education curriculum has been well documented in research, is an expected studentoutcome for all engineering programs and it relates to skills sought out by engineering employers[1]-[3]. Engineering students must function effectively on a team whose members togetherprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives [2]. For teams and students to be successful, all individuals must be engaged[4]. In this respect, assigning team roles may have a positive impact on overall team success[5],[6]. However, modern teams tend to be more fluid in their roles and not rely solely on definedrole assignments [7].All students should enjoy and be successful in their teams, while obtaining the
corequisite course dependencies, simply folding the prerequisite courses into theordering of the required curricula. It likewise does not meet the full range of opportunities wesaw in the metro map format as it does not consider a student's unique path through a curriculum,nor does it provide support for understanding the pathways to completing elective requirements.In future work we plan to revise this visualization to address the articulation of prerequisites andcorequisites, as well as develop ways to greater support students' individual navigation throughcurricula.Conclusion and Future WorkPast research in curriculum visualization has considered how to make the “shape” of a degreeprogram [5] more easily understandable by students, faculty, and
helpingself-efficacy instead of putting a barrier in front of each lab. In the Sensors and Systems course,the math is related to the behavior and operation of sensors which are part of IoT systems as oneof the “things” that make up Internet of Things. In addition, sensor calibration for IoT and otherapplications require appropriate math. To make learning exercises and tools available for remotelearning, we plan to use the free online platform www.webwork.maa.org through theMathematical Association of America.The assignments will be designed by the mathematician. A first step was for the mathematicianto read the course textbook [19] and sort out which formulas lend themselves to transferassignments.In the second chapter of the Sensors and Systems
a detailed lesson plan for instructors and ensuring that the additional post-classassessments will align with the learning objectives [18]. We plan to pilot test the module in bothour own circuits courses as well as in those of our colleagues, which will require creating moreexample questions/activities from which instructors may choose. Following our pilot tests, we plan to assess the impact of the EV battery module onstudents’ learning and attitudes using a mixed methods approach. We will develop formalevaluation rubrics for both the pre-/in-class activities and the post-class assessments.Additionally, we will use adapted validated surveys before and after the course to determinestudents’ sense of social responsibility or adherence
informed us that the multilayered mentorstructure led to an enhanced and empowered learning environment for student venture teams.Additionally, peer mentors indicated strong enthusiasm for the personal relationship with thesenior mentor and an increased desire for engagement in entrepreneurship. In this paper wediscuss formation of the multilayered mentor model, outcomes from implementation of themodel within our Engineering Entrepreneurship Summer Institute and discuss plans for futuredevelopment. An overview of pilot model activity, including mentoring structure and topics areprovided.Introduction. This is a work in progress paper focused on sharing a new multilayered mentormodel (M3) developed for our Engineering Entrepreneurship Summer
,regardless of their incoming academic background, for the problem-solving requirementsassociated with second-year College of Engineering coursework. Students receive modern andpedagogically sound instruction in general engineering courses while at the same timecompleting two semesters of calculus, one semester of chemistry and one semester of physics.Students who are not calculus-ready take remedial courses and other common core classes untilthey have completed the appropriate requisites to follow the degree completion plans asapproved by the individual engineering departments. Previous CoE data has shown that studentsthat begin in Calculus I have a greater retention rate than those who begin in a pre-requisite mathcourse (i.e., Precalculus or
built environment for any of the life cycle stages of a construction project,such as planning, conceptual design, construction, operation, and End-of-Lifecycle (EoL)[4], [12]. One of the purposes of BIM is to virtually simulate the procedures, activities, andanalyses of new and existing constructions to evaluate different design alternatives and theperformance of the building [13]. A BIM model is a powerful virtual environment thatprovides clear information in an understandable way for designers and professionals [3].Due to BIM's user-friendly features and accessibility to the public, some studios haveintegrated the use of BIM for engineering education. In their work Abbas et. al [7],developed a framework to provide guidelines for the
articulated clear intentions for academic and careeropportunities that integrated business components into their engineering realities. Based on thesefindings, authors were inspired to explore the conceptual development of an entrepreneurialengineering identity and its practical application to engineering degree (re)design, student academicadvisory and career planning. IntroductionThe inextricable link between innovation and commercial enterprise has provided a suitable nichefor entrepreneurship within engineering programs and industries1,2,3,4,5,6. Recent economic andsocietal trends have illuminated a need for future engineers to be equipped with business acumenand, in particular, entrepreneurial
decide to switch to on-campus participation later.One student opted to start remotely and pre-planned to come to campus after a few weeks.The data presented herein, thus, must be considered in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic,which was well into its second year of pronounced societal impact at the time of the summerprogram. Its economic issues [22] likely had some impact on students other opportunities anddecision to participate in an REU program (as opposed to, for example, pursuing private sectoremployment). The effect of the pandemic on participants mental health [23], [24] (with thepandemic impacting everything from interpersonal relationships [25] to suicide rates [26]) alsobears consideration. In this second year of pandemic operations
data collection. However, the intended plan of action is givenbelow. We requested and received a year extension from the NSF Program manager.Theoretical FrameworkAs the theoretical framework for this project, we hypothesize that there is an association betweenengineering students’ personality attributes with experiential learning theory and transformativelearning theory as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Hypothesized Associations Between Personality Attributes and Experiential and Transformative Learning from STSAPResearch Objective for Year 1The objective for the first year is to explore any differences by demographic group in personalityattributes (biogenic, sociogenic, experiential learning style) and transformative
-accreditation of its programs under the conventional criteria. While preparing for the ABETevaluation visit, the Division also initiated work for future accreditations under EC-2000 criteria.The Division of Engineering organized a faculty retreat off campus in early October 1998 tofocus on team building, long term planning, and brainstorming. The EC-2000 criteria werepresented as an opportunity for further development and improvement of the engineeringprograms, as the Division had recognized that the proactive view of engineering educationassessment was essential in achieving its educational mission. During this retreat the facultypresented, discussed, and documented a roadmap to EC-2000 criteria.Following the retreat, faculty members in each program
-week in-personworkshop designed to introduce middle school students to engineering and what engineers do aspart of an educational Summer Camp at Brookdale Community College, located in Lincroft, NJ.Other discussion highlights will include: research supporting the importance of introducingengineering to middle school students; the motivation behind the instructors’ decision to conductthe program in a summer camp setting; the significance to the program’s success of having hadengineers and continuing education professionals design and teach the program; and plans for anexpanded program during the summer of 2022, based on lessons learned.Regarding the 2021 Summer Camp program, the engineering design process was the vehicle fordemonstrating the
were required to undergo mandatory one-on-one academic advisement with anassigned faculty mentor in their department to discuss academic progress and career development 4opportunities. Such one-on-one meetings were scheduled right before the beginning of registrationperiod, to maximize the impact of course planning for the following semester, with the overall goalof helping students navigate the shortest path to graduation. In addition, at least once a year,students were also required to attend mandatory one-on-one mentoring with one of the STEMprogram team members. These types of student-faculty communications allow students to addressnon academic or personal issues that might affect their
to the basicconcepts of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [1]. Students were taught how to design, build andfly their own quadcopter. The program was an ideal learning experience for students as they wereintroduced to key aerospace and aerodynamics concepts such as lift, drag, thrust, engineeringdesign, 3-D printing, mechanical and electrical systems and computer programming. Anotherprogram, the Drone Exploration Academy project at Elizabeth City State University provided6th-12th grade students a series of Friday sessions and a weeklong summer session in which theywere introduced to UAV mission planning, field investigation and designing ground and aerialvehicles to meet specifications [2]. The informal learning environment introduced students
(CLOE) will support this initiative by creating the AggiesLEAD ETBadge for North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. The ET digital badge willbe a holistic approach to professional development that focuses on technical skills within thisdiscipline and leadership skills needed to elevate the knowledge and performance of our facultyand staff. CLOE will provide the online learning portal for communication, registration andtracking the progress of all ET Badge participants. Faculty will receive a badge for each new ETconcept mastered. These additional credentialing badges will be beneficial for annual reviews,promotion, tenure, and reappointment (PTR) packets, and post-tenure reviews.Project Evaluation Plan and Logic ModelWe will
classroom [6], allowing the collaborative inquiry process to leverage both peer knowledge[7] and the ability of individuals to learn more from their data when they work together ratherthan alone [8]. Analyzing the variety of uses, Bell et al [9] derived a set of collaborative inquirycharacteristics: • Orientation/question – the process by which the group establishes the problem which they are attempting to solve and the evidence available for analysis. • Hypothesis generation – the creation of a testable statement of a solution to solve the identified problem, often in terms of if-then, cause-effect, or statistical language. • Planning – the development of the methodology to test the hypothesis, including naming the
collaborations like 3+2 programs. For example, since 1969 Spelman hasoffered its students a dual-degree program in engineering in collaboration with 14 partneringinstitutions. Other examples of successful academic collaborations for Spelman College include3+2 BS+MS programs combining a BS in Biology with a MS in Neuroscience, or a BS in HealthScience with a MS in Public Health. MSU has MOUs for dual-degree graduate programs inengineering disciplines with a number of international institutions, as well as a 3+2 program withMedgar Evers College (an HBCU) and graduate programs in Forestry at MSU. Our plans tobuild a consortium offering undergraduate and graduate training in data science beyond theconfines of this single HBCU+PWI collaboration build on the
experiments. While these obstacles required program facilitators to adjust the waythey originally envisioned and planned the program, the shift to online instruction also resultedin opportunities. For example, a larger number of affiliated STEM graduate and postdoctoralstudents were willing to lead video chats with high school participants about their post-secondaryeducation journey, more flexible hours for participants in high school with unique homelifesituations, and lessons focused on professionalism and networking within the STEM fields.A Call to ActionThe need to increase gender and racial representation in the STEM fields in order to create amore diverse and inclusive workforce has been known for years. Yet, despite this recognition, therates
% problem solvingand thinking, 21% communicating their work through documentation, 18% communicating as aconsultant, 13% gathering information, 8% planning work, 8% negotiating requirements, and 2%completing other administrative tasks [2]. Surveys in 2004 and 2012 found that design engineers spendapproximately 60% of their time engaged in technical work, while the other 40% of their time is spentinvolved in socially collaborative work [3]. In 2006, a group of civil engineer professionals articulated aglobal vision for civil engineering [4]. Among the key attributes for the 2025 civil engineer, expertsidentified the need for engineers to communicate, lead, collaborate with teammates, and manage projectswithin budget, on time, and within scope. In
Week Grading Type % Introduction, scope, and rubrics (by the instructor) 1 - - Topic proposal and foreign partner (3-min pre-recorded presentation) 2 Peer 10 Progress report (3-min pre-recorded presentation) 4 Peer 10 Project Management follow-up (plan, logbook, MS TEAMS space) 2-14 Inst. 20 Poster 13 Peer 20 Presentation (6-min pre-recorded) 14 Peer 20 Self-assessment (three pp
requirements for 15 highly regardedprograms# showed that while ~73% required a statistics/probability-focused course, only 33%required one taught with biomedical engineering focus. While our curriculum incorporates bothapproaches, a time gap following the initial training in our stand-alone biostatistics course andthe later application in subsequent courses often leads to reduced retention of the material. Thus,we have aimed to improve this through the incorporation of an open-ended fault-findingassignment for our students to help reinforce the teachings in our sophomore level biostatisticscourse. Details of the course, assignment and planned assessments are discussed in the followingsections.Course BackgroundDue to the heavy overall credit
sustainability of educational institutions generally depends largely on strategic planning, both in terms of optimal allocation of resources/manpower and budgeting for financial aids/scholarships to incoming students. Hence, forecasting of student enrollment plays a vital role in making crucial decisions based on previous time-bound records. This work demonstrates the power of neural network-based time series forecast over a traditional time series model and recommends the better network architecture between deep and shallow neural networks based on 25-year historical records of student enrollment in a CS1 course at a mid-west university in the United States of America. Exploratory analyses were performed
thedemographics currently served by these departments, and a plan was created to fill those holes. Ourstrategy was to look at the last admitted class and look for areas in New England that are underrepresentedin that class. The PIs then contacted guidance counselors and STEM educators at schools in thoseunderrepresented areas.Once an applicant is made aware of the program, there may be barriers to complete the application. Usingthe digital portfolio from above as an example, one possible barrier could include access to technology.Does an applicant have access to a digital camera via a smartphone, tablet, camera, or computer? If not,can an old smartphone with a camera be sent to students who requested them? It may be possible, at yourinstitution, to
critical to our adoption of ERSP, especially in ENG 294, waslogging because it helped us to identify team issues and determine proposal progress. Anothercritical aspect of the course was allocating time during class to check-in with each of the teams.Check-ins were done by the faculty and the graduate student.ConclusionOverall, the changes made to the ERSP model were not major, but they were necessary for theadoption of the program to an institution like UIC. These changes were incorporated to ensurethat the program met the goals and kept its critical components (i.e., ENG 294 course, dual-mentoring, and team-based structure). After the first year of the program, we plan to report onstudent outcomes and assessment data as well as provide a more
department’s efforts, the RED research team has helped influencethe entire College of Engineering. The RED grant PI was instrumental in establishing asustainable plan for having diversity and inclusion be a permanent staple at Rowan University. Itis now required for faculty to focus some aspect of their curriculum on these concepts forpromotion and tenure. To assist faculty across the college of engineering, the RED research teamwill set up a series of workshops in the final year to get faculty members outside of the CEEdepartment to change their approach to making their courses more inclusive. The workshops willfocus on introducing the concepts of inclusive pedagogy and present faculty with methods toengage students. Examples developed by the CEE
assessment of abilitiesand have taken a cognitive approach. One of the most influential models for problem-solving isPolya’s [3] 4-step model: 1) Understand the problem, 2) Develop a plan, 3) Carry out the plan,and 4) Look back. In psychology, Newell and Simon [4] described problem solving as aniterative process consisting of finding a path through a problem space, with each step movingfrom one mental representation of the problem to another mental representation, until a solutionwas reached. The theoretical work of Jonassen and colleagues [5] [6] has been influential inbringing together much of the current thinking on problem solving in engineering.In this paper, we refer to the cognitive processes that students apply in order to analyze, solve,and
and opportunity to disseminate the findings at the NSF Grantees’Poster Session. In the presentation, we plan to share our findings regarding the challenges inremote learning and mentoring activities among engineering students and faculty membersduring the COVID-19 outbreak in Spring 2020. Building on our prior studies [1]–[6] and a well-established mentoring input-process-output model [7], [8], we will also present how thementoring support could mitigate engineering students’ remote learning challenges and academicdisruption in the crisis of a pandemic.MethodsData/SampleThe data were collected through online surveys for faculty and students on June 3-22, 2020.Student survey invitations were emailed to the undergraduate and graduate students
improve water control and flood management within specific regionsof the watershed. Each project required capital investment with ongoing operational andmaintenance requirements. This paper examines the challenges project teams experiencedspecifically related to their use of engineering economics methods in making decisions during theengineering design process and formulates a series of lessons learned that may guide futureinstructors in planning community-engaged projects with their students.1 IntroductionEngineering capstone design projects are a critical part of the undergraduate engineeringcurriculum that binds the training and education received to a real-world application to preparestudents for lifelong careers as engineers. Integrating
a junior Optics course taken by physicsand electrical engineering students. Possible project extensions of this system includeimplementing two-way communications, implementing remote time transfer and clocksynchronization, and simulating atmospheric turbulence effects by inserting frosted plates intothe laser beam.Conclusions We have presented a few of the design considerations of advanced laboratory tools thatare being used in the laboratory curriculum of an interdisciplinary engineering and physicsdepartment. Specific plans and schematics are available from the authors upon request. Futurework on this project will emphasize the experiences of students and faculty members that learnfrom or teach with these tools, including the use
technology [17]. We draw on this work in our similar goal offoregrounding HCD mindsets in STEM courses.Capstone courseWe created and ran a semester-long capstone experience for undergraduate computing studentswith an interest in HCD. Two of the authors on this paper executed the course and the third wasinvolved in the course planning and research.Our research goals were to understand how to integrate human-centered mindsets and practiceswith technical learning goals in STEM education. This included understanding how STEMstudents with an HCD background approach a design task with a human participant,understanding what additional support was necessary, identifying opportunities where HCDcontent could be seamlessly integrated with STEM project goals