ClassTranscribe is a web-based learning system and video lecture platform that has morethan 13,000 users. Some of its features have been previously presented at ASEE [4, 23, 15].Its adoption has led to measurable and statistically significant improvements in learningoutcomes [5] and large scale studies of the importance of UDL for engineering students withand without disabilities, for example, [2, 14]. ClassTranscribe was created at the University ofIllinois Urbana-Champaign and is used as one of the instruction tools in engineering coursesacross multiple disciplines. Using UDL principles, ClassTranscribe provides students withan accessible interface including accurate captioning, caption search, and lectures deliveredin video and text-based modalities
gratefully acknowledge the alumni participants in this study and the contributions ofour research team. Finally, we acknowledge the generous support of this work from theHasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Program.References1. National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. Wigner, A., Lande, M., & Jordan, S. S. (2016). How can maker skills fit in with accreditation demands for undergraduate engineering programs?. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.4. ABET Student Learning Outcomes, Retrieved from
transgender and gender nonconforming engineering undergraduate experiences through autoethnography," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[16] B. E. Hughes, ""Managing by not managing": How gay engineering students manage sexual orientation," J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 385-401, 2017, doi: 10.1353/csd.2017.0029.[17] oSTEM, "About oSTEM," oSTEM, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.ostem.org/.[18] NOGLSTP. "NOGLSTP is Out to Innovate." National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Science and Technical Professionals. https://noglstp.org/ (accessed February 24, 2023).[19] K. Yoshino, Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights. New York City: Random House (in English
,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2008. doi: 10.18260/1-2--3430.[6] D. Ellis, G. Liao, and M. Ssemakula, “Closing the Competency Gap in Manufacturing Processes as it Applies to New Engineering Graduates,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2013.[7] G. Lugaresi, Z. Lin, N. Frigerio, M. Zhang, and A. Matta, “Active Learning Experience in Simulation Class Using A Lego®-Based Manufacturing System,” in Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 2019, pp. 3307–3318. doi: 10.1109/WSC40007.2019.9004703.[8] J. S. Lamancusa, J. E. Jorgensen, and J. L. Zayas-Castro, “The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of
Sensitivity in Science,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 439–453, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.1080/0305724022000029662.[20] P. W. Odom and C. B. Zoltowski, “Statistical Analysis and Report on Scale Validation Results for the Engineering Ethical Reasoning Instrument (EERI),” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: May 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/statistical-analysis-and-report-on-scale-validation-results- for-the-engineering-ethical-reasoning-instrument-eeri[21] J. R. Rest, Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger, 1986.[22] J. R. Rest, D. Narvaez, S. J. Thoma, and M. J. Bebeau, “DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of
Electrical Engineering and a BA in Economics from Rice Univer- sity in 1998. She attended the University of IllinoiProf. Cameron Nowzari, George Mason University Cameron Nowzari is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Depart- ment at George Mason University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in June 2009 from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and his Ph.D. in Engineering Sciences in Sept 2013 from the Uni- versity of California, San Diego. He was with the Air Force Research Laboratory at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base as a Summer Faculty Fellow in 2019, working with the Aerospace Systems directorate Dr. Nowzari’s research interests are in the broad area
from minoritized and marginalized identities. A Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), her work has led to changes in policies and practices to advance equity and inclusion in ASEE, ASCE, ABET and other global organizations. As past chair of ASCE’s Formal Engineering Education Committee, Dr. Pearson and her team led the organization’s charge of educating programs on strategies for the inclusion of principles of sustainability in engineering curricula, in large part by promoting a transdisciplinary, convergent approach to attaining the UN Sustainable Development Goals. For the past few years, she has served on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee, where she helped develop
assignments.References[1] M. Knoll, “The Project Method: Its Vocational education Origin and International Development.,” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, vol. 34, no. 3, 1997.[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019,” abet.org, [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2018-2019//#4. [Accessed Feb. 25, 2021].[3] D. Olawale, J. Sanchez and S. Spicklemire, “UIndy Engineering DesignSpine: Engineering leadership development through interdisciplinary teams and early exposure to real life problems,” in ASEE IL-IN Section Conference, West Lafayette, IN, 2018.[4] G
University. Currently, he is working as a Profes- sor of Engineering at the National University, San Diego, California. He received the President Disguised Teaching Award in 2020 and two times President Professoriate Awards. He published and presented 100+ technical papers in the peer reviewed journal and conference proceedings. He edited nine conference proceedings, chaired nine conferences including 2009 ASEE/PSW and 2015 ASEE/PSW and three US Patents. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #37135Dr. Bhaskar Sinha, National University Dr. Bhaskar Sinha is a Professor in the School of
earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering research. In the Center, she also supports other research projects and undergraduate labs on topics of high school science pedagogy and student engagement in science.Annie DouglassJulie Allen ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Family Voices: Learning from Families with Preschool-Age Children from Historically Marginalized Communities to Expand our Vision of Engineering (Work in Progress) Over the
lessonslearned for developing open educational resources.Project OverviewThis section contains details of the project execution, including descriptions and objectives for thetwo phases: (1) Development of the OER textbook, and (2) Incorporation of student problems.In the first phase, developing the OER textbook, an internal university grant of $1,000 was awardedin April 2020, which allowed for an adaptation of existing material. Rather than create an entirelynew textbook, OER statics and physics textbooks were adapted. A research student was hired inthe fall of 2020 to support the creation of the OER, using the Pressbooks platform. The studentwas recruited based on their performance in the Fall 2019 Statics course with the facultyresearcher, for their
performance in STEM fields [10]–[13]. Wai et al. discussed the consistency ofheightened spatial skills in those who excelled in STEM domains but recognized that spatialability is often overshadowed by mathematical or verbal skills when predicting success in STEMfields [3]. A 2019 study by Veurink & Sorby found that students identified as “low visualizers”who took a course specifically designed to improve spatial skills ultimately performed at thesame or higher levels on a spatial ability assessment when compared to students who hadinitially higher spatial skills but did not take the course. Also, students who took the spatialability course were more successful in their first attempt at introductory engineering courses thanthose who did not take
the Blind, "Blindness Statistics," Published Apr. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nfb.org/resources/blindness-statistics. [Accessed February 3, 2023].[2] W. Erickson, C. Lee, and S. von Schrader, Disability statistics from the American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI), 2022.[3] L. Schuck, R. Wall-Emerson, D.S. Kim, N. Nelson, "Predictors associated with college attendance and persistence among students with visual impairments," Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 339-58, winter 2019.[4] M. Hersh and M. Johnson, Assistive technology for visually impaired and blind people. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2008.[5] S.I
teaches courses and conducts research related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions and she is an author on over 95 peer- reviewed publications.Caroline SolomonDr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021
Complexity Typology as Tools for Faculty Development,” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 2022.[11] G. Panther and H.A. Diefes-Dux, “Instructor Adaptability and the Course Complexity Typology as Tools for Faculty Development,” Australasian Engineering Education (AAEE) Annual Conference, Sydney, Australia, December 2022.[12] L.R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, and J. F. Volkwein, “Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000.” ABET, 2006, https://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/04/EngineeringChange-executive-summary.pdf[13] B. Pejcinovic, “Design of Rubrics for Student Outcomes in 2019-2020 ABET Criteria,” presented at the 43rd Int. Conv
, O. Adio, and W. N. Waggenspack Jr., “Large-scale student programs increase persistence in STEM fields in a public university setting,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 57-81, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20244.[13] M. C. Mitchell, and P. Bandini, “Development of a one-on-one mentoring model for undergraduate students at a Minority Serving Institution,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA, July 2020. Available: https://peer.asee.org/35997.[14] K. D. Kendricks, K. V. Nedunuri, and A. R. Arment, “Minority student perceptions of the impact of mentoring to enhance academic performance in STEM disciplines,” J. STEM educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 38- 46, Apr. 2013
. Indian Educ. 2015, 54, 29–51. [Google Scholar][12] Medin, D.L., Ojalehto, B., Marin, A., Bang, M. Culture and Epistemologies: Putting CultureBack Into the Ecosystem. In Advances in Culture and Psychology; Oxford University Press:Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar][13] Lord, S.M., Przestrzelski, B., Reddy, E. Teaching social responsibility in a circuits course.In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa Bay, FL, USA, 16–19June 2019. [Google Scholar][14] Gelles, L.A., Lord, S.M. Pedagogical considerations and challenges for sociotechnicalintegration within a materials science class. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2021, 37,(5), 1244-1260. [GoogleScholar][15] Hoople, G.D., Chen, D.A., Lord, S.M., Gelles, L.A., Bilow, F., Mejia, J.A. An
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) has also proposed a set of coreprinciples stipulating that engineering learning may be considered three dimensional with a focuson engineering habits of mind (e.g., creativity, iteration, collaboration), engineering practices(design, optimization, constraint assessment), and engineering knowledge (principles, problemsolving, and technological outputs) [5]. This approach diverges from the way STEM hastypically been taught in U.S. middle schools, where science and engineering principles are rarelyanchored in relevant phenomena [6]. Since teachers often assume the main responsibility forimplementing engineering tasks in their classrooms to comply with the widespread focus onSTEM integration, they may
Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. June 14-17, 2015.[23] C. Brozina and K. Meyers, “Engineering Major Discernment: A Model for Informing Students and Offering Choice Paper”. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, June15-19, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[24] J. Gardner, P. Pyke, M. Belcheir and C. Schrader, “Testing our assumptions: Mathematics preparation and its role in engineering student success.” In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii, June: 24-27, 2007.[25] J. Van Dyken, L. Benson and P. Gerard, “Persistence in engineering: Does initial mathematics course
capstone project.ConclusionAs a capstone project, we successfully designed and implemented an 8-bit CPU using the DE2FPGA board. The CPU has 16 operations in its instruction set, each defined by a 4-bit opcode.With the use of VHDL code, we were able to realize the arithmetic functions of the ALU-CU ata higher level, bypassing the need for circuit-level design. We tested all the operations in theinstruction set and verified the results through the use of the 7-segment displays and LEDs on theDE2 board.References[1] Ronald Hayne, “An instructional processor design using VHDL and an FPGA”, Proceedingsof 118th ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26 - 29, 2011.[2] Karim Salman, Michael Anderton, “5-step design methodology for a general
Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Peer Document Repositorydatabase, and (3) the ProQuest Education Database. We started our literature search using thesearch query (recruit* OR college choice AND Black or minorit* AND undergraduate studentsor college students AND engineer*) or near equivalent queries. We used the asterisk wildcard (*)on recruit*, minorit* and engineer* to pick up words like “recruitment” or “recruiting,”“minority” or “minoritized,” and “engineers” or “engineering”. It quickly became apparent thatmany peer-reviewed sources with the content we needed were under the keyphrase of“broadening participation in engineering,” and so we chose to include that search term as well,but still only selected articles that focused
Paper ID #39253Making Electric Machinery Labs Easier to GradeDr. Glenn T. Wrate P.E., Northern Michigan University Dr. Wrate returned to his boyhood home and began teaching at Northern Michigan University in 2014. He was promoted to full professor in 2016 and tenured in 2018. He is a member of HKN and IEEE and is a past chair of the Energy Conversion and Conservation Division of ASEE ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Making Electric Machinery Labs Easier to GradeAbstractThe best way to teach electric machinery is with hands-on labs. At the beginning of the Fall2020 semester
. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.018.[6] L. C. O. Tiong and H. J. Lee, “E-cheating Prevention Measures: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Study.” arXiv, Jan. 24, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09841[7] M. Knight and R. Cooper, “Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior,” NASSP Bull., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 65–92, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0192636519826709.[8] J. Acosta and M. A. Guerra, “Validating Guerra’s Blended Flexible Learning framework for Engineering Courses,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[9] H
students. We will also presentour most recent findings since ASEE 2022 based on our ongoing research.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation, ”Collaborative Research:Fostering Engineering Creativity and Communication through Immediate, Personalized Feedbackon 2D-Perspective Drawing”: 2013612 (Texas A&M University), 2013504 (Georgia Institute ofTechnology), 2013575 (San Jose State University) and 2013554 (Purdue University). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] D. P. McCrum, “Evaluation of creative problem-solving abilities in undergraduate
, “Product Design and Development,” 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill: Hightstown, NJ, USA, 2020.[10] J. S. Gero, and J. Milovanovic, “A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains,” Design Science, vol. 6, e19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.15 4[11] U. Kannengiesser, and J. S. Gero, “Design thinking fast and slow: a framework for Kahneman’s dual-system theory in design,” Design Science, vol. 5. e10, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.9[12] J. Alcaide-Marzal, J. A. Diego-Mas, and G. Acosta-Zazueta, “A 3D shape generative method for aesthetic product design,” Design Studies, vol. 66, pp. 144–176, 2020. https
., Katz, J., Wandersman, A., Skiles, B., Schillaci, M. J., Timmerman, B. E. and Mousseau, T. A. (2013). Exploring the role of sense of community in the undergraduate transfer student experience. Journal of Community Psychology, 41: 277- 290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21529[3] Walters, N., DeSalvo, A., & Shafer, S. 2017. Intervention for College Attendance Program: 2015-2016 Report. Minnesota Office of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.ohe.state.mn.us/pdf/ICAP_Report_15-16.pdf. on March 10, 2021.[4] Smith, B. 2013. Mentoring At-Risk Students through the Hidden Curriculum of Higher Education; Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.[5] Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A., Knight, D., Swan, C., Canney, N., 2019
/1-27/9. Accessed: Jan. 27, 2022.[8] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “The role of role-play in student awareness of the social dimension of the engineering profession,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 882–905, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1624691.[9] J. E. Lewis and D. Wheatley, “Using a Mock Hearing to Engage Students in Critical Thinking,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1602.1-22.1602.13. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-a-mock-hearing-to-engage-students-in-critical-thinking[10] J. L. Carlson and N. T. Skaggs, “Learning by Trial and Error: A Case for Moot Courts,” Journal of
identity,development and socialization, especially among underrepresented minorities and women. Wehave also aimed to identify key characteristics of academic or non-academic spaces, structuredby the program, that foster STEM identity development.References[1] U. Ghosh-Dastidar, D. Samaroo, A. Solis, and S. Han, “S-STEM: An Educational Model for Retention at an Urban Institution,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[2] Institutional Description [Online] Available: https://facultycommons.citytech.cuny.edu/sponsored-programs/institutional-description/ . [Accessed: 28 Feb. 2023].[3] U.S. News and World Report [Online] Available: https://www.usnews.com/best- colleges/cuny-tech-2696 [Accessed 28 Feb
continueadopting academic and community partnerships as an effective student learning model. 6References [1] A. Dominguez, H. Alarcon, and F. Garc´ıa-Pe˜nalvo, “Active Learning Experiences in Engineering Education,” 2019. [2] M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? a Review of the Research,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004. [3] A. Shekar, “Project-Based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–1016. [4] M. L. Fioravanti and et.al, “Integrating Project Based Learning and Project Management for Software Engineering Teaching: An Experience Report,” in Proceedings of the
. J. Eng. Educ. 111, 2 (April 2022), 357–375. [2] Jill Davishahl and Sura Alqudah. 2020. Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in introductory-level pre-engineering classes. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings (Virtual On line). ASEE Conferences. [3] E.L. Deci, H. Eghrari, B.C. Patrick, and D. Leone. 1994. Facilitating internalization: The self determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality 62 (1994), 119–142. [4] E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. 2012. Self-determination theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology, P.A.M. van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, and E.T. Higgins (Eds.). Sage Publications Ltd., 416–436. [5] C.S. Dweck. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success