Paper ID #29698To Be, or Not to Be, a Professor: Views of Engineering PostdoctoralScholarsDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the educational attainment and schooling experiences
Paper ID #29913Work In Progress (WIP): A Systematic Review Describing Impacts onEngineering Undergraduates who Participate in OutreachDr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is Executive Director of The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA.Prof. Karen A. Thole, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Karen A. Thole serves as the head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University and also holds the title of Distinguished Professor. She is the co-founder of the Engineering Ambassador Network, which is a professional development program for
were very awful. But I think that really is what a lot of people get out of college is the positive experience of meeting people who are like- minded and accepting, especially with regards to sexuality and orientation and those identities.”Jordan was heavily involved in on-campus student organizations, participating in variousdiversity-centered engineering student organizations such as Society of Women Engineers(SWE), Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), and Women in Electrical andComputer Engineering (WECE). These student organizations are also designed to be inclusivespaces for certain marginalized populations, providing spaces for marginalized peoples to buildcommunity around their identities. For
Paper ID #35303A Study of Available Time for Engineering Undergraduates’ Involvement inCo-curricular ActivitiesDr. Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design process and methods, ill-structured problem solving, problem typology, and experiential and informal learning environments in the professional formation of engineers. He is interested in the development of tools, methods, and strategies
Paper ID #20096Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education: A DelphiStudy (Fundamental)Dr. Brian Hartman, Walla Walla University Brian is a professor of education at Walla Walla University. He has 5 years of experience teaching high school science and practiced engineering for 12 years. His research interests include K-12 biological and chemical engineering curriculum development, nature of engineering, and creativity in engineering design.Randy L. Bell, Oregon State University Dr. Bell is an Associate Dean and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. His
the program, he had aresearch question in mind. Brandon proposed measuring road roughness from a mechanical,rather than a civil engineering perspective. He claimed civil engineers know all about the roadand nothing about signal processing. The current standard of measuring road roughness entailedmeasurements made at constant speed under ideal conditions. This approach did not accuratelyrepresent normal driving conditions. Brandon considered multiple factors and conditions in hisapproach, arising from his past project experience with the research institute.Interpreting the Case through the CoCPBrandon amassed substantial domain-relevant skills across domains over his extensive career.He was confident in his testing and design skills, his
Paper ID #26333Intended and Unintended Consequences of Rapidly Expanding an Engineer-ing Mathematics Intervention for Incoming First-Year StudentsDr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of
Paper ID #29560Can Community Development Projects in Engineering Education Be BothResponsible and Sustainable?: Theory, Education, and PraxisDr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University
Paper ID #22619Fundamental: A Teacher Professional Development Program in EngineeringResearch with Entrepreneurship and Industry ExperiencesMr. Sai Prasanth Krishnamoorthy, New York University Sai Prasanth Krishnamoorthy received his BSEE from Amrita University and M.S in Mechatronics from NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical En- gineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, serving as a research assistant under NSF-funded RET Site project. He conducts research in Mechatronics, Robotics and Controls Laboratory at NYU and his research interests include automation
interacting points of view) alongside discussions of“objectivity.” Integrating conversation architectures that value and develop intersubjectivestatements allows multiple perspectives to come out so teams can take advantage of them in theirwork. Open Sentences also allow students to share their personal interests and values; connectingwith these inner interests can increase their intrinsic motivation [15].Open Sentences can lead to emotionally vulnerable spaces when students share their values,motivations, and fears. In our experiences, engineering curricula do not typically provide manyspaces for the development of affective skills, and facilitators should keep this in mind. Forinstance, it may be helpful to use a progression of Open Sentences that
Paper ID #21516Reactions from First-year Engineering Students to an In-depth Growth Mind-set InterventionDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a MS in Industrial Engi- neering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her research is focused on decision-making within the context of engineering design. She is working to leverage engineering edu- cation research to shift the culture of engineering to be more inclusive of
Paper ID #25329Developing an Engineering Identity through Immersive Design Challenges inAcademic Makerspaces: A Qualitative Case StudyMr. Juan Torralba, University of Miami Juan Torralba is a PhD student in STEM education and educational researcher at the University of Miami. His research focus is on equity in STEM education, with specific interest in access to opportunity for minoritized students.Dr. Rob Rouse, Southern Methodist University Rob is a Clinical Assistant Professor at Southern Methodist University’s Annette Caldwell Simmons School of Education and Human Development. In addition, Rob is the Interim Director of
Paper ID #27430Engagement Patterns across Race, Gender and Family Income in Engineer-ing ClassroomsDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability.Lauren Summers, University of Washington Lauren Summers is a doctoral student in the College of
Paper ID #11690A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Student Perceptions and ExperiencesRelated to Global ReadinessDr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working
Paper ID #12088Engineering practitioners in PhD programs: Who are they and why do theyreturn?Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in Psychology and Sociology from Case Western Reserve University. Before pursuing a PhD, Erika had a dual appointment in UM’s College of Engineering working in student affairs and as a research associate. While grounded in the field of higher education, her research interests include
Paper ID #12151Just-in-Time Support: An Evidence-Based Academic-Student Affairs Part-nership to Enable Engineering Student SuccessDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University Edward Berger is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, having joined Purdue in August 2014. Prior to that, he was the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Virginia, where this initiative took place.Mrs. Lisa Lampe, University of Virginia Lisa Lampe is the Director of Undergraduate Success in the University of
. First, the project focuses on faculty community, rather thanexternal communities such as companies or local residential communities. The definition ofcommunity we adopted is not just in a physical location, but in an organizational location, in “thecooperation in labor, order and management,” (Tönnies, 2000, p. 43). This is important in ourconsideration of community of engagement, as we go beyond physical boundaries, such as thosebetween university and its wider locale, to cognitive boundaries, such as those within and amonguniversity colleges and departments. It is with this in mind that we define engagement andengaged communities. Second, it expands the definitions and model of community engagementby highlighting how engineering faculty
Paper ID #24932Exploring the Experiences of Prospective Transfer Students in a Global En-gineering ProgramJessica R Deters, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Jessica Deters is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. She holds a B.S. in Applied Mathematics & Statistics and a minor in the McBride Honors Program in Public Affairs from the Colorado School of Mines.Ms. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center
), I need to work harder, or excel beyond other men, in order for my input to even be considered as valuable.”One of our goals for the unit was for students to consider whether investigating who participatesin STEM is (or should be) an important part of learning physics. Alyssa answers this question asshe describes the importance of this class to her personally: “This classes addresses tough topics, beyond physical material. While learning quantum mechanics is the primary focus, this is the perfect class to tie in challenging societal norms and stigmas. I say the word “engineer” and an image of a white male almost instantaneously appears in my mind.”For Alyssa, her own awareness of the lack of
Paper ID #42518Exploring How Contextual Factors Influence the Implementation of MiddleSchool Engineering Curricula (Fundamental)Dr. Jessica D Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jessica Gale is a Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). As a member of CEISMC’s Research and Evaluation Group, Dr. Gale’s recent work explores the development, implementation, and effectiveness of innovative STEM and STEAM curricula and programs. Dr. Gale’s research spans and often connects diverse subjects within K-12 education including: project-based
Paper ID #42710Factors Impacting the Development of Intercultural Competence in EngineeringStudents’ Long-term Study AbroadDr. Sigrid – Berka, The University of Rhode Island Sigrid Berka is the Executive Director of the International Engineering Program (IEP) at the University of Rhode Island, Professor of German and also the Director of the German and Chinese IEP, responsible for building academic programs with exchange partners abroad, corporate relations, and fundraising for the IEP. Sigrid served as Editor, with Editor-in-Chief Brent Jesiek (Purdue University), of the Journal of International Engineering Education (JIEE
rigid thinkersthan untenured faculty.Generally, faculty and staff see veterans as being more diverse than the civilian studentpopulations within engineering. The exception being the senior lecturers which may be based onthe level of courses they teach. Please note, they are also the smallest of the faculty pools withinthe study. Clearly the military prides itself on being one of the most diverse organizations in theUnited States and its practices of selecting candidates with diversity in mind for militaryacademies is currently coming under attack in U.S. courts [11]. The goal for promoting a morediverse officer pool at service academies is to provide leaders representative of the diversitynaturally observed within the enlisted ranks. Of course
Paper ID #42713Developing an AI and Engineering Design Hybrid-Remote Summer CampProgram for Underrepresented Students (Evaluation)Alvin Talmadge Hughes IV, University of Florida Alvin (TJ) Hughes is a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelor of Science in Materials Science and Engineering and a minor in Engineering Innovation. He has interests in additive manufacturing, materials analysis, and data analytics. He is the Data Science/AI curriculum lead for the EQuIPD grant at the University of Florida currently manages teams working on Python Professional Development for teachers interested in Data Science, as
Paper ID #42974Small Shifts: New Methods for Improving Communication Experiences forWomen in Early Engineering CoursesDr. Jonathan M Adams, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Jonathan Adams is an assistant professor of rhetoric and composition and the writing program administrator at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, AZ. His research on rhetorical theory, infrastructure, and communication pedagogy informs his teaching of courses in rhetoric, composition, and technical communication in engineering.Ashley Rea, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, PrescottBrian Roth, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
for this integration of NEIR with engineering curriculum and the delivery process, whichprovided the pedagogical framework.The developed PD was then delivered during a full day review to individuals who are SubjectMatter Experts (SMEs) with expertise working with secondary STEM education (16 years ormore). The SMEs provided expertise in teacher professional development, equity education andservice learning, and both science and engineering education.They were also asked to provide suggestions on how the PD program could be improved. Basedon their feedback, the SEEE team revised the PD content and PD materials. They also kept theSMEs suggestions in mind as they delivered the PD in Year One and found that the suggestionswould continue to be
diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offers multiple benefits to the academic world.There are many approaches to advancing DEI, one of which is through mindful use of language.Thoughtful language can help foster inclusivity, contributing to the broader goal of creating aninclusive and equitable academic environment. In particular, the American PsychologicalAssociation (APA) has published a language use guideline that provides instruction on languageusage that offers practical suggestions and highlights examples of biased language commonlyfound in academic writing. In this academic atmosphere, the engineering education community isincreasingly recognizing that language use is one of the essential components of creating aninclusive and equitable
: including“specified criteria for success” as they go about defining problems, and planning and carryingout “fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identifyaspects of a model or prototype that can be improved.”6 Another principle for elementary through high school engineering education, accordingto the Committee on K12 Engineering Education, is that it promotes engineering habits of mind.Specifically, the committee referenced the following habits of mind: “systems thinking,collaboration, ethical considerations, creativity, communication and optimism.”7 Optimism“reflects a world view in which possibilities and opportunities can be found in every challengeand an understanding that every technology can
massive engineering projects created in the 1970s had to run through a highly populated area, it would follow the path of least resistance through low-income minority neighborhoods displacing those without the social influence to do anything about it. With the shortcomings of past infrastructure in mind, the new infrastructure bill allows current civil engineers to design and construct more effective national infrastructure that models the values of equity and greatness that America was created to represent. This opportunity for growth and reconstruction inspires me the most to become a civil engineer.” Male URM student, 2022 “Another reason I am interested in engineering is because I want to play a role in combatting the gender
Paper ID #32547The Role of Study Abroad Curricular Interventions in EngineeringStudents’ Intercultural Competence DevelopmentDr. Sigrid Berka, University of Rhode Island Sigrid Berka is the Executive Director of the International Engineering Program (IEP) at the University of Rhode Island, Professor of German and also the Director of the German and Chinese IEP, responsi- ble for building academic programs with exchange partners abroad, corporate relations, and fundraising for the IEP. Sigrid is co-editor of the Journal of International Engineering Education (JIEE) and a cer- tified Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI
Paper ID #33450Cohort-Based Supplemental Instruction Sessions as a Holistic RetentionApproach in a First-Year Engineering CourseMiss Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin Nisha coordinates the Supplemental Instruction program. She received her B.S. in cell and molecular biology from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007, her M.S. in biology from Texas A&M University in 2012 and her M.A. in STEM Education from The University of Texas at Austin in 2019. Additionally, she has over five years of combined industry and science research experience, has worked as a senior bioscience associate at UT’s Austin Technology