Tajvidi P.E., Utah State University Moe Tajvidi is a PhD candidate in engineering education at Utah State University. His BS and MS degrees are in structural engineering and he has a sixteen year long career experience in structural engineering along with four years of instruction of civil engineering courses. In his teaching experience he has been committed to introducing real life engineering problems to the learning environment. The subjects he has taught include engineering mechanics (statics, dynamics, and mechanics of material), structural analysis and design, soil mechanics and foundation engineering. His research areas of interest include: use of computer simulation in engineering education, project-based
part of electrical and computer engineeringexpands, it is necessary for us to explore how curriculum design should be addressed. If we areto prepare students for a career in modern industry, it is imperative that we reconsider the skill-set that an undergraduate needs to succeed.19 Virtually none of our undergraduates go intosingle-topic specialties with their undergraduate degrees; they are members of multi-disciplinarydesign teams and are frequently in leadership-track positions in which they must considertechnological problems with concerns for the complex relationships across topics - theboundaries are fuzzier than ever.At the University of Virginia we are addressing this with a new breadth-first curriculum thatplaces a strong emphasis on
, electric power and electronics for technology students, senior design, as well as a long-standing residential/online graduate course on the fundamentals of biorenewable resources and technology. He has leveraged this interest into over $10M in teaching-related grant funding over his career and has contributed broadly to the literature in areas of curriculum, student risk characterization, and mentoring. He believes well trained, curious, thoughtful people are crucial to a university’s research effort, and similarly to the function and survival of society. For this reason, the overarching goal of his teaching is to impart the core content needed by the students, and to do so while encouraging inquisition and higher
engineering programs for K-12 education.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously, she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, after having obtained her PhD in 2007 from the University of Illinois at Chicago under the supervision of Dr. Thomas L. Theis. She has developed a research program in sustainable engineering of bioproducts. Her research ranges from design of systems based on industrial ecology and byproduct synergies, life cycle and
Paper ID #20287Examining engineering concepts in practice: Is conceptual understandingrelevant to practice?Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Mr. Matthew Stephen Barner
faculty members fromtwo-year and four-year colleges in USA have requested our modules and IPAR. After a professorat Fairleigh Dickinson University in Hackensack NJ tried our material in his graduate class inforensics administration, a retired policeman who is going to start another career in computerforensics wrote: “I had completed both the Academic Dishonesty case and Incident Responseportion of this forensic game. I was very impressed about the real life experience it gives you.Everything that you could encounter is right in front of you. But I was more impressed with usingthe real life tools like FTK imager and Autopsy and well as other that the game tells you todownload in advance. I’m a believer in this game process of learning.”6
engineering programs at the University of Houston, Texas Tech University, and the University of Texas at Tyler. To promote confidence in student support services, the program’s department chair, the South Campus engineering program coordinator, and the faculty of the engineering program all maintain open-door policies. Additionally, staff and faculty meet with 5 students regularly—collectively and one-on-one—to discuss career goals and ensure necessary course sequences. This is especially important for students who may be the first in their families to attend college. Faculty members also mentor pre-engineering students in the Clear Horizons Early College High School, which is
Paper ID #20381Extended Faculty Development Effort Based on Faculty NeedsDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Mr. Matthew Stephen Barner, Oregon State University M.S
major Jhalil Paynefrom Central State University, pre-service STEM education teacher Brein Babbs from CentralState University, and in-service teachers David Oldiges and Kerensa Hughes from Xenia HighSchool/Greene County Career Center and Dayton Public Schools, respectively, for assisting withthe preparation of cellulosic materials for polymer fabrication and characterization presented inthis paper.References1. Roksa, J., Kilgo, C., Trolian, T., Pascarella, E. Blaich C., and Wise, K. “Engaging withDiversity: How Positive and Negative Diversity Interactions Influence Students’ CognitiveOutcomes”, Journal of Higher Education (2017) 88:3 297-322.2. Larive, C. K. “Problem-based learning in the analytical chemistry laboratory course”, AnalBioanal Chem
. “Pursuing and Adjusting to Engineering Majors: A Qualitative Analysis,” J. Career Assess., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–63.
] Hsieh, S. "Skill Sets Needed for Industrial Automation Careers" 2016 ASEE AnnualConference, June 26-29, New Orleans, LA.[4] Robotics Industries Association (RIA). (2008-2017) The Growth of Robotics in STEMEducation. Accessed January 19,2017 from: http://www.robotics.org/robotic-content.cfm?id=243[5] Kapoor, Chetan. August 2015. Breaking down the robot-factory language barrier. Accessedon January 19, 2017 from Robotics Tomorrow Online Robotics Trade Magazine:http://www.roboticstomorrow.com/article/2015/08/breaking-down-the-robot-factory-language-barrier/6544/[6] Shum, A., Wang, Y., and Hsieh, S., “Design, Build and Remote Control of a MiniatureAutomated Robotic Sorting System,” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 –8887), Volume
, no. 1 (2016): 36–39.5. National Institutes of Health, “Design by Biomedical Undergraduate Teams (DEBUT) Challenge,”National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, May 22, 2013,https://www.nibib.nih.gov/training-careers/undergraduate-graduate/design-biomedical-undergraduate-teams-debut-challenge.
. Question Mean Sd The lab/project work I do for this course is relevant to 4.20 0.71 my learning Doing the labs/projects for this course is interesting for 4.40 0.72 me The labs/projects for this course show me how to 4.30 0.64 problem-solve in Computer Engineering The labs/projects in this course make the content more 4.20 0.84 understandable Understanding the content of this course will benefit 4.10 0.75 me in my career Doing the labs/projects shows me real life applications 4.10 0.75
, college life could beconsidered the “training wheels” of life. It is the time period when you leave home and yourresponsibilities gradually increase until you a fully responsible for yourself. During that timeperiod, especially if you are living on campus you are exposed to living and learning with otherstudents training for life as well. When receiving a traditional education, the actual collegeexperience includes meal plans, Greek life, sporting events, festivities, etc. [7]Another benefit of receiving a traditional education is the networking. The environment iscomprised of students, faculty and professionals in all degree areas. Prior to graduating, thenetworking students gained can come from the career center, previous professors, or
as effective studyhabits, note-taking strategies, working effectively in groups, and several others. Additionally,Career Development Services offers numerous seminars on resume writing, interviewing, andinternships. The PIs collaborated with these groups and arranged for a seminar series to behosted within the engineering building and targeted specifically towards engineering students.The workshop topics were selected based on the interest survey completed by programparticipants, but were also open and advertised to all students enrolled in the introductoryengineering courses during the semester the workshops were offered. Attendance at theworkshops ranged from three to eight students, representing, on average, less than five percent ofthe
Bent, Bucknell University Edward Bent is currently an undergraduate student at Bucknell University majoring in chemical engineer- ing.Rachel Cincotta, Bucknell University Rachel Cincotta is a student at Bucknell University pursuing a BS in Chemical Engineering.Kyle Andrew MacDougall, Bucknell University Chemical Engineering Department Currently a Chemical Engineering student with a process concentration in Bucknell University’s class of 2017. Throughout my studies at Bucknell I have gained many areas of interest, especially in the fields of food science, pharmaceutical engineering, and material science. After graduation I plan on pursuing a career as a process engineer, either in the food or pharmaceutical
) sponsored AeroDesign competitions, as well as theAssociation for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) sponsored StudentUnmanned Aerial Systems (SUAS) competitions are ideal outlets for students to complementtheir classroom knowledge with hands-on experimental experience towards an Educational outcome - where students develop a deeper understanding of the interconnections and importance of class material, covered over their undergraduate career, as it pertains to achieving a specific goal – in this case, a stable and robust aircraft that reliably achieves an overall mission.Prior experience, as discussed by Phillips et. al. in [1] has shown that these competitions alsogenerate and foster important secondary channels of learning
administrators in first year programs understand whattheir students are learning in the first year, how students are defining the practice of engineering,and the current themes that the authors found from students definitions of the practice ofengineering. The researchers thought it would be helpful to include an analysis of the syllabusused in the class and how much time was dedicated to each topic to see if there was anycorrelation to how the students were defining the practice of engineering.BackgroundThe career of engineering has long carried the reputation as a field of people that are good atmath and science 2. However, now it is recognized as a distinct and separate discipline with itsown components of thinking and execution 3. This research
technology as career fields. This survey instrument was chosen forthis study as the instrument is currently being used to examine effects of makerspaces andmaking projects on engineering students (Morocz et al, 2015; Morocz et al, 2016: and Talley etal, 2016). These other ongoing studies allow comparisons of this preliminary data to those ofother student groups in future work. As the students in this study were in a senior design course,it was expected that their engineering design self-efficacy would increase as a result of thecourse and project as observed by Miskioglu (2016) in a similar study of engineering design self-efficacy in a senior design course. This preliminary data was collected to compare to futuresemesters, when not all students
Paper ID #18550Mr. Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University Rodney Boehm is the Director of Aggies Invent and an Associate Professor of Practice in the Dwight Look College of Engineering. He has broad industry experiences, including over 30 years in all aspects of the telecommunications industry (sales, marketing, manufacturing, business development, and technical design), the creation of a telecommunications standard (SONET - Synchronous Optical Network) for the fiber optics industry that is still in use internationally over 30 years later, a wide variety of business expe- riences in international companies, and start up experiences that have helped him lead a very successful industry career. He holds a BS and ME in
not available to differentiate student perceptions by age, it is importantto note that difference in perceptions of engineering could have also be attributed to varyingdegrees of awareness of the various career choices possible. Additionally, data on the students’familiarity with mechanical engineering (like if they had mechanical engineers in their family)was also unavailable and could have affected variations in student perceptions as well.Conclusions and Implications This study was positioned to inform a larger study of student experiences with possibledata on what students were expecting of their experience of mechanical engineering. If we wereable to uncover that say, African American young girls had some trend in how they
-instructor interaction,questions, and class discussions. Once background in a particular concept is established, theflipped classroom method of in-class problem-solving and discussions can be pursued.Lecture videos can help improve student motivation and information retention1. Hence, theauthor’s objective is to present electromagnetics through methods compatible with today’sinternet-connected students. Lecture videos (.mp4 files) are stored on dropbox.com; first offeredin Fall Quarter 2015. Another goal is to show students how this important subject directly relatesto present-day applications (all wireless systems) and how it serves as the gateway to interestingand rewarding electrical engineering careers. Research has shown that actively-engaged
into the classes, which has causedsignificant discrepancy between the college course content with the industry expectations. Thispaper presents a summary of the currently widely adopted geotechnical engineering programused in the practice and discussed the ways to incorporate these design programs in the existinggeotechnical engineering courses. One example is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of thesedesign programs in improving the effectiveness in teaching and stimulating the students’interests on the subject and pursuing a career in geotechnical engineering.Geotechnical Programs and Their Potential Implementation in TeachingThis section presents the commonly used geotechnical engineering programs used in the practice.The geotechnical
experiences will include open-ended designchallenges formulated by industry. Such challenges would likely be deployed on a regional basis, and beoffered more frequently than the twice per year global online game. In addition, the EAC’s emphasis ontransdisciplinary integration makes it a potential platform for universities to give accepted engineeringstudents (e.g. students between secondary & university education) a fun overview of engineering’s role inshaping civilization, to help students envision career “missions”. Additionally, future EACs may giveeducators the option to customize the game according to degree program learning objectives, and seamlessintegration with learning management systems (LMS) such as Blackboard, to augment courses with
with the objective that during subsequent years, this type of collaboration can be replicated with additional engineering groups, interested in join forces to study cross-border multidisciplinary collaboration. An alternative method is to include Service Learning activities to include high school students interested in pursuing a professional career in the STEM field.Conclusions and Future WorkAs discussed throughout this paper and according to this first cross-border effectivecollaboration, partnership among UTRGV and TecNM/ITM for technology development andinnovation is a strategic program planned for the better understanding of our multiculturalcross-border region, to prepare engineering students skilled in
services and supports with the system priorities of improving Access to a SUNY education, increasing the number of students who Complete SUNY programs, and ensuring that SUNY programs prepare students for Success in their lives and careers. She initially joined SUNY in 2009 as as Director of the SUNY Center for Professional Development, a university-wide program providing training and professional development to faculty and staff across the SUNY campuses in support the SUNY Strategic Plan, The Power of SUNY. In that role she led the development of competency-based, community-driven certificate programs and the establishment of services and an online platform to support, promote, and facilitate communities of practice
– Global Practices1. IntroductionCompetency Based Education (CBE), which focus on flexibility, mastery of abilities and the roleof the professor as a coach, is fast expanding worldwide. This is the result of an approach thatresponds to current global needs. Universities are aware of the changes and challenges ahead,and are committed to developing “global citizens” 1. One dimension they are working on, is theinternationalization of their students.The promotion of scientific and technological careers is on the agenda of international agenciesand countries. It is expected that the demand of Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) professionals will increase rapidly in the next 10 years. Also, thecompetencies they must have are going to
- 60 -- 61 - Program Model Student Profile• Six week bridge Low income, first program during the generation summer before freshman Rank top 5% in high year begins. school• Obtain college credits for Physics & Calculus I.• Beyond the first summer, cohort model scaffolds 4 year experience. - 62 -Scaffolding Success Academic & Social 1st yr Integration 2nd yr Major/Degree Focus 3rd yr Honing Career Goals Secure Job or Grad 4th yr School - 63 - Example Programming (4th
whether students over time perform at higher rates than previous years. Ideally, to testgains across a given span of time, data is collected longitudinally, tracking an individual acrosstheir college career. Because we assume that regardless of student ability and demographicbackground, as whole, students will have higher learning gains as they progress through theengineering program, we assert that by aggregating and averaging out values over different classstanding groups can provide insights similar to that of a longitudinal study.Figures 1 and 2, where average scores are examined across learning components and stage levelsfor different class levels. The results show a general upward trend for both variables: learningcomponents and development
teacher’s ability to intuit solid state chemistry concepts from other knowledge. It is alsopossible that teachers who decide to pursue professional development in this area are influencedby prior exposure to the material (for example, by teachers in their district who teach materialsscience or workshops attended earlier in their career). Table 3: Descriptive Statistics comparing the baseline content knowledge of teachers in control group and treatment group.Parametric and nonparametric analyses confirmed that the control group of teachers was significantly less knowledgeable about materials science. This was true both when the treatment group included all teachers and only new teachers.Dependent Variable: Pre-camp Number of Items Correct