science teaching methods course and volunteered for a follow-up engineeringprofessional development institute, which was the context for this study. Data sources includedvideos of the teachers solving design problems, teachers’ written and oral reflections onengineering teaching experiences, and researcher field notes from the after-school week. Wegenerated thick descriptions of the cases of Ana and Ben and used these to develop conjecturesabout their engineering epistemologies. Following microethnographic methodology andstrategies from discourse analysis, we re-examined transcripts and other data artifacts forconfirming and disconfirming evidence of these conjectures.We found that Ana and Ben framed engineering learning as building knowledge
colleagues. Yet, teamwork skills are rarely “taught” inengineering curricula; in fact, compared to business representatives, university educators havebeen found to underestimate the value of teamwork KSAs. Instead, students are expected todevelop teamwork and leadership skills via a sink-or-swim approach where they are assignedgroup work and left to perform as they can. Often, these poor teamwork experiences combinedwith the lack of training and opportunities for guided reflection lead to students disliking workingin groups, impacting not just the cognitive but also the affective domain of learning.In response to this identified weakness, a committee of representatives from the Faculty ofEngineering and other support units at the University of
, complexity, and context [4, 7]. 2 Knowledge of strategies encompasses general learning and problem-solving strategies, as well astask specific strategies [4, 8].Within metacognitive regulation, our framework focuses on planning, monitoring, controlling,and evaluating. Metacognitive planning involves integrating the elements of metacognitionfocused on a specific task, setting task goals, sub-dividing more complex tasks, and predictingtask outcomes [8, 9]. Monitoring and control are necessarily linked activities. Monitoring isbeing reflective during a task, keeping track of progress, how things are going, and if selectedstrategies are working [8, 10
student experience3 and favors learning styles that are intuitive, verbal, reflective,and sequential, as defined by the Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles (ILS). Felder andBrent point out the futility of trying to tailor instruction individually4 and Alghasham posited thateducational planners desiring to enhance teamwork should group students of mixed learningstyles.5-7 A balanced pedagogy blending learning styles will challenge students to step outsidetheir comfort zone to “stretch and grow.”3 This allows those that favor the opposite end of thelearning style spectrum, sensory, visual, active, and global, to benefit from the proposedpedagogy. Through the approach presented, new graduates will have a better chance to apply anappropriate
Pedagogically-trained LAs Chemistry 5 2628 Pre-post assessment by topic Fall 2014 Concept Warehouse; Cooperative learning studio; Engineering 4 1389 Reflection Mathematics 1 70 Clickers; Treisman Excel Studio Physics 1 398 Clickers; SCALE-UP studio Integrative POGIL; Clickers; Inquiry-based laboratories; 4 1933 Biology Pedagogically
AR raised students’ interest whichincreased the majority of participants learning of science concepts. Still, the majority of currentAR literature reflects the prior point: researchers’ attempts to evaluate and measure studentlearning in AR applications has little basis in learning science or educational literature. Webelieve our guide will add to the literature by designing AR applications within the situatedlearning environment.Situated LearningSituated learning theory is based in the situative conceptual framework and examines howlearners gain knowledge through social contexts and interactions with materials and people.When discussing theory, it is important to understand the nature of knowing and consequentlywhat signifies learning and
leadership and teamwork11.Developmental bibliotherapy (guided reading) is a tool that uses fictional written stories to helpdevelop social, emotional, or psychological growth at all levels of development12-13. In 1949,Shrodes identified four stages of developmental bibliotherapy: 1) identification - where thereader identifies with a character in a story; 2) catharsis - when a reader is able to experience theemotions of the character of the story; 3) insight – a deeper understanding which is achievedthrough reflection on the identification that the reader makes with the characters and situations ofthe story; and 4) universalization - when a reader is able to apply the insights the reader hasgained through reflection to situations they encounter in
their own experience through immersion and examination. Teams documentedtheir observations using blogs that focused on the same general area of inquiry they wouldpursue in Lumbisi. The blogs were available to the garden community and organizers, as well asother teams, allowing them to dialogue about their understanding of the subject. Research teamsalso were required to review other teams’ blogs and comment on observations.During the course development, coordination across educational units, universities, organizationsand countries flowed surprising smoothly and without issue. Perhaps the greatest challenge of theentire effort came when devising a course name that would reflect the interests of engineers,social scientists, planners and
quantitative data from an Infrared thermographytechnique. The specification of the Fluke infrared camera used in this work is given in Table 1.Also, as part of the thermography process, Extech Model 451181 was used to record thetemperature of the inside air, temperature of the outside air, wind velocity, and relative humidity.The main problems experienced are the special technique used for the measurement of emissivity(ε) value of the target surface and the evaluation of the reflected temperature.Table 1. Technical specification of the Infrared Camera used in this work. Name Fluke TI25 Field of view 23° x 17° Thermal sensitivity ≤0.1 °C at 30 °C (100 mK) Spectral range
. 6) The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is an area of scholarly work that is receivingincreased attention in higher education and many engineering education faculty are embracingmore scholarly approaches to teaching and learning. Streveler, et al.2 outlined a wide range ofinquiry in engineering education, and was informed by scholars in and outside the field ofengineering education (e.g., Hutchings and Sulman, 1999; Lohmann, (n.d.); and Streveler,Borrego, Smith, 2007 as cited by Streveler, et al.2). Table 1 summarizes the variety of ways inwhich engineering faculty can engage in engineering education research and practice in fourlevels of inquiry. Level 0 Teach: Teach as taught and without reflection Level 1 Effective
competitiveness of the US economy. This endeavor has become a national priority1.However, the ECE enrollment and attrition trends in recent years are sources for concern.Enrollment in U.S. institutions of higher education has grown steadily at all levels rising from14.5 million students in 1994 to 20.7 million in 2009, but such a growth is not fully reflected inscience and engineering. Institutions of higher education in the United States granted engineeringdegrees in the mid-2000s at a lower rate than in the mid-1980s. The number of Americanstudents earning bachelor’s degrees increased by 16% over the past 10 years, however, thenumber of bachelor’s degrees earned in engineering decreased by 15%. Nationally, less than50% of the students who enrolled in
have produced, piloted, and internally distributed 64 curriculum modules and/or labs.The purpose of this paper is to provide preliminary results of an investigation of the relationshipof learning setting and instructional use of experimental centric learning, especially for students ofcolor. Learning settings studied include: 1) traditional classrooms, 2) lab settings and 3)homework. Variations by instructional use included: 1) instructor demonstration, 2) cooperativeand 3) independent student use. Student outcomes reflect gains in: 1) pre-requisites to learning; 2)immediate short-term learning; 3) long-term and transferable outcomes and 4) selected ABETcharacteristics (importance and preparedness). Findings indicate that both setting and
put emphasis on the importance of understanding students andfaculty perceptions of engineering education. It also mentions the importance of curriculumorganization and impact of curriculum organization on instructors. Need for student reflection,exposure, and discussion. It also supported the theme of industry cooperation to help professors.In nearby Canada, McGill University, University of Sherbrooke, Hydro-Quebec, ALSTOM havepartnered together to create a joint Institute of Electrical Power Engineering based on theperceived need for more power engineer who are optimally trained.11Finally in recent years there are those who have addressed ways to optimize the introductorypower engineering classes at the university. This can apply not only to
-order thinking skills canbe developed through practice, feedback, and reflection. (Miri, 2007; Sawyer, 2013).In order to build the STEM workforce of tomorrow, faculty must be trained to implementevidence-based pedagogies that foster higher-order thinking skills. Specifically, learningenvironments must foster and support critical and creative thinking skills. While there arecountless examples of institutions focusing faculty development efforts on promoting criticalthinking, very few place an explicit emphasis on the creative aspect of higher-order thinking. Thesingular example we identified that emphasized critical and creative thinking was focused in theliberal arts (Five Colleges of Ohio, 2012). Higher education must shift the paradigm that
novel application. II. Coordinate (3 – 10 days prior to lesson) Students present a lesson outline to the faculty mentor, receive advice on leading an efficient and effective review session, refine the plan, and rehearse the classroom activities.III. Execute (during the class period of the lesson) Students lead an instructional period on the selected topics described above. Student performance is evaluated by the instructor and mentor. Performance expectations can be found in Appendix 2.IV. Reflect (within one week after the lesson) Students review their performance through a written reflection due the following week. Emphasis is placed upon determining how helpful the review period
become experts in complementary areas, for example.—Individual and group accountabilityEveryone takes responsibility for their own work and the overall work of the team.Accountability can be promoted through milestone deliverables, frequent group communication,and a grading scheme that has a shared group element, for example.—Teamwork skillsEach member practices effective communication, decision making, problem solving, conflictmanagement, leadership. Instructors can promote the development of teamwork skills bymodeling and describing conflict management approaches, and guidelines for clear, directcommunication and effective leadership.—Group processingThe team periodically reflects on how well it is working, celebrates, and corrects. Providing
than memorization and copying. Learning how to think, how to self reflect, how to take personal responsibility for learning, and the development of expert problem solving skills are all reasons why this style of teaching is life changing for many students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 WORK IN PROGRESS Flipping Engineering by DesignAbstractIn a flipped mechanical engineering sophomore design course, students engaged with interactiveonline learning modules and follow-up graded quizzes prior to face-to-face hands-oncollaborative sessions. Analysis of the student post-assessment responses demonstrated highcomfort with the
anengaging platform. In order to present students and teachers perception about this newmethodology, Kahoot system is presented in five different approaches: Introduction of anew concept or topic; Reinforcement of knowledge; Encouragement of reflection andpeer-led discussion; Connection of classrooms and Challenge for learners to make theirown Kahoot quizzes. Some of these purposes presented were studied in Physics I andChemistry courses for freshman students and Physics II course for sophomore students inan Engineering School.IntroductionImmediate feedback enhances students’ learning. For students, it’s a chance to go furtherby breaking misconceptions and changing learning routes. For teachers, it’s a practicalopportunity to feel the “temperature
differential effects of the instructors’ approaches.BackgroundCourse description. The course examined for this study is taught through a combination ofmethods, including directed readings, classroom discussions, activities, reflective writing, andpresentations by guest speakers. Students in both sections learn about self-management, values,centralized and decentralized organizational structures, the leadership vs. management debate,implicit bias, women in leadership, and creating a culture of participative decision-making.Guest speakers from a range of industries and levels of experience present to both sections andhave lunch with students. The students’ learning culminates in a team project.Instructor A’s section emphasizes class discussion
groups were presented with an Owl’s Dilemma at the beginningof each week or Concept. The dilemma was presented in an inquiry-based fashion for Group Aand required that they share their thoughts about the dilemma. Group B, on the other hand wasjust presented with the dilemma and not asked to comment on it. Both groups were asked toreflect on Owl’s Solution at the end of each week or Concept. Figure 10 shows the percentage oflearners in each group who reflected on Owl’s Solution. Group A learners were consistentlymore likely to reflect on Owl’s Solution than Group B learners. In weeks 5 and 6, 12.9% and15.4% more learners from Group A reflected on Owl’s Solution than learners from Group B.This indicates that Group A learners were more engaged with
learners receive and process information. The FSLM incorporates someelements of the Myers-Briggs model and the Kolb’s model. The main reasoning for its selection inthe DLMS evaluation is that it focuses on aspects of learning that are significant in engineeringeducation.The FSLM consists of four dimensions, each with two contrasting learning styles: Processing(Active/Reflective); Perception (Sensing/Intuitive); Input (Visual/Verbal); and Understanding(Sequential/Global). The details of the dimensions can be found in Ref.6. In order to determine anindividual’s specific learning style, Felder and Soloman13developed the Index of Learning Style(ILS) survey. Each of the 44 questions within the survey is designed to place the learner’spreference within
students directly,and also the faculty indirectly – resulting in a more inspiring classroom environment. Simplystated by Harold Hongju Koh, “Theory without practice is as lifeless as practice without theory isthoughtless 15.”It is well researched and documented that problem based learning is well suited for engineeringprograms for students to engage in complex, ill-suited, and open-ended problems to fosterflexible thinking and support intrinsic motivation 16. These characteristics in turn can increaseopportunities for group discussion over potential solutions, provide opportunity for criticalinstructor feedback, and essential self-reflection of the learning.A. Kolb and D. Kolb define Experiential Learning Theory as the “process whereby knowledge
Synchronistic presentations to other classCurrent ApproachWithin each course, the interdisciplinary approach included four parts: a brief introduction to theother field; science fiction reading assignments that include the theme of nanotechnology’simpact on society; a project that involves synchronistic interaction of the students from eachclass where the students teach the other students about principles from their class and writtenstudent reflections about their experience in presenting to the other class.Table 2. Key interdisciplinary activities included in the courses. Key Interdisciplinary Activities When Activity Activity Description (Week of 10 week course) Week 1-2 Brief • Nanotechnology professor
also typical of engineering fields, although a bit high for thisinstitution (the freshman engineering class at this university was 18% female). As expected, 76%of respondents were first year students, while 14% were transfer students. Participating facultycame from a range of engineering programs including Biosystems, Chemical, Industrial andSystems, Mechanical, Polymer and Fiber, and Computer Science and Software Engineering.Instruments A battery of attitude scales was assembled for the purposes of this study from theliterature. The first 17-item scale assessed students’ Beliefs about Engineering, with half of theitems reflecting beliefs related to engineering as a helping or communal profession (e.g.,“Engineers are helping to solve
Biomedical Engineering CoursesResearch highlights the benefit of student reflection and frequent, formative feedback. One suchmethod is the Muddiest Point exercise where students reflect after instruction about both unclearand interesting points. Then, instructors analyze student feedback for the most popular conceptsand select those central to the learning objective. Previously, our work has shown that studentsfeel favorably about the interest, utility, and “cost” associated with this exercise in a one-credit,junior level Statistics course. This work compares student attitude in other courses to discern ifthe Muddiest Point exercise strategy is universally favorable.The previously validated, reliable Student Value Survey of Muddiest Points Survey
developed reflective questionnaires for each block ofassignments (training exercises, business games), asking students to answer questions thatreveal the level of cohesion of the group, the presence and influence of the positive socio-psychological climate on the performance and the willingness to work in this group, thepresence of barriers in interactions. In addition, each student had the opportunity to expresstheir opinion about the work accomplished individually or in collaboration with others,describe their classroom experience and emotions during interaction within the team, etc. It should be noted that the reflection was carried out after the completion of each exerciseand at the end of a class. A content analysis of an exercise or class
as fairness” made famous in the 20th century by the philosopher John Rawls. 12 On the contractarian view, there is a strong “publicity” requirement for airing of differences of opinion about norms of conduct within any practice that hopes to become more just. The same can be said of science and engineering: the opportunity to negotiate better norms of practice first requires a publicizing of differences. After, by means of a process that Rawls called “reflective equilibrium,” practitioners are able to converge on an improved understanding of a norm. And, importantly, they will have done so through an exercise of “public reason” and
reliableinstrument.Internal reliability of each was measured by Cronbach’s alpha for each of the four factorsand for the instrument overall. The reliability ranged from 0. 614 to 0.672 for the fourfactors and was 0.602 for the instrument overall. In general, this shows a marginal levelof internal reliability, which is something that will need to be addressed in furtheriterations of the instrument.DiscussionIn general, our analysis did result in four discrete factors that reflect the acceptance orresistance to two distinctive aspects of ill-structured problem solving: ambiguity andmultiple perspectives. With further development, an instrument of this nature could beused by classroom instructors to gauge where students are with respect to majorthresholds in how they
survey responses in light of studentgrades in the course. Each ILS dimension is scored on a (-11, 11) interval describing thespectrum between two extremes. For example, a score of (-11) on the ACT-REFdimension indicates a strong preference for active learning, while a score of (+11)suggests a deeply reflective learner. In this first phase of data analysis, we definemisalignment as the (student) – (instructor) ILS score across all four ILS dimensions. Assuch, we have 440 misalignment scores (4 ILS dimensions for each of 110 students), andall are integers on the interval (-22, 22)[1]. We also have dynamics course grade for eachstudent.Results—ILS MisalignmentWhen we consider all participants from both the faculty (nf = 33) and student (ns = 317
as an Assistant Professor in 2004. From 2008 to 2011, he was a Research Engineer at the Georgia Tech Research Institute where he fabricated scalable multiplexed ion traps for quantum computing applications. Prof. Geddis returned to NSU as an Associate Professor in 2011. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2016 ASEE ConferenceAbstractThis paper presents the initial pilot findings from a multi-year project that is initiating experimentalcentric approaches to learning in electrical engineering courses via the use of an Analog DiscoveryBoard (ADB). The specific audience emphasized in the paper reflects participants in circuits-content courses; the majority