extent to which you agree with the following statement. a. Society views engineers as an asset. 9. To what extent does your sense of who you are (i.e., your personal identity) overlap with your sense of what an engineer is (i.e., the identity of an engineer)? [Scale 1= not at all, to 8= to a great extent]. ReferencesAnderson, C. B., Lee, H. Y., Byars-Winston, A., Baldwin, C. D., Cameron, C., & Chang, S. (2016). Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy, Interest, and Outcome Expectations for Career Development in Academic Medicine. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(1), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565780Barney, C. C. (2017). An Analysis of
Life History in a Social Science Perspective. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 1989.[20] D. J. Clandinin and F. M. Connelly, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.[21] F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, Teachers as Curriculum Planners: Narratives of Experience. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1988.[22] J. W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2005.[23] P. B. Myers and K. D. Myers, Myers-Briggs Type Indicators. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, 1998.[24] A. S. Denzer and K. E. Hedges, “From CAD to
positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114.[7] G. Crisp and I. Cruz, “Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 525–545, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2.[8] S. L. Fletcher, D. C. Newell, L. D. Newton, and M. R. Anderson-Rowland, “The wise summer bridge program: Assessing student attrition, retention, and program effectiveness,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2001, pp. 10605–10611.[9] S. C. de Janasz and S. E. Sullivan, “Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol
Monica Cardella was serving at the National ScienceFoundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References[1] R. Yin, Qualitative research from start to finish, 2 nd ed., New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2016.[2] F. Marton, “Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us,” Instr. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 177–200, 1981.[3] M. F. Pang, “Two Faces of Variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 145–156, Jun. 2003.[4] F. Marton, “Phenomenography: A
Classroom to Increase Students’ Engagement and Interaction in a Mechanical Engineering Course on Machine Design," International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 19-34, 2017, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v7i4.7427.[6] E. Blair, C. Maharaj, and S. Primus, "Performance and perception in the flipped classroom," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1465-1482, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10639-015-9393-5.[7] C. Rotellar and J. Cain, "Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing the Flipped Classroom," American journal of pharmaceutical education, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 34, 2016, doi: 10.5688/ajpe80234.[8] J. O'Flaherty and C. Phillips, "The use of flipped classrooms in higher
and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 2005.[3] K. E. Bledsoe, R. Shieh, Y.-S. Park, and E. Gummer, “Role perceptions and role dynamics between graduate scientists and K-12 teachers in a school-university outreach project: Understudied constructs,” J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–122, 2004.[4] C. Gartland, “Student ambassadors: ‘Role-models’, learning practices and identities,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., 2015.[5] M. Portsmore, C. Rogers, and M. Pickering, “STOMP: Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program.” Proc. 2003 Annu. Conf. American Soc. Engineering Education, Nashville, TN, USA. https
productivity. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 923-954.12. Potter, H., Higgins, G. E., & Gabbidon, S. L. (2011). The influence of gender, race/ethnicity, and faculty perceptions on scholarly productivity in criminology/criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(1), 84-101.13. Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students' research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791-805.14. Lev, E. L., Kolassa, J., & Bakken, L. L. (2010). Faculty mentors’ and students’ perceptions of students’ research self-efficacy. Nurse Education Today, 30(2), 169-174.15. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., &
. 141-147, 2010.[3] D. Xu, & S.S. Jaggars, “The impact of online learning on students' course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 37, no. 46-57, 2013.[4] L.L. Long, & J. A. Mejia, “Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers for underrepresented engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 211-218, 2016.[5] D. Lawton, N. Vye, J. Bransford, E. Sanders, M. Richey, D. French, & R. Stephens, “Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessments,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 244-287, 2012.[6] S. Badjou, & R. Dahmani, “Current status of online science and
. 13Litzinger, T., Van Meter, P., Firetto, C., Passmore, L., Masters, C., Turns, S., Gray, G., Costanzo, F., & Zappe, S. (2010). A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 337–337.Lutz, B. D., Ironside, A. J., Hunsu, N., Groen, C. J., Brown, S. A., Adesope, O., & Simmons, D. R. (2018). Measuring Engineering Students’ In-Class Cognitive Engagement: Survey Development Informed by Contemporary Educational Theories. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/30795McCord, R. E., & Matusovich, H. M. (2019). Naturalistic observations of metacognition in engineering: Using observational methods to study metacognitive
talent at the crossroads,” National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, Washington DC, 20115. W.B. Harvey, “American council on education (ace), minorities in higher education twenty- first annual status report (2003-2004),” American Council on Education, 1-100, 20056. P. Gurin, E.L. Dey, E.L. Hurtado, Gurin, P., “Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes,” Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330-366, 20027. P. Gurin, B.R.A. Nagda, G.E., “The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship,” Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 17-34, 20048. A.L. Antonio, M.J. Chang, K. Hakuta, D.A. Kenny, S. Levin, & J.F. Milem, J. F. “Effects of racial
95 R-Square 5.57% R-Square Adjusted 3.21% S (Pooled Standard Deviation) 1.454 Table 7. Analysis of Variance Results for Problem 1 ANOVA Source df SS MS F P Group 1 10.287 10.287 4.867 0.029* Grade on Exam 1 2 2.827 1.414 0.669 0.514 Error 120 253.64 2.114 Total 123 268.60 2.184 *5% significance level, ** 1
: If yes, what disadvantages did that introduce? o Free Response, only answered by students in multidisciplinary groups • Q9: Based on your experiences, what is the greatest challenge for effective communication between team members? o Free Response • Q10: I feel the collaboration within my team was successful when working together towards our learning objective(s). o 5-Point Likert Response (strongly agree to strongly disagree) • Q11: I feel that my groups learning objectives were achieved. o 5-Point Likert Response (strongly agree to strongly disagree) • Q12: I feel the deliverable(s) my team achieved are appropriate for our defined group learning objectives
/262274614_Simply_Python_for_CS0/links/54de78c40cf296663786a2a1/Simply-Python-for-CS0.pdfArora, S. A. S. (2018, September 5). Learn Python: Tutorials for Beginners, Intermediate, andAdvanced Programmers. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from https://stackify.com/learn-python-tutorials/.Ateeq, M., Habib, H., Umer, A., & Rehman, M. (2014). C++ or Python? Which One to Beginwith: A Learner's Perspective. In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning inComputing and Engineering (pp. 64–69). (Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271425337_C_or_Python_Which_One_to_Begin_with_A_Learner's_Perspective)Bell, C. (2017). MicroPython for the Internet of Things: A Beginner’s Guide to Programmingwith Python on Microcontrollers. Apress. https://link.springer.com
preparedness and self-efficacy. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2012. [4] S Marikunte, F Harackiewicz, J Nicklow, and L Chevalier. Benefits and challenges of training teaching assistants. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2006. [5] RJ Gustafson. Determining impact of a course on teaching in engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. [6] S Montgomery. A hands-on course on teaching engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering
, Cohort 2 has almost twice the number of students. This is one set ofdata points that suggest the approaches utilized in STRIDE are not only effective, but may evenbe improving in their execution. It should be noted that there could also be various reasons forthese changes, and continuous improvement and revisiting of new data is recommended. A boostin overall average of Cohort 2 over Cohort 1 could have been as a result of a stronger incomingfirst year class. It could have also been due to the recent implementation of university-wide firstyear advising. In the year that Cohort 1 was in their first year, the university did not have its newFirst Year advising model. In Cohort 2’s first year, the university did have it. Hence, this couldhave also
Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitive and educational psychology. Her research has included classroom learning, person perception, health perceptions, and jury decision making.Dr. Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of Washington in
] N. A. Tran and M. J. Nathan, “Pre-College Engineering Studies: An Investigation of theRelationship Between Pre-college Engineering Studies and Student Achievement in Science andMathematics,” J. Eng. Educ., 2010.[2] “Boston-Area Summer Programs for Middle & High School Students,” 2020. [Online].Available: https://oeop.mit.edu/resources/boston-area-summer-programs-middle-high-school-students.[3] R. Hammack, T. A. Ivey, J. Utley, and K. A. High, “Effect of an Engineering Camp onStudents ’ Perceptions of Engineering and Technology and Technology,” J. Pre-College Eng.Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, 2015.[4] J. Rodriguez, S. Butt, and T. Fredericks, “Pre-College Activities to Promote PositivePerception of Engineering and Engineering
Paper ID #29625Faculty Experience in Team Teaching in Construction Management HigherEducationDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil
] L. J. Virguez Barroso, “A Quantitative Analysis of First Year Engineering Students’ Courses Perceptions and Motivational Beliefs in Two Introductory Engineering Courses,” Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2017.[3] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models,” in 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 1–5.[4] V. Tinto and A. Goodsell, “Freshman interest groups and the first-year experience: Constructing student communities in a large university,” Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 1994
UndergraduateEngineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review. J. Eng. Educ., 106: 475-526.doi:10.1002/jee.20171[3] Woods, D.R.,Problem-Based Learning: Helping Your Students Gainthe Most fromPBL,Woods, Waterdown ON ISBN 0-9698725-1-8, 1996,Chapter 3, distributed on the WWWthrough http://chemeng.mcmas-ter.ca/problem based learning/.[4] Engineering Criteria 2000, 2nd Ed., Engineering Accreditation Commission of theAccreditation Board for Engineering Technology (ABET), Baltimore, MD, 1996.[5] Sternberg, R.J., “Criteria for Intellectual Skills Training,”Educa-tional Researcher, Feb., 1983,pp. 6-12.[6] Robin S Adams, Jennifer Turns, Cynthia J Atman, Educating effective engineering designers:the role of reflective practice, Design Studies, Volume 24, Issue 3, 2003
oftraditional textbooks, although the latter were allowed to be used. Through short tasks thatwere designed to be initiated and terminated during in-classroom sessions, mostly to beworked in peers, we cover three general moments in the designed learning experience: ashort introduction, a discussion and a closure argument with general feedback by the end ofeach assignment.Each guide has different learning objectives: 1. Guide one: a. To distinguish sets that may or may not be subspaces of 𝑅𝑅 2 or 𝑅𝑅 3 , using GeoGebra for visualization. b. To construct linear combinations in 𝑅𝑅 2 and 𝑅𝑅 3 and identify the geometrical locus they define. c. To determine which vectors belong to the span of S for
to evaluatethe impact of retention factors on larger private and public institutions. Machine Learning and datamining can be very rewarding as researchers can apply many different methods to institutions of all sizesand types as needed. The suggestion of establishing a centralized center supporting different kinds ofresearch to solve retention problems could impact the university’s marketing and recruitment activities aswell. Improved management of new, innovative, and existing resources could improve retention andallow for greater financial stability at Jonson C. Smith University.References[1] L. A. Spakman, W. S. Maulding and j. G. Roberts, "Non-cognitive predictors of student success in college.," College Student Journa, p. 46, Fall
listen to me: Anticipated power and women’s disinterestin male-dominated domains,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 116-128, Jan. 2015.[4] V. VanDoren, “Road to engineer's license is both difficult and worthwhile,” ControlEngineering, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 21, Jan. 1998.[5] J. Keen and A. Salvatorelli, “Principles and Practice of Engineering Exam Pass Rate byGender,” Engineering Studies, vol. 10, no. 2-3, pp. 158-168, Sept. 2015.[6] E. Hamm, “Have you considered certification?” Cost Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 6, Feb.1995.[7] J. Naveda and S. Seidman, “Professional certification of software engineers: The CSDPprogram,” IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 73-77, Sept. 2005.[8] D. S. Sink and J. L. Higle, “Fusion
, SensePublishers, Rotterdam, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-980-7_2[2] (Available Online) https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/globalhighered/global-citizenship-%E2%80%93-what-are-we-talking-about-and-why-does-it-matter[3] Warrington, R.O., Kulacki, F.A., and Warrington, A. (2011), “Vision 2030 : A Time for Engineering Leadership”, Proceedings, 2011 INEER Conference, Belfast.[4] Urbina, J., Oliden, J. F., Tunno, P., Lakhtakia, A., Rodriguez, J., Estrada, M. L., Obonyo, E., Zappe, S. E., Masters, C. B., and Fonseca Pacheco, F. (2019, June), “Experience-Based Learning: Global Engineering Culture and Society”, Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32789[5] (Available Online
Graduate School: A Realistic Expectation or a Dangerous Dilemma,” New Dir. Student Serv., vol. 115, pp. 31–45, 2006, doi: 10.1002/ss.[10] S. K. Gardner, “Fitting the Mold of Graduate School: A Qualitative Study of Socialization in Doctoral Education,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 125–138, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x.[11] C. M. Golde, “Should i stay or should i go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 199–227, 2000, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0004.[12] S. K. Gardner and S. K. Gardner, “Contrasting the Socialization Experiences of Doctoral Students in High- and Low-Completing Departments : A Qualitative Analysis of
development programs and active learning in higher education.AcknowledgmentsThe authors of this paper gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundationfor this project under Grant No. JTFDXXX. References [1] Felder, R. M., & Brent. R. (2016). Teaching & learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [2] Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College teaching, 44(2), 43-47. [3] Jungst, S., Likclider, L. L., & Wiersema, J. (2003). Providing Support for Faculty Who Wish to Shift to a Learning-Centered Paradigm in Their Higher Education Classrooms. The Journal of Scholarship
class or not.The majority of students are sympathetic to a student who may arrive late to class, and considerthis a “minor thing” as highlighted in the following comment: Professor absolutely disliked students walking in late in class and would ask them to leave if they walked a minute past the class start time. I think this was not only unwelcoming and embarrassing for the student(s) arriving late, but being forced to miss the lecture, despite paying for college tuition was unfair. This act of negative reinforcement also caused the student(s) to be behind and had to catch up on the material on their own time. While I understand that walking late into class can be distracting for the students and the
] Johnson, M.J., & Sheppard, S. D. (2004). Relationships between engineering students and faculty demographicsand stakeholders working to affect change. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 139-151.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year singleinstitution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-246.[3] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., & Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and ethnicity differences infreshmen engineering student attitudes: A cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477-489.[4] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: Amulti-year, multi-institution
. D. Graaff, "The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education," Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5– 16, 2017.[2] P. Shekhar, M. Demonbrun, M. Borrego, C. J. Finelli, M. Prince, C. Henderson, and C. Waters, "Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 597–609, 2015.[3] A. Kirn and L. Benson, "Engineering Students Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 87–112, 2018.[4] S. Tharayil, M. Borrego, M. Prince, K. A. Nguyen, P. Shekhar, C. J. Finelli, and C. Waters, "Strategies to mitigate student