distinct specialty, will suffice for teaching sustainability principles ratherthan the need for integration throughout engineering courses, programs, and departments is 2023 ASEE National Conferencesufficient. As a result, a majority of engineering students graduate without adequate training inhow to solve problems, communicate and collaborate across disciplines, and make critical designdecisions (e.g. related to design, materials sourcing, manufacturing, distribution, disposal, etc.),all of which are fundamental to preparing engineers to succeed in their profession and meettoday’s sustainability-related challenges by developing cutting-edge technological solutions thatare not only more sustainable but net zero
Paper ID #39912Board 82: Remote, Hands-on ECE Teaching: Project RECETDr. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and The Inclusive Engineering Consortium Kenneth Connor is an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engi- neering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research in- volves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology
., Feldon, D.F. and Timmerman, B. (2014), “Exploration of factors related to the development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduate teaching assistants' teaching orientations”, Studies in Higher Education, 39(10): 1910-1928.[7] Chadha, D. (2021), “Continual professional development for science lecturers: using professional capital to explore lessons for academic development”, Professional Development in Education, 1-16.[8] Heron, M, Donaghue, H. and Balloo, K. (2023) “Observational feedback literacy: designing post observation feedback for learning”, Teaching in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2023.2191786[9] Gallardo-Williams, M.T. and Petrovich, L.M. (2017), “An
Technology Education, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12-18, January 2017.[2] N. Holstermann, D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz, “Hands-on Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest” Research in Science Education, Vol. 40, pp. 743–757, November 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0.[3] A. Hofstein and V.N. Lunetta (2004), “The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century,” Research in Science Education, Vol. 88, pp. 28-54, December 2003, https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106.[4] L. Carlson,and J.F. Sullivan, “Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 15 No.1, pp. 20-31, 1999.[5
Paper ID #39917Board 84: The 2TO4 Project - Facilitated Transition from 2-Year to4-Year Engineering Studies (WIP)Dr. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engi- neering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research in- volves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology
is actively involved in community outreach with a goal of increasing the number of women in STEM and creating effective methods for introducing young children to CS concepts and topics. Dr. Coffman- Wolph’s research interests include: Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic, Software Engineering, STEM Education, and Diversity and Inclusion within STEM.Dr. Kimberlyn Gray, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Kimberlyn Gray is an Associate Professor at West Virginia University Institute of Technology in the department of Chemical Engineering. She coordinated STEM outreach for the Leonard C. Nelson College of Engineering and Sciences.Dr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr
Dartmouth College. She had a BA degree from BostonUniversity but no BLS. Only data for engineering librarians, other librarians, faculty members,and library administrators were analyzed in this study.5. The Directory of College Engineering Library PersonnelIn 1948, the Executive Committee of the Engineering School Libraries Section (ESLS) of theAssociation of College and Reference Libraries (ACRL), which was chaired by Madeline Gibsonof the Michigan College of Mining and Technology, decided to compile a directory of librarystaff and faculty associated with academic engineering libraries in the U.S. and Canada. Manylibrary staff directories had been published previously but this was the first to focus onengineering libraries. The project was
Paper ID #39174Applying STS to Engineering Education: A Comparative Study of STS Mi-norsProf. MC Forelle, University of Virginia MC Forelle is an assistant professor, teaching track, in Engineering & Society at the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. Their work examines the intersection of law, technology, and culture, with particular interests in materiality, sustainability, and practices of resistance and change. Currently, they are developing a a book project that studies the technological challenges faced by users, tinkerers, and repair communities working to repair, maintain, and
inequities in student success; and (c) cultivate more ethical future scientists and engineers by blending social, political and technological spheres. She prioritizes working on projects that seek to share power with students and orient to stu- dents as partners in educational transformation. She pursues projects that aim to advance social justice in undergraduate STEM programs and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research.Dr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. David also does
TechnologyTom McKlinMr. Douglas Edwards, Georgia Institute of Technology Douglas Edwards is a K-12 Science Technology Engineering Mathematics (STEM) educational researcher with the Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational experience in the Atlanta area for the past twenty years includes high school mathematics teachiRafael A. Arce-NazarioJoseph Carroll-MirandaIsaris Rebeca Quinones Perez, University of Puerto Rico, Rio PiedrasLilliana Marrero-SolisJason Freeman, Georgia Institute of Technology Jason Freeman is an Associate Professor of Music at Georgia Tech. His artistic practice and scholarly research focus on using technology to engage diverse audiences in collaborative, experimental, and ac- cessible musical
. He served as SPE Drilling & Completion journal review chairman, SPE Cedric K. Ferguson Medal Award committee member, SPE Drilling, and Completion Advisory committee, and SPE advanced technology workshops. He received the A Peer Apart SPE Award, which is dedicated to the technical excellence of authors to the industry. He received the Associate of Former Student of Texas A&M University College-level Distinguished Achievement Award in Teaching and Distinguished Achievement for Petroleum Engineering Faculty, Society of Petroleum Engineers-Middle East & North Africa Region. Dr. Retnanto is an active Program Evaluator (PEV) with the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET.Dr. Nayef Alyafei, Texas
Paper ID #37392Supporting Student Persistence in Engineering Graphics through ActiveLearning ModulesDr. Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Aaron C. Clark, DTE is Department Head and Professor for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education within the College of Education at North Carolina State University. He is a member of the Technology, Engineering and Design Education faculty. Research areas include graphics education, engineering education, visual science and professional development. He has also served in various leadership roles in disciplines related to engineering
the Robert H. Smith School of Business. Her introduction to the field of ethics research came in her first year of college, when she joined a paper as a research fellow headed by Dr. Jen Radoff and Dr. Chandra Turpen. She hopes to combine her passions for business, technology, and ethics to make the technology industry more equitable.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland College Park Dr. Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of Maryland. She has expertise in physics education research and engineering education research. Her work involves designing and researching contexts for learning (for students, educators, and faculty) within higher education
to technology-richenvironments like makerspaces for traditionally underserved youth in engineering. Several pro-Makerspace actors purport that having experiences in such open-ended project-based settings canencourage engagement with engineering. However, as we know from prior work in the area,simply providing access to technology-rich spaces does not allow underserved youth to feelownership and belonging in both makerspaces and engineering environments. Additionally,formal and informal engineering education experiences do not center on preventing harm tocommunities and the environment in engineering work. Not only do future generations ofengineers need to reduce the harm caused by engineering and technology proactively, but harmreduction
Paper ID #36772Non-human Animals and a New Ethics for EngineeringDr. Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia Rosalyn W. Berne, Ph.D. is the Olsson Professor of Applied Ethics in the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Virginia, and Chair of the Department of Engineering and Society. She also directs the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science (OEC). As a scholar, Berne ex- plores the intersecting realms of emerging technologies, science, fiction, and myth, and the links between the human and non-human worlds. Published under her name are two academic books: Creating Life from Life
multidisciplinary study and the beauty ofcollaboration among students. Co-taught by a CS/Engineering professor and a visiting artist-in-residence, the course brought together students from diverse majors from Brown University andthe Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) and aimed to augment existing artistic robots anddesign new dynamic interactive creations. Students developed both technical and artistic skillswhile also contemplating and discussing as a class the uses of technology and its interaction withinsociety. Some of the lessons learned from this unique course structure were the critical importanceof communication and the educational value of learning from peers. Students stated that the coursesignificantly enhanced and deepened their education
Paper ID #38004Advancing Student Perspectives through Bi-Institutional HemisphericCollaboration in Humanitarian EngineeringProf. Aaron Brown, Metropolitan State University of Denver 1st author: Aaron Brown is a professor and program director at Metropolitan State University of Denver in the Department of Engineering and Engineering Technology. He has directed much of his work towards a focus in the areas of Appropriate Design, Humanitarian Engineering and Humanitarian Technology. Dr. Brown has worked on projects that help marginalized or vulnerable people all over the globe in such locations as Costa Rica, the Dominican
highereducation settings, particularly for disabled students, who are often forgotten or less emphasizedin DEI efforts. In some disciplinary areas, such as in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) fields, disabled students are more likely to experience discrimination due to a reportedlymore competitive and less flexible and supportive environment. Academic librarians and othereducators can make a difference for these students by contributing to a more inclusive campusenvironment for disabled people in STEM by implementing universally accessible and inclusivepedagogy, resources, services, and spaces. Such efforts are more effective when they incorporatea disability justice perspective, which provides an intersectional framework to understand
practice identifieda gap in known research associated with how engineering disciplines align with the practice ofFCA’s. An emphasis of this study was how FCA’s can be utilized as a pedagogical tool to representarchitectural, civil, electrical, mechanical, structural, and technological engineering disciplines.Recommendations for facility engineering practice and education is presented for application toengineering disciplines within academia. Globally, this is the first research attempt to linkengineering education and management to the practice of facility engineering. This research canbe used by facility managers, engineering service providers and engineering educators alike tofoster transparency with facility engineering practice, FCA
ethics and the ethicalunderstanding of engineering from a Philosophy of Technology approach. We then utilizethe intersection of queer theory and video game studies to present how the understandingof failure can help us reshape how it is approached in engineering. Finally, to illustrate theuse of these ideas, we present two theoretical examples of how failure can be enacted in theclassroom for a better understanding of engineering ethics.II. FAILING AT G AMES , A B RIEF I NTRODUCTIONThe initial quote, from the 2023 Game of the Year, Elden Ring [1], serves as a call to action,a start to an adventure, the beginning of a quest that we hope will change the world (at leastthe one within the game. . . ). Video games can act as a world within a
University of Missouri (2006), and an M.S. in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering (2010), M.P.Aff in Public Affairs (2010), and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (2013) from The University of Texas at Austin. She received the National Science Foundation CAREER award and the UCOWR Early Career Award for Applied Research for her research work on the energy- water nexus. She was honored with the 2015 Girl Scouts of Central Illinois Woman of Distinction Award in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, the 2018 Rose Award for Teaching Excellence, and the 2018 AEESP Award for Outstanding Teaching in Environmental Engineering and Science. Dr. Stillwell has also been included on the List of Teachers Ranked as
practiced in real-world settings, educators need to constructopportunities for youth to learn about the socially engaged nature of engineering. Educators canseek to create just and equitable classrooms by cultivating in teachers a critical consciousness ofsocial justice and its role in engineering (Shuster & Giesemann, 2021). This consciousness canbe developed by tying the interactions of classroom life (i.e., talk, texts, technologies) to largerissues of engineering in society. This involves the recognition that engineering is mediated by‘ideologies, beliefs about learning’ and is encoded in ‘representations, spaces and socialpractices’ of the learning environment and of the broader societal context in which engineering ispracticed (Gravel et
support breadth and depth in these topic areas. Research concepts and projects have alsobeen implemented in core and Advanced Placement science courses. This work presents theinfrastructure and methodology for successfully incorporating engineering topics such ascomputer vision, machine learning, virtual reality, and space systems into a high schoolclassroom. Additionally, college preparedness and matriculation into STEM-related collegefields is discussed.IntroductionImproving science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) exposure andachievement in pre-collegiate settings has been a long time goal of the education field at a local,regional, and national level [1], [2]. It has been found that increased, consistent exposure toSTEM topics
the undergraduate level. Itsenvironmental engineering program is one of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) accredited environmental engineering programs in HBCUs. While theenvironmental engineering program at Central State University is small, it significantly impactedthe African American population in environmental engineering education by being the firstABET-accredited environmental engineering program in an HBCU and continuously producingminority environmental engineers to the workforce. According to recent ASEE’s Profiles ofEngineering & Engineering Technology, Central State University’s Engineering programs(including the Manufacturing Engineering program) have served minorities heavily (ASEE,2021; ASEE, 2022
Paper ID #39950Implementing i4.0 Tech to Engineering Systems Lab for SmartManufacturing LearningDr. Hayder Zghair, Southern Arkansas University Dr. Hayder Zghair is an assistant professor of industrial engineering and director of Industrial Engineering development in the College of Science and Engineering at Southern Arkansas University. He completed a B.S. and an M.S. from the University of Technology, where he majored in Industrial and Production Engineering. Dr. Zghair earned his second master’s degree in Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Doctor’s Degree in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from Lawrence Technological
* *Penn State University, ESMAbstract This is a work in progress study of implementing novel educational content deliverymethods in 2nd year engineering mechanics courses. Today’s students have access to a plethoraof digital information and are quickly adapting to new technologies. Addressing the continuingchallenges in maintaining students’ motivation and success requires new approaches to teachingintroductory topics in engineering courses. In typical engineering class, traditional teachingapproaches, such as chalkboard talks and PowerPoint presentations are often utilized, this oftenpresents the issue of unidirectional communication and passive learning. While students haveaccess to many online education resources such as YouTube and
-Centered • Students determine the scope of the engineering challenge and solve Design it by prioritizing the users' needs and other stakeholders. • Students physically construct a prototype and test it to solve the Design-Build-Test engineering challenge. Engineering • Students generate new technological knowledge by designing Science controlled experiments. Engineering • Students try to optimize the performance of an existing system. Optimization Engineering • Students analyze data and solve engineering challenge by developing Analysis mathematical frameworks. Reverse • Students
Paper ID #40855Preparing Engineers for the Future: Project Management for DevelopingGenerative AISakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College Lon- don and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her research interests include: workforce
Paper ID #39099Improving Video-Conference Workshops through an Intersectionality LensDr. Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Carol Marchetti is a Professor of Statistics at Rochester Institute of Technology, where she teaches introductory and advanced statistics courses and conducts research in statistics education, deaf education, and gender equity in STEM.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey
areeducation-adjacent. Two companies with strong ties to engineering education will participate inthis study: a software company whose product is widely used and taught in engineering coursesacross US universities, and an educational technology company whose product supports studentlearning and faculty classroom management. Both companies have an interest in ensuring theirproducts support engineering learning and would like to conduct research around this area. Thefindings of this study will be based on in-depth interviews with industry professionals about theirmotivations for conducting engineering education research, research goals, research processes &infrastructure, and barriers they have encountered. Thematic analysis will be as part