Joseph A. Untener University of DaytonIntroductionThe Department of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton (UD) is in the thirteenthyear of a successful 3+1 program with Shanghai Normal University (SNU) in China. Thisinnovative partnership brings together students from a public institution from one side of theglobe, in one of the most urbanized cities in the world, with students in a private Catholic schoolin the Midwest of the United States. Both groups benefit from this internationalization ofengineering education.The internationalizing of engineering education has been a goal of nearly every university formore than a decade. The National Academy of Engineering, for example, produced reports inthe
asthe development of an engineering identity has been positively linked to persistence in engineering [1-7].Uncovering the traits and experiences that lead to the development of a stronger engineering identitycould aid in the creation of new strategies in the education and retention of engineering students that arespecifically targeted to each of the individual disciplines.Researchers collected data at a large, public research institution in the southeastern United States, using amodified version of the SaGE survey. Adjustments were made to the SaGE survey to allow for thecollection of additional information on underlying identities (namely math, chemistry, and biology) inaddition to Physics. The same survey format was utilized with the
college students (FGCS) face considerable obstacles to college success,including a lack of role models in the family, a lack of familial mentoring and support, a lack offamiliarity with the college climate, and, generally, lower socioeconomic status [1-6]. They tendto be less academically prepared for college, and English is not their native language for a higherproportion than of continuing-generation college students (CGCS) [3]. However, in many ways,recent research suggests that FGCS are very similar to CGCS. They respond to the same factorsencouraging college persistence and success [7-8], and often demonstrate considerable “grit” inpursuing their undergraduate careers (9), a factor instrumental in undergraduate achievement.Indeed, Boone and
space race, engineering education in theU.S. was reformed. In 1955 the ASEE "Grinter report" on evaluation of engineering educationemphasized the importance of graphical expression, including sketching, as a means for creativethinking, spatial visualization, and the ability to convey ideas [1]. However, with the advent ofcomputer aided design (CAD) in the 1970's, free-hand sketching was eliminated from thecurriculum in most undergraduate engineering programs in North America [2], [3].Much of the current literature in representational competence is in science education rather thanengineering education, especially in chemistry and physics. In the engineering education literature,studies that show improved ability in CAD oriented engineering
pointed at their wayof looking at reality and at their own professional identity. It pointed at the difficulties ofgeneral courses to offer educational methods that were interpreted differently from studentgroups of different departments. And it pointed at differences at basic competences needed todive into deep learning and to be motivated by what is offered by the course. Solutions arediscussed.IntroductionFuture engineers are not only expected to have technical knowledge, skills, and abilities, butalso a foundation in professional and ethical practices [1]. One important challenge foreducators is that students show large differences in how they perceive courses and what theireducational needs are [2]. In this article we focus on a large first
hydraulic vibration machine at IIT Madras, for Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Tumba. In US he worked for the R&D departments of Computer, ATM and Railway Industry. He then resumed teaching at several US academic institutions. He spent two summers at NASA Kennedy Space Center as a research fellow. He received awards for academic, teaching and research excellence. His teaching experience ranges from KG to PG. After his return to India, Dr. Malladi taught his favorite subject ”Engineering Mechanics” at a few en- gineering institutions and found a need to 1. simplify the subject 2. create a new genre of class books to facilitate active reading and learning and 3. reform academic assessment for the sure
Efficient) Teaching (Work in Progress)IntroductionThe paper is the result of a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) [1] within the college ofengineering at the University of Delaware. The FLC was initiated, with the help of a $4k grantfrom the University’s Center for Teaching and Learning, to create a series of short guides oneffective teaching practices that distill the literature on various topics into actionable steps anyfaculty member (particularly new faculty) can implement. The FLC consisted of members fromall departments within the college of engineering and a single colleague from the college ofeducation with expertise in professional development (7 members total). All
different professors taught sections EngineeringStatics in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering with no common syllabus or commonassignments. Drop, withdraw, fail (DWF) rates varied from 2% to 78% – students picked theircourse section based on grade expectation. Over the years between 2005 and 2013, I taught moreand more of the offered sections, effectively reducing course drift and enforcing a common set oflearning objectives.Figure 1. Total Enrollment in Statics Total as taughtinby Enrollment Howard Statics, Fall and Spring Author's sections, Other faculty's
, Aerospace Engineering,IntroductionPersistence, retention and academic achievement in higher education are influenced by a complexinteraction between self-efficacy, motivation and engagement. Bandura [1] defined perceived self-efficacy as “belief in one’s capabilities to organize, and execute the courses of action required toproduce given attainments, the perception to do tasks and achieve goals”. Bandura and Locke [2]observed a strong relation between self-efficacy and performance in general. A meta-analysis of114 studies by Stajkovic and Luthans [3] found a strong correlation between self-efficacy andwork-related performance. A review of literature [4] on self-efficacy and academic performancepublished between 2003-15 indicated a moderate
receive timely feedback from students.Many helpful feedbacks were received this way. Many students commented that interactiveactivities such as group discussion made them focused on materials which otherwise would makethem sleepy. Another feedback from students was that they would like the videos to be short.The eight to twelve minutes recommended by Abeysekera and Dawson 1 and Ronchetti22 seem tobe too long for our students. Majority students wanted five minutes or less. This will be a factorwhen the next modules are developed.It was noticed that the second flipped module contains three videos with total time of 20 minutes,these videos were created using the recorded lecture captured in the previous semester. Thecaptured lecture lasted about 45
of the need for targeted faculty development in the implementation of active-learning methodologies to insure the method has the intended effect on student learning andengagement.Introduction:Teaching methods are known to affect student performance in a course. The meta-analysis of225 studies on active-learning by Freeman, et al [1] found students in STEM courses taught withextensive lecturing are 1.5 times more likely to fail, earn a D, or withdraw from the course thanstudents taught with active-learning methods in the same STEM course subject. A second meta-analysis of engineering and technology education journal articles confirmed that small-group andcollaborative learning pedagogies increased student performance by close to a half a
management skills andconstruction related expertise with the aim of finishing a building construction project on time.The pedagogy includes traditional lecture, group learning, hands-on assignments, teamdiscussion and presentation, reading pertinent literature, case studies and independent learning.BIM is a process-oriented approach that emphasizes on learning BIM as a revolutionaryconstruction management process and its impacts on the success of projects.The course structure includes several learning modules and each module consists of fourdifferent sessions as follows: 1. Introductory oral presentation accompanied by exclusive studying materials; 2. Lab 1: Teaching Assistant leading a hands-on-exercise tutorial by a well-defined procedure
with students through outreach events andprograms to increase student awareness of library resources, with the primary goal of fosteringacademic success and lifelong learning. [1] At Syracuse University, approximately 25% of thegraduate students are STEM majors, making it a high priority for the STEM Librarian to findnew and effective avenues for connecting with them. However, attempts to connect graduatestudents to these resources have been hindered by a lack of understanding for how to reach andcommunicate with graduate students, an absence of regularized funding to host events, andinsufficient data regarding graduate students professional development needs and interests. TheSTEM Librarian’s traditional interactions with graduate students
.Changes in industry trends are the primary cause for the addition of different areas in the ChemEcurriculum such as the need for large-scale production of commodities chemicals, productdevelopment, pharmaceuticals, and bioengineering [1]. However, there are many hurdles tocompletely invigorate the ChemE curriculum. Some examples may include accreditation, coursecredit limits, maintaining consistency with the rest of the universities, among others. Manyengineering disciplines have addressed these challenges by adding non-traditional learningexperiences such as research experiences, cooperative learning, project-based learning, servicelearning, and experiential learning [2].Conventional wisdom advocates that engineering student’s involvement in
narrow and implicit due to lack of support in development of research designskills, and professional identity and socialization4, 1. Wenger5 reminds us that “meaningfullearning in social contexts requires both participation and reification to be in interplay” (p. 1),but REU participants likely lack opportunities afforded to graduate students to more legitimatelyparticipate in the community, given their relative inexperience and contracted timeframe.While the challenges of attracting, retaining, and educating engineers are well-recognized6,engineering researchers are divided in their beliefs about effective ways to socialize REUstudents into the engineering field. Sadler, Burgin, McKinney and Ponjuan7 call for moreexplication of concepts, others
University, a mid-size Mid-Atlantic public university, we set out to foster anEntrepreneurial Mindset in our first-year engineering students by modifying the ProductArchaeology framework that was first developed by K. Lewis, et al. [1]. In our implementation,we allowed student teams to choose from a bank of products and guided them through the fourphases of product archaeology (preparation, excavation, evaluation, and explanation). For theevaluation phase, each team developed and executed three or more qualitative experiments fortheir product. At the conclusion of the project, students wrote a report that addressed the fourphases of product archaeology, including the results of their quantitative experiments. Eachreport was graded using an
learning opportunitiesprovided to students as well as to the methods used to assess learning. These programmaticchanges provided motivation for the enhancement of a writing-based approach known as free-writing that has been utilized by the author for many years. The free-writing activities have beenused to provide students with a unique opportunity to demonstrate their understanding of keyconcepts in the introductory physics course. The original motivation for the free-writingactivities themselves was inspired from the strategies highlighted in the Angelo and Crosshandbook on classroom assessment techniques [1]. There Angelo and Cross outline a number offormative classroom assessment strategies (CATs), most of which have a writing component.Along
on behalf of Pearson in2015 [1] and found that Tablet usage remains high and growing – especially for younger studentsat 78% (66% usage of laptops). At lower grades elementary school iPads are common, butChromebooks are becoming more popular [1]. Chromebooks can be purchased with or withouttouch screens, but in the coming years it is anticipated that touchscreens will become morepopular [2]. Smartphone usage has increased across all grade levels and is most prevalent amongolder students. In 2015, 53% of elementary school students, 66% of middle school students and82% of high school students used smartphones in school regularly. The availability ofsmartphones in Higher Ed has increased from 84% in a 2014 [3] to close to 100% in a 2017study
Hispanic students. Architecture, engineering, and technology students make upbetween 10% and 30% of the entering first year students. There was an application process forthe program. Students who were accepted, would be a part of a cohort of students who met witha lead instructor weekly, with the program being run as a 1-credit course. Additional instructorsfrom the student life side were also available to help facilitate activities, and connect students toco-curricular and extra-curricular aspects of college life. The present paper will describe some ofthe programming and assignments of this pilot program, and discuss some of the relatedstrengths, weaknesses, challenges, and successes. A primary focus of the programming was tohelp students
Distributed System of Governance in Engineering Education.” In it, we analyze diversity discourses among faculty and administrators in engineering programs across the Unites States, and the initiatives deployed in the name of diversity. We use methods of discourse analysis to study how the term “diversity” is leveraged in different contexts to enact certain methods of recruitment and retention of particular populations.Introduction Diversity initiatives have been a priority in university settings for decades, but havelargely not delivered on their promises. The percentage of bachelor’s degrees awarded toHispanic, Black and Native American students is in the single digits [1], and the proportion ofwomen in
effect of thislimitation is that the department has only one instructional lab. In addition, being an old program,the lab was originally designed for some of the more traditional Bioengineering fields, such asbiomechanics and instrumentation. About 15 years ago, in 2006, a new Bioengineering building was constructed reflecting thechange in the field to areas related to molecular biology and tissue engineering, among others.The instructional lab was moved to a new home in a lab which contained chemical hoods andcell culture hoods, but was still nevertheless setup with stations designed for physiological andinstrumentation studies (Figure 1). Figure 1: Main lab area with 16 stations each with data acquisition devices (Biopac & NI myDAQ) for
reflexivity toward awarenessof the politics imbued in technology as well as the often exclusionary cultures entangled therein.Further this research brings field work observations of these groups and their practices(designated as Study 1) into conversation with interviews of engineering education researchers(designated as Study 2). In that vein, this examination asks: What might an analysis of thepractices and mindsets of feminist hacker and opensource science hardware groups contribute tothe world of engineering education, specifically for educators interested in change-makingstrategies for creating a more equitable higher education environment that takes on issues ofracism, sexism, heteronormativity, ableism, etc.?With a theoretical grounding in the
electricalengineering with control systems and computer systems, as shown in Figure 1. In the 21stcentury, as low-cost embedded computers have become ubiquitous in every aspect of oureveryday lives, very few new products are strictly mechanical. Even refrigerators and coffeemakers are Internet connected and able to share their status and be controlled from a distanceover the network. All of the new products in the Internet of Things are in some sense a productof mechatronics engineering. This emerging network of devices provides a growing opportunityfor new mechatronics engineers and the schools that educate them.A significant limitation in engineering education is providing all students sufficient laboratoryaccess to gain practical experience in classroom
major. By far, a 100% ofundergraduate placement for totally 2006 graduates has been maintained at the JI. Over 80% ofthe graduates pursued higher level studies in graduate schools, mainly in the US. Among thestudents who pursued graduate studies in US universities, over 55% were admitted to the top 10engineering schools. The students who chose employment after graduation were placed inengineering as well as non-engineering organizations.Different forms of multi/inter-disciplinary effort have been tried with some successes achievedand lessons learned [1][2][3]. Publications suggest that integrating curricula and organizingactivities across disciplines are not easy [4][5]. Yet it is believed that interdisciplinary curriculaand activities relate
offer students a hands-on learningexperience. Many first-year engineering courses at schools like Northwestern University,California Polytechnic State, and University of St. Thomas have predefined projects in their first-year curriculum [1-3]. These projects’ goals are to develop fully functional prototypes that cancomplete specific sets of tasks and meet certain requirements. This allows for the difficulty levelbetween projects to remain the same and provides a clear grading system for the prototypes. Another form of projects available throughout engineering curriculum are open-endedprojects (OEPs). OEPs have fewer restrictions and require the development of a unique, workingprototype through brainstorming and iterative design. It
this course by analysis of the neuralnetworks model for function approximation project.1. IntroductionIn higher education, especially, in engineering education, all the effort of educators is focused oneducating students to be qualified for their future professions. To achieve these learning outcomesin engineering education, a variety of pedagogical considerations have been implemented andexperimented. There have been a large number of pedagogical efforts proposed and implemented,such as inquiry-based learning (Behrouzi and Kuchma, 2016), project-based learning (Khorbotly,2015; Wang et. al., 2017; Zhao et. al., 2017; Luo, 2015), cooperative learning (Akili, 2012), activelearning (Luo, 2015; Akili, 2014; Oliveira, 2015), divide-and-conquer
accreditation body that accredits programs in the UnitedStates and many countries throughout the world [1]. These programs are accredited under oneof four accreditation commissions: Engineering Technology (ETAC), Engineering (EAC),Computing (CAC), and Applied and Natural Sciences (ANSAC). These commissions differ inseveral accreditation criteria while maintaining a common fundamental theme. Accreditation isassociated with quality education by ensuring that graduates are prepared for professionalpractice or ready for further studies [2, 3]. In addition, graduation from an ABET-accreditedprogram is a requirement for many professional engineering licensing bodies.While the focus in recent years has been on having a continuous improvement process that
University of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She is passionate about translational research and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 GENDER AND RACIAL DISPARITIES IN STUDENTS’ SELF-CONFIDENCE ON TEAM-BASED ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECTS Jenni M. Buckley, PhD1,3, Sara Grajeda, PhD2, Amy E. Trauth, PhD1, Dustyn Roberts, PhD4,1 1 University of Delaware, Department of Mechanical Engineering 2 University of Delaware, Center for Research in Education and Science Policy 3 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development
Information systems.IntroductionSeveral studies have pointed out the need to foster a diagnosis and an intervention concerninggender equality in academic contexts (1-14). Studies carried out by Amâncio (9-10) demonstratedthe existence of gender patterns in access and mobility processes to which are linked gender biasesand stereotypes that place women on the "margins" of knowledge production. Recent studiesdeveloped in Portugal (15) describe how women and men are socially perceived according toessentialist dichotomous principles, which favour the invisibility and devaluation of women.Legislation on the promotion of gender equality in educational institutions in Portugal is relativelyrecent compared to other European countries and it is the result of a
during the firstsemester, transfer students go through a period of adjustment. Investigation into these transitionshas brought to light the reality of “transfer shock” [1] and its consequences for transfer studentson multiple levels: personal, social, and academic. In recent years, research has focused on thecomplexity of such factors, like background, prior educational experiences, the transfer process,social adjustment, and academic progress, to reduce transfer shock [2-6]. These studies haveutilized diverse methodological and analytic approaches, from institutional data, quantitativeanalysis of survey responses, to more recently some qualitative analysis of focus groups and open-ended questions. These results create a picture of the barriers