, including: (1) students’perceptions of engineering, (2) engagement in the e4usa course, (3) influences of the e4usacourse, and (4) experiences as a female in engineering. Focus group data were analyzed usingopen coding and constant comparison methods. Themes emerged from each of the main questioncategories, giving insight into students’ experiences in the e4usa course. Understanding studentexperiences in the e4usa course has the potential to impact the future design of pre-collegeengineering experiences that can lead to a more diverse engineering workforce.Introduction Pre-college engineering education as a subject is relatively new to the United States’(US) education system [1]. A small number of pre-college engineering curricula were
on structured lecture and laboratory activities. The resultssuggest that student perceptions of the polytechnic nature of a class did not significantly differbetween the two pedagogical approaches. Students found each class to be representative of apolytechnic nature because hands-on, physical labs were utilized. It did not matter if the labactivities were open-ended or structured. This aligned with the students’ definition of whatpolytechnic education means: “hands-on”.IntroductionClassroom delivery modality has received much attention in recent years as institutions navigatechanges in higher education funding and student preparation for learning [1]. One approach thathas been employed in the engineering classroom is to flip the class, by
identifying skillscritical for chemical engineering employability, by surveying alumni and employers. Fletcher etal. published professional skills ranked in order of importance, with teamwork, analyzinginformation, communicating effectively, ability to gather information, and self-learning ability inthe top 5 skills [1]. Grant et al. presented similar skills, grouping them into six key skills buckets:1) communication and presentation, 2) analysis and numeracy, 3) information technology, 4)planning and organization, 5) teamwork and collaboration, and 6) innovation and creativity [2].In addition, Grant mapped which of these skills were developed in selected chemical engineeringcourses. Peuteman et al. published work on a novel educational program
presented.BackgroundThe role of two-year colleges in the United States has grown in the last 30 years. Enrollment hasgrown 53% from 5.3 million in 1990 [1] to 8.1 million in 2020 [2]. This can partially beattributed to the growing and constantly changing workforce needs in our technology-drivensociety. The World Economic Forum’s 2020 Future of Jobs Report predicts that “[i]n addition tothe current disruption from the pandemic-induced lockdowns and economic contraction,technological adoption by companies will transform tasks, jobs and skills by 2025” [3]. Inaddition, two-year schools have helped to make access to higher education more equitable.About 67% of public two-year college students have family incomes under $50,000; and 45% ofstudents enrolled in
which allows us to better understand students' reasons for adopting certainlearning strategies and preferences. Alongside these insights, we identify opportunities forimproving student satisfaction and share actions we took to better support our students.I. IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted higher education, with students and teachersbeing forced to adapt to emergency remote learning (ERL, or “online learning” for convenience)for over a year. As shown in Figure 1, the Fall 2020 (Sept. – Dec. 2020) and Winter 2021 (Jan. –Apr. 2021) semesters were entirely online at our university. During this time, teaching modalitiesvaried across faculties and instructors, and generally fell into one of three categories: (1)synchronous
outcomes in support ofsustainable design. In this paper, we unpack the case study and its holistic design foundations.We also posit a theory to account for its outcomes that can guide others who would like to testthese ideas in other settings.IntroductionThe National Academies of Engineering (U.S.) has advocated transdisciplinary design for itspotential to address dynamically complex societal needs [1]. Sustainability is certainly one suchneed. One of the dilemmas about educating people to work in transdisciplinary design settings isthat such settings are largely unpracticed in engineering college settings. For example, Lang etal. [2] offer design principles for transdisciplinary research, with these as highlights: Build acollaborative research
workforcedemands. Technological change, global competition, and the pandemic have combined to usherin and hasten the era of shop-floor digitalization and automation of manufacturing. Combinedwith a growing "silver tsunami” retirement and “Great Resignation” of skilled workers and thelack of a curricular emphasis on applied learning in some sectors [1] and we have now reachedcrisis level in a much-reduced pool of highly skilled, manufacturing-ready engineers available tomanufacturers.In addition to technical aptitude, there is growing demand from industry for engineeringgraduates to be equipped with professional or “soft” skills and abilities [1], [2]. “Moreover,engineers have recently begun to incorporate considerations such as sustainability
andreflections. For this, the semester-long project was complemented with one reflection-on-actionactivity. In the activity, students were asked to watch a video of secrets of successful teamworkand were asked to reflect on their perceptions about the role of communication within teams. Thestudents’ reflections on the activity were analyzed using qualitative inductive thematic analysis tounderstand the students’ perceptions regarding teamwork and communication within teams.Keywords: cooperative learning, teamwork, team communication, undergraduate students1.0 BackgroundThe industry expects young graduates to possess professional skills such as teamwork,communication, critical thinking, and problem-solving [1], [2]. Just developing technical skills isnot
written report followed by an oral presentation.However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, student learning outcomes were significantlydisrupted as the plan of study changed to online mode from March 2020. The purpose of thecurrent study is to document the students’ learning experiences of the capstone design courseduring the pandemic year. As the course is so comprehensive in nature, wide range of studentlearning assessment is possible from this course. Data were collected from Fall 2020 and Spring2021 semester to assess the student outcomes in the category of communication with theteammates, fulfill roles and responsibilities, and listening to the teammates. The scales of one tofour (1-not acceptable, 2- below standards, 3- meets standards, 4
tension members, beams,columns, and simple connections, which builds on students’ previous structural analysis knowledge.An important step in developing an understanding of structural steel framing design is merging theindividual element design concepts with how various components are connected, constructed, andused in practice. Traditionally, the classroom experience has relied on photographs and diagrams toconvey the information, which have improved due to new technologies [1]. A typical enhancementto the classroom experience is providing a physical field trip where students can combine theinformation they are learning in class with real world experience [2]. A visit to a construction siteprovides students with the opportunity to better
on campus, which was not a concern pre-pandemic.Important decisions have been made about how to vary assessment measures [1] for exampleby having students give a pre-recorded, non-assessed group presentation, and to then use theconstructive feedback to prepare a live, assessed, group presentation. Similarly, we wereobliged to re-consider how best to support peer-to-peer collaboration [2] with students beingset collective goals, and meeting face-to-face on a group rotational basis once a week withcontribution and attendance being periodically monitored. Furthermore, students wereencouraged to make use of sanitised study space in the department, and to actively conversethrough TEAMS as and when appropriate. Additionally, challenges arose with
related to the delivery of material (e.g. design project with stipulations, flippedclassrooms with teacher as facilitator, and adopting a multi-disciplinary approach) alsorevealed themselves as categories from an analysis of the data. This work has wideimplications for how undergraduate engineering students can be taught in order to developtheir engineering judgement.Teaching engineering judgementAs a community of engineering educators, we have always been interested in notions ofengineering judgement and whether such a capability can be developed in our students [1].Students are expected to have developed their engineering judgement through accreditedprogrammes such as those offered by the Institute of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), theInstitute
workshop did not in 2020, there was a huge push to virtualize education out ofchange. They were: (1) to provide an immersive environment for necessity. Formal and informal instruction had to be ported to aparticipants to learn about Blockchain technologies; (2) to cultivate virtual platform. Scheduled conferences were cancelled. A newnetworking and collaborations among faculty and students inBlockchain; and (3) to stimulate interest and awareness of Blockchain normal in the human experience was on the horizon [1-4].and Fintech research in engineering and computer science
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com An Autoethnographic Account of a Female Undergraduate Engineering StudentAbstractThis work explores formative experiences and various aspects of one female undergraduatestudent’s Kayla’s time in university, from her first to last year of school. Studies have shown thatnormative engineering culture can make women feel “visible as a woman, yet invisible asengineers” [1]. Some women who persist in the field of engineering have been shown to have an“engineering identity” [2]. This study focuses on how various aspects of one student’s livedexperiences formed her engineering identity and assisted in her
needs of the technical workforce requireengineering students to gain both disciplinary depth and interdisciplinary and interpersonal skillsto ready themselves for the evolving career landscape. Specifically, engineering students areexpected to build relevant skills through experiential learning opportunities [1]. However, formost high school students considering engineering in college, their preparation is typicallyadvanced placement courses in science and mathematics. Courses alone don’t meet theincreasing national demand to better prepare high school students for careers in technology andmanufacturing [2]. To bridge this gap, high school students may pursue the skills and qualitiesexpected of them in a university setting, which will enable
Education)Gloria L. Blackwell © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Building Community Understanding of Institutional Compensation Systems: An ADVANCE Partnership ProjectThe wage gap between men and women persists in the United States. According to the U.S.Census Bureau, in 2018 women earned $0.82 for every $1.00 earned by men (averaging acrossall races) [1, 2]. Institutional structures and systems of power influence salary outcomes and paypractices, which in turn are closely related to the quality of work life, informing our knowledgeof what (and who) is important to the organization [3]. Even when controlling for
education allover the world. Sustainable development has been integrated into teaching and learningthroughout the engineering education program in many universities. There is an increasingdemand from the public to achieve a balance between environmental, social, and economicoutcomes within sustainable development [1]. Therefore, engineers, especially Civil Engineers,should be able to respond to societies' concerns about the impact of human activity on theenvironment. Civil engineers are responsible for designing the critical infrastructure whichprovides the basic services that allow operations of modern communities [2]. However, recentevents have shown infrastructure systems to be vulnerable to natural events because manyinfrastructure systems are
described in the second paper of this series [4] andaddresses the following two questions: (1) What modifications were ultimately employed to translate a traditional in-person teaching workshop to a remote setting? (2) How did these modifications impact the execution of the workshop?This paper compares these modifications to conduct of the in-person workshop and assesses theimpacts from the perspective of all contributors to the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop. Effects ofthe modifications on participants’ teaching will be presented in a future paper.Overview of Traditional In-Person ExCEEd Teaching WorkshopThe in-person ETW is a weeklong workshop hosted by and held at a U.S. university for thepurpose of improving civil engineering
, conducted in a laboratory setting. In all of his research, the goal is two-fold: (1) exploring fundamental cognitive processes related to learning to add to our theoretical understanding, and (2), where appropriate, applying this knowledge to improve education. An assumption underlying his research approach is that current educational issues provide investigators with some of the most compelling research topics and that rigorous empirical work aids us in making the education process more successful. He has collaborated actively with researchers in STEM disciplines outside of psychology (engineering and chemistry). Dr. Therriault currently serves as a Board Member on UF’s IRB.Elliot P. Douglas (Professor) Dr. Elliot P
returning toschool for their graduate degree. We term these students direct pathway and returners,respectively, with a five year gap between receiving the bachelor’s degree and starting themaster’s degree marking the boundary between the two groups. Their differing backgroundscontribute to differences in their needs and expectations from an academic advisor, andunderstanding these needs and expectations could help universities to provide more effectiveadvising and mentoring to these students.BackgroundGraduate-level returners in engineering programs have been the subject of rigorous research forapproximately the past ten years. Prior to that time, there was little literature on the subject, andwhat existed was primarily anecdotal (e.g., [1]). The
. The studentsurveys showed that these projects were effective in achieving the course outcomes [1]. AtWestern Carolina University (WCU) that multiple authors are affiliated with, a five-PBL-coursesequence (one course in each of the first three years and two courses in the senior year) isincorporated into the curriculum of all the programs within the department (encompassingelectrical and mechanical disciplines in engineering technology and engineering programs), sothat the students can gradually sharpen their technical expertise, professional skills, andteamwork to perform well in the year-long capstone projects in their senior year, often sponsoredby the local industry.For an instructor or a class of students new to PBL, the uncertainty in
studies using lectures and student exercises that focus onbasic page translation, page faults, handling memory writes, and using a translation lookasidebuffer (TLB). The effectiveness of these case studies will be assessed using a combination ofpre/post quizzes, exam problems, and a student survey.1. IntroductionIn its idealized form (Figure 1(a)) [1], a computer system consists of a processor that isconnected to a memory containing instructions and data organized as binary words. Theprocessor operates by fetching instructions from memory and executing the instructions specifiedby the architecture of the processor, including instructions that read and write data in memory.It is difficult to build a single memory that is both large enough to
needs of a diverse student body [14]. Many two-yeardegree institution types are open access and have institutional priorities focused on increasingdiversity and inclusive practices among both the students and faculty [1]. Although the inclusionof women traditionally underrepresented in STEM disciplines in higher education settings is anational concern, the advancement of women at institutions that offer support networks andinstitutional practices such as two-year degree institutions contribute to women’s advancementand diversity in the talent pipeline. This research study investigates systemic approaches at two-year degree offering institutions that have led to the progression of women in STEM fields andthe inclusion of women in academic
counterparts [6]. While someresearchers noted it was especially challenging for rural teachers to connect classroom contentwith rural students’ lived experiences and interests [10], others reported better opportunities forrural teachers to offer hands-on experiential learning and to connect STEM topics to rural life[8].Arnold, Newman, Gaddy, and Dean [1] assert that there is a lack of high-quality researchfocused on the specific challenges facing teachers in rural school settings. The seeminginconsistencies and conflicting evidence in rural education research may relate, in part, to theabsence of a clear and consistent definition for rural, as well as to the evident complexity anddiversity of rural contexts [1]. Demographers and public agencies
Powered by www.slayte.com A Roadmap for the Design and Implementation of Communities of Practice for Faculty DevelopmentAbstract: This evidence-based practice paper provides a roadmap for addressing a key challengeassociated with designing and leading CoPs (Communities of Practice) for faculty development:there is no one-size-fits-all approach to the design and implementation of a CoP. CoPs are bynature context-specific and designed to address the unique needs of the individuals andorganizations of which they are comprised. As such, the design, implementation, and assessmentof a CoP requires an iterative, flexible, and responsive approach. In this paper we share (1)findings from a participatory evaluation of ten
and estimate the time spent on each problem. The purpose of administering these examswas two-fold: (1) provide longitudinal assessment data to inform changes made to mechanicscourses in the civil engineering program and (2) provide self-assessment for students to identifyareas of weakness before being required to apply the concepts in follow-on courses or on theFundamentals of Engineering Exam. In addition to summarizing quantitative performance on theexam, the confidence and time spent on each problem were analyzed to identify trends.Completed exams were also reviewed to identify common errors made on each problem. Thispaper summarizes those common errors for mechanics concepts included in the exam. Errorswere categorized as conceptual, non
indispensable quality forengineering, and given the growing scope of the challenges ahead and the complexity anddiversity of the technologies of the 21st century, creativity will grow in importance.” [1].Creativity and Innovation in Engineering EducationCreativity and innovation find application in many domains, but it is in engineering that we seeperhaps the most fundamental examples of how they contribute to economic development andhuman welfare. Solutions deemed innovative are celebrated. Innovative engineers are heraldedas exemplars. Engineering education is full of references to innovation – both in examples usedto motivate and inspire students, changes made in the classroom to better educate students, andin the continuing improvement of
chat and to track their own poll usage and response rates to experiment with theironline teaching approach of keeping the class engaged.1 IntroductionIn 2012, we introduced an online section of our introduction to programming course ("CS1"),representing the first online course at our university. Our CS1 has been taught every term since andserves 300-500 students per term, divided into sections of about 100 students including one onlinesection every term since 2012.At the time the online section was created in 2012, our in-person CS1 had already adopted several activeteaching pedagogies [Me93], with students in both in-person and online sections doing extensive weeklyonline activities with immediate feedback, consisting of about 100 short
now at a point where the number of connected devices significantlyexceeds the world population. [1] Each of these devices represents a potential entry point forindividuals with malicious intentions. As such, many contend that cybersecurity is nationalsecurity extending across multiple governmental, industry, and consumer sectors.To mitigate new and current threats as cybersecurity evolves into the future, considerableeducation and research is needed on both the operational technology and network sides of theindustry. This research and education, by its nature, involves vulnerability testing, intentionalnetwork intrusion, virus testing and ethical hacking. The conduct of these activities hasassociated internal and external risk, as well as
that educational innovations with the potential to accelerate digitaltransformation in education, have an opportunity to be tested [1]. Emergency Remote Teach-ing (ERT) has been the solution adopted by many institutions [10], allowing to test the com-plete replacement of the traditional face to face lectures with a synchronous videoconferencescheme with the support of online learning platforms. One of the challenges of online learning is their applicability to the teaching of practi-cal subjects in areas like engineering or medicine [1] [13], where many courses require labor-atories to apply the knowledge in practical situations. In this study we analyze a program-ming course taught using emergency response teaching, to identify how