; Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrialand organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journalof Engineering Education, 102(4), 472-512.Cardador, M. T., & Caza, B. B. (2018). The subtle stressors making women want to leave engineering.Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2018/11/the-subtle-stressors-making-women-want-to-leave-engineering?ab=at_art_art_1x1Campero, S. (2021). Hiring and intra-occupational gender segregation in software engineering. AmericanSociological Review, 86(1), 60-92.Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique ofAntidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of
or Equivalent on First Attempt. D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 C1 C2/C3 C4 B1 M S M S M S M S M S M S M S M S M S#A 82 48 51 31 63 27 42 31 39 20 32 31 65 30 21 17 27 11 N 246 90 243 88 224 87 208 87 187 87 192 86 262 89 122 85 92 42% 33.3 53.3 21.0 35.2 28.1 31.0 20.2 35.6 20.9 23.0 16.7 36.0 24.8 33.7 17.2 20.0 29.3 26.2Notes: #A = raw number of tests scored with Approved
. Newton, “How to Co-Lead a Team,” Harvard Business Review, 2015. https://hbr.org/2015/07/how-to-co-lead-a-team (accessed Nov. 07, 2022).[13] Q. Wu and K. Cormican, “Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. January, pp. 1– 12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198.[14] “Best Biomedical Engineering Programs - Top Engineering Schools - US News,” 2022. https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/biomedical-rankings (accessed Feb. 22, 2023).[15] Allen, R. H., Acharya, S., Jancuk, C., & Shoukas, A. A. (2013). Sharing best practices in teaching biomedical engineering design. Annals of
some cases, a single essay is all the evidence an institution canaccess to plan DEI interventions and improve academic programming. Our recommendation foraddressing the STEM pipeline leak is to create a system to track students that fall out of formalSTEM pipelines. The system can assist the student to return to the pipeline if the student desires.The system will support the student to secure employment in the engineering discipline.References[1] L. L. Crumpton-Young, S. Etemadi, G. E. Little, and T. D. Carter, “Supportive practices used with underrepre- sented minority graduate students,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.25979. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org
Organization (WHO) Arsenic is a well-known carcinogen2 . The levelof toxicity depends on the type of compound. For example, Arsenic in organic compounds is lesstoxic but Arsenic in inorganic compounds is more toxic. Arsine (ASH3), Arsenite, and Arsenatein particular are highly toxic compounds. Humans unknowingly consume Arsenic throughdrinking water and plants. In addition to naturally occurring Arsenic, the Arsenic concentration ofsoil increases due to human activity. Arsenic compounds are used in the industry sector in themanufacturing of semi-conductors, glass production, papers, metal adhesives, ceramics, woodpreservatives, and explosives3 . Inorganic Arsenic compounds were used as pesticides in theUnited States of America (USA) before the 1950’s
questions in the concept inventory test; however, the index propertiesand soil classifications required seven classes and had only one question in the assessment test.Table 3. Course Coverage and Assessment Questions Class Hours Topic Coverage, Test Question Curricular Topic Devoted % Number(s) Geology 2 5 - Index Properties and 7 18 Classifications 1 Phase Relations 4 10 2 Compaction
questions are generally related to the heat transfer processes/geometriesdescribed in said figure. Students are asked to carefully scrutinize the figure toidentify the probable mode(s) of heat transfer. During the review period, groups ofstudents work together to come up with potential exam problems related to thecovered content and then identify strategies, methodologies, and/or relevantequations to obtain solutions. The primary role of the instructor during theseactivities is to ensure that the discussions are relevant to the upcoming exam’scontent or focus. Review sessions are typically held the day before the exam, andthe preview figures are provided in advance. The review activity is based onvarious studies supporting collaborative learning as
-13/ALL_MAJORS/X/X/home/ (accessed May 27, 2022).[9] S. B. Robbins, I-S Oh, H. Le, and C. Button, Christopher, “Intervention effects on collegeperformance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors:Integrated meta-analytic path analyses,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp.1163-1184, 2009, DOI: 10.1037/a0015738.[10] C. Cairncross, T. VanDeGrift, S. Jones, Sharon, and L. Chelton, “Best practices for advisingat-risk first-year engineering students, 7th First Year Engineering Experience Conference,August 3-4, Roanoke, VA, 2015,https://pilotscholars.up.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=egr_facpubs[11] W. R. Habley, “Key concepts in academic advising. In Summer Institute on
February 2022).[6] U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR)’s June 2021 report “Education in aPandemic: The Disparate Impacts of COVID-19 on America’s Students”. Available at:https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/20210608-impacts-of-covid19.pdf (Accessed: 10February 2022).[7] Faulkner, B., Earl, K. and Herman, G. (2019) ‘Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students’,International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), pp. 97–128.doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8.[8] Zavala, G., & Dominguez, A. (2016, June), ‘Engineering Students' Perception of Relevance ofPhysics and Mathematics’ Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, NewOrleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26664. doi
2014.[2] “Why Colleges Suck at Making Programmers”, codeup.com Commentary, https://codeup.com/why-colleges- suck-at-making-programmers/, August 14, 2018.[3] Nigaglioni I., “Pokémon Go: An Unexpected Inspiration for Next Generation Learning Environments”, Childhood Education, 93:4, 333-336, DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2017.1343588 https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2017.1343588[4] Hu X, Goh Y., Lin Z, “Educational impact of an Augmented Reality (AR) application for teaching structural systems to non-engineering students”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 50, 2021[5] Iqbal M, “Pokémon Go Revenue and Usage Statistics (2021)”, https://www.businessofapps.com/data/pokemon-go-statistics/, May 6 2021[6] Ho S
something successful at the end.”(I18M, Pos. 19).4.2.4 Fellow Students Proposition 2.4: ME218 attracts highly motivated and talented students and creates an environment where friendship and partnership flourish.Ten interviewees emphasize the connections and the quality of their ME218 classmates. “EdCarryer will tell you on day one: ‘This is hard, and we will take up your whole life for thisyear.’” (I12M, Pos. 29). Thereby he creates that feeling that the students “[…] are all in theMarines together […]” (I15M, Pos. 22). The preselection process at Stanford University andME218’s image leads to the situation that “[…] the people around you are phenomenal.” (I01M,Pos. 34).During ME218, students collaborate closely and spend much time together. Their
material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos.(HRD 1834628 and HRD 1834608). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] NASEM, "Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads," National Academy of Engineering, Washington, 2018.[2] X. Y. and R. Larson, "STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes, and yes. Monthly Labor Review," 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis- or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm.[3] T. Dinh and Y. L. Zhang, "Engagement in
. The solution occurs where theminimum area for heat transfer needed to provide adequate heat transfer out of the system12.6kW is achieved. Figure 1 indicates that this point occurs at approximately 0.0465m2 (72in2).Using this area, students determined the minimum volumetric flow required to provide adequatecooling is 0.69 m3/s, as shown in figure 2. Figure 1: Solution for most efficient radiator output Figure 2: Required Volumetric flow rate for given Radiator area Taking these solutions into account the team decided to add a factor of safety andincrease the total radiator area 20%. Resulting in the selection of a radiator with a 0.058 m2 (90in2) cross section for the final design and a fan that has
://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/what-is-project-management[2] Accessed Feb. 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/who-are-project-managers[3] Accessed Feb. 5, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/project-management.html[4] Accessed Feb. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/project-manager-qualities[5] S. M. Shariff et al., "Assessment of Project Management Skills and Learning Outcomes inStudents’ Projects," in 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching(InCULT 2012), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) pp. 745 – 754.[6] P. N. Mustaro and R. Rossi, “Project Management Principles Applied in Academic
in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewersfor their constructive feedback that helped us to improve this paper. Lastly, we thank the studyparticipants themselves for allowing us to learn important insights from their lived experiencesof shame in the context of engineering.References[1] J. P. Tangney and R. L. Dearing, Shame and guilt. Guilford Press, 2003.[2] J. L. Huff, B. Okai, K. Shanachilubwa, N. W. Sochacka, and J. Walther, “Unpacking professional shame: Patterns of White male engineering students living in and out of threats to their identities,” Journal of Engineering
Undergraduate Education (EHR/DUE) and Division of Engineering Education and Centers (ENG/EEC), where she worked in multiple STEM education and research programs, including the IUSE, TUES, STEP, WIDER, S-STEM, Noyce, REU, and ERC. She also served as Associate Chair and was on the faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering.Shelly B. Blunt (Associate Provost for Academic Affairs) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Capacity-Building to Transform STEM Education Through Faculty Communities in Learning Analytics and
as they are also at a point of transition to a new Director. Formore information about the evaluation, please feel free to contact the author team.References:Jordan, D., Spiegel, S., Sanders, M., Cutler, S., & Zappe, S. (2022). Lessons Learned: Findingsfrom an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons Learned Paper#2 of 2). American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,Minneapolis, MN.POD Network (2018). Defining what matters: Guidelines for comprehensive center for teachingand learning (CTL) evaluation.https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/POD_CTL_Evaluation_Guidelines__2018_.pdf 5Appendix 1. 6
,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.[2]V. Vankatesh, and F. Davis, (2000). ”A Theoretical Extension of the Technology AcceptanceModel: Four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, 46(2), 186.[3] J. Case, and G. Light, (2014). Framing Qualitative Methods in Engineering EducationResearch. In A. Johri and B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering EducationResearch (pp. 535-550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034.[4] Vedel, J. Ramaprasad, and L. Lapointe, “Social Media Strategies for Health Promotion byNonprofit Organizations: Multiple Case Study Design,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 4, p.e15586, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.2196/15586.[5] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Owusu-Ansah, and S. L. Stockero, “Factors
and experiences to develop student's leadership and other professional Experiences skills [41] 3 Undergraduate Coaching Developing the engineering leadership of undergraduate students through coaching [42] 7 Diverse Student Workshops Workshop-based co-curricular EL development for diverse student populations [43] Out-of-class 2 SHPE Social-cognitive Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE)'s Social-cognitive leadership theory [44] experiences Leadership Theory 2 International Experience International project-work/experiences for undergraduate students [45
ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award, the 2020 TEES Faculty Fellows Award, and the 2011 Charles H. Barclay, Jr. '45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. She has also been recently appointed as the Speaker-Elect of the Faculty Senate. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Julie S Linsey (Professor) Georgia Tech © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Sketchtivity, an Intelligent Sketch Tutoring Software: Broadening
, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 163–166, 2013, doi:10.1002/sce.21032.[3] K. P. Cross, Adults as Learners. Increasing participation and facilitating learning. 1981.[4] P. Shekhar and A. Huang-Saad, “Examining engineering students’ participation inentrepreneurship education programs: implications for practice,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 40, Jun.2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00298-9.[5] P. Shekhar, A. H. Saad, and J. Libarkin, “Understanding student participation in entrepreneurshipeducation programs: a critical review,” The International journal of engineering education, vol. 34, no. 3,pp. 1060–1072, 2018.[6] S. Harding, Objectivity and Diversity. 2015. Accessed: Oct. 02, 2016. [Online]. Available:http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books
housed within safety and health of industry. Since 1990’s, theconcept of ergonomic awareness became discernible within enterprises. The continuous researchhas yielded to a certain level of knowledge about how to improve product quality and productivity.Workers safety and benefits of process improvements are now widely acknowledged in industry[1] [2]. Meanwhile, the application of ergonomic process is very limited in household sector. Theword “housekeeping” has demonstrated as better technique that affect industrial quest forcontinuous improvement by eliminating of waste in a cluttered area [3]. Later, the housekeepingconcept turned out to be as 5S program.Main framework of 5S program was first proposed by Osada in 1991 [4] and then Hirano in1995
describing certain types of visualelements, such as phase diagrams and phase transformation plots in materials science andengineering, T-s, h-s, and P-v diagrams in thermodynamics, output response plots in controlsystems, as well as other common visual elements in mechanical engineering courses; and (4)Writing text for animated visual elements that describe in detail all dynamic processes andmovements in the animation. This paper describes our guidelines in detail, and presentsexamples from three different zyVersions used in mechanical engineering courses. Thesestandards can be modified for use across various engineering disciplines and will enable authorsof online content to provide higher quality material that meets accessibility
capturing video, the team developed themes of each video and created scripts andvisuals. Scripts included on-camera dialogue that presenters usually read like a news anchor.Scripts were kept simple with concise sentences for easy flow of information. Scripts included anintroduction and a body. The introduction was generally less than 1 minute to introduce thepresenter(s) and give audience a high-level objective of topic presented. The body consisteddetailed text and references to visuals and any drawing on the tablet.To align with attention spans of humans, engage a wide audience, and communicate effectively,each video was kept as short as possible with a goal of between 5 to 7 minutes. After videos wererecorded, the software application iMovie
held high agreement andfollowed the increasing velocity trend as set by the analytical solution. Radius Solution (m/s) Experiment (m/s) Percent Error 0.024 0.002 0.003 74% 0.033 0.009 0.003 63% 0.042 0.016 0.013 22% 0.051 0.023 0.022 5% 0.059 0.029
, itinvolves the visualization and recreation of mental images that are shared with listeners through adynamic interplay of verbal and non-verbal communication from both the speaker and listener(s).In the context of pedagogy, storytelling has been shown to encourage self-awareness [23],enhance professional development [24, 25], and cultivate empathy [26, 27].3 Our ApproachLegacy refers to the value we create for other people and places in the world. The story of aperson’s life reflects their legacy. In the Exploring LegaCs experience, we met for weekly, virtualmeetings to learn about effective storytelling, to share personal experiences, and to consider thelegacy that engineering students want to leave. The design of the Exploring LegaCs program
students had little to no prior experience in computing,they have made a smooth transition into graduate school and secured full-time employment inthe tech industry.SummaryOur iCAN program is the first of its kind in the state of Illinois from a large public university.Our graduate certificate in computing fundamentals provides a high-quality credential from aleading computer science department. Graduates of our program are prepared to pursue techcareers in industry or pursue a full graduate degree in computer science. Thus, our programbrings together non-computing college graduates from diverse areas of expertise andbackgrounds in an accelerated graduate certificate program that broadens participation incomputing.References[1] A. Ivey, S. R
similarpurpose to institutional honor codes (and will fully align with existing institutional policies) butwould have the advantage of being more clearly related to the opportunities and challengesassociated with engineering education. Student and faculty perceptions of these new codes ofethics will be assessed and reported.Additionally, given the similar nature of the two universities included in this preliminary study,further research in this area could be expanded to include different types of institutions withmore varied contexts.AcknowledgmentsAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of their institutions. The authors thank thestudents and
audience interested in the field of bioengineering. Afterwatching these student-produced videos, new students can assess their own understanding andperception of learning via suggested questions and surveys. This approach, namely the use ofvideo medium and student voice, has the potential to benefit both the creator and consumer ofthe videos, specifically in communication skills and understanding of courses.References Cited[1] D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. O. Briggs, and J. F. Nunamaker, “Instructional video in e-learning:Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness,” Information &Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004.[2] D. S. Kreiner, “Guided Notes and Interactive Methods for