-represented minorities (URMs) inengineering education.However, despite numerous calls to diversify engineering [4], [5] and the initiation of thesepolicies and programs, there is still a lack of diversity in the proportion of engineering bachelor’sdegrees awarded to people of color that is then reflected in the profession [6]. The representationof minorities among engineering graduates is not keeping pace with the changing demographiclandscape of the general population or undergraduate population of the 21st century. Themajority of undergraduate engineering degrees in the U.S. are awarded to students who identifyas White. In 2015, White students received 65% of the engineering Bachelor’s degrees, Asianstudents over 13%, and Hispanic students nearly
graduates.The Needs of IndustryIn order to maintain a strong focus on industry needs, both RCBC and RU have engaged industrypartners in skills inventory activities that have identified the most important non-technical andtechnical skills. These identified skills were then used as the basis for the new degree programs,with appropriate competencies strongly linked to the course and program outcomes.This important information was gathered through activities such as a technology conference inwhich 59 participants, including academic and industry partners, discussed the critical skills andcompetencies that are needed in industry and should be reflected in the new MET curriculum.Additionally, the Principal Investigator and Co-Principal Investigator have
related to an ability toidentify, formulate, and solve electrical engineering problems, which students have 50.00%‘strongly agree’ and 39.30% ‘agree’ of statement. Question 2 is “I understand fundamentalbuilding blocks to design a memory, control unit, processor system of computer, alighted to anability to design electrical systems, components, or processes to meet desired needs, reflects at7.14% of disagree. It is because that this class has no lab sessions associated with it. Studentshave no opportunity to perform lab and course project. Moreover, in comparison with theinstructor’s previous experience teaching this course with a traditional project-based method (i.e.no student-centered and no back-and-forth module for reflection and adjustments
intensive course for our discipline, and the students satisfy this requirementby writing ten 500-word essays on a variety of design-related topics, including the ancillarytopics listed above. The student increase in understanding and incorporation of these ancillarytopics into their design is partially reflected in the upward-trending average score for the writingintensive assignments, which went from a mid-B (86) in the 2016 course offering to a high-B(89) or low-A (91) in the 2017 and 2018 course offerings.Figure 1. Enhanced Structure and Functionality of TAMUK Chemical Engineering CapstoneDesign ExperiencePerformance of Student Teams in Capstone DesignTable 1 presents some of the factors that may be unique to Hispanics or other
implementation of UDL focuses on integrating the three principles across four criticalinstructional elements: Clear Goals, Intentional Planning for Learner Variability, FlexibleMethods and Materials, and Timely Progress Monitoring [5]. These critical elements areimplemented using an instructional design model that includes five steps: (1) Establish ClearOutcomes, (2) Anticipate Learner Variability, (3) Establish Clear Assessment and MeasurementPlans, (4) Design the Instructional Experience, and (5) Reflect and Develop NewUnderstandings. UDL makes use of a variety of technology-enhanced, evidence-based, strategiesand instructional resources to enhance instruction for all students.Preliminary Outcomes of RET and Train the Trainer Model of SupportsEarly
Model (PSRDM) created by Canneyand Bielefeldt [4]. The model seeks to gauge “the development of personal andprofessional responsibility in [students]” and merges these two dimensions togetherfor the professional connectedness realm [4]. The personal social awareness piecerelates to the development of one’s feeling “a moral or social obligation to help1This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1635554. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. 1others” while
accountability, each student is thenasked to formulate a discussion question and be prepared to lead a 10-15 minute in-class groupdiscussion. This approach was successfully used in a senior-level course on digitalcommunications [11]. The accountability requires student reflection to provide a productivelearning experience when the students meet in a group setting. The professor can then randomlyselect or solicit a student volunteer to lead the discussion.The F2F learning is a more expensive mode of communication when compared to onlinecommunication. F2F learning requires both instructor and students to be physically together. Ina F2F environment, learners must work together at the same time and place, to reach a commonunderstanding of what is to be
Web-basedMultimediaPre-labs Figure1.Atheoreticalframeworkforthedevelopmentofweb-basedmultimediapre-labs.Content: explanation of related theoriesStudents require adequate time for interaction and reflection in order to enable meaningfullearning [21]. However, when executing an experiment, students have to carry out many taskswithin a set limited time, leaving no time for reflection [23], [31]. One method to overcome thislimitation is to prepare students conceptually through pre-labs before they attend the laboratory.Thus, pre-labs should focus on theory in addition to procedure by explaining the related theory,connecting theory to procedural steps, providing a rational for each step, and explaining what
, we found that the patterns by gender reflect themesidentified in the literature for major preferences by gender. Zafar, for example, found that collegeaged women favored degree programs emphasized social responsibility, a concern for people andthe environment [15].Table 2: Analysis of students’ academic standing in the year following their departure fromengineeringColumn1 Women Men Count % Count %Not enrolled 205 16% 1733 20%Good Standing ProbationRemoved or Reinstated 28 14% 286 17%Switched Non Stem 92 7
journal article and five conference publications connected to this project.Data CollectionThe primary source of data were interviews conducted in dyads with collaborating engineeringand education faculty members. Semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 60 to 90minutes were designed and implemented to elicit understandings about futures, values, systems,and strategic thinking and how these ways of thinking were used by the engineer-educator teams.Dyads were first asked to describe their collaborative projects followed by a moment to reflectindividually. The individual reflection involved writing about their thinking related to theirengineering-education collaboration. This activity was used to prepare participants forverbalization of
line configurations including bundled conductors and usage of standard conductor data tables for calculation of transmission line parameters are introduced. Transmission line equivalent circuit parameters, voltage, current, active and reactive power variations along the transmission line, π model and its approximations for short, medium and long lines are presented and discussed. 6. Power Flow in Power Systems: One-line diagrams, bus types, Ybus matrix calculations, power balance equations, iterative solutions such as Gauss and Newton Raphson methods along with examples are introduced. 7. Power Transformers: Ideal transformer current voltage relationships, turns ratio, reflected
to gather near-immediatefeedback from the students about the teaching-learning process which the instructor can use to improvestudent learning and his/her teaching effectiveness [1]. Classroom assessment techniques also helpstudents reflect on their understanding of the course content as the course is unfolding and, in this way,promote the development of lifelong learning skills [2]. Multiple classroom assessment techniques havebeen described and collated in the classic reference “Classroom Assessment Techniques: a Handbookfor College Teachers” by T.A. Angelo and K.P. Cross [3].The “muddy points” or “muddiest point” (MPs) is one of the most commonly used classroomassessment technique that consists in asking students at the end of a lesson to
could be fosteredthrough a series of reading assignments and reflections in a junior-level material science course 4.Henderson et al. studied whether mindsets influence a student’s engineering identity over timeand to see if this relationship differs by gender 5. Dringenberg et al. held a series of focus groupson the growth mindset with first-year engineering students, and found that it was useful forstudents in unpacking and reflecting on past experiences, and for educators in understanding thenature of intelligence 6. Lastly, Zappe et al. described instructor training to understand the growthmindset and how to promote it when students approach assignments 7.Fostering a sense of belonging in undergraduate engineering majors has also been a
transition of developingan employed engineer persona. This shift in identity is reflected in writing as a student adjuststo the genre of the workplace and adapts to that workplace’s cultural engineering identity. Thisshift in writer identity creation can be compounded by the lack of practical writing help intechnical communication books (Wolfe, 2009, 2011). Wolfe (2011) notes that technicalcommunication books have shifted away from writing practice assignments to focus more onthe overall written product than on how to create the product over the years and assuming moreof a humanities bias in presentation of writing practices. There are elements of the written engineering work that may not become evident in engineering courses or in a
), where students are presented with a set of options to select theappropriate response. The responses of the students to the questions capture the level of awarenessand reflection on ethics. The final eight questions are designed to measure the level of interest ofengineering students on ethics.The concept questions were derived from the textbook by Barry and Seebauer13, and the shortcases used in the questionnaire were adapted from a list of cases published by the NationalAcademy of Engineers (NAE) (2014), National Society of Professional Engineers (2014), and theVanderbilt University Center for Ethics (2014). The questions were reviewed and endorsed by anexternal subject experts representing industry and academia who served as project
arbitrarily shaped/customized antennas, propagation in bentwaveguides, reflections/scattering of waves from discontinuities, etc. Examples of some of the (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 3. Some of the 3D visualizations developed. (a) Right-hand rule. (b) A rotating vector field and its Curl calculation. (c) Stoke’s Theorem representation and Electrostatic field of a dipole (d).visualizations that were developed are presented in Fig. 3. Specifically, Fig. 3(a) demonstratesthe right-hand rule for cross product operations, Fig. 3(b) illustrates the curl of a vector field, Fig.3(c) provides an interactive
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Impacting Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups in an Engineering Career PathwayAbstractThis work in progress describes the overall initiative in the program for engineering access,retention, and low-income-student success. It discusses the program structure, implementationof activities, outcomes for the first of five years of project, and reflections on our initial findings.IntroductionThe Program for Engineering Access, Retention, and LIATS Success (PEARLS) was establishedwith the objective of increasing success statistics of low-income, academically talented students(LIATS) in the College of Engineering (CoE) of the University of Puerto
learning, and collaborative learning [3]. The skills gained by incorporatingthese approaches are critical for students looking to pursue a career in the construction industry.Felder et al. reinforced the notion that active learning is more effective than lecturing as studentscan gain a deeper understanding of the material [4]. They also stressed the importance of practiceand reflection in the learning process. Freeman et al. compared studies focused on undergraduatestudents in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) that used active learningtechniques and those that used traditional approaches [5]. Average examination scores increasedby 6% in the active learning sections, thus highlighting the importance of active learning inSTEM
Hat)Fig 3: Instructor Encouraged Student Participation (Fall 2018 without Top Hat)One of the primary expectations of this research was that if students participated in classmore, their learning would increase and this would be reflected in their final grades. Ananalysis of the class average grades before and during the Phase I pilot did not reflect anincrease in student’s average grades. (Fig 4)Fig 4: Average Grades (In Percent)7. Summary of Key Findings and Future ResearchSince the deployment, there have not been any significant quantitative impact achievedby using Top Hat. Student participation in the end of semester surveys is not mandatory.Even though students were strongly encouraged to participate. The participation duringthe Phase I
—engineeringfaculty, leadership faculty, and industry practitioners—brought their respective experiencetogether to determine the learning outcomes. The practitioners then developed teaching materialsusing their experience designing curriculum to help new college hires and interns succeed in theworkplace.This content was delivered by the practitioners, who were paid as adjunct instructors, in Fall2018 and Spring 2019. There were seven modules, described below, each of which consisted of atwo-hour lesson scheduled during the regular senior capstone lab period. Each module consistedof mini-lectures, applied learning activities, discussion and written reflection. During this year-long course, the 16 students were assigned to applied project teams and thus had
homework, with quickfeedback. A final hurdle was that this was the author’s first time teaching Vibrations. Therefore,it was necessary to prioritize lesson plan preparation over delivery logistics. This precluded timeintensive efforts such as learning complicated software or prerecording lectures in an instructionallab environment.Mastery learning (or learner-centric) techniques introduced by Bloom in the 1970s and expandedby researchers over the last half century have an established track record for enhancing studentlearning.1–3 In particular, periodic formative assignments are necessary and should be designed sothat students reflect on mistakes and adjust their learning efforts as needed. Within the Vibrationscourse, the mechanisms for formative
engineeringstudents there were 296 academic misconduct incidents, of which 130 were committed bystudents enrolled in engineering technology programs, with a peak during the academic year2016-2017, as shown in Figure 1. This peak can be explained in part by an added commitment ofthe faculty to eliminate cheating as much as possible, especially after some of the senior studentexit interviews reflected the observation that there were still faculty who turn a blind eye oncheating. At the time this article was written at the end of fall 2019 semester, there were 12incidents of academic misconduct in College of Engineering, with three of them committed byET students.Examples of academic misconduct include: copying and submitting CAD drawings, homework,portions of
much more of a reflection upon me than the modules themselves. We get in aroutine and dropping something in is difficult for me. I would recommend that they prepareto drop those in.”In summary, both mathematics and STEM faculty members found value in the co-teachingexperience. The experience has created a cooperative culture between faculty members thathas led to benefits for both faculty members and students. In addition to gaining better insightinto each other’s disciplines, several faculty members remarked about how the model isadaptable to other situations.Student ObservationsIn interviews conducted by the external evaluator, students indicated they enjoyed the STEMprofessor coming into the classroom and giving them practical STEM problems
issues, in somecases also promotes positive environmental attitudes, behaviors, and values among variousstudent groups, which range between middle school and college [6]-[13]. Muderrisoglu andAltanlar [14] stated that although environmental attitude and intention may improve, the changemay not be reflected in behavior to the same degree. Lack of participation in activism towardsenvironmental issues among college students was noted as quite concerning [14].Along the lines of activism, Yazdanpanah et al. [13] studied young adults' intentions to conservewater. "The students’ attitude (the extent to which he/she believes that supporting a conservationwater scheme will deliver positive outcomes) was the main determinant of his/her willingness
bladder adaptive response, and (iii) understand the fundamental mechanisms that correlate the mechanical environment and the biological process of remodeling in the presence of an outlet obstruction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Effects of a New Assessment Model on Female and Under-Represented Minority StudentsAbstractIn 2016, Michigan State University developed a new model of classroom education andassessment in their Mechanics of Materials course. This model used a modified masteryapproach that stresses formative assessment, guidance in the problem-solving process, andstructured student reflection. We now refer to this new approach as SMART
primary difference was beams were previously unreinforced.Additionally, students previously constructed their own forms as opposed to using the lab-provided molds. The shift to this new exercise was made in order to put more focus on theinteraction between concrete and steel reinforcement. In addition, the lab report component wasadded to prompt students to reflect and understand what went on during fabrication and testing.Process – beam fabrication, testing, and report The entire “lab” consisted of three parts, utilizing two class days. Students had two“Beam Days”; one was fabrication and the other was testing. The final part was a report, thatwas generated by each student group. Students were divided into groups of three. Prior to
button and then placing the tube on the round metal part.” Or simplified like: the test tube as weightedEach student’s score was calculated by dividing the number of correct identifications (either trueor false) over the total number of statements (nine). The average results of all students in Figure1(b), suggest an improvement in their ability to identify elements of an effective writing. (a) (b) Figure 1. Pre and post survey results on: (a) students’ self-assessment of technical writing skills; (b) students’ scores of True/False statementsPart B:In addition to the pre and post survey items in part A, students were asked to reflect on
, (6) offers feedback and reflection, and (7) is of sustained duration.The engineering PD, including in-classroom deployment of activities and data collection, wasdesigned as an iterative process to be conducted over a three-year period. This will allow forimprovement and refinement of our approach. The first iteration, reported in this paper, consistedof seven high school science teachers who have agreed to participate in the PD, implement theproblem-framing activities, and collect student data over a period of one year. The PD itselfconsisted of the teachers comparing science and engineering, participating in problem-framingtraining and activities, and developing a design challenge scenario for their own courses.The participating teachers
operations in thechemical processing plant. The second design problem will present a plant troubleshootingscenario and examine the students’ ability to develop a solution to solve the problem that iscausing issues in the processing plant. At the end of the course the study participants will begiven an exit survey to evaluate the perception of their design abilities. Six months after thecourse has ended, participants will be asked to complete a longitudinal survey to reflect on howthey believe the course has impacted their chemical engineering process design competency.4.2 Phase TwoIn this phase the course will be executed with a VR component integrated into the coursedeliverables. The research will look at approximately 100 participants that are
, pp. 28-49, 1986.[11] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students' ways of experiencing human-centered design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28-59, Jan. 2013.[12] E. Dringenberg, J. A. Mendoza-Garcia, M. Tafur-Arciniegas, N. D Fila, and M.-C. Hsu, “Using phenomenography: Reflections on key considerations for making methodological decisions” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA, USA. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using- phenomenography-reflections-on-key-considerations-for-making-methodological- decisions[13] N. D. Fila and Ş Purzer, “Work in progress: A preliminary investigation of the