do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 26.737.13References1. Palaigeorgiou, G. and Despotakis, T., 2010, ―Known and Unknown Weaknesses in Software Animated Demonstrations (Screencasts): A Study in Self-Paced Learning Settings,‖ Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 9(1), pp. 81-98.2. Lloyd, S. and Robertson, C. L., 2012, ―Screencast Tutorials Enhance Student Learning of Statistics‖, Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), pp.67-71.3. De Grazia, J. L., Falconer, J. L., Nicodemus, G., and Medline, W., 2012, ―Incorporating Screencasts into Chemical Engineering Courses
student population as part of a survey conductedfor all students at our home institution, and to enhance participation as much as possible.Acknowledgements: Page 26.25.13 Financial support for this program came from Armour College of Engineering, PritzkerInstitute of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Wanger Institute for Sustainable EnergyResearch (WISER), and Carol and Ed Kaplan (endowed fund to Armour College).Bibliography1. Boyer Commission. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.2. Smith, S. J., Pedersen-Gallegos, L
and M. Gonzalez, "Integrating Control Concepts in an Embedded Systems Design Course," IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1273-1278, 2013.[13] R. Streveler, K. Smith and M. Pilotte, "Aligning Course Content, Assessment, and Delivery: Creating a Context for Outcome-Based Education," in Outcome-Based Education and Engineering Curriculum: Evaluation, Assessment and Accreditation, K. Mohd Yusof, S. Mohammad, N. Ahmad Azli, M. Noor Hassan, A. Kosnin and S. K, Syed Yusof (Eds.)Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global, 2012.[14] G. P. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by design, ASCD, 2010.[15] J. McTighe and R. S. Thomas, "Backward Design," Educational Leadership, 2005.[16] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking and
professors in the department, to discuss theirsolutions or consult for any number of problems they may be facing. These “expert-interviews”are limited in time (approximately 10-15 minutes for one expert interview, in wholeapproximately 2-3 hours for the entirety of the expert interviews) which forces the groups toprepare beforehand either a list of questions or bullet points to discuss with their chosen expert(s)to fully utilize the time allowed16,17. A more detailed description of the concept is in preparationby the authors. Page 26.154.7Figure 2: Support system for student groups during IGE-GER17.As mentioned previously, the two advisors co
propose a game app for smart phones for single familyHWM. The game app will use realistic residential water usage distribution data and suggeststrategies and specific action(s) that a player can take to save water (scarce resource) and thusmoney (economics) resulting in better environment and equity for all concerned. Players will trydifferent strategies and see the action(s) that suits their situation best. In addition, the app willalso show other sustainable development benefits – like energy saved (in kWh) and carbon dioxide abatement (for better environment) and other equity benefits (the 3 Es). This information isof utmost importance to educate the public, increase their awareness and for the residents to beresponsible citizens by actively
Satisfied (5) to Very Dissatisfied (0). **Percentage responding yes.Faculty comments provided to the open-ended questions were also very positive. When asked tocomment what s/he thought was the most valuable outcome of group interaction from the lunchseries, one faculty member answered “Meeting other faculty especially from other departments.Also, the more experienced faculty have provided great support and insight into how to getthings done at OU.” Other faculty members stated “Information gathering. Resources that arealready in place on campus [are] not easy to find online - therefore, the interaction makes it [an]information gathering channel” and “Meeting the other faculty and staff because then I had an
Page 26.539.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Work in progress: Development of the James Madison University Undergraduate Engineering Leadership ProgramAbstractThe Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) at James Madison University has asingle baccalaureate engineering degree program that is aimed at engaging students anddeveloping their engineering knowledge, skills, and values through a project-based curriculum.One recent development is the Madison Engineering Leadership (MadE Leadership) program.The engineering leadership idea grew from the first lines of the Harvard Business Review BlogNetwork June 7, 2010 article entitled “British Petroleum (BP)’s Tony Hayward and
, Australia, 1989.2. Diamond R.M., " Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide " San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,1997.3. Fink L.D., "Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses", San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 20034. Saroyan A., Amundsen C., "Rethinking teaching in higher education: From a course design workshop to a faculty development framework", Sterling, VA, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2004.5. Toohey S., "Designing courses in Higher Education", Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press, 1999.6. F.P. Deek, F.P., Kimmel, H., & McHugh, J., “Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first course in computer science: Problem solving then programming”, Journal of
changing in the future would be to focus more on directexamples of technologies useful in the green design field. However, this is a model that we willcontinue to implement and would recommend to others.References:[1] M. Rickinson, C. Lundholm, and N. Hopwood, Environmental Learning: Insights from research into the s tudent experience, 2010 edition. Dordrecht ; New York: Springer, 2009.[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Definition of Green Building. http://www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/pubs/about.htm; Accessed Jan 02/2015.[3] Smith, G. Sustainability and Schools: Educating for Interconnection, Adaptability, and Resilience. The Journal of Sustainability Education; Vol. 8, 2010[4] “Stockholm 1972
contact information with the team leader toallow follow-up.After the training event, teams are effectively empowered and dispatched to plan and organizetheir ambassador event(s) with minimal assistance from the Office of K-12 Outreach. Teamleaders contact their team members, school liaison and alumni and meet again with their teams tofinalize the event date(s) and venue. This autonomy and empowerment of the teams allows themto design their event to meet the particular needs of their hometown high school and leveragetheir own skillsets and experiences in putting together an effective outreach event. It also keepsthe central management and maintenance of the program to one of supporting and answering thequestions of the team leaders, as opposed to
, S. J., Langen, T. A., Compeau, L. D. and Powers, S. E., “A theme-based seminar on environmental sustainability improves participant satisfaction in an undergraduate summer research program,” Journal of Engineering Education-Washington-, vol. 97, p. 95, 2008.6. Fraser, J. M., et al, “Community Outreach and Engagement through Sustainability,” Proceedings of 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper ID #7429.7. Paudel, A. M., “Teaching sustainability – an increment into the engineering courses or a paradigm shift in engineering education?” Proceedings of the 2013ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference, pp 121-126.8. Paudel, A. M. and Fraser, J. M., “Teaching Sustainability in an Engineering Graphics Class
choice question, detailing chapter aspect of this feedback with appropriate page#, location on chapter to test the explanation(s) that feedback page etc.; reader's help explain why explanations, and a understanding, with the distractor photocopy for the one correct choice choices are tutor, on another and three incorrect, and aspect of the "distractor" - explain why the
: People, places, and pursuits . National Academies Press: Washington DC. 6 Krishnamurthi, A., Ballard, M., & Noam, G.G. (2014). Examining the impact of afterschool STEM programs . Palo Alto, CA: The Noyce Foundation. 7 Friedman, L.N. & Quinn, J. (2006). Science by stealth. Education Week , 25 (24): 45, 48, 49. 8 Bell, P., Lewenstein, A.W., Shouse, A.W., & Feder, M.A. (Eds.) (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits . National Academies Press: Washington DC. 9 Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career
activities was successfully presented in ASEE 2014. As the project advances, research papers on project activities and assessments will be submitted for presentation at conferences such as ASEE & ITiCSE. These conferences will provide venues for obtaining additional input and accomplishing broader community building. In 2014, a journal paper was also successfully published in the ASEE – Computers in Education journal. The investigators plan to submit additional articles in ACM Queue (Magazine), ACM Transactions on S/W Engineering and Methodology, and IEEE Transactions in S/W Engineering. Page
research questions that guided this study.SD ModelingSD modeling allows for tangible systems thinking to take place through the building of modelsthat help the modeler(s) gain knowledge and understanding on potentially non-intuitive systemicoutcomes of a particular problem.10 A SD modeling exercise can take both qualitative andquantitative forms, where qualitative modeling (diagramming) typically precedes, and thenfacilitates, quantitative modeling (simulating);11 however, qualitative system dynamic modeling Page 26.1039.3often stands by itself as a useful way to teach systems thinking when the goal is to fosterproductive conversation about how
range from -2 to 2.The accuracy of Kay’s perceptions is found by comparing the entries in Kay’s perception matrixwith the Level II Truth matrix, which contains the actual friendship links between the membersof the network.6.3 Level IVThe Level IV data is the 4-dimensional matrix Pi,,j,k,l containing l ‘s perceptions of k’sperceptions of how i feels about j. If we relabel our generic team of four people using specificnumbers rather than generic letters, we have Ira (1), Jay (2), Kay (3) and Ella (4), then the cellP1234 contains Ella’s perception of Kay’s perception of how Ira feels about Jay. To create LevelIV friendship network, Ella is asked for her perception of the following: Kay’s perception of Ira’s feelings of friendship towards Jay
C. randomize order of treatments D. all of the above8. A company wants to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between their new cholesterol drug and their old cholesterol drug. Which test should the company use to compare the sample means? A. ANOVA B. p-test C. t-test D. both B & C9. Which of the following is/are the correct test(s) to compare sample variances of two populations? A. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) B. t-test C. f-test D. both A & C10. A biomedical researcher has measured the strength of several different brands of coronary artery stents. Which of the following tests should he/she use to compare the data? A
Paper ID #11864Mapping Student Development in Culturally Contextualized DesignLaura S´anchez-Parkinson, University of Michigan Laura S´anchez-Parkinson is a Research Assistant for the Office of the Provost, Global and Engaged Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan (U-M) and a Program Coordinator at the National Center for In- stitutional Diversity. She holds a B.A. in Organizational Studies and Sociology and a M.A. in Higher Education Management and Organizations from the U-M. Her research focuses on organizational change by exploring deep-seated inequalities at colleges and universities to promote positive change for
Paper ID #12011Teaching Assistant Professional Development through Design: Why TheyParticipate and How They BenefitDr. Kathleen A Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and college of
Page 26.1512.4themselves while earning engineering degrees in various disciplines were compared to those ofstudents earning degrees in physics, chemistry, math, economics and psychology at the sameinstitution. Inclusion of these degrees was informed by the University of Colorado Boulder (CUBoulder)’s 20-year historical trends of the degrees students earn when they leave the College ofEngineering and Applied Science (CEAS), but continue on to earn university degrees. The topmajors of those students who earn degrees outside of the CEAS, who were in the college at sometime are: 1. economics, 2. finance, 3. psychology, 4. integrative physiology, 5. biochemistry, and6. math. Of those, economics and psychology were chosen for the study because they
Page 26.1559.15 – Average age for nursing homes - 84As we chronologically age, our life demands for shelter, transportation, food and clothing allchange. These many changes are a reflection in large part to our changing family makeup atdistinct periods in time. From above, it can be construed our U.S. populace generally getmarried in their 20’s. The 30’s are typically a time for the collection of material possessions(cars, homes, furniture, appliances, etc.) Our late-40’s reflect an empty nester’s phase, where ourchildren become, theoretically, independent and move out onto their own; whether this becollege or simply moving away from home to begin working. During our 50’s, we begin tonotice the changes of primary ageing; that is
particularcomputational processes were inherent, which may have introduced leading questions and biasedanswers. Moderator acceptance bias may have also been present, whereby interviewees provideanswers to please the moderator. Respondents might interpret what they believe the moderatorwants to hear and answer accordingly. All instances of bias were noted during coding process.Acknowledgment This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underaward 0939065. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] Vergara, C. E., Urban-Lurain, M., Dresen, C., Coxen, T., MacFarlane, T., Frazier, K., et al
. Perry, W. G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years – A Scheme, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, 1970. 2. Guttenplan, D. D., “Measuring the Wealth Effect in Education”, in The New York Times, 12/1/2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/world/europe/measuring-the-wealth-effect-in-education.html? , (accessed 1/26/2015). 3. Strauss, S., “The Connection Between Education, Income Inequality, and Unemployment”, in The Huffington Post, 1/2/2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between- ed_b_1066401.html , (accessed 1/26/2015). 4. Morse, R. and M. Foster, “How U.S. News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings”, in US News
, Hocevar D, Hagedorn LS. A social cognitive construct validation: Determining women’s and men's success in engineering programs. J Higher Educ. 2007;78(3):337-364.4. Vogt C. An account of women’s progress in engineering: A social cognitive perspective. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2003;9(3&4):217-238.5. Zeldin AL, Pajares F. Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers. Am Educ Res J. 2000;37(1):215-246.6. Lent R, Brown S. Cognitive assessment of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy: A thought-listing analysis. J Career Assess. 1996;4(1):33-46.7. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduate Leave the Sciences. 12th ed. Boulder, CO
control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited presentations - 13 plenary - at international and national forums, conferences and corporations. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research academic success and professional development (ASAP) program that has served over 500 students. These efforts have been supported by NSF STEP, S-STEM, and CSEM grants as well as industry. Dr. Rodriguez’ research inter- ests include: control of nonlinear distributed parameter, and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment (FAME); design and control of micro-air vehicles (MAVs), control of bio
Initiative, American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference, 2014.[5] E.M. Kim, T.F.S. Jr., F.G. Jacobitz, Student Peer Teaching in Engineering LaboratorySituations, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2014.[6] M.A. Munoz-Garcıa, G.P. Moreda, N. Hernandez-Sanchez, V. Valino, Student ReciprocalPeer Teaching as a Method for Active Learning: An Experience in an ElectrotechnicalLaboratory, J Sci Educ Technol, 22 (2013) 729–734.[7] D. Borrelli, S. Masten, Empowering Engineering Students in the Educational Process,American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2008.[8] L. Fiorella, R.E. Mayer, The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teachingexpectancy, Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 38 (2013) 281
asking students to vote for a favorite among the fivepresentations that they have reviewed. We suggest that it could be even more valuable to askstudents to grade those five presentations based on the assessment criteria that they receivedbefore recording their own videos. This grading exercise could be included in the peer feedbackexercise.Take-home essay exam with open-ended question(s). Group II argued that it is not necessary toassess student learning of individual ILOs since the ILOs are inseparable from each other – if astudent achieves one of them, he/she will achieve others as well. One of the group memberssuggested that the teacher should “simply ask students to address such a big, complex problem”.The group suggested that examination
to the following for their contributions to the learning modules: KimWoodrow and members of the Woodrow lab, Suzie Pun, Barry Lutz, Rahil Jain, and IanAndrews.Bibliography1. Yilmaz, M., Garcia, C., Guillen, T. & Ramirez, D. (2011). A K-12 Advanced Research Camp for Engineeringand Science Disciplines. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference 2011, Vancouver, Page 26.283.14Canada, 2011. 2. Yilmaz, M., Ren, J., Ramirez, D., Custer, S. & Coleman, J. (2010). An Improved K-12 Outreach Camp
misconceptions.23AcknowledgementsWe thank the National Science Foundation for funding this work through grant NSF 0918531,0918436, 0918552, and 0920242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Page 26.404.11NSF. 1 Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–166.2 Steif, P. S. & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometric