outside theirdisciplines. Key components of service-learning include critical reflection and reciprocity [3].Reflection requires that students articulate the experience, while reciprocity requires that studentsaddress the real needs of sponsor to meet the learning outcomes. Because of reciprocity, theseprojects are more likely to be viewed by students as worthwhile given the creative freedom, thefeelings of empathy or for personal satisfaction [1]. Notwithstanding, service-learning projectscan bring risks such as an ill-defined project scope by not having a team of engineers define it, alack of direction by not having a
the department showing care for the wellness of its students even if theydid not attend the events. A linear trend emerged across the academic year amongst thestudents with the senior cohort engaging the most (likely because the organizer was aninstructor of senior design) and the first-year cohort engaging the least. The year of WellnessWednesday events impacted 28% of the engineering student population and 41% of theengineering faculty and staff population. These percentages correlate to a student, faculty, orstaff member attending at least one Wellness Wednesday event. Repeat attendance of senior,junior, and sophomore students and faculty occurred but is not reflected in these percentages.When polled between semesters about the wellness