, development, and demonstration activities in government, industry, andacademia1. The program is offered through awards to California State University Los Angeles,Humboldt State University, Michigan Technological University, University of North CarolinaCharlotte and the University of North Dakota. Recognizing the inherent complexity of the topicand a multitude of new concepts, the HFCT programs are integrating laboratory practicum andprojects supporting student learning.This paper provides an overview of each participating institution laboratory practicum designand implementation after one and a half years of executing the program. While the funding wasprovided under the same DOE program, the paths, disciplines, courses, approaches ofimplementation
an understanding of various cultures and their interrelationships Demonstrate the ability to integrate the breadth and diversity of knowledge and 6 experience 7 Demonstrate the ability to make informed, intelligent value decisions 8 Demonstrate the ability to make informed, sensitive aesthetic responses 9 Demonstrate the ability to function in one’s natural, social, and political environmentThe stereotype of an engineer as someone who could do math, couldn’t communicate withnormal people, and had never read anything outside science and engineering is passé. Of coursethat stereotype has always been inaccurate, but today perhaps more than ever, engineeringeducators must ensure that our graduates are formally equipped
employees, for that; a survey was carried out to assess how can theindustry-university-government enhance the engineering education to initiate acontinuing and evolving process to provide curriculum designers with importantinformation from industry. Schott et al [1] debate the problem of the Australianengineering education system which depends the traditional mode and the “chalk andtalk” pedagogy, they argue the importance of the development of a new mixed systemwhich considers the industry’s needs. May be there no perfect method or procedure tobe followed while designing an engineering curriculum, Dym et al [6] study the project-based learning, but they emphasize the importance of the involvement of the interest ofthe industry in the engineering
immerse students in the design process and a multi-disciplinary teamwas selected not only to address the community partner needs, but also to pilot a college-widecapstone experience. Management of the project with this new academic experience provides anopportunity to research and share best practices related to such an opportunity. The design projecthas engaged students and faculty from materials science, mechanical engineering, and civilengineering through an entire academic year experience. While the student design team ischallenged with developing a final product that integrates all aspects of their engineeringdisciplines, the faculty team is also charged with ensuring the students gain a valuable academicexperience within this project. To
years showed many publications whose purpose was to discuss course andcurriculum changes1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Although this search is not comprehensive, we found that noneof these publications about course and curriculum reform specifically described a processthat mimicked an engineering design process.In this paper, we describe how we organized and conducted our curriculum study around anengineering design process, and how doing so not only helped us to approach curricula in the Page 12.1570.2same thorough manner in which engineers approach technical problems but also helped usbuild faculty consensus. The approach could easily be used by other
Connections & Knowledge Transfer between Engineering Thermodynamics and Mathematics (WIP)AbstractIt is well-established that students have difficulty transferring knowledge and skills betweencourses in their undergraduate curriculum. In order to assess the ability of students to transfer ideasbetween their classes, the connections students make between integral calculus and other subjectswas tested in a thermodynamics class. In this pilot study, students were posed the classicalthermodynamics problem of boundary work, which requires the application of calculus skills tosolve. After a first attempt to solve the problem with no instructor guidance, students were givena relevant calculus problem in order to activate their prior knowledge
manufacturing industry. The course of study is based onthe existing mechanical engineering program in the School of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering, but focuses on manufacturing processes and technologies in greater depth. Theprogram curriculum allows the students to tailor their education to an area(s) of interest to themthrough the selection of electives. Using the elective courses students can select to have anemphasis area in microelectronics. A new microelectronics learning laboratory provides hands-on exposure for students in this area. The microelectronics emphasis area and the manufacturingfocused microelectronics lab are unique in a manufacturing engineering program.The region, encompassing southwest Washington and northwest Oregon is
gamification studies focus on large enrollment STEM courses like those taken bychemical engineers early in their major program, and few incorporate robust measures torigorously and systematically assess students’ behavioral, cognitive, and affective changes. Thegoal of this study is to establish effective strategies for the application of gamification in coursesthat appear early in the chemical engineering curriculum, supporting the retention of students inthe major and the graduation of chemical engineers. This was achieved through the developmentof a chemistry and chemical engineering focused dashboard that is integrated within an onlinelearning management system that includes gamification tools (i.e., leaderboard, badges, andrewards).We report the
opportunities for improvement. Recommendations regarding humanitiesand social sciences for BOK3 are presented based on the findings of this student. Therecommendations are grounded in previously established curriculum guidance including ABETprior to ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000, EAC/ABET 3(a) through 3(k), BOK and BOK2.Integration of Humanities and Social Sciences into BOK, ABET and other CriteriaThere is a large body of literature, going back in time, which provides support for humanities andsocial science (H/SS) in the education and the practice of engineering.1-6 There is a commonagreement that an engineering education must be supported with a fundamental education inmathematics, natural sciences, humanities and social sciences. The graphic
Paper ID #11190Ethics for BeginnersDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics; she is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter editor. She was named an
Of CollaborationAbstractCollaborations between engineering faculty and skilled experts outside of engineering properbuild strong undergraduate engineering curricula that clearly emphasize professional skills andABET program outcomes (Criteria 3 d, f, g, h, i,). With shared goals of providing undergraduateswith a rich educational experience in which research, communication and critical thinking arecentral to achievement and to the development of integrity in engineering, such collaborationsproduce an instructional program that readies students for the requirements of continuouslearning and complex analysis essential to a successful, principled engineering career.This paper will describe the contributions to undergraduate engineering education
a problem if the results are curricula that lack integrity and ultimately utility. For manyfields the key to this problem is the idea of experience. Additionally, there are two aspects to theissue of experience for many curricula. First is the idea that experience is important and necessaryas identified externally (beyond higher education) and the second is the idea that some knowledgemay not be gained without experience. The following discusses John Dewey and his work, createsa broad description of the concept of experience in higher education for the purpose of furtherilluminating the aforementioned problem, and provides an initial attempt at a framework forconsidering the use of experience in curriculum.Introduction In order to
goals of the HSTI are to: 1) Facilitate the teaching of fundamental scienceand math skills through high technology applications and presentation techniques, and 2)Increase students' awareness and appreciation of the interdependence of science, mathematics,technology, and society. To accomplish these goals HSTI has formed an interdisciplinary teamthat develops educational modules that integrate into the existing science and mathematicscurriculum. These HSTI modules are based on the merger of science and mathematics preceptswith technology derived from these disciplines.A key component in this initiative is the teacher who is responsible for the delivery andinterpretation of the curriculum. Interactions with regional high school faculty over the
, humanitarian practice, peace, and sustainability. We have developed thesematerials to support our Mechanical (ME), Electrical (EE), Integrated (IntE), and Industrial &Systems Engineering (ISyE) degree programs. New courses include Engineering and SocialJustice, Engineering Peace, Community-Based Participatory Apprenticeship, User-CenteredDesign, and an Integrated Approach to Electrical Engineering. Modules or other content havebeen incorporated in courses including Circuits, Materials Science, Operations Research, SixSigma - Process Improvement, and Robotics. Existing courses in the curriculum whichincorporate materials designed to help students become Changemaking Engineers byincorporating sociotechnical elements are summarized in Table 1
AC 2007-1016: IMPACT: INNOVATION THROUGH MULTIDISCIPLINARYPROJECTS AND COLLABORATIVE TEAMSKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University KELLY CRITTENDEN is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. He teaches within the Integrated Engineering Curriculum and Multidisciplinary Senior Design series. His interests are in promoting collaboration across discipline and college boundaries in order to stimulate innovation and advancements in engineering education. Dr Crittenden received his B.S. and Ph.D. in BioMedical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University. Page
enroll in the ET degree program with 15 credit hours under their belt. Finally,various Workforce Florida programs provide CPT skill set training opportunities tounemployed workers. Although their primary objective is to make a person work readyand immediately employable, a trainee who achieves the CPT credential also acquires apathway to an A.S. Degree which, in itself, provides a pathway to a better lifestyle.The implementation of the CPT pathway for unemployed and incumbent workers wasstraight forward. Workforce Florida recognizes the merit of the CPT and provides fundsto support specific CPT certification training. The development of the CPT pathway wasa more involved process. Curriculum frameworks for a new program of study had to bewritten
partnered with the New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association, the NewJersey Department of Education and Verizon Communications to co-sponsor a one-day summit at Stevensin May 2007 for principals and administrators to share a vision of the technological competencies neededby citizens and workers in the 21st century. This conference will present research on student impact of K-12 engineering programs; provide an orientation to exemplary K-12 engineering curriculum resources;showcase best practices and strategies for integration of engineering/technology into existing curricula;and link K-12 engineering efforts to New Jersey’s policy and plans for STEM education and workforcedevelopment. Five New Jersey engineering universities will present
achieve and maintain accreditation, and the constant enlargement of theknowledge base. The second part of the challenge is in helping these educators to learn how bestto integrate these realities into their approach to teaching. If faculty members do not adequatelyunderstand the fundamental changes occurring in the global economic landscape, as well as theirimportance6, these topics will not be incorporated into the curriculum and may even be activelydenied their place in the curriculum development process. Many faculty members have not hadexposure to these topics in their educational or professional background. This is perhaps truer ofacademics who have not worked in industry.Through the KEEN Innovators program at Baylor University, selected
deliverables and presents the project'soutcomes assessment strategy. It also presents and discusses results.MEEP's Goals and TasksMEEP's goals were achieved through four major tasks, namely:.Curriculum Development: to develop a practice-based undergraduate engineering curriculum which balances analytical and theoretical knowledge with manufacturing, design, business realities, and professional skills;.Integrated Learning Factory: to develop a "Learning Factory" at each partner institution, integrated with the curriculum, for hands-on experience in design, manufacturing, and product realization;.Industrial Partners: to develop strong collaboration with industry; and.Outreach: to share the project's deliverables with other academic
talents frompre-college to 2-year and 4-year colleges, and graduate programs. Although there is an emphasison CS curriculum, non-CS STEM students and practitioners who frequently apply AI to theirtasks are also intended users of the educational materials.The project, which began in August 2020, is currently underway. The purpose of this paper is toshare the project team's exciting endeavor broadly. Specific information to be disseminated at theconference include: Design of a series of reproducible, customizable, modular, experiential educational units that can be integrated within existing courses and/or taken as standalone self-directed learning activities. Results (to date) of actual use of the educational units in
integrated into the engineering curriculum for higher education at other institutionsor K-12. Second is to test the versatility and variability of the Biola Uno Project compared to atraditional Arduino Uno in elementary robotics. Beyond loading the software, the Biola UnoProject should strive to have the same capability levels as other models.Bibliography[1] “Arduino Uno.” http://prosoltechnologies.com/product/arduino-uno/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2020).[2] D. Mellis, “Building an Arduino on a Breadboard,” Oct. 23, 2008. https://www.arduino.cc/en/main/standalone (accessed Feb. 04, 2020).[3] “How to Make Your Own Arduino Board.” https://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-make-your-own- Arduino-board/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2020).
Session 2520 International Robotics Design Competitions: Potential and Pitfalls Cherrice Traver, John M. Spinelli Union CollegeAbstractThe role of international design competitions in an Engineering Curriculum isinvestigated using a case study involving participation by 9 Union College students in anautonomous robot competition in France. As part of their degree requirements, all UnionEngineering majors are required to have an international experience. Participation in the1998 E=M6 Robot Soccer competition in France, and subsequent study of Frenchengineering education, was used by some to fulfill this
. More equipment has been procured for civil materials and faculty are currentlybuilding up the introduction to environmental engineering laboratory course with a largepurchase of equipment at the start of the fall 2015 semester.The other major concern was to require a third natural science course in the curriculum.Chemistry and physics, each with two courses, are integral to the curriculum. It was determinedthat biology could be used as that third science course. Fortunately for this accreditation cycle,transcripts for all six initial graduates indicated that the students had taken a biology course. Forall current and future students, an immediate curriculum change was instituted to requirebiology. In the future, the third science course may be
Reflections On Four Approaches Taken At Rensselaer,” presented at the 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2009, p. 14.1386.1-14.1386.16. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/sustainability-as-an-integrative-lens-for-engineering-education-initial-re flections-on-four-approaches-taken-at-rensselaer[6] J. L. Aurandt and E. C. Butler, “Sustainability Education: Approaches for Incorporating Sustainability into the Undergraduate Curriculum,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 102–106, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000049.[7] D. M. Riley, “Pushing the Boundaries of Mass and Energy: Sustainability and Social Justice
(SOPS), a term that describesthe multicomponent organic system that comprises a drug, nutraceutical, or medicineformulation.The workshop modules proposed for the 2012 Summer School will introduce faculty to theessential concepts of pharmaceutical engineering in a way that they can be easily integrated intothe undergraduate curricula at their home institution. This will be accomplished throughinteractive exercises where workshop participants will learn new concepts and then be engagedto explore ways to improve the courses they teach. We will use the approach that we havepracticed at Rowan University, to integrate concepts of new technologies into the traditionalundergraduate chemical engineering curriculum through laboratories/demonstrations, in
critical in Historically BlackColleges/Universities (HBCUs). Based at an HBCU-designated school with extensive support from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF), we have studied the phenomenon of the gap between our expectations andstudent performance in the mathematical competencies and preparation for advanced coursework[57-59]. As observed, such weaknesses connect to the level of student academic engagement –both inside and outside of the classroom. This study, attempting to address student weaknesses byaddressing low academic engagement levels, led to the design and exploration of the Knowledgeand Curriculum Integration Ecosystem” (KACIE), in which a framework that organizes research-based principles from the learning sciences and from
learning environment and promote the socialization of learners into a specific discourse community. All courses are taught by cross-disciplinary teams of faculty and industry representatives. In addition, instructors require students to work on both large and small cross-disciplinary teams and integrate and synthesize the technical knowledge learned in traditional courses. Most importantly, students are encouraged to develop managerial and professional skills with an emphasis on verbal communication and technical writing.Whether the faculty focus on established courses or on the development of a new coursesequence, they must plot out specific sets of skills at specific points in the curriculum inorder for
-engineering knowledge Professional Such skills cover technical competency aspects required to perform specific engineering tasks. Scientific They enable students to have a firm foundation in engineering science, thus enabling them to realign themselves with the changes in emphasis in the scientific field and to develop an interest in R&D and design.Table 2 shows a basic guideline in designing an engineering curriculum where the minimumcredit allocations for the respective skills and competencies are assigned. Typical subjectsclassified under the different skills and competencies are also listed in the table as a guide inpreparing engineering
the community and if applicable, community NGOpartner. However, while the online resources assist students in gaining an understanding of the local context,they are not able to directly interact with the community. With over 7,000 participants in Australia andNew Zealand alone this would be too much of a burden on the community partner. In order to simulatethis interaction EWB hosts a student discussion forum on the EWB Challenge website where studentscan post any questions regarding the design projects and local context. These questions are answered byEWB with consultation with the community partner, thus allowing students an avenue to interact withand explore the local context.Course Integration One area where the implementation
provided to students either byestablishing freestanding courses in engineering ethics or by integrating ethics across thecurriculum. Service learning can also provide help students to understand the impact of theirengineering work to help others, and it is a very effective way to teach students aboutengineering ethics.Whichever means is used to include engineering ethics in the curriculum, ASEE strongly sharesthe view that it is an essential element in the education of all engineers. Only those who areprepared to recognize their ethical responsibilities and to effectively solve ethical problems willbe able to responsibly carry out their roles as agents of technological change