. (IEEE Press, New York, 1997).12 J. F. McClymer and L. Z. Knoles, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 3, 33 (1992).13 D. R. Krathwohl, Theory into Practice 41 (4), 212 (2002).14 National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. (National Academy Press, Washginton, DC, 2000).15 S. B. Feichtner and E. A. Davis, J. Organ. Behav. Teaching Soc. 9 (4), 58 (1984).16 R. L. Pimmel, IEEE Transactions on Education 46 (2), 273 (2003).17 G. Novak, A. Gavrin, W. Christian et al., Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology (Series in Educational Innovation). (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999).18 R. L. Mertz, IEEE Trans. Educ. 40 (1), 41 (1997).19
soon madethem responsibility of the team’s Systems Engineer or Systems Engineering Manager.This assignment was generally welcomed by all team members. As we will demonstratebelow, traditional engineering students lacked familiarity with the products while SE andSEM students were less familiar with the technology of the projects. Most design teams used MS Project to develop and present their schedule. Theywere asked to identify the major milestones in the two semesters, major efforts in thedesign and fabrication process, individual(s) primarily responsible for each effort, startand stop dates, and time required. The level of detail in the schedule required of eachteam was tailored based on the number of cadets on the team and whether or
press). 5. Masullo, M.J., Calo, S., Nguyen, T., Willner, B., "Multimedia On-Demand and the Organization of Education Systems", Proceedings of IFIP WG 3.2 Conference on University Uses of Visualization, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USA, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., July 2003. 6. Negroponte, N., Knopf, New York, USA, 2005. 7. Ruiz, A., Masullo, M.J., "A Universal and Global Education Infrastructure", UNESCO World Congress Moscow, Russia, July 2002 Page 11.490.16
, Aldine: Chicago, 1967[13] Merriam, B. S., Qualitative research and case study applications in educa- tion, Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, 1998 Page 11.58.24[14] Patton, Q. M., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Second Edition, Sage Publications: London, 1990 Page 11.58.25
Composite Materials”, Oxford University Press2. Strong A. B.; 1989, “Fundamentals of Composite Manufacturing: Materials, Methods, and Applications”, Society of Manufacturing Engineers3. BGF Industries, Inc.; “http://www.bgf.com/cchart.htm4. Hexcel Corporation, Inc.; “http://www.hexcelfibers.com/Markets/Products/Continuous /_Productlist.htm”5. The Dow Chemical Company, Inc.; “http: /www.dow.com/ derakane specific/product/ 411-350.htm”6. Kelkar Ajit D. and Tate Jitendra S.; 2002, “Low Cost Manufacturing of Textile Composites Using Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding”, All India Manufacturing Design and Research Conference, Ranchi, India, December 2002
: Distinguishing Itself from Other FieldsNot only does some of the literature on entrepreneurs distinguish them from others in business,the field of entrepreneurial studies has sought to identify itself as different from mainstreambusiness studies, even though similarities exist. We see this distinction as another reason forcreating ethical studies for entrepreneurial education. Higher education has allocated a greatmany resources towards keeping up with changing business trends: growing, modifying andcustomizing curriculum to better prepare graduates to compete in the ever evolving economiclandscape. In the mid 1990’s entrepreneurship education was born. Over the last decade it hasbecome one of the fastest growing fields of study available to students
to develop the site plans (contours and cross sections), drainagepipes and inlets, roadway plans for all components of the circulation system (plan/profiles,typical sections, intersection geometry and traffic design, and detail elevations for paving),utilities plan (sewer main, water lines, underground electrical, telephone, data, and gas), andright of way and set-back requirements for facilities. Each plan shall also include the significantstructural design of a design element, such as a retaining wall, parking deck, small building ormajor component(s) of larger structures, etc. The plan must also include a cost-effectivedrainage system to accommodate the ultimate development of the site. “Green Facility”concepts should be considered in the
. Trigwell (1999). "Understanding Learning and Teaching." The socity for Page 11.91.17 research into higher education and Open University Press.Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright 2006, American Society for Engineering Education 6. Dochy, F., M. Segers, et al. (2003). "Effects of Problem Based Learning: A Meta Analysis." Learning and instruction Vol 13: pp 533-568. 7. Duch, B. J., S. E. Groh, et al. (2001). "The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Sterling." 8. Felder, R. M. and B. R. (2003). "Learning by Doing
followingeducational objectives: 1. Design experiments to optimize the performance of a CVD reactor. o Identify key reactor inputs and determine relationship between input levels and achieved thin film uniformity. Select Select the Choose an response/ independent appropriate dependent variables/ experimental variable(s) factors design Draw Analyze the Perform the conclusions/ data using experiment inferences appropriate (collect data
is a coherent rigorous verbal framework specifying aconcept. A discussion of the conflicts between the infinities of everyday experience and formalinfinities based on axioms can be found in reference 12.The interesting conversations13 of a knowledgeable father with his six-year old son, Nic, providean insight on how a child's intuition builds an image of the concept of infinity. In the beginningof the conversations Nic imagines infinity as a very huge number, much bigger than 10, biggerthan a million, probably bigger than a "googol" (1 followed by a hundred 0's). Nic's infinity canbe operated on like any other number in arithmetic ("infinity" + "infinity" = "two infinity", andthere is "half infinity" as well). Nic also invents a number
any concepts from physics course that you can apply to the project?Questionnaire # Yes No Physics principles (questionnaire II) II 11 3 Resistance and voltage relation n=14 Flow of electricity Force = mass * acceleration Applied forces and how it affects the distance(s) and amount of work needed to accomplish the task. This was applied to the angle at which the ladder should be and the weight of the farmer applied upon the ladder.Note: Not all students responded for Questionnaire II.Table IIB show how an idea
engine torque by dividing the power by the engine speed in radians/s. Apply the proper unitconversions to express the torque in kN-m.5. Compute the fuel efficiency. The fuel efficiency is defined here as net power divided by the energy content of thefuel supplied. Using the mass of air (m) and specific work per cycle (w) computed above, the lower heating value ofthe fuel (LHV) and the air fuel ratio (AFmass) from the combustion calculation, the efficiency is given as ηfuel = (mairℜw)/(mfuelℜLHV) = (AFmass w)/(LHV)6. Repeat the steps above for complete combustion with 130% theoretical air.7. Repeat the steps above for combustion with 80% theoretical air. Assume that the products contain unburned fuel(5% of the
Engineering Programs. Engineering Accreditation Commission.2. Polman J. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. Teachers College Press.3. Barron, B. J. S. (1998). Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-based Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-3114. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What's so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61-79.5. L.R. Barroso and J. Morgan (2005). “Introducing Projects into Undergraduate Structural Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus-Christi, TX. March 23-25, 2005.6. J. Morgan
environment. It should be noted that both CQItechniques and CATs yield feedback for the person administering, as well as the personresponding to, the feedback mechanism. The responder has to become aware of her response(s)to the produce or service being delivered and, in some cases, evaluate her behavior.Faculty should perform assessment. Assessment activities should occur throughout the academicyear. By including tests, quizzes, assignments, and projects, students would know when thosemajor activities would occur (via the syllabus). Most of the assessment activities would occurduring lectures, labs, and learning community activities (outside of the classroom/lab). Themajority of the activities would be informal in nature. The included survey would
a model for diversity at theUniversity.Hostile Conditions for Women at URIUntil the mid 1990’s, there was never more than 1-2 female faculty in the College ofEngineering at the University of Rhode Island. In 1997, the number of women faculty hadincreased to three out of 68 faculty members, which at 4.4%, was typical of US nationalaverages. However, in quick succession the URI Engineering College lost two new assistant Page 11.143.4professors in one department, and the College of Engineering was becoming known as a hostileplace for women. There were many stories about the chilly climate and a number of womenfaculty members and graduate
previous opportunities for discussions to share ideas andresources, it doesn’t appear to be utilized to a great degree as in previous years. Programscurrently tend to struggle with the same issues of program implementation and evaluation and itwould be nice to see increased dialogue between programs and to ensure that information andresources are readily available to those working with similar programs. Plans are now underwayfor an RET Listserve of current RET programs5 and a potential conference emphasizing theissues surrounding program evaluation. SWEPT programs, in their current form, have been in existence at least since the early1990’s and have been wrestling with the issues surrounding program evaluation from the start.Following a