psychologicalsafety survey, survey on perceptions of class, and a CoP-specific instrument, the CommunityAssessment Toolkit (CAT). In this paper we report on our piloting of the instruments.Introduction.A recent National Academies report notes the need for changes in graduate STEM education:“Recent surveys of employers and graduates and studies of graduate education suggest that manygraduate programs do not adequately prepare students to translate their knowledge intoimpact…” (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM], 2018) (p. 1).In particular, students need to develop abilities for working in collaborative and team settings, tocommunicate to diverse audiences, to acquire pedagogical skills (p. 96), and to deal with diverseopinions
the Graduate Teaching Fellowship from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Departmental Doctoral and Masters Awards in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University, and the R.C. Edwards Graduate Recruiting Fellowship from Clemson Univer- sity. Dr. Caldwell is a member of ASME and Pi Tau Sigma.Dr. Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools
Paper ID #32883Engaging High School Students in Computer Science Through MusicRemixing: An EarSketch-based Pilot Competition and EvaluationDr. Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations from K-12 up to the collegiate level. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2012.Dr. Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni
that areunder-represented in a specific field of study or profession relative to their numbers in the generalpopulation. In this work, the fields of study used to define an under-represented minority include Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Under-represented minorities do not necessarily havesimilar characteristics such as culture (family, ethnic, social), motivations, perspectives etc. For example,a Hispanic student who grows up in the inner city, is on free or reduced lunch, and lives in a governmentsubsidized home often has little in common with a Hispanic student who is raised in a financially stablehousehold in the suburbs. Additionally, an under-represented minority with immigrant parents may beraised in a cultural
Paper ID #27632Implications of Gamification in Learning Environments on Computer Sci-ence Students: A Comprehensive StudyMs. Leila Zahedi, Florida International University Leila Zahedi is a Ph.D. student in the School of Computing and Information Science (SCIS) at Florida International University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from the University of Is- fahan and two Master’s degrees in Information Technology Management from the University of Yazd and Computer Science from Florida International University. Her research interests include computer science education, quantitative data analysis, and data
Page 23.615.3As shown in Figure 1, the chart displayed the number of students enrolled in engineering andengineering technology program in an HSI, and their graduation rate. Students are grouped underwhite and minority category according to their ethnicity. The female gender is consideredunderrepresented in engineering and is also considered in this study as a separate category. Theminority category includes all those traditionally considered as underrepresented ethnicities:African American, Hispanics and Asian American. However, the number of students withHispanic background is the largest in HSIs, and Hispanic is used instead of minority student inthe later sections of this paper. Although white student’s enrollment is the largest in the
, graduate, and undergraduate teaching assistants.PurposeThe purpose of the first phase of the pilot is to investigate the current practices of five of thethirty-five KEEN institutions that are currently incorporating EML elements into their first-yearengineering curricula. Through assessing these current practices, we will be able to develop acurriculum that integrates the best practices and examines the progress of student motivation,identity, engineering skillsets, and learning over the first year. The overarching research questionthat we are studying is: In what ways do entrepreneurial minded learning (EML) experiencesaffect first-year engineering students’ motivation and identity development? Additionally, we areseeking to answer the following
(1), 38-41.3. Greenfield, G. (2014). Career outcomes of women engineering bachelor’s degree recipients. In Ed. S. J. Frueh, Career choices of female engineers: A summary of a workshop. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.4. Margolis, J., & Kotys-Schwartz, D. (2009). The post-graduation attrition of engineering students: An exploratory study on influential career choice factors. Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Lake Buena Vista, FL, November 13-19.5. Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R., Miller, R. L., & Olds, B. A. (2009B). Competence in engineering: A tale of two women. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education
PhD student in the Department of English and the Center for Writing Studies. She currently serves as Assistant Director for Center for Writing Studies. She teaches a range of writ- ing courses and works with faculty and teaching assistants across disciplines to help hone their writing pedagogy. Her research and teaching focus on holistic literate development.Prof. S. Lance Cooper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign S. Lance Cooper is Professor and Associate Head for Graduate Programs in the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in Physics from the University of Virginia in 1982, his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Illinois in 1988, and he was a
the work of building the faculty and staff team, faculty development, the benefits andchallenges of the organizational structure, specific elements of curricular and pedagogicalinnovation, operational structures and decision making, etc.II. METHODSThis paper is a descriptive case study detailing the visioning and building of Wake ForestEngineering. It is written from the emic perspective of the Founding Chair who happens to alsobe an engineering education research scholar. This descriptive case study offers a chronologicalaccount of key activities that impacted the student experience, including (1) department vision,mission, identity, (2) curriculum structure and development, (3) student advising, (4)pedagogical strategies, (5) integrative
AC 2011-2368: BUILDING ENGINEERS AND MENTORS: A MODEL FORSTUDENT-LED ENGINEERING OUTREACHAJ Almaguer, UC Berkeley AJ Almaguer studied Mechanical Engineering and Material Science Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the founding members of BEAM.ROY TANGSOMBATVISIT, UC BerkeleyMatthew Ford, UC BerkeleySusan Yushan Chen, Berkeley Engineers and Mentors at the University of California, Berkeley I am a Bioengineering senior at UC Berkeley. I joined BEAM in my junior year because I have always wanted to mentor. I have since been working with BEAM as staff and mentor. I have also helped establish BEAM as a more prominent engineering outreach organization on campus. I plan to enroll in graduate
, retaining, and pursuing theengineering profession [24-26] and better predict the long-term persistence of freshman students[27]. Underrepresented groups like women, who often perceive engineering as a male field,especially experience an identity conflict and gender roles affect their retention in engineering[28,29].The Current StudyThe current study aims to bring up-to-date industry-relevant problems into the classroom and doso by having students interact with industry professionals who pose the problems for students tosolve in a scaffolded manner. It employs design-based research (DBR approach) [30-33] withmultiple cycles of implementation. Our research plan includes one baseline condition (Spring2021) and two cycles of enactment (Fall 2021 and
such, our efforts in thisthird phase of study delve more deeply into program participants’ experiences of culture, power,and belonging. Through these efforts, we offer a functional sketch of the individualcharacteristics of a program (developed to support transformative learning) that mostsignificantly impact overall program culture to create a transformative educational environmentfor engineering students. 1.2. Communities of PracticeWhen developing educational programs to be piloted as transformative learning interventions atthe beginning of phase two of our study [2], we identified the Community of Practice (CoP)framework because of the potential ease of integration of the transformative learning influencersinto this model of
stream at Queen’s University. Proceedings of the Canadian EngineeringEducation Association. DOI: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3943Tonso, K. (2006a) Teams that work: campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions.Journal of Engineering Education 95(1): 25-37.Tonso, K. (2006b) Student engineers and engineering identity: Campus engineer identities asfigured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education 1(2): 1-35.Valverde, K.L.C and Dariotis, W.M. (2019) Fight the Tower: Asian American Women Scholars’Resistance and Renewal in the Academy. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswick, New Jersey.Wang Y., Zhang, X., Khalkhal, F., Claussen S., and Biviano A. (2023) A quantitative analysis onteamwork behavior, disagreement, and their linkages to Students
development topics into the ECEcurriculum. We present the results of a one-week module for graduate students that linksdisciplinary and intrapersonal knowledge through a design thinking framework. We present acontent analysis and descriptive statistics from two surveys distributed to students from Fall2024 about their experiences with the module. These surveys asked students about theirexperiences with the module, their engineering identity and belongingness, and their beliefsabout their future careers. A major takeaway from this analysis was the saliency studentsexperienced around the topics of ambiguity, failure, and risk in the context of thinking abouttheir future careers. Finally, we offer recommendations for other ECE educators interested
] Case study: Ayesha and the Trade Show [14] – addressing invisibility and “old-boy 6 network” in workplace 7 Continue the case study from the previous week 8 Panel: Women in Engineering 9 No lecture. Students attend Women+ in Biomedical Engineering Lunches 10 Wrap-upReferences[1] M. J. Johnson and S. D. Sheppard, "Relationships between engineering student and faculty demographics and stakeholders working to affect change," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 139-151, 2004.[2] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, "Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States
that they would stay on the pathway to a bachelor’s degree in engineering or computerscience. COVID-19’s impact on our plans to host in-person networking events in convenientlocations and times in specific regions of the U.S. resulted in a need to pivot to virtual events.While this move allowed us to offer these events to anyone interested in attending, regardless oflocation, it presented some recruitment challenges that negatively impacted event attendance bythe specific population we were most interested in studying,This study was also undertaken to help inform SWE’s program development to better supportCC students in STEM programs. SWE has limited relationships with students attending CCs, andthese events were offered as a way to introduce
Computing Identity and Persistence Across Multiple Groups Using Structural Equation ModelingAbstractDespite the projected growth of computer and information technology occupations, manycomputing students fail to graduate. Studying students’ self-beliefs is one way to understandpersistence in a school setting. This paper explores how students' disciplinary identity sub-constructs including competence/performance, recognition, interest, and sense of belongingcontribute to academic persistence. A survey of 1,640 students as part of an NSF grant wasconducted at three South Florida metropolitan public universities. A quantitative analysis wasperformed which included a structural equation model (SEM) and a multigroup SEM. The
Paper ID #6666Learning Statics by Feeling: Effects of Everyday Examples on Confidenceand Identity DevelopmentMs. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, whose work examines and develops initiatives to encourage more students, especially women, into the eld of engineering. Currently, Tsai’s research focuses on understanding the dynamics of how status and prestige are constructed among novice engineers.Dr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Design Center Colorado Co-Director and an Instructor
beliefs about math, English, science, and social studies. Other research interests of hers include the formation of career aspirations, the school- to-work transition, and the differential participation in science, technology, engineering, and math fields based on social identity groups such as gender and Racial/Ethnic identity.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and a Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
professional identity development in medical and engineering students, and formative joint display analysis on dissonance in a cultural competency study of first-year engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research AbstractThis theory paper explores ways in which the engineering education community can achievemore comprehensive integration in mixed methods designs. We searched for exemplars in theJournal of Engineering Education, the European Journal of Engineering Education, and theAustralasian Journal of Engineering Education using “mixed-method” and “mixed
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Measure the significance of the alignment of the research stakeholders [academicians,manufacturers, and students (graduate and undergraduate/senior-level)] through an AHP analysisand a statistical comparison of their individual priorities.Methodology of the Research ProjectTable 1 maps the methodology proposed to answer the research objectives. It is based upon asynthesis of various approaches to qualitative observational research. [5], [6], [7] In addition, Table 1includes a column, “Saaty step(s)”, to map the research methodology steps to the Saatyalgorithm. [8]Table 1. Research Plan Step Description of the Step Saaty
of Engineers per 10,000 inhabitants in some OECD Countries in 2011 .However, this scenario may change in a few more years due to the increasing numbers ofBrazilian engineering undergraduate students lately, where in 2012 this number had asignificantly percentage of growth probably due to recent Brazilian educational policieschanges46. And the number of masters‟ degrees and PhDs graduated in all field areas byBrazilian universities has more than quadrupled in the last 15 years, jumping from 13,219 in1996 to 55,047 in 201111. Figure 2 shows the evolution of doctoral and master‟s degrees inengineering from 2001 to 2011. Nevertheless, this growth was not enough to place Brazilamong countries with large contribution to engineering research yet
Paper ID #28898Building Early Elementary Teacher Confidence in Teaching ComputerScience Through a Low-Cost, Scalable Research-Practitioner CollaborationJustin Lee Clough, University of Southern California Justin L. Clough is a PhD student at the University of Southern California studying Mechanical Engineer- ing; his advisor is Assad A. Oberai. He received his Bachelors of Science from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Masters of Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, both in Mechanical Engineering. He holds a DOD:SMART scholarship and works closely with the AFRL/RQHV teams at Wright-Patterson
anythingwe have written about in this paper. For example, if teams of faculty and students are interestedin using our signification framework, either at their own institutions or as part of a cross-institutional study, we are open to sharing and/or collaborating. As we progress with our project,we will continue to share our experiences with SenseMaker with the engineering educationcommunity.References[1] LEES, "Welcome to the LEES website," Accessed on: 28 April, 2020Available: https://sites.asee.org/lees/[2] S. E. Van der Merwe et al., "Making Sense of Complexity: Using SenseMaker as a Research Tool," Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 25, 2019.[3] L. A. Schreiner, "Thriving in College," New Directions for Student Services, vol. 2013
research design was guided by the job hindrance-control-support JHCSmodel [11] and prior studies of doctoral student stress (e.g., [8][9][10]). The overall researchquestion for the project is What is the nature of and what are consequences of stressors forgraduate students?Study DesignThis project mixes qualitative and quantitative research methods in a sequential design for thepurpose of triangulation [12] to in Year 1 uncover the identities of top stressors experienced bydoctoral engineering students and in Years 2-3 to measure their effects on student well-being andretention. The goal of the longitudinal interview phase of study in the first year of the project isto collect data supporting the creation and testing in years 2 and 3 of a novel
chance to do it yourself. Okay so [our university] started a course, we piloted it...which attempted to give that experience, hands on experience, guided towards innovation, to undergrads. And it’s a delightful thing...it is exactly what we need to inspire these [students].” (00:47:56–00:49:15)This quote provides another example of Leo seeing a problem and trying to solve it, with obviouscurricular implications for engineering education at his university.Lisa (Education)Lisa’s interview transcript narrative followed the overall structure of the interview protocol,connecting repeatedly back to interrelated themes of social justice, equity and inclusion,macroethics, fixing structural factors, and authenticity. We observed both
Paper ID #38182Board 207: ACCESS in STEM: An S-STEM Project Supporting Economi-callyDisadvantaged STEM-Interested Students in Their First Two YearsErica ClineMenaka AbrahamSarah AlaeiDr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington, Tacoma Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, she worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer working on both energy efficiency and renewable
include recognition, interest, andperformance/competence. There are 11 questions total within the three constructs, including “Myinstructors see me as an engineering”; “I find fulfillment in doing engineering”; and “Iunderstand concepts I have studied in engineering.” These are assessed on a six-point scale(strongly disagree to strongly agree). Role identity is identified as a theoretical framework. Herinitial pilot study included over 300 students and the subsequent study had over 2500 studentresponses. As she concludes in her 2016 paper “The items developed to measure engineeringidentity are the first of their kind to quantitatively measure students engineering identity self-beliefs. I offer these items as a way to quickly assess and broadly
using a qualitative approach findings are able to emerge from the dataand not be restricted to pre-determined categories or themes. In this way we did not limit ourresearch analysis or findings to “fit” prior work conducted in different settings.MethodThis study is part of a larger project researching barriers to engineering as a career choice forAppalachian youth. The project used an exploratory qualitative methodology and employed in-person semi-structured interviews and maximum variation sampling32. In this section wedescribe the data collection, participant characteristics, and qualitative analysis (coding) used toanswer the research questions: What role(s) does interest play in engineering career choices ofAppalachian students? How do such