frequency domain,and the fourth plots the mean frequency calculated per second of data. The slope of a line of bestfit of the fourth graph can be used to determine the user’s current state of muscle fatigue, whichcan factor into an individual’s risk of injury [1], [2]. A commercially-available andnon-professional product for use during exercise such as the Myowearable will providecost-friendly access to a tool that can greatly reduce the risk of recurring injury.Introduction & BackgroundDoctors often recommend their injured patients avoid strenuous or physically demanding activityto prevent accidental injury. However, many patients are unsureof where that limit lies, until they have gone too far anddamaged their muscle more. Muscle activation
Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comPractitioner Perspectives of the Impact of COVID-19 on CS Education in High Schools Serving Historically Marginalized Students (Fundamental) Monica M. McGill1 , Angelica Thompson2 , Eric Snow3 , Leigh Ann DeLyser4 , Stephanie Wortel-London5 , and Luronne Vaval6 1,2 CSEdResearch.org 3 Evidence-Centered Research and Evaluation 4, 5, 6 CSforALL 1 monica@csedresearch.org, 2 angelica@csedresearch.org, 3 evidence.centered
ADVANCE grants. The fourthone has a history of programs focused on women’s success. Efforts to recruit more womenfaculty at these institutions are shown by increases at the assistant professor rank from 2008 to2018. However, the increase in the percentage of STEM women faculty in the lower ranks hasnot been consistently reflected in the higher ranks, suggesting that retention remains an issue(Figure 1). This is noted also at other ADVANCE institutions [1]. Overall, the numbers ofwomen faculty in STEM fields at the four partner institutions are significantly lower than the34.5% national average of STEM women faculty at doctorate-granting research universities,particularly at the full professor rank [2].Research indicates women and underrepresented
raised questions about their future reliability, muchof the current technological advancement in the green energy sector has been a result of evidenceimplicating their use as a primary factor in the ever-growing climate crisis.As such, there has been an unmatched investment in the future of alternative sources of energy,such as wind, solar, and hydropower. These have led to massive improvements in every aspect ofthese technologies, especially cost and efficiency [1]. For example, according to the Departmentof Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the cost of a 200kW solar array has declinedfrom 5.57 to 1.72 dollars per watt, a 69% decrease [2].However, there are still many drawbacks to these technologies. Perhaps the most notable of
. RIOS isdownloadable for free at https://www.cs.ucr.edu/~vahid/rios/.1 IntroductionConcurrent tasks are needed in various software applications. Operating systems allow programmers todefine processes or threads, and the operating system then manages by executing each task for sometime, saving task state, switching to another task, and so on. Some languages like Java have threadconcepts built-in. However, in many scenarios, a way is desired for a programmer to define multipletasks without relying on an operating system or built-in language support.One such scenario involves embedded systems. Although a trend is for many embedded systems to useincreasingly powerful architectures that support operating systems like the popular FreeRTOS[FreeRTOS21
remarked variability in levels ofpreparedness and experience in the use of online course delivery, groups (i.e., administrativestaff, faculty, students) struggled and diverse outcomes were realized with the transitions toonline learning [9]. Recent research on COVID-19 has demonstrated that this rapid transition had a negativeimpact on the mental health of college students with symptoms ranging from minor irritabilityinto excessive anxiety and panic attacks [8], [5], [2]. Additionally, various studies demonstratedsome student’s preference for in person learning rather than online learning [1]. This was mainlydue to multiple drawbacks that online learning presents. Some of these drawbacks include butare not limited: poor community
format for active learning in engineering ethics educationand provides an outline for ethics education in a wide range of professional disciplines.1 IntroductionEngineering ethics is the study of moral issues, decisions, conduct, character, ideals, andrelationships of individuals and organizations involved in engineering and technologicaldevelopment [1]. Across all disciplines of engineering, ethics is a required course component ofundergraduate engineering education and is included on the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)and professional engineering (PE) examinations. At the undergraduate level, there is only abroad requirement by ABET for students to have “an ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering
five semesters, tenhours per week of Japanese during the 16 weeks of the semester. Students also spend an intensive summer course inNUT, until they complete 1000 hours of technical Japanese before presenting the Japanese language exam in order to beaccepted by NUT.When students visit NUT during the summer to improve their Japanese language skills, they live with host families inNagaoka, get to know the university, and participate in important events such as the visit in 2009 of the Ambassador ofMexico to Japan, to celebrate the 400-year-old relationship between the two countries.RESUME OF THE PROCEDURE: 1) Select students interested in the program under the criteria of level of English and high school grades. 2) Selected students
has led educators to develop anentrepreneurial mindset in engineering students [1, 2]. Entrepreneurial mindset (EM) is definedas an “inclination to discover, evaluate, and exploit opportunities" [3, 4], and the way to thedevelop EM in graduates is through education. As an example, a Moroccan university hasintroduced a training-based educational approach for Ph.D. students to improve theirunderstanding of opportunity recognition and its surrounding environment by instilling anentrepreneurship mindset [5]. Many other approaches enhance engineering student abilitiesthrough forms of entrepreneurial-minded learning such as problem-based learning, and project-based learning [6, 7]. One possible way to promote these practices is through the SOTL
leads departmental activities in ABET accreditation. He is Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of ABET Commissioner and served as program evaluator representing IEEE since 2005. Grinberg has over 57 peer-reviewed journal and conference publications and numerous presentations in his field. He is IEEE Senior Member and currently holds a position of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Zone 1 Chair and ASEE Board of Directors member. In addition, he is recognized scholar and author in World War II military history. The book he co-authored, Red Phoenix Rising: The Soviet Air Force in WWII, was named an Outstanding Academic Title by the Choice Magazine.Saquib Ahmed (Dr)Joaquin Carbonara
Practice (EBP) paper is to describe an innovative approachand the impact of that approach on undergraduates engaged in engineering and computer scienceresearch experience involving robotics swarms. While critiques of a narrow reading of EBPapproaches rightly assert inapplicability when applied as a mandate to educational practitioners[1], our goal here is to contribute to the evidence base supporting our educational practitioner-driven pedagogy thereby expanding the definition and applicability of EBP in education. Morerecent approaches to EBP in disciplines aligned with the learning sciences have made it clear thata broad range of evidentiary warrant (i.e., beyond quantitative measures in randomized controltrials), integration of cognitive
increase in female faculty;however, the data is insufficient to show causation.UST’s enrollment of women exceeds the expected enrollment for the majors we offer. Womenare retained within engineering at rates comparable to men and on average they graduate faster.Efforts to understand the causes of these results are mixed and continuing work is necessary intracking student body composition and assessing the reasons behind our success to date.IntroductionWomen have been historically underrepresented in engineering fields. There has been someimprovement recently with the percent of degrees awarded to women increasing from 17.2% in2011 to 19.7% in 2016 [1]; however, these numbers still mean that less than one in fiveengineers are female.Many causes of
contrast, very few engineering Master’s programs in the United States are ABET EACaccredited. The number on the ABET website of institutions with ABET EAC accredited MSprograms is ten, as of January 3, 2020. There are an additional seven international programs [1].Therefore, arguably, ABET EAC currently has minimal effect on graduate education in the US.In this paper, we present a discussion of the EAC/ABET Master’s level criteria, provide somecontext regarding MS programs that are accredited by EAC/ABET, summarize perceptions ofsome stakeholders within the academic community, and finally, provide recommendationsshould ABET and professional societies choose to promote master’s level accreditation.Current Master’s Level CriteriaThe question is why
class sizes were typically smaller for this group, these relationshipsheld when we separated our data and compared class sections of similar size. We show a mildtrend that larger class sizes correlate with lower GPAs and higher DFW ratesWe suggest that NTT faculty can have a positive effect on student education, provided thosefaculty are well supported by their institution.BackgroundOver the past several decades, faculty demographics at US institutions have shifted from amajority of faculty being in the tenure system in the 1970s to only 27% in 2016 [1]. At R1institutions, approximately 30% of instructional faculty are in the tenure system, while 27% arefull-time non-tenure-track (NTT) and 14% part-time. Two-year colleges and community
professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.Robert John Agnew (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student Post-Pandemic Perceptions of Supplemental Instructional VideosAbstractWith the structural shift in education due to the
) are all conceptually significant,providing students the opportunity to carefully reason through the questions. The range correctfrom the eight questions (31% - 58.6%) indicates these questions are conceptually challengingfor students. Thus, the associated written explanations are good candidates for machine learninganalysis to reveal student reasoning.Qualitative analysisFor the preliminary analysis reported here, one question, CW5703 - shown in Figure 1, was usedfor initial manual coding and machine learning coding. Using a combination of a priori andemergent approaches described in Creswell & Poth (2018), a coding scheme was developed toclassify elements of student explanations and provide categories to train the machine
,” and “Product Commercialization.” The third project is justbeginning and aims to further expose undergraduates to research and reinforce the importanceresearch in student formation. It is entitled “An EM-Driven Framework for UndergraduateResearch” and involves six institutions from across the KEEN network. The areas beingdeveloped are Early Exposure, Student Research Training, Faculty & Mentor Training, andAssessment. This project is just starting and will be ongoing for three years.IntroductionThe concept of research is not new. Some people describe the concept of research as old asscience itself, however, the concept of the close relationship between research and subsequentdevelopment was not generally recognized until the 1950s [1
assessments must be carefully integrated in course design and reveal the need for alarge scope of practice questions to enhance student learning.IntroductionAdaptive learning (AL) is a personalized learning approach that dynamically adjusts content,assessment, and feedback based on algorithms that monitor student progress, pace, orperformance. Learning analytics from AL systems enable instructors to adapt instruction basedon student needs and can identify at-risk students to provide interventions [1], [2]. ALcourseware provides students increased control and engagement, real-time feedback to developconfidence and improve grades, while increasing degree completion [3]–[5]. Notably, there isstrong potential that AL can disproportionately benefit
to as cheating, have beenshown to be alarmingly prevalent in United States institutions. A review of multiple studiesshowed the mean prevalence of cheating overall to be on the order of 70%, while only 40% forcheating on examinations [1]. One study [2] that focused specifically on engineering students,found that upwards of 96% of the students reported having performed at least one of 17 discreteacts that would be considered cheating by a majority of students and faculty.Although one recent study [3] found that, of the numerous motivations to cheat, “availability”did not appear to strongly influence student behavior, in an online environment where studentshave unfettered access to online resources, “availability” would be expected to be a
, derives and simplifies equations, andshows how to use them to answer questions about a particular process or system. The learningoutcomes of the course then center around the learner being able to formulate and solveequations to answer a variety of questions about systems or processes to which the theoryapplies. The context of this study is an upper-division chemical engineering course on kineticsand reaction engineering at a large university in the northeastern U.S. This course is aprototypical engineering problem-solving course.Achievement goal theory [1-5] is being used to frame this study. Very briefly, achievement goaltheory posits that students perceive a goal structure based upon the course environment, that thegoal structure they perceive
: Embedding process safety modules within core CHE coursesIntroductionThe chemical engineering world has been grappling with process safety concerns and industrialaccidents for as long as many of us can remember. Many horrific events have spurred progressin process safety education in the Chemical Engineering field. While the Safety and Healthdivision of the American Institute of Chemical Engineering (AICHE) was chartered in 1976 [1],the Center for Chemical Process Safety was formed as a response to what is considered theworld's worst industrial accident, the release of methyl isocyanate gas at the Union Carbide inBhopal India where approximately 3,800 people were killed [2]. Furthermore, it wasn’t until2007, after
processes, as well as facilitating prototyping andpilot manufacturing of new products. Multiple industry-sponsored projects in Construction,Mechanical, Mechatronics, and Electrical areas have been completed. On the entrepreneurialside, a few new products were developed and provisional patent applications were filed.This paper describes, 1) the motivation and process needed to establish the Center forInnovation and Design, 2) facility, equipment and tools, 3) applied research projects conducted,and 4) outcome from these projects.Literature ReviewThe common goals of any innovation center, maker space, or design center are to promotecreativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Goals can also include creating new businessesand jobs for economic
, Design & Society Department at the Colorado School of Mines and Director of the Humanitarian Engineering and Science graduate program. She is an anthropologist with two major research areas: 1) the sociocultural dynamics of extractive and energy industries, with a focus on corporate social responsibility, social justice, labor, and gender and 2) engineering education, with a focus on socioeconomic class and social responsibility. She is the author of Extracting Accountability: Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility (MIT Press, 2021) and Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which were funded by the National Science Foundation, the
inform potential adjustments in the earlier curriculum. Additional support in CapstoneDesign may also be developed based on these results.A sample of 26 reports from a Capstone 1 class conducted in Summer 2021 were rated using acustomized version of the VALUE rubric for Information Literacy (IL). Results show thatstudents were most proficient in paraphrasing from sources, selecting high quality sources,choosing a variety of information sources, and citing sources accurately. They struggled morewith higher order, more contextually dependent skills like determining the extent of informationneeded and synthesizing information from multiple sources to achieve a specific purpose, such asjustifying a course of action. Additionally, project type was
critical for the developmentof STEM interest, from a child’s early years [1]–[3], to their secondary education [4]–[9].Engagement with informal learning environments supports students’ interest to pursue a STEMdegree [10], [11] and can also enrich learning in formal environments [12]. Students in grades K-12 spent only 18.5% of their time in formal learning environments (i.e., classrooms), while themajority of their time is spend in informal learning environments [13]. Thus, out-of-schoolexperiences offer students’ an opportunity to foster interest in STEM-related activities and sustaintheir interest over time [14]–[16]. Prior work has found that interest and engaging in out-of-schoolactivities in middle school has a significant long-term effect
positive effects can be found.Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to elucidate, how in the U.S., (1) hasmastery learning been implemented in undergraduate engineering courses from 1990 to 2021 and(2) the student outcomes that have been reported for these implementations. Using the systematicprocess outlined by Borrego et al. (2014), we surveyed seven databases and a total of 584 articlesconsisting of engineering and non-engineering courses were identified. We focused our review onstudies that were centered on applying the mastery learning pedagogical method in undergraduateengineering courses. All peer-reviewed and practitioner articles and conference proceedings thatwere within our scope were included in the synthetization
-progress, we share some preliminary findings that emerged from the four interview themes: 1)Why Engineering? (student motivations for studying engineering), 2) What is Engineering? 3)Who are Engineers?, and 4) What Engineers Do. The students had burgeoning conceptions ofengineering/engineers with traces of sociotechnical perspectives. These preliminary findingsreiterate that students will not simply ‘get’ sociotechnical engineering after a single courseexperience. If we want students to truly integrate these concepts into their own conceptions aboutengineers/engineering, we must do the same as an engineering education collective and integratethem fully into the entirety of their engineering education experiences.IntroductionThe University of San
in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation, and learning outcomes.Melissa Montalbo-lomboy (Lecturer) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Measuring Students’ Interdisciplinary Competence and Entrepreneurial Mindset based upon Exposure to a Holocaust NarrativeIntroductionThe responsibilities of engineers are constantly evolving to meet the demands of anever-changing world. Today, industries are looking for engineers who possess skills outside ofengineering, such as strong communication and interdisciplinary team-working skills [1]. As theresponsibilities of
were higher than previous onlinesemesters but still below previous face-to-face semesters.IntroductionBecause of covid, many engineering classes have been forced to be online since the middle ofspring of 2020 and have struggled to engage students and uphold academic standards [1]. Thethermodynamics class was to be offered online during the summer of 2021, and a more effectiveformat for the class was sought. Flipping a thermodynamics class allows more time fordiscussion and problem solving and most students indicate this builds their confidence in thecourse [2]. Pre-covid studies show that online courses should include some face-to-face or atleast some synchronous meetings to provide in-depth explanations and clarifications of difficultconcepts
www.slayte.com Engineering Stress Culture in Project-based Engineering ProgramsAbstractBackground: This research paper examines engineering stress culture in the context ofproject-based learning engineering programs at the university level. Multiple authors havereported that the culture of engineering and engineering education can be stressful and exclusive.A study conducted by Jensen and Cross [1] found that measures of inclusion such as ”DepartmentCaring” and ”Department Pride” were negatively correlated with stress, anxiety, and depression.We used the approach developed by Jensen and Cross to examine stress culture in the context ofthree project-based learning engineering programs.Purpose: Our goal was to