Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.The training is to be applicable to all types of GTA contexts: lab, discussion, and lecture. Becausemany of our engineering students’ career goals are within non-academic settings, students oftenhave little natural motivation to develop effective pedagogical skills. As explained in our previouspaper 1 , the team made a strategic decision to combine the teaching of leadership skills and peda-gogical skills in order to appeal to GTAs who plan to go into non-academic careers. In this paper,we will present our logic model for the iELITE program, which has four categories of inputs:GTAs, Engineering Faculty, Administration (College and Departments), and External Partners (in-dustry sponsors
, full implementation, program administration, andfuture plans.Introduction For the past few decades, there have been numerous calls to improve education in theUnited States from cradle to career. Of particular importance is the demand for better STEM(science, technology, engineering and mathematics) educational programs at all levels. Whilenumerous programs have been implemented across the country to address STEM education,there is still much more to be done in order to meet the STEM workforce growth, to close theperformance gap for underrepresented minorities, and the rectify the lack of quality STEMteachers [1]. The growth of science and engineering employment opportunities is predicted tooutpace the growth of jobs in general [2], thus
students that pulls knowledgefrom the journalism and performing arts community. Our program has three specificcomponents: (1) creating jargon-less podcasts; (2) receiving training from an improvisationalactor on stage presence; and (3) presenting at “curiosity cafes” to audiences from the generalpublic. This paper will present the design of the curriculum including the overarching theoreticalframework, programmatic issues, and recruiting. This paper will be of interest to faculty thatwish to improve graduate student oral communication skills and are seeking novel programs thatare being pilot tested at other universities.IntroductionThe effective communication of science to the general public is increasingly important as oursociety continues to
experience for thesynthesis and integration of prior engineering content knowledge [1]. It may have implication onthe disciplinary approach to teaching and learning, as well as how different educationalexperience and interventions in the classroom may advance learning. With an ultimate goal offacilitating more effective teaching and learning of design [2], this study proposes thedevelopment of methods to assess engineering understanding [3], conceptions of engineering anddesign, and an assessment framework for design learning. For the purposes of this study wedifferentiate between design and engineering ways of knowing, thinking and doing (problemformulation and problem solving), and design and engineering learning (focused on change inthe student’s
, improve communications, and increasetolerance for ambiguity. Researchers have revealed the benefits of engaging educators andprofessionals in innovative strategies to increase cultural awareness and competency skills [1].Numerous studies contain evidence that organizations with effective understanding of differentbusiness cultures in different countries have the capacity to transform business practices. Thechanges lead to distinctive commercial practices as demonstrated by the broad internationalpresence of Coca-Cola, Starbucks, and McDonalds corporations [9][25][43][49]. Businessleaders lacking cultural understanding are less likely to survive as indicated by the failure ofWalmart expansion in Germany [35]. This paper discusses American role in
1 below gives an example of smallUDI codes. Figure 1: Small sample UDI codes on PEEK materialEquipment Laser Marking Unit - Keyence MD-X1500,3-axis hybrid model. Software - Marking Builder 3.While these are the components that were used, the main intent of this paper is to discusspossible approaches to marking quality that could be easily applied to any piece of equipment. Itis, therefore, less important to me what was used to create these particular markings that will bediscussed, because the end deliverable is intangible. Gained knowledge that can be applied to awide variety of situations, equipment types, brand names, or even engineering disciplines is theadded value that I hope to be able to give the
Who of Asian Americans. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Support Remote Collaboration in Virtual Computer Labs1. IntroductionComputer labs are commonly used in computing education to help students reinforce theknowledge obtained in classrooms and to gain hands-on experience on specific learning subjects.While traditional computer labs are based on physical computer centers on campus, more andmore virtual computer lab systems (see, e.g., [1, 2, 3, 4]) have been developed that allowstudents to carry out labs on virtualized resources remotely through the Internet. Virtualcomputer labs make it possible for students to use their own computers at home, instead ofrelying on computer centers
. He is currently a professor and head of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University. He is a fellow of IEEE. A complete vita is available at: http://www.engr.colostate.edu/ ˜aam. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019What Engineering Students Think About How They Learn Professional SkillsTo promote better engineering education within the United States, in 2004, the NationalAcademy of Engineering launched The Engineer of 2020 project [1]. This project ushered in anew era of engineering education by emphasizing not only technical skill development, but alsothe development of critical social skills needed for engineers to be successful in an
hurdles, including curriculum development, selection of textbooks, the development ofonline labs, and novel approaches to linking program content to courses. Informal feedback fromindustry indicates students know what they need to know to be successful. The adaptation of theUbD pedagogy was crucial to the development of the program and we believe it could be usedsuccessfully by others.IntroductionAn interdisciplinary group of university faculty worked together in a Faculty LearningCommunity to study a pedagogy called Understanding by Design (UbD). We then implementedit in our university courses. Results were reported in [1].Just as we were completing this study, I was tasked with developing a new program inManufacturing Engineering Technology
organizing and participating in the educational outreach programs such as science summer camps for middle school and high school girls. Before coming to UIUC, she was Associate Pro- fessor at the Eastern Illinois University where she mentored female and minority students in science and mathematics. She was Founding Chair and Mentor for the Women in Science and Mathematics (WISM) Initiative and Minority Mentoring in Mathematics and Sciences (M3S). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Introducing Bioengineering Approaches through Healthcare Grand ChallengesIntroductionAs the landscape of health and medicine is changing [1-2], we seek to
assessment of the learning gains using direct measures.The theoretical framing for this project is Cognitive Flexibility Theory (CFT), which Spiro et alsuggested as a means to help students learn in complex and ill-structured domains [1]. Whilethere has been recent discussion of CFT in the literature, there is no clear consensus on adefinition of cognitive flexibility or how it is directly measured, particularly in complexproblem-solving situations such as engineering design. One common definition of cognitiveflexibility is the ability to switch between thinking about two different concepts and being able tothink about multiple concepts simultaneously (for example, multiple design criteria or constraintsin an engineering problem or multiple
assessment of support provided to undergraduate students in STEM(science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), such an instrument will aid STEMeducators and college administrators in monitoring progress and identifying unmet needs in localenvironments, thereby providing data-driven evidence for targeted interventions. In thisexecutive summary, we present: 1) an overview of the instrument development process; 2) anevaluation of the prototype for face and content validity; and 3) a revised instrument and pilotdata to determine test validity and reliability across varied institutional contexts.Project OverviewWe began the instrument development process with theoretical constructs from the model of co-curricular support (MCCS), which is a
. Her experiences as a student and educator contributed to her support of learning settings where students’ diverse backgrounds are valued and included in the curriculum. Currently, she is a Ph.D. candidate in Literacy/Biliteracy at the University of Texas at El Paso engaging in research on students’ experiences in bilingual programs from their own voices and perspectives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Latinx Persistence in and Beyond the Degree: Intersections of Gender and Ethnicity Hispanic-serving institutions [HSIs], which enroll almost half of Hispanic studentsattending college [1], HSIs represent less than 6% of
police, andadministrators in universities around the country. Since the enactment of Arkansas Act 562,permitting the concealed carrying of handguns on university campuses, little research has beenconducted to investigate students’ perceptions of risk associated with the new law. Therefore, thepurpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate whether engineering students’ perceptions ofrisk of an active shooter event occurring on campus and their stated intention to obtain aconcealed-carry license differ from other students on campus, and (2) to determine what factorspredict students’ stated intention to obtain a concealed-carry license. The investigator employeda survey of undergraduate engineering and education students (N = 89) in a four
; as well as consultingtwo underrepresented minority undergraduate engineering students, one male and one female,who were leaders in their engineering societies and who did not take part in the study. Thecoding of the interviews was done by the principal investigator. The first transcript was coded bythe principal investigator and the social scientists were in consensus with the initial codes. Theinterviews were structured around three themes: 1) Who are leaders (society, technology, etc.)and what are their attributes? 2) What inspired the engineering undergraduate student to take onleadership roles and the lessons learned and/or skills developed from these experiences? Theirself-selected social identities (e.g. race, gender, socioeconomic
negative effects; most notably, landfill waste. With a burgeoning worldpopulation, much attention is focused on how we sustainably use our ever-decreasing supply ofmaterials. This project was framed within the context of low-cost flat-pack furniture, which istypically made from non-biodegradable particleboard. The end-of-life for particleboard islandfill or incineration.The overarching research goal of this project was to determine whether post-consumer paper anda bioplastic binder were suitable for the creation of a more environmentally friendly composite(than its traditional particleboard counterpart) that has future potential to be composted with foodwaste. Specifically, we aimed to (1) empirically test how this composite performs understandard
activities.The building industry has a major impact on the US economy and accounts for: $1 trillion inannual spending (Huesman, Holland, Langley, 2015); 40% of the nation’s primary energy use(U.S. Department of Energy, 2011); and 9 million jobs (Dong et al., 2014). Despite its massiveimpact, the industry has been criticized for poor productivity compared with other industries andalso billions of dollars in annual waste due to the lack of interoperability (Gallaher et al., 2004).Furthermore, the industry has been approaching a “labor cliff,” meaning there are not enoughnew individuals entering the industry to offset the vacancies left by an aging, retiring workforce(Sulak Brown, Goodrum, Taylor, 2015). To remain effective, this critical industry will
Tolerancing(GD&T) into engineering drawings in a Senior Design reduces the number of design iterations,increases design quality, and enables both the handoff to manufacturing and easier manufacturing.This demonstration is accomplished by a Senior design group manufacturing an Alpha styleStirling Engine out of 6061 Al using a manual lathe and mill and using GD&T. We will comparethis engine to another Stirling Engine built by a Senior design group in 2015 that was based on thecoordinate dimensioned design by Senft [1]. We compare the time it takes to manufacture bothdesigns, as well as the design quality once they are fully manufactured.The implementation of GD&T is not commonly taught in undergraduate mechanical engineering(ME) curriculums
participation of African Americans in engineering and computer science that isinformed by existing literature and subject matter experts. To address this purpose, our three-phase project includes: (1) a series of systematic reviews of the literature on barriers to participation andproposed solutions for each juncture of the education-to-workforce pathway; (2) interviews with subject-matter experts to discuss their professional experiencesregarding broadening the participation of African Americans, and what can be done to gainmomentum in this regard; and 1 (3) a Delphi study to reach consensus on the key issues, gaps in our understanding
. Figure 1 shows the demographics of selected independent school districts (ISD) inTexas. The ISDs of Bryan, Navasota, Brenham, and Pharr-San Juan-Alamo (PSJA) have abouttwo times more African American or Hispanic students than the average ISD in Texas. Thenumber of students from low-income families is also 20-50% more than the state average. Thedropout rates at Bryan and Aldine ISDs are also particularly alarming (Figures 1-2).School programs with hands-on and manufacturing focuses – as compared to academicmathematics or pure science-- would be attractive to students since they can relate the training toeveryday examples, potential employment, and even advanced careers. Some middle/highschools, however, limit the growth of their technology
diversifying pathways to and throughengineering programs.Project GoalsResearch on student veterans in engineering (SVEs) has been increasing. Military veterans holdpromise for expanding and diversifying the engineering workforce [1]. Given their diversebackgrounds, their increasing numbers, and the growing national demand for engineeringprofessionals, it is important to study the conditions under which student veterans pursueengineering education and the factors that support their success. Increasing the participation ofveterans in engineering offers the possibility of enhancing engineering’s diversity in manyneeded dimensions since, compared to civilian students, veterans are more likely to be older,first-generation college students, disabled
Education, 2019 Paper ID #25689 caused institutions to change policies so that they may improve. Awards and publications may be found at https://engineering.purdue.edu/people/russell.a.long.1.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science
thatappear in the summation of functions’ power series expansion. Applications of derivative and integralmathematical operations to power series of functions have important real-life applications such ascalculating the noise differentiation of wave lengths and observing the area between the wave length andinput information by integrating the function as a part of the Fourier analysis. Several other results onstudents majoring in mathematics and physics power series’ knowledge was conducted in various studies([1-9]). Pedagogical research on engineering majors’ understanding of how to apply mathematicaloperations to series expansion of functions received hardly any attention from researchers ([10]). In thiswork, the emphasis is given to engineering
learning in engineering, STEM education policy, and diversity and equity in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing a Middle Grades Spatial Skills Curriculum in Minecraft (Work in Progress)Introduction Many researchers maintain that spatial skills, or the collective and diverse set of cognitiveabilities that involve generating and manipulating mental representations of objects, provide acritical foundation for intellectual ability and learning [1-9]. Further, researcher also suggeststhat spatial abilities are critical to success in STEM fields and STEM learning [10, 11]. Despiterecognition of the critical role these skills play in STEM learning, research continues to
engineering courses involve problem solving, and solving problems requires thedevelopment of several types of knowledge and skills. From course to course, the kinds ofproblems that are solved and the specific knowledge and skills required can be very different.But across a wide range of courses we can define categories of knowledge and skills that arerequired for solving most problems. By referring to these categories while teaching, studying andpracticing, we can develop a framework for learning. This framework provides a location and astructure for storing important knowledge, making it easier to recall.Let’s call these learning categories the Seven C’s. 1. Concepts are the fundamental ideas, laws, principles, theories, hypotheses and models
many Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) fields to pursue postdoctoral research scholar positions (postdocs) as their first jobs afterPhD completion [1], [2]. In some STEM disciplines, postdoctoral employment is a prerequisitestep toward tenure track faculty positions. The National Science Foundation defines postdoctraining as “a temporary and defined period of mentored advanced training to enhance theprofessional skills and research independence” [3]. According to the National ScienceFoundation Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED), between 1985 and 2013, around 22% ofengineering PhDs indicated postdocs as their plan upon obtaining the degree. In engineering, thenumber of postdocs more than doubled from 2000 to 2010, making
are trained technically, with less focus on critical examinationsof assumptions within engineering practice, and less emphasis on the larger contexts in whichengineering is embedded. With funding from an NSF IUSE/PFE Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) grant, our School of Engineering is "revolutionizing" engineering education,with the aim of preparing students to innovate engineering solutions developed within acontextual framework that embeds humanitarian, sustainable and social justice approaches withtechnical engineering skills [1]. This requires an enhanced curriculum with a focus on studentteamwork, a greater consideration of social and economic factors, improved communication withdiverse constituents, and reflection on an
will be describedfurther.BackgroundLaboratory time serves multiple functions in an engineering curriculum. Feisel and Rosa outline13 potential learning objectives that include instrumentation, models, and data analysis, but alsocreativity, ethics, and sensory awareness [1]. Educators across science and engineering areworking on shifting from cookbook laboratories to more authentic scientific experiences [2-4].Round and Lom describe a “continuum of autonomy, responsibility, and immersion” in labexperiences, with cookbook labs at the lowest level and apprenticeship in a research lab at thehighest level [5].The integration of lecture and laboratory experiences is effective for linking the theoretical andpractical and for increasing student
academic (e.g., GPA, etc.) andnon-academic terms.IntroductionMany engineering and computing students have strong pre-college academic records thatindicate potential for success in their programs; nonetheless, many struggle when they reach theuniversity setting. Cognitive measures like SAT/ACT are at best weak predictors of academicsuccess [1], [2], and non-cognitive and affective (NCA) measures may form the constellation ofcharacteristics that offer further predictive power [3]. This IUSE NSF grantee poster describesour work to date to collect data on students’ NCA factors using the SUCCESS survey—StudyingUnderlying Characteristics of Computing and Engineering Student Success. The survey usesconstructs such as big five personality, future time