Paper ID #43918From Classroom to Career with Practical Network TrainingMr. Erwin Karincic, Virginia Commonwealth University Erwin Karincic received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Engineering from Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) in 2020 and 2021, respectively. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree from Virginia Commonwealth University. He is an experienced security researcher with focus on reverse engineering and exploit development. An avid learner in many different fields, his research interests are cyber security, reverse engineering, exploit development, Internet of Things, software defined radio, antenna
weaponry—even as a point of discussion—isapparently outside the scope of the course, despite evident student curiosity and the seeminglylogical connection of nuclear weaponry to the course theme (including the pervasiveness ofengineering careers directly or indirectly connected to the military sector [22]). The topic ofnuclear weaponry repeatedly goes unaddressed, and students repeatedly seek to bring it up. Thisdimension of HC includes those topics notably absent from the formal curriculum, notableespecially when their inclusion would seem to be reasonable or even likely. A third implicitlesson extends the second and is conveyed by the quality of interaction between students andfaculty participants, or at least how the quality of that interaction
Paper ID #32355Penalized for Excellence: The Invisible Hand of Career-TrackStratificationDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a
Paper ID #34914Using a Values Lens to Examine Engineers’ Workplace ExperiencesDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also
work (average 8.4, Table 2), but perhaps this wasdue to other courses that they had taken rather than the senior-level engineering professionalismand ethics course. I2 required multiple ethics courses outside engineering that were taken earlierin their undergraduate careers, and perhaps those courses were viewed as being more helpful. Inaddition, the I2 course was new (in first to third iterations) and the alumni who responded to thesurvey had only worked for about 1 year after graduating. The short time in-practice was notatypical compared to alumni respondents from institutions I3, I6, and I7. The exemplarinstructors from I1, I3, I6, I7 did appear to have more established courses. More information isneeded to understand this difference; with
increasing the probability of pursuing graduate education[1]. Also, research experiences can provide increased self-efficacy. Due to the lack ofopportunities at a two-year institution, a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)Program purposefully recruited from a local community college. By recruiting from communitycollege students, we provide opportunities to underrepresented populations, women, and otherswhich can meet the demand for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)graduates for the United States to remain globally competitive [2].As global competitiveness increases, community colleges can also help to increase interest inSTEM careers, especially engineering. Through research experiences, community collegestudents are
lists 190 known impact sites worldwide. [37]Solar Electric CartFrom Summer 2013 to Spring 2016, 16 students completed four research projects involving thedesign, construction, and testing of a solar electric cart [38] – [41]. These students successfullyconverted an old, worn-out gas utility cart into a fully-functioning solar-electric vehicle. SAC’sMESA Center has used the vehicle at various school events to increase students’ interest in STEMeducation and careers as well as promote sustainability and renewable energy technology.Later Years (2016 – 2018)Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle (HFCV)From Fall 2015 to Spring 2018, 30 SAC Motorsport (SMS) team students completed four projectsinvolving research, design, construction, and testing of prototype
-MadisonIntroductionThe discipline of project management, as traditionally taught, seeks to precisely plan, budget,and schedule projects, then execute according to those predetermined plans, budgets, andschedules. Engineers seek to fully understand and avoid possible risks to project success. In thisview, success depends on accurately predicting the future, developing a path to success, andensuring all elements of the project remain fixed on that path.The true success of any project depends on whether the project delivers its intended value tostakeholders. Whether the project follows the planned path to success is immaterial. The scope,schedule, and/or budget may evolve to the benefit of all, provided the target value is delivered.To achieve project and career
decreasing rate. The dwindling number of high school graduates – which, from the research, is premised on declining birth rates, contributed to by higher levels of educational attainment, career pursuits, and increasing greater graduation debt loads [15].In reviewing the literature on distance and distance-hybrid based courses/programs, the literaturereviewed focuses on: Overall increase/decrease in distance education enrollments. Distance enrollments differing by university type, sector within each type and regions.DefinitionsBefore continuing, it is necessary to initially briefly define the three types of institutions forminga part of this paper. The three types of addressed institutions are public, private non-profit
Paper ID #23384Early-career Plans in Engineering: Insights from the Theory of Planned Be-haviorTrevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan Trevion Henderson is a doctoral student in the Center for Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. He recently earned his master’s degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University while serving as a graduate research associate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise. Trevion also hold’s a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science and Engineer- ing from The Ohio State University, where he served as a research assistant in
including business development, marketing, product develop- ment, and operations. Throughout her career, Rachel and her team have provided education solutions for several industries including defense, life science, high-tech, energy, healthcare, manufacturing, and construction. Rachel currently serves on the board of directors for INCOSE and AUVSI New England. Rachel has a B.S. and M.S. in the life sciences, as well as an M.B.A.Mrs. Stacy L. Chiaramonte, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Stacy Chiaramonte is the Director of Operations and Online Learning for WPI’s Corporate and Profes- sional Education (CPE) division. Stacy is directly responsible for online strategy, program development, logistics and operations for WPI
Paper ID #26745Community College Innovation Centers – Lessons Learned from Works inProgressDr. Carl Whitesel, South Mountain Community College Carl Whitesel has spent his career teaching Engineering Technology, and has taught in the community college setting since 2007. He is the Engineering Program Coordinator for South Mountain Community College. His teaching focus is primarily on circuit analysis, electronics, and introductory engineering courses. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Curriculum and Instruction, from Arizona State University in 2014. His primary research interests are Maker spaces, conceptual
Paper ID #22702Managing Engineering Talent in Organizations: A Qualitative SystematicLiterature Review on Engineering Talent ManagementMs. Swetha Nittala, Purdue University, West Lafayette (School of Engineering Education) Swetha is currently a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue. Her current work includes identifying and developing leadership and technical competencies for early career engineers and managers. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to manage technical talent in organi
Paper ID #25940A University-State College Collaborative Project to Advance Students’ De-gree Completion and Career Attainment in Engineering and Computer Sci-enceDr. Ali Zilouchian, Florida Atlantic University Ali Zilouchian is currently a professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at Florida At- lantic University. He is also currently the Director of ”CAPTURE” program which is related to increasing pipeline, graduation rate as well as future jobs in the State of Florida related to STEM graduates espe- cially Computer Science and Engineering fields. His recent projects have been funded by DOE, Florida
(URM) choosing to pursue careers orgraduate studies in NEWT-related STEM fields, and to improve the mentorship skills of NEWTgraduate students and postdocs participating as mentors.From the inception of the program, NEWT’s education team has collaborated with the UniversityOffice of Evaluation and Educational Effectiveness UOEEE at ASU to formulate a logic modeland UOEEE also provides external evaluation of the program.This report presents the results of the evaluation of the 2018 NEWT REU cohort, focusing on theprogram participants’ perception of the program, and other findings that will serve as the basisfor planning the 2019 cohort.3. BackgroundOne of the strategic goals of the Engineering Research Centers (ERC) Program sponsored by
CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal Processing, Communications, and Education Societies.Dr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education at George Mason University and currently a Program Officer in the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Infor- mal Settings at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests include engineering education, mathematics education, faculty development and mathematics teacher leadership.Prof. Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University ANASTASIA P. SAMARAS is Professor of Education in the College of Education and Human Develop
Paper ID #21635Understanding the Socializer Influence on Engineering Students’ Career Plan-ningRohini Abhyankar, Arizona State University Rohini Abhyankar is a second year graduate student at Arizona State University’s Engineering Education Systems and Design doctoral program. Rohini has a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University and Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in Physics from University of Delhi, India. Rohini has over ten years each of industry and teaching experience.Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a part-time faculty Research Scientist for Virginia Tech and owner
involved in outreach to K-12schools to help improve student interest in engineering as a career choice. Documenting theseexperiences themselves may be worthy of publication, however, long term assessment of their Page 15.849.4effectiveness is of more interest to the engineering educators, journal editors, and conferencereviewers.Some common papers document outreach activities,24, 28 while others may discuss service-learning projects that involve international experiences.25-27 In one case, two faculty membersinvolved with summer engineering camps for middle school students proposed a paper on theirsummer camp. The ASEE K-12 Engineering and Pre
course content, the authors havefound their input overlooked, underappreciated or disregarded. Although hired in large part dueto our vast industry experience, colleagues have not always been anxious to embrace our input ascredible. This further exacerbates the emotional challenge noted earlier associated with a loss ofexpertise moving from a well established industry career to that of a new engineering educator.In this case though, we have the expertise but we’re not allowed validation by our peers,essentially negating the most positive attribute we have to offer, at least in the first few years.Suggestions in the Area of Instructional ApproachAs is presently done in many engineering technology programs, the educational institutionshould
courses demonstrated tome how difficult presenting new material to students actually can be. I found that I had to notonly review concepts that I had learned years before, but I also had to learn new areas that werebeyond my standard span of working knowledge. It was one of the most challengingassignments that I had ever undertaken, but was also one of the most rewarding.In June 2003, I was offered the opportunity to make a career change from being a practicingCivil Engineer with the Maine Department of Transportation to becoming an adjunct professor atthe University of Maine. The opportunity came quickly in order to replace a professor for thefall 2003 semester. The position was offered for a temporary position and required that I take aleave of
“This town ain’t big enough for the both of us”: Two Engineering Educator Careers, One Department J.W. Bruce1 and Lori M. Bruce Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State UniversityABSTRACTDemands and stresses on a dual-career couple can be great. When the couple works in the samedepartment, it starts to become difficult to separate professional and person life. Each dual-careercouple must work out their own arrangements for dealing with communication, confidentiality,and emotional support. However, each person in the couple must strive from the first day tomaintain a separate professional identity and manage
well.Michael Gregg, Associate ProfessorAn alternate and increasingly less traveled road toward tenure in engineering is via industry.This is particularly true in a research university, such as Virginia Tech. Twenty years ofindustrial experience included self employment, government consulting (honorably referred to asa ‘beltway bandit’ in the Washington D.C. environs), machine design and automation, qualitycontrol, marketing and manufacturing. Reaching a ‘technical ceiling’ in industry – a positionabove which administrative duties abound but active engineering is relegated to others – requireda reassessment of career path. Teaching engineering had never been considered as an option,having seemingly endured that experience as an undergraduate and
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationResearch reported by Fields in an NSF brief indicates that PhDs who work as post-doctoralassociates are not likely to be hired into tenure-track positions.3 What the work of Fields does notaddress is how many of those post-docs sought tenure-track positions. Some may have realizedduring their post-doc that they were not interested in an academic career, or were more interestedin administration without assuming the responsibilities and pressures of a tenure-track position.Others may have used to post-doctoral position to gain an advantage in obtaining industrialemployment.Rather than add to the
not immediate, but will waitupon an opportunity when a NEE application/request and an offended senior facultymember on a given committee come into confluence. This could take years, and act likea time bomb and landmine in the NEE’s academic career path.Ironically the NEE may be slow in discerning accumulating hints that all is not well,particularly if still sensing that the director, chair, dean, and/or mentor support them.Many faculty are skilled at hiding their true feelings, and may still present a civil face tothe NEE, even if seething internally. They may smile while proverbially stabbing theNEE in the back. Hints include a repeated pattern of what a senior faculty member doesbeing inconsistent with what he/she has said (unfulfilled
AC 2010-951: PROPOSAL ADVICE: EXPERIENTIAL ADVICE FOCUSED FORNEW FACULTYAdrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University having recently moved from Mississippi State University, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She received her PhD and M.S. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michigan Tech. At Tech, Adrienne has taught Advanced Kinetics. At MSU, she taught graduate Chem Eng Math, Process Controls, Intro to Chem Eng Freshman Seminar, Heat Transfer, and Analytical Microdevice Technology courses. She is an NSF CAREER Awardee and was the faculty advisor for MSU’s
large enough to support claims of statistical significance. • The article is not scholarly in that it does not have any hypotheses or conclusions, or only proposes research with no results. • Conclusions as stated are not supported by the given data. • References, data, software, hardware, and other techniques do not reflect current technology or are otherwise out of date. • References are not in the appropriate format; the EDGJ requires APA format. • Poor quality graphics, confusing charts, and mislabeled figures. • Multiple grammatical and spelling errors, along with poor clarity of expression.At one time or another, and usually countless times over the span of a career, authors have theirsubmissions
those in industry considering a similar career change.Introduction Page 10.1356.1Even before the start of the second year as a full-time professor in the Engineering and Design(E&D) Department at Eastern Washington University (EWU) it was apparent that it was going to Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationbe very busy. There were new courses to prepare, department and university committeeappointments, new academic programs to develop, professional papers to write, and the quest fortenure
Paper ID #35744Improving Minority Students’ Career Readiness Through Enhanced SeniorDesign ExperiencesDr. Hua Li, Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Hua Li, a Professor in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, is interested in sustainable manufacturing, renewable energy, sustainability assessment, and engineering education. Dr. Li has served as P.I. and Co-P.I. in different projects funded by NSF, DOEd, DHS, NASA, USDA, etc.Mr. Ricardo Miguel Garcia Pineda, Texas A&M University KingsvilleProf. Kai Jin, Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Kai Jin is a Professor of
Paper ID #38583Attributes of Research Mindset for Early Career Engineering ResearchersMr. Sanjeev M Kavale, Arizona State University Sanjeev Kavale is currently a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Systems and Design (EESD) at Arizona State University (ASU). His research interests are mindsets and their applicability in engineering, outcomes-based education, and problem / project-based learning. He is having a teaching experience of 11 years and an industry experience of 2 years prior to joining PhD.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University