is going well or what is difficult encouraged the use ofmonitoring strategies.Keywords: metacognition, reflection, qualitative, first year, feedback, critical thinkingI. IntroductionA common theme across university-level engineering courses is the overlooking of strategiesstudents use to learn material in favor of technical material coverage [1], [2], [3]. Causes for thisimbalance include educators’ beliefs that there is limited class time to teach an abundance ofnecessary information and that reflection, as an example of a learning strategy that engineeringeducators could develop, is better suited for humanities courses, not engineering [3]. As anexample, Ndethiu et al. [2] showed that engineering educators did not play a role in third
, etc. During his career Dr. Robles had the opportunity to work for the Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) as a Manager and a Principal Investigator of research projects with budgets of approximately 1 MUSD/year. In August 2008 he started his tenured track career at the University of Houston at the College of Technology as an Assistant Professor, in 2014 he became Associated Professor with Tenure, he was the graduate program coordinator from 2009 to 2014 and he became professor in 2020. He is an adjunct faculty at Rice University since 2018Medhat El NahasBurak Basaran (Associate Professor)Kamran Alba Dr. Kamran Alba received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of British
transitioning from industry to academia, based upon the recent experiences of surveyedfaculty who have completed this transition successfully. This preliminary work is intended toseek feedback that will be helpful for expanding this work to a more extensive survey of facultythat fit this category. The most obvious challenge is the adjustment to teaching rather thanworking in an engineering production, design, or consulting environment for industry. However,the information presented here includes a myriad of challenges beyond teaching, includingdeveloping an academic research program through direction of graduate work, and satisfying thevarious professional development, service, and research requirements expected of universityprofessors [1, 2].The three
from the literature as a guide [1], [2].Here, we first describe the class format, which included short asynchronous videos for most ofthe core content along with live virtual classes for pre-submitted questions. We then discuss theresults in terms of student engagement and learning. Finally, we discuss lessons learned and howwe have continued to update this format in future semesters with more ability to meet in-person.Class formatOur overarching strategy in moving to the virtual format was to capitalize on the advantages ofthe online format, when possible, especially to ensure student interaction and engagement. Forinstance, instead of a single, 55 minute in-person lecture, online videos can easily be broken intoshorter, digestible portions
behaviors is also presented.IntroductionAn important factor affecting student comprehension of key concepts taught in the classroom ofundergraduate engineering courses is their ability to visualize the physical behavior related tothose concepts. Numerous authors and researchers have documented the need and benefits ofengaging students beyond the “traditional” lecture approach to improve learning in theclassroom. Lowman [1] in Mastering the Techniques of Teaching states: “Listening andthinking activities are the primary activities by which students learn during class, yet studentslearn most from what they see.” Similarly, Freeman and Walsh [2] identify engaging multipleintelligences, including spatial intelligence, as one of “ten brain-based
given module to be paired withother technical problems in multiple engineering courses.Literature ReviewThe ABET definition of engineering design includes policy and regulations among possibledesign constraints. Among the student outcomes required by ABET are: “an ability to applyengineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of publichealth, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors” and “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineeringsituations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineeringsolutions in global, economic, environmental, and social contexts” [1]. Clearly, the
delivery ofknowledge maps.IntroductionA 2016 national online survey of U.S. academic librarians reported a few challenges toinstruction such as lack of time to prepare the library instruction sessions and lack of studentengagement in class [1]. Another similar survey of information literacy instructional practices inIsraeli academic libraries also echoed the same challenges [2]. This article describes anexperiment carried out by an Engineering Librarian who used a knowledge mapping tool toexplore its effectiveness in enhancing engineering information literacy instruction in terms ofteaching preparation and in-class student engagement. The experimented class is a one-timelibrary information literacy instruction session offered to a senior-level
modalities across the four categories. The findings corroborate positive reviews by formerparticipants and facilitators, especially for groups of university students from diverse culturalbackgrounds. The findings from the pilot study indicate a positive trajectory: Intentionalinclusion of guided, interpersonal communication exercises in engineering courses based on theUNESCO Story Circles methodology is appreciated by learners. The method offers a potentialtemplate for broad adoption in engineering programs due to its readily accessible, cost-free, andeasily adaptable format for diverse instructional settings.1 IntroductionAs we continue to adjust to the “new normal” in pandemic-infused academic contexts, manylearners, educators, and administrators
Challenges using course lesson objectives or points allocated on graded events. Theassessment framework will provide educators within a program insight on how well theircurriculum prepares their students to address the Grand Challenges. A case study is providedusing an ABET-accredited undergraduate environmental engineering curriculum to demonstratethe insights provided from our assessment framework and to provide a baseline for comparingcourse content and educational experiences across programs.1. Introduction In 2008, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) announced the Grand Challenges forEngineering in the 21st century, which highlighted achievable and sustainable opportunities tohelp people and the planet thrive [1]. The publication
the organization plans to further utilize it going forward.IntroductionCommunity-engaged learning, also known as service-learning, strives to incorporate service tomeet community needs, academic connection to course material, reciprocal relationships andmutual learning between all stakeholders, and intentional reflection [1]. Within engineering, thepedagogy has been found to be effective in supporting student’s development of coreprofessional competencies [2,3] as well as in serving as a recruitment and retention tool for theprofession among diverse populations [4,5]. Engineering community engagement is often used inproject-based design experiences where there is a project deliverable. Both the project and theengagement process generate and
warehouses to name a few. Besides robotic control, The PLC based control system are usedin other types of applications including utilities, rides in theme parks, traffic control systems,railroad, aviation, and a variety of transportation modalities [1-6]. Traditionally, control usingPLCs is not taught in a ECE undergraduate or graduate curriculum. However, an electrical and/ormechanical engineer needs these skills to work in a variety of industries. Typical ECEcurriculum includes control theory, analog and digital electronics but seldom include courses inPLCs and integrating them with different equipment. This missing link led to the development ofPLC and industrial instrumentation related courses in remote learning and technology programs[7]-[10
NX CAE tool has been carried out and theresults compared with the results from 1D simulation have been compared with an earlier workthat used the AutoDesk simulation tool. The main design variables in these stands are thegeometry, material and safety factor. The teaching and learning outcomes of the work along withthe safety and ethical issues have been discussed. It is hoped that through this study the studentsdevelop a clear understanding of assumptions made in the CAD and FEA course topics onframes and how they address the CLOs.Introduction and Literature ReviewStructural analysis of space frames is not a new subject. There are numerous textbooks andresearch papers available on this topic [1-4]. In addition, several CAE tools have been
distribution. Dr. Natarajarathinam has chaired 91 graduate capstone projects, and several undergraduate capstone projects, and has served on two master’s committees. Dr. Natarajarathinam was chosen as of the “40 under 40” faculty by the American Society of Engineering Educations, Prism Magazine in 2018.Sharon Lynn ChuMathew Kuttolamadom (Associate Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com ‘All Together Now’ - Integrating Horizontal Skills in Career Technical Education Classes with Making and Micromanufacturing Osazuwa Okundaye 1 , Malini
Madison Area Technical College. The goal of the CREATE Centeris to advance the field of renewable energy by supporting two-year college programs whileserving as a source of mentoring, industry networking, faculty professional development, andeducational materials [1]. CREATE has produced renewable energy program profiles, facultyand alumni interview spotlights, an ongoing newsletter, blog, and a robust collection of hands-onlaboratory instructional materials. The CREATE community of practice includes over 900energy educators representing all fifty U.S. states and three U.S. territories. The CREATECenter delivers hands-on Renewable Energy Institutes for educators [2], provides guidance in thedevelopment of energy infrastructure and instructional
research. Educational Technology Research and Development 69, 2209–2224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09966-7Friedrichsen, D. M., Smith, C., & Koretsky, M. D. (2017). Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 177-202.Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984.Hodge, E. M. (2019). “Common” instruction? Logics of ability and teacher decision making across tracks in the era of common standards. American Educational Research
catalog is an “Introduction to the physical principles of biological systems. Molecularstructures in biological contexts, bioenergetics, environmental interactions, thermodynamic andkinetic regulation of biological systems”. Biophysics is an interesting subject that has appeal tomany disciplines. Not only is it modern in its approach utilizing a multitude of technologiesbased on physical principles, but Biophysics also requires the synergy of many disciplines tounderstand its concepts. Subjects such as Physics, Biology, Mathematics, and Chemistryintertwine offering new approaches and discoveries and thus allowing the inquiries ofresearchers of science and engineering to be investigated.[1]It has been my experience as a trained biomedical engineer
simple answer “you are going to use it in college” [1]. It’s important thatstudents understand that they are not learning a set of individual topics in the class. They aredeveloping the academic competencies that allow them to go beyond the singularity of thetopic and connect it to a global picture of knowledge.The narrative in which teachers present the applications of their class activities is highlyrelevant. Siew et al., [2] proposes that an important factor of the reduction of STEM interestis the method in which teachers approach the topics in class. Students leave the classroomwith a perception that the STEM topics are too hard, too boring and not worth the effort.Over the last years many educational tendencies, such as Competencies Based
Comprehensive Review and a New Provisional Model Simin Nasseri1, Mohammad Jonaidi2, Navid Nasajpour-Esfahani1, and Ralph Schultz1 1 Mechanical Engineering Department, 2Civil and Environment Engineering Department Kennesaw State UniversityAbstract:Lean manufacturing methods have been widely used in industry for many decades. The leanconcepts which have been adopted, largely have increased profit and reduced waste.Lean philosophy has been reviewed in academia by researchers, but only few major models havebeen developed. In these models, various factors have been discussed without finding a commonground or core.The focus of this paper is to review the lean models in use
Indianapolis, Indiana, introduced a new course into the curriculumfor engineering students. I was assigned to teach this new course, Engineering Thermodynamics.As I was preparing to teach this course, one thing I saw was the difficulties others haddocumented both in teaching and learning the subject matter [1],[2],[3],[4],[5]. I went into thecourse looking to see where any problems would occur. For this thermodynamics course, the topics covered started with heat transfer and transfermechanisms, then moved to the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, introducing steamtables along the way. Next, the class covered entropy and isentropic processes. While coveringthese topics, methods used included traditional lectures, in-class examples
orlaser-cut parts in the University Makerspace. The physical prototype helped students analyze thebusiness aspects of the new modules.A pre-assessment survey was deployed to explore the students' conceptualization of: 1. The role of MSRP. 2. Additional cost to production outside of physical material. 3. Products sold through a distributor. 4. Understanding of the supply chain beyond just company and retailer.The final project report examined how the students were able to address aspects of theEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) in determining the cost to produce, the manufacturers suggestedretail price (MSRP) for the console, and the shipping cost of the consoles. The EML modules inthis course can be adapted to any course.1. IntroductionOver
\SRWKHVHV7KHORZHVWFRUUHODWLRQ ZDV REVHUYHG EHWZHHQ DVVXUDQFH DQG SHUFHLYHG VXLWDELOLW\ r 7KH VWURQJHVWFRUUHODWLRQr ZDVREVHUYHGEHWZHHQUHOLDELOLW\DQGUHVSRQVLYHQHVV Table 1. Zero order correlation among all variables n 9DULDEOH 5HOLDELOLW\ ± $VVXUDQFH ± 5HVSRQVLYHQHVV ± (PSDWK\ ± :HEVLWH&RQWHQW ± 3HUFHLYHG6XLWDELOLW
-author that her duties as a mother to multiplechildren in virtualized K-12 would not get in the way of course planning and delivery. The co-author, in having virtually witnessed an abundance of his female colleagues “drowning” in theirdual roles as mothers and faculty at any number of Zoom meetings, assured the author that wewould do no such thing; that we would let the lessons of Fall 2020 inform our efforts in Spring2021 – that we would plan and deliver this engineering course not necessarily meeting thestudents’ learning needs but to meet our own mental and physical needs; to allow ourselvesrespite. At last, we both agreed and sighed, we had given ourselves of our own “life raft.”1 A live metaphor is a metaphor identified in qualitative
youth liked best about the project.IntroductionEngaging young people in engineering activities and encouraging them to select a pathway tohigher education in the sciences continues to be a high priority in the United States and abroad[1, 2]. Precollege programs are the main way higher education institutions work to inspire youngpeople to pursue engineering education and ultimately a career in the sciences. Many precollegeprogram options use on-campus “camps” or other strategies to bring youth onto the campus toexperience STEM curriculum and to connect with faculty, staff, and students. However, there aremany limitations to this method including cost [3], transportation from rural locations [4, 5], andmore recently, the impact of COVID-19
transfer responsibilities of platform support to the browser developers butalso to design a more intuitive interface for the students to upload, retrieve and manage filesusing the SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP). The latest survey noted an 86.2% approval of ourapplication over the traditional methods, and the download count of the application is now 10times of the old version after we applied engineering practices.IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, studying and working remotely became regular practice forstudents, professors, and workers around the world [1]. Consequently, the need for a remotecomputer connection software has exceedingly increased since the outbreak of COVID-19pandemic in 2020. This need is anticipated to continue to rise
-12engineering education, with emphasis on K-8 grades—a time when first impressions ofengineering may be developed. Calls for increased participation by all students, including thosewho have been historically marginalized, motivate the need for theoretically grounded ways ofdeveloping and assessing educational programs [1]. This paper draws from sociocultural learningtheory and applies four theoretical and empirical analyses to derive design principles for equitythat can inform curriculum, instruction, and assessment of preK-12 engineering educationprograms. We present a model for equity-oriented preK-12 engineering learning and delineate itsdimensions and principles, illustrating each with examples and discussing ways of implementingequity-oriented
how to disrupt the oppressive environment of engineeringeducation, b) protect vulnerable populations, and c) center participants’ voices. In writing thispaper, our goal is to provide a transparent account of decisions that can go into designing aqualitative study and implementing a research grant proposal, keeping in mind how our powerand privilege influence every decision in the research process.Keywords: methods, research quality, ethics, equity, marginalization 1. IntroductionThe research process involves many decisions. It is important for engineering educationresearchers to make these decisions intentionally, developing and justifying each component oftheir research design. It is also essential for researchers to align the inner
challenges will be addressed in the future to better prepare the studentsfor their future professional careers.IntroductionCareer and Technical education (CTE) degrees, like Construction Management, are programsthat require students to be engaged in two learning components so that they can succeed laterin their professional lives. Not only are they required to learn academic skills (study habitsand strategies that help absorb subject knowledge) for the technical component, but also toacquire employability skills (abilities needed by an individual to be fit in a workingenvironment) and engage in actual trainings pertaining to this industry [1]. Even thoughefforts were made to have active involvement in the training component such as
for both years. In year 1,students designed and fabricated drill-powered vehicles. In year 2, students designed andfabricated adapted tricycles for children in the community with physical disabilities. In both years,three focus groups were held at the end of the course. The focus groups were analyzed using amodified grounded theory approach, leveraging existing motivation theory to frame and interpretthe results. This led to the emergence of a set of PBL “best practices” that educators can considerwhen engaging in PBL with students. These best practices are related to the following: autonomy-supportive course faculty, project scaffolding, project authenticity, triggering and maintainingstudent interest, providing opportunities for skill
obtained a satisfactory result in the standardized mathematics test administered by thatinstitution [1]. As a result, some students willing to accomplish their dream of becomingengineers are part of that group. However, their lack of a strong background in mathematics isone of the obstacles they face during their first year. This situation is not an exception in GalileoUniversity. We typically obtain low pass rates in the first mathematics course required forengineering majors. Therefore, offering remedial mathematics courses for first-year engineeringstudents is a must. The objective of such remedial courses is to build up the students’ skills andcompetencies required to succeed in regular college classes [2].The problem above is even more