or ECE, such as Control Theory, Digital Signal Processing or StructuralDynamics.The curricular goals of ESA are to further develop students’ skills and expertise in theengineering analysis process, increase their self-directed and peer learning abilities, and toconvey content that is common to ME and ECE programs. The focus on quantitative analysis ispart of a broader effort to educate students in this area. The course material is built around ahands-on project to control an inverted pendulum on a cart, a classic problem in control theory[1] which is often included in Signals and Systems and System Dynamics courses [2], [3].To this end, we developed a project using an affordable system based on an Arduino-likeplatform, the Balboa 32U4
solve complex engineering problems. [1], [2] However, these goals haveevolved from practical-focused to more theory-oriented throughout the decades. Maintaining andupdating instructional labs requires high equipment, space, and human resources cost. [2] Thesereasons lead to traditional engineering experiments often became procedure-orientated andfocused on reinforcing a fundamental principle in a narrow discipline. [3], [4] Holmes et al.demonstrated that labs designed to reinforce concepts show no added value in enhancing students'understanding of fundamental physics material. [5] They compared exam performance betweenstudents who did and did not enroll in a closely-coupled laboratory course. Their results show noimprovement or even worse
typicalclasses, learning activities from levels 1-5 take place before students are asked to tackle level 6 learningactivity. This forms a natural progression in learning. When it comes to programming, this naturalprogression is broken for the sake of accelerated effort to get the students familiar with the field as wellas programming, simultaneously. This approach, while noble in intention, can be compared to trying torun without the ability to walk.In this paper the conventional material to teaching programming to freshman MEs is replaced withnewly developed material which has been designed so that students know and understand everyproblem assigned before they tackle the task of writing code to solve the problem. The problems arechosen in such a way
and curricular resources forachieving engineering literacy for all. This resource exchangedocument will provide a brief introduction to the framework andexplore how the highlighted concepts can build upon each otherto influence more immediate and purposeful instructionalpractice. The complete framework can be downloaded forfree at https://p12framework.asee.org/.Defining Engineering Learning: The framework operationally defines Engineering Learning as three-dimensional which includes 1) the Engineering Habits of Mind (i.e., Optimism, Persistence, Creativity,Systems Thinking, Collaboration, and Conscientiousness) that students should develop over time throughrepetition and conditioning, 2) the Engineering Practices (i.e., Engineering Design
educators can employ to understandcorrelations between STEM learning topics such as climate change, and students’ susceptibilityto AI-driven misinformation. The proposed approach has the potential to guide STEM educatorsas to the STEM topics that may be more difficult to teach (e.g., climate change), given students’susceptibility to AI-driven misinformation that promotes controversial viewpoints. In addition,the proposed approach may inform students themselves as to their susceptibility to AI-drivenSTEM misinformation so that they are more aware of AI’s capabilities and how they could beutilized to alter their viewpoints on a STEM topic.1. IntroductionThe rapid expansion and adoption of communication technologies has led to the dissemination
has had such anexplosive growth in the last ten years. In fact, the FAA predicts that the number of slightlylarger UAS; those over 55 lbs, could exceed the number of general aviation aircraft by the mid-2030s. [1] It is important that academia stay ahead of any emerging technology to help developinnovative graduates and provide the appropriate knowledge and skills to succeed in industry. Itis no surprise then that academic institutions, and STEM programs in particular, areincorporating UAS into their education. As with any technology, this can present bothopportunities and challenges. This paper will outline the growth of the UAS industry anddemonstrate the need for partnerships between academia and the industry. Then, it will discussthe
of social programs.Dr. Cristian Ruz, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de ChileMr. Tom´as Andr´es Gonz´alez, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Protocol to Follow up Students in Large-Enrollment Courses1. IntroductionIn response to the COVID-19 health crisis, two thirds of higher education institutions quicklymoved to online education [1]. As a result, students faced unexpected difficulties, such aslack of a good study environment, which affected their wellbeing [1]. Aware of thoseadditional difficulties, some institutions promoted a flexible approach, suggesting teachers toincrease communication with their
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Provisional History of the Idea of “Soft” vs. “Hard” Skills in Engineering Education soft adj. 1. not hard, firm, or rough. 2. not loud or bright. 3. gentle. 4. (too) sympathetic and kind. 5. weak, foolish. 6. (of drinks) nonalcoholic, 7. (of drugs) not highly addictive. soft option easy alternative. soft-pedal v. refrain from emphasizing --Oxford Mini Reference Dictionary and Thesaurus, p.598 disparage v. suggest that something is of little value or importance. syn. belittle, criticize, decry, denigrate, deprecate, minimize, run down, undervalue
psychology, when "students failed, not institutions" [1]. During the1980s, we began rethinking the causes and cures of minority student attrition when there was arealization that student-focused interventions would impact entering students' success [2]. Thisearly work on student retention ushered in what might be called the "age of involvement" [1],[3]. We have learned that belonging and involvement matter and are critical to success during thecritical first year of college [4], [5]. Further, as a profession, we have recognized we are intransformation (for example, The Engineer of 2020 [6]), and now, more than ever, "criticalthinking," and "learning how to learn" have become recognized as crucial attributes of teachingengineering fundamentals
,seating a large number of students physically in a traditional classroom is not considered safeduring the pandemic and teaching modalities that minimize spread of the virus are adopted. Whilea transition to virtual learning can eliminate the spread of the virus, such transition cannot be takenlightly by everyone. A report by Allen and Seaman [1] indicates that institutions with onlineofferings in 2014 to 2015 are just as positive about it as ever, but those who have no onlineofferings say that it will not be part of their plans for the future. Moreover, academic leaders atinstitutions with online offerings have consistently held a more favorable opinion of the learningoutcomes for online education than those at institutions with no offerings
memo which also helps develop technical communication skills. The final exam forthe course is a flight test taking maximum payload weight to a specified altitude Design-Build-Fly (DBF) projects are most commonly cornerstone and capstone experiencesfor undergraduate aerospace engineering students as a way to get them excited about the major(cornerstone) and give them a chance to demonstrate all they have learned during their degree(capstone).[1] These hands-on projects develop a wide array of engineering skills and have beenshown to increase retention and engagement in a difficult major.[2] However, there are fewer ofthese experiences present in the middle of a typical aerospace curriculum. Early DBF experiencestypically focus on basic
yet begun. While all teams usedbasic sketching, the amount of CAD modeling that had been done varied. The major challenges faced byinstructors as the medium turned unexpectedly virtual included: (1) enabling teams to continue to worktogether given varying locations; (2) internet connectivity and lack of experience with appropriate softwaretools; (3) the inability to physically work with peers on the second prototype; (4) the lack of access to toolsand materials for prototyping; and (5) needing to learn and use modeling software remotely. Consideringall these challenges, the instructors collegially decided to enable asynchronous delivery of learningexperiences, supplemented by virtual office hours.To help students transition into the virtual
Paper ID #32918A Sojourn of Engineering Identity Conflict: Exploring IdentityInterference Through a Performative LensDr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational success strate- gies, and b) understanding how
inperson2. High-school teachers working in online and hybrid spaces need distributed groupwork options that will engage students in collaboration to developcooperative skills. The Engineering Group Work Spectrum was developed drawing from diverse real-world collaborations. The Spectrum offers seven tiers ofstudent interdependence from complete interdependence (a “three-legged race”) to completely independent work. The purpose of this spectrum is to providepractical choices for teachers to continue to use groupwork in engineering design instruction even as normal classroom routines and settings are disrupted bydistance learning online or socially distanced learning in the classroom.1 Dym, C. L., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J
activities, iv) Family Caféevents, and v) Summer workshop for STEM teachers.i) NASA-STEM content developmentThe NASA STEM contents were first identified based on the existing lesson plans adopted inparticipating schools in Broward and Palm Beach Counties in Florida. Then, the NASA STEMcontents were embedded into the NGSSS based on the lesson plans and instructional calendar.The methodology adopted for NASA-STEM content development is shown in Figure 1. Thevarious steps were: i) Review and analyze the existing curriculum followed by the schools andwork closely with the STEM teachers to identify available time-slots to introduce NASA-STEMcontent to their existing lesson plans; ii) Download the NASA’s STEM content for Grades 6, 8,11-12 from the NASA
decades there has been abundant discussion, research and subsequentpublication about the need for leadership skill development both for newly minted and seasonedengineers. The calls have come from both engineering practice [1] and academic communities[2], and the expectations have been codified by ABET for engineering academic preparatoryprograms [3].At the recommendation of our School of Engineering Industry Advisory Board late in the 1990sit was decided to develop a new graduate program to address a changing manufacturing andindustrial environment in our state. Increasing use of technology in this environment called for adifferent set of skills needed for engineers. A Master of Science in Technology Managementdegree (MSTM) was introduced in the
differential equations.Depending on the application in as to how you define a problem, for different people with theirpeculiar background, Matlab, Maple and Python may end up being 'best' for that application.Actually, often, one will find that a mixture of a symbolic package, and a numeric package (orlibrary), with a little glue programming, will be best. This is because for advanced applications,one probably really wants to do 1. symbolic model manipulation 2. symbolic model simplification 3. numeric model simulation 4. code generation (for efficiency)Some experts have reported that the premise of Matlab is numerical computing. Depending on theapplication, say if one just wants to numerically compute
whopursue a tertiary education diploma or degree has been increasing steadily in recent years; this isdue to the strengthening of the Chilean educational ecosystem incorporating various modalities ofschools and study programs. Despite the above, Chilean women's participation in STEM areas isnot higher than the previously mentioned average. Our main objective is to analyze trends on thistopic for Chilean students based on the following variables: type of institution, school shift andmodality, age of students, and career type. We made a percentage analysis to investigate trendsover time about students' gender within the variables: (1) type of institution (Community College,Professional Institute, and University); (2) school shift and modality
werepositively correlated to the motivation and Engineering Identity scores.1. IntroductionEngineering curricula are typically structured as a set of sequential courses (often taught bydifferent instructors) where later courses build upon the knowledge gained from the earliercourses [1]. The Industrial Engineering (IE) curriculum is no exception. One limitation of thistraditional approach is that the separation in time and context across different courses can makeit difficult for students to connect fundamental topics to real-world problems[2]. This lack ofconnection is a potential factor that impacts engineering students’ attrition rates. Engineeringstudents have graduated at a rate of about 50% for more than 60 years [3]–[8]. Many factorscontribute to
softwaredevelopment and engineering problems, why should we not provide them an environment wherethey can be familiar with the industrial software development, engineering and projectmanagement practices? This paper explores the project based instructional benefits in an industrysetup using Industry Standard Tools and Practices (IST&Ps) and investigates the learningeffectiveness and engagement. IST&P involves software development, deployment andmanagement tools, and common Agile practices using popular web-based tools widely used inindustries. Our approach is to engage students in cross-course collaboration [1] with Agilepractices with three groups of 3rd and 4th year undergraduate students among three project-basedcourses: Software Engineering (SE
instructional settings and EE topics.The success of the HBCU ECP project led the group to consider whether or not the scope of thecollaboration could be expanded to include a broader range of topics and participants. As theECP project wound down, the group has been reflecting on what lessons there are to be learnedfrom this experience. First and foremost, the project succeeded because many schools workedtogether as one to collectively improve the learning experiences of their students.What enabled the group to succeed? 1) Experienced faculty trained faculty at schools new topersonal instrumentation at both in-person workshops and regular online meetings. Theexperienced faculty from within the project had worked together previously in the MobileStudio
educational processflow. In this work, we present a survey-based study of the students’ opinions and perspectives onthree different remote teaching techniques, practiced in the school hosting this study. The studytakes place during spring and summer of 2020 and more than 500 students participated in it. Thefactors affecting the students’ experience in each method will be identified, and, accordingly, bestpractices for the instructors will be recommended to ensure students’ engagement and satisfaction.1. IntroductionSince COVID-19 [1] was declared a pandemic in March 2020, normal life as we knew it wasdisrupted. Many universities across the US and worldwide were forced to either end their springsemester early or switch to remote learning for what was
this review, a comprehensivecollection of relevant publications was compiled by identifying appropriate search terms,databases and inclusion criteria. An initial search identified 478 results. Once 223 duplicateswere removed, the titles and abstracts of the remaining 255 publications were screened and 201records were removed because of their irrelevance to the topic of interest. Finally, the full-textsof 54 articles were assessed for eligibility and articles were excluded based on (1) lacked aframework (n = 25); (2) irrelevance to engineering in higher education (n = 15); and (3)examined the process of argumentation, rather than a produced argument (n = 2).The full texts of the 11 qualifying studies were then examined and coded to reveal
gained through multidisciplinary approaches, and furthervalidation of multidisciplinary capstone projects.IntroductionCognizant of the burgeoning needs of multidisciplinary engineering competencies in addressing global grandchallenges for engineering, reports such as The Engineer of 2020 and Innovation with Impact have helpedunderscore the significance of preparing engineering students with multidisciplinary competencies [1-2]. Theannouncement and implementation of Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) also emphasized the ability ofengineering graduates to function in multidisciplinary teams [3]. At the same time, numerous conference papersand journal articles have recognized the urgent need for multidisciplinary engineering education, while
science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women (specifically Black and His- panic women) in computer-related engineering fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A systematic review of social constructivist pedagogies in computing and their effects on broadening participation for women in undergraduate computingAbstractThe necessity for computing professionals has underlined the
currently a contributing research member of the Renaissance Foundry Research Group.Dr. Robby Sanders, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Robby Sanders is an Associate Professor at Tennessee Technological University (TTU) in the Depart- ment of Chemical Engineering. He obtained his Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering from TTU in 1995, and he obtained his Master’s degree and his PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Vander- bilt University in 1998 and 2001, respectively. His research efforts address 1) innovation-driven learning with a focus on student learning at disciplinary interfaces, 2) clinical diagnostics and therapeutics for dis- eases of the lungs, 3) wound healing, and 4) performance of soft gel
outcomes.IntroductionIn problem-based learning, students are presented with an authentic and ill-structured problemprior to learning, which then requires creative and critical thinking [1], [2]. The knowledgeobtained through the authentic contexts used in problem-based learning is more meaningful andtransferable, and is retained better [1]. Collaborative project-based learning (PBL) expands uponproblem-based learning by requiring self-directed learning, communication, and teamwork [3], skillsemployers desire but that have been found to be lacking in recent graduates. A survey by theAssociation of American Colleges & Universities (AACU) found that employers prioritize writtencommunication, teamwork skills, critical thinking, and information literacy [4
learning curve for an organizationseeking to start such work is steep. Additionally, it is important to evaluate to what extent worktypified as community engaged work actually creates a participatory space of community-centered perspectives regarding roles, interests, worldviews, actions and outcomes. To this end,we developed a formative assessment tool using previously identified domains [1]. This tool,created in partnership between a university and an outreach group affiliated with the Air Force,allows organizations to evaluate existing projects and explore ways to develop on a path towardstrue community-engagement. The outreach group in this case undertakes significant STEMeducation within New Mexico, but in the past, a majority of the work has
with how they viewthemselves and feel they are seen by others. These experiences were used to develop a model tounderstand the ways perceived recognition is interpreted as meaningful by students. Two use-cases of this model are presented to illustrate ways the PIER model may be used by studentsbased on their experience with an engineering identity.IntroductionThis research paper presents a model for the interpretation of recognition by undergraduateengineering students. Identity researchers are encouraging educators to think beyond solelyteaching subject content and to include practices that support students seeing themselves asengineers [1]–[5]. Engineering role identity influences student learning, persistence, andmotivation [6]–[8], which
reported 19% of undergraduates reported a physicalor cognitive disability (see Table 2-6 of [1]). Students with disabilities are those who reportedthat they had one or more of the following conditions: blindness or visual impairment that cannotbe corrected by wearing glasses; hearing impairment (e.g., deaf or hard of hearing); orthopedicor mobility impairment; speech or language impairment; learning, mental, emotional, orpsychiatric condition (e.g., serious learning disability, depression, ADD, or ADHD); or otherhealth impairment or problem. However most disabilities are not reported to the institution orcourse instructors. For example, Previous research showed 75% underreporting of students witha wide spectrum of disability, i.e. only a quarter