materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline data from the Ph.D. completion project,” Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.[2] C. Wendler et al., “The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States,” Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2010.[3] J. M. Jones, “The dual pandemics of COVID-19 and systemic racism: Navigating our path forward,” School Psychol., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 427-431, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1037/spq0000472.[4] C. Davies, C. A. Arbeit, and M. Yamaner
interactions. After analyzingthe results of Phase 2, we have been constructing a series of narratives to present findings fromboth Phases related to pertinent themes.The participants in this study included seven individuals who were enrolled in STEM programsseeking a master’s and/or doctoral degree(s) at universities with varying levels of research2 Multidimensionality is an analytical framework for understanding how the interdependentsystems of oppression and privilege interconnect, compound, conflict, and overlap in a person’sexperience afforded by the convergence and divergence of the individuals’ socio-culturalcategorizations, capital, and community cultural wealth.3 AFAB is an acronym used in the queer community to describe people who were
objectives and cognitive load. Literature is also silent on howmany learning objectives are pursued in a typical laboratory activity.Consequently, relating laboratory activities to cognitive load requires more work. Theoreticaland qualitative work can define better categorizing features of a laboratory, and ensure thosefeatures predict learning and perceptions of difficulty. Quantitative work can probe theunsupported relationships in the logic model. Finally, specialization is probably a widespreadbehavior, and more work qualitative and quantitative should document stories of specialization,the conditions that create specialization, and how specialization affects learning.REFERENCES[1] E. Byrnes, Y. A. Mahsud, S. Rosen, and M. Spencer, “A Survey
, girls were found to draw male scientists three times more often than female scientists[31]. Similar trends were found in Capobianco et al.’s [23] study. About 40% of the engineersthat first grade girls drew were female and about 30% were male, but when examining thedrawings of fifth grade girls, just under 60% drew male engineers and about 30% drew femaleengineers. Given the age of the participants, previous research suggests it is likely that theywould draw male engineers.The study took place in the context of a Girl Scout troop environment. This may have influenced theparticipants’ conception of engineers for several reasons. First, the national Girl Scout organizationrecently began a significant focus on STEM opportunities within the
insight into how well this framework impresses on them. The sum of thesefindings will provide the foundation for scaled infusion of EOP throughout the curriculum andpotential adoption of this approach across many engineering and design programs.REFERENCES[1] N. A. of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. 2004.[2] “Engineering for One Planet,” Engineering For One Planet, 2020. https://engineeringforoneplanet.org/.[3] United Nations, “The 17 Sustainable Development Goals,” sdgs.un.org, 2015.https://sdgs.un.org/.[4] I. S. Rampasso, R. Anholon, D. Silva, R. E. Cooper Ordóñez, O. L. G. Quelhas, and L. A. D. Santa-Eulalia, “Developing in engineering students a critical analysis about
material is based upon work supported by the United States Agency forInternational Development (USAID) under Grant No. USAID-Egypt NFO:72026318RFA00002. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect USAID's views.References[1] J. Yang, C. Schneller, and S. Roche, The role of higher education in promoting lifelong learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning in Hamburg, 2015.[2] B. Karleuša, A. Deluka-Tibljaš, N. Ožanić, and S. Ilić, "The Role of Higher Education in Developing Awareness about Water Management," in 11th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering-WMHE 2009, 2009.[3] S. S. Ashraf, S
large response rates (i.e. not skip logic based). Thisrestricts the number of responses used for analysis as well as the ability to test the surveyinstrument’s factor structure in its entirety. This means that there may be larger underlyingthemes that we cannot pull out or important themes present in these opt in items that will beoverlooked. References[1] S. Lipson, E. Lattie, & D. Eisenberg, “Increased rates of mental health service utilization by US college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017),” Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019.[2] S. Lipson & D. Eisenberg, “Mental health and academic attitudes and expectations in university
University for reviewingthis paper and providing constructive feedback.References[1] W. Zhou and X. Shi, “Culture in groups and teams: A review of three decades of research,” Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–34, 2011.[2] A. S. Tsui, S. Nifadkar, and A. Y. Ou, “Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations,” J. Manage., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 426–478, 2007.[3] S. Wei, D. M. Ferguson, M. W. Ohland, and B. Beigpourian, “Examining the cultural influence on peer ratings of teammates between international and domestic students,” in the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] J. Wang, G. H.-L. Cheng, T
, 2007.[2] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing Engineers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1994.[3] M. T. H. Chi, S. Kang, and D. L. Yaghmourian, “Why Students Learn More From Dialogue- Than Monologue-Videos: Analyses of Peer Interactions,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 10–50, 2016.[4] M. D. Koretsky, D. Gilbuena, S. B. Nolen, G. Tierney, and S. E. Volet, “Productively Engaging Student Teams in Engineering: The Interplay between Doing and Thinking,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 2014.[5] S. Michaels and C. O’Connor, “Talk Science Primer,” Terc, pp. 1–20, 2012.[6] M. R. Banaji and A. G. Greenwald, Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People, 1st ed
[NSB], “Science & Engineering indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1),” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Accessed on: Aug., 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf. [3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM]. “Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century,” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. 2018. Accessed on: Aug., 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25038. 2018. [4] S. K. Gardner, “Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high-and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution.” The Journal of Higher
, "Depoliticization and the Structure of Engineering Education," in International Perspectives on Engineering Education, S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham and B. Newberry, Eds., New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2015, pp. 203-216.[7] M. Nelson, G. D. Hoople, J. A. Mejia and S. M. Lord, "Work-in-Progress: What is Energy? Examining Engineering Students' Conceptions of Energy," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 22-26 June 2020.[8] G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, S. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, F. Bilow and J. A. Mejia, "An Integrated Approach to Energy Education in Engineering," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, 2020.[9] R. Rincon, "SWE Research Update: Women in Engineering by
Pendulum System,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Vol. 3, pp. 1804–1809, 2009. 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of Columbia2 K. Lai, Jin Xiao, Xiaoguang Hu, Jianxin Fan, Bing Wu, “Modeling and Control for Stability and Rotation Velocity of a Rotary Inverted Pendulum,” 2015 IEEE 10th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2015, pp. 955–960.3 Y. Kim, S. H. Kim, and Y. K. Kwak, “Dynamic analysis of a nonholonomic two-wheeled inverted pendulum robot,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2005, pp. 25– 46.4 S. Awtar, C. Bernard, N
. 28 References[i]Bennett,J.&Hogarth,S.(2009).Wouldyouwanttotalktoascientistataparty?Highschool students'attitudestoschoolscienceandtoscience.InternationalJournalofScience Education,31(14),1975–1998.[ii]Britner,S.L.(2008).Motivationinhighschoolsciencestudents:acomparisonofgender differencesinlife,physical,andearthscienceclasses.JournalofResearchinScience Teaching,45(8),955–970.[iii]Brotman,J.S.&Moore,F.M.(2008).Girlsandscience:areviewoffourthemesinthe scienceeducationliterature.JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,45(9),971–1002.[iv]Miller,P.H.,Blessing,J.S.,&Schwarz,S.(2006).Genderdifferencesinhigh-school
. June 2016. Paper ID #16370.2. Ragusa, G., Mataric, M. (2016). “Research Experiences For Teachers: Linking Research toTeacher Practice and Student Achievement in Engineering and Computer Science,” 2016 ASEE123rd Annual Conference and Exposition. New Orleans, Louisiana. June 2016. Paper ID #17351.3. Trenor, J., Yu, S., Grant, D., Salem, H. (2009). “Participation in a Research Experience forTeachers Program: Impact on Perceptions and Efficacy to Teach Engineering,” 2009 ASEE 116thAnnual Conference and Exposition. Austin, Texas. June 2009. Paper ID #AC 2009-786.4. Klein-Gardner, S., Johnston, M., Benson, L. (2012) “Impact of RET Teacher-DevelopedCurriculum Units on Classroom Experiences for Teachers and Students,” Journal of Pre-CollegeEngineering
engineering looks like foryoung children in a family learning context and how early experiences with this topic can shapethe ongoing learning pathways of children and their parents.ReferencesAlexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Leibham, M. E. (2015). Emerging individual interests related to science in young children. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 261–280). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X
perspectives and cross-cultural skills such as the InterculturalDevelopment Inventory (IDI) [8], Miville Guzman Universality Diversity Scale (MGUD-S) [9],and the Engineering Global Preparedness Index (EGPI) [10]. The global perspectives ofengineering students in this study was measured via the Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) [11].This instrument was used because it closely aligns with global perspective constructs the studyaims to measure. The GPI is also a validated instrument and widely used for a basis forcomparison against non-engineers. Additionally, a number of studies have used the GPI toexamine the impact of study abroad experiences with consistent results and strong statisticalreliability and validity [11, 12, 13]. Given the expansion of
- ing Education and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman served as Chair for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division last year. She received a Dipl.Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University in 1992, an M.S.M.E. from the University of Washington in 1994 and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in 2000.Dr. Gregory Mason, Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of
?" Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Erie, PA.Dick, T. P., & Rallis, S. F. (1991). Factors and influences on high school students’ career choices. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 281 - 292.Garriott, P. O., Raque-Bogdan, T. L., Zoma, L., Mackie-Hernandez, D., & Lavin, K. (2016). Social cognitive predictors of Mexican American high school students’ math/science career goals. Journal of Career Development, 44, 77-90. doi:10.1177/0894845316633860Gillen, A. L., Kinoshita, T., Knight, D., Grohs, J., Carrico, C., Matusovich, H. M., … Bradburn, I. (2017). WIP: Gatekeepers to broadening participation in engineering: Investigating variation across high
. Sweeney, S. Nolen, M. Koretsky, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, S. Nolen and S. Davis. “Re-situating community and learning in an engineering school.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017, https://peer.asee.org/27753.[3] S. Lord, D. Rover, N. Kellam, N. Salzman, E. Berger, E. Ingram and J. Sweeney. “Work-In-Progress: Talking about a revolution - overview of NSF RED projects”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017, https://peer.asee.org/28903.[4] S. Lord, J. London, N. Salzman, B. Sukumaran, T. Martin, A. Maciejewski, J. LeDoux and J. Sweeney. “Work-In-Progress: Progress of the NSF RED Revolution”. Paper and panel
Course for First-year Engineering Students in Microsystems and Nanomaterials. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.Lambeth, M. C., McCullough, M. B., & Aschenbrenner, M. H. R. (2015). Creating a Pipeline into Biomedical Engineering. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.Madihally, S., & Maase, E. (2006). Introducing Biomedical And Biochemical Engineering For K 12 Students. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.Martinez, A. W., Phillips, S. T., Whitesides, G. M., & Carrilho, E. (2010). Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices
disengagement.ReferencesBardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). “Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1207-1220, 2003.Boucher, K. L., Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B. & Murphy, M. C. (2017). “Can I Work with and Help Others in This Field? How Communal Goals Influence Interest and Participation in STEM Fields,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 31, May 2017.Brown, E. R., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., Allen, J. & Muragishi, G. (2015b). “From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ science motivation,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1116-1135, Nov. 1, 2015.Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C
Technology.Barr, R. E. (2012). Engineering graphics educational outcomes for the global engineer: An update. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 76(3), 8–12.Duffy, G., Farrell, S., Harding, R., Behan, A., Raighne, A. M., Howard, R., Nevin, E., & Bowe, B. (2015). The effects of spatial skills and spatial skills training on academic performance in STEM education. The 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Symposium conducted at the meeting of School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Dublin, Ireland.Gold, A. U., Pendergast, P. M., Ormand, C. J., Budd, D. A., Stempien, J. A., Mueller, K. J., & Kravitz, K. A. (2018). Spatial skills in undergraduate students—Influence of gender
scenarioscan and do create spaces for workplace learning. Moreover, the examples they provided arelargely idealized and do not account for the full range of experiences newcomer engineersencounter. Thus, analysis included working recursively through the data, literature, and examplesto develop operational definitions of each variable. We deconstructed the examples provided byJacobs and Park (2009) to develop functional criteria that could be applied to journal entries todetermine the location, structure, and role of facilitator(s) within each entry, as described below.Determining location of learningJacobs and Park (2009) define on-the-job as learning that occurs “near or at the actual worksetting,” but also emphasize experienced-based learning in on
Literature Review of the Upbringing Influence on Spatial Ability References 1) Bandura, A., “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unified Theory of Behavioral Change”, Psychological Review, Vol. 84, 1977, pp. 191-215. 2) Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. 3) Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. 4) Dabbs Jr, J. M., Chang, E. L., Strong, R. A., & Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(2), 89-98. 5) DeLamater, J. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1998
material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. References[1] M. F. Fox, “Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social- organizational indicators and implications,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 997–101, 2010.[2] M. Sabharwal and E. A. Corley, "Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline," The Social Science Journal vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 539-556, September, 2009.[3] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Postsecondary Teachers, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and- library/postsecondary-teachers.htm
participated in this six-week nanotechnology summer research program in 2015 and who then integratednanotechnology into the classroom over the 2015-2016 academic school year. Second, we reportobservational data from five teachers’ nano-lessons by using a modified version of the ScienceTeacher Inquiry Rubric (STIR).5 Third, using the Student Attitudes toward STEM (S-STEM)survey,6 we present changes in these teachers’ students’ attitudes towards STEM, as well aschanges in students’ perceptions of their own 21st century skills. Lastly, we report changes instudents’ reported interests in 12 STEM careers.Table 1. Overview of Research Evaluation Questions and Methods Research Evaluation Questions Method Participant Q1
group as a senior engineer, and later brought his real-world expertise back into the classroom at Purdue University Calumet. He is currently a Clinical Associate Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago where he enjoys success in teaching and education research.Prof. Jeremiah Abiade c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Execution Details and Assessment Results of a Summer Bridge Program for First-year Engineering StudentsAbstractThis paper reports the execution details and the summary assessment of a Summer Bridge Program(SBP) that is a part of an ongoing National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Math (S-STEM
. This project focuses on the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE)'s SummerEngineering Experiences for Kids (SEEK) program. This multi-partner project allows us toexpand and strengthen the experience, conduct research on the impact of the program, andconduct research on how such outreach programs might grow in sustainable manners. Our posterwill present a summary of the large-scale data collection that occurred during the summer of2018 at all 16 sites located across the US. We administered a variety of instruments to identifychanges in the children's STEM-related outcomes over the course of the SEEK experience. Tofurther operationalize the variation in organizational contexts across sites, we collected data fromparents and mentors. In the
: http://www.dtic.mil2. Abyad, A. (2011). Intercultural leadership and communication in global business. Middle East Journal of Business, 6(2), p. 8-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5742/mejb.2011.620263. Ali, S., & Green, P. (2012). Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: An IT outsourcing perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 179-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9183-y.4. Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2006). Definitions of globalization: A comprehensive overview and a proposed definition. GCSP. P. 1-21. Retrieved January, 25, 2014 from www.sustainablehistory.com/articles/definitions-of- globalization.pdf5. AME Info.com (2012). The Ultimate Middle East business resource. Retrieved from
science knowledge using real data. This fell to just 7.7% post-institute – with furtheropportunities to engage in hands-on research using emerging technology throughout the schoolyear.VIII. AcknowledgmentThis work has been made possible by the NSF EPSCoR Track III Award #1348266.IX. References1 National Center for Education Statistics. 1990–2009. Digest of Education Statistics. US Department of Education. nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2 Wang, M.T., Eccles, J.S., &, S. (2013). Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender Differences in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Psychological Science May 2013 24: 770-775, first published on March 18, 20133