software and my soft skills. I believe they go hand in hand. That could be a bit challenging. Probably as an African American those are the areas where I need to go a bit deeper. Those are the areas where I need to work harder. Those are the areas where I need to bridge the gap basically. So um well the positive I can always take out of it, being an African American, being from a disadvantaged background has always made me want to achieve the best. Has always made me want to work harder at whatever I do. So based on that, well, that’s a positive. That’s something I believe that could spawn me into achieving bigger and greater goals. So um I believe I probably need to work twice as hard. Yes
students an opportunity to learn and practicevaluable “soft skills.”Unlike the Fall Career Networking Event, which is focused primarily on careerdevelopment and includes only computing and engineering industry/governmentprofessionals in addition to the students, UMBC faculty and staff are included inSpring Into Leadership as well since the focus is on developing as leaders in thesefields more broadly. Seating is assigned for this event, as opposed to the more openseating of the Fall Career Networking Event, so students will be seated with peersand at least some faculty/staff/industry professionals from their majors/areas ofinterest. This seating arrangement makes it more important for this event than FallCareer Networking to have a sufficient
on Enhancing Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Benefit,for example, the veteran population holds great promise for expanding and diversifying theengineering and sciences workforce [24]. Haynie [25] argues that military veterans are wellsuited to STEM majors, given that military training often exposes them to technological tasksacross a variety of fields; many also strengthen their “soft skills” such as teamwork, leadership,and communication skills.The current study aims to address a gap in the literature on student veterans in engineering byfocusing on the experiences of first-generation students. Thus far, our project has investigatedSVE pathways into engineering education [26] [27], the quality of SVE transitions into highereducation [28
continual process engaged in by participants – students, educators, and professionals10.Therefore, effective interventions in engineering can impact not only the future generation ofengineers, but the current one as well.NormativityThere are perceptions of a normative culture within engineering which dictates, firstly, thatengineers and engineering is a highly technical field that does not focus on or value the socialaspects of one's life. This false dichotomy of “social skills” versus “technical skills” withinengineering leads to a valuing of technical prowess and a devaluing of social skills (oftenlabeled, pejoratively, as “soft skills”) which many students who have non-normative identitiesbring to the table. This dualism of skills is a false
use, and the patience to listencarefully and overcome the communication gaps. One interesting finding is that for those who reportedthoughtful prompt results and active engagement, their communications were often not limited toprompt interviews but covered topics not directly related to the course content. For example, studentsdiscovered that the KFC menu in China and American are very different, from there they became moreinterested in learning what shape the differences/similarity between two cultures. These experiences, though not always positive, have made students realize that communicationis not just a “soft skill”, but the core of global engineering practice: Through communication studentsdiscovered nuances of how engineering
members within their program of study. What made this workshop design different is the participation from each entity in the alliance and their knowledge about technology programs. The objectives for the workshops are accomplished by the following activities: 1. The students joined American Toastmasters or similar organizations which assists them with soft skills and helps them with their writing skills and public speaking. 2. Students received job training through practical lab assignments and real life applications. The students then present discoveries and are evaluated by their peers, industry, faculty, and advisory board. 3. Increase students’ technical
business and entrepreneurship, an awareness of the globalenvironment, and soft-skills development in engineering education was made clear. However, inthe authors’ opinion, it has also become clear that out of the typical 4-year plan, the roughly 2 ½years worth of engineering courses are not sufficient to do justice to both the theory and thepractice of engineering, let alone all the other skills required of the 21st Century Engineer.References1-20 discuss some of the major developments in the world order, in the engineeringfield, and in the educational structure of engineering and engineering technology of the lastcentury leading to the present situation. Despite the obvious pressures to meet the demands of atechnologically advanced and
discipline may be required to meet. In this paper, we will focus attention on thecommon (3.a) through (3.k) outcomes since these apply to all engineering programs. These elevenoutcomes may be classified into two groups. The first group, consisting of (3.a), (3.b), (3.c), (3.e),and (3.k) are technical outcomes; for example, outcome (3.a) is an ability to apply knowledgeof mathematics, science, and engineering. The second group consists of the remaining outcomes,(3.d), (3.f), (3.g), (3.h), (3.i), and (3.j), are related to what might be called professional skills 20 (alsooccasionally referred to as soft skills), as well as those related to societal issues. Thus outcome(3.d), related to a professional skill, is an ability to function on multi
education can be made more relevant tosocietal needs in the new millennium” (Parrish in Ollis, Neeley, and Luegenbiehl, 2004, p. 15).While these goals provided the energy behind the vision of EC2000, there was no clear logicalbridge between the vision and the discrete outcomes, nor between the various outcomes. Another challenge was posed by the language of “soft skills” (vs. “hard skills”) and themental model underlying it. Some of the most tangible evidence of the progress achieved in thelast 15 years is that the language of “professional skills” has become pervasive if not universal inthe literature on engineering education. Although most conversations assume a distinctionbetween “technical” and “non-technical” (or professional skills
-distributed students.ConclusionIn this paper, we presented a solution for SE education, using international standards in a project-based-learning approach. Thanks to this concept, students will learn to not only engineer therequested system, but also to engineer it the right way, using real-life SE practices conveyed bystandardized processes, together with communication, team management, collaboration and re-lated soft skills. The main advantages of our solution are the processes, life-cycle, and projectsadaptation and management components, as well as the shared workspace for students engineer-ing tasks during all the life cycle. Another advantage of the solution resides in its ability to helpin meeting the challenges of a project-based-learning
-classroom approach, the program incorporates rapiddevelopment of programming and CAD skills, in addition to the soft skills developed fromworking in a challenging and long-term group project.Beyond this groundwork is the project itself, which is based on an interactive robotics course.The course is controlled using a modular network of partially custom hardware and monitoredusing an array of cameras which provide positioning information for robots. Students are loaneda custom controller designed by the program, and access to the program’s store of buildingmaterials from which they can use their team budget to buy components from. Interfacing withthe store using a catalog like website, students are able to order parts as well as submit designsfor
critical reflections in engineering education effective in assessinglearning outcomes? During this investigation, two additional topics of relevance emerged: c)Factors that contribute to successful implementation of reflection and d) The recognition of theneed for further research on reflection.a) Critical Reflections and Achieving Learning OutcomesThe literature reviewed indicated that educators sought diverse learning outcomes through use ofreflection, with many focusing on the development of skills beyond strict technical abilities, suchas teamwork [9][10]. It is interesting to note, however, that reflection upon these “soft” skills ormore consistent reflection over the duration of the project was, in some cases, associated withresults linked
. But Fair and enjoyable. The difficulty depended on the rest of the classmates and how engaged they were.3. Comments on academic preparedness • While there were certain areas in the course that I knew little about the benefit of working on a multidisciplinary team meant that there were certain areas where I was better equipped to do the work and somewhere another student was better equipped. Overall though I felt prepared for this class. • Academically I was very prepared. I think this course hit hard on soft skills that are not easily obtained or perfected through courses at a university. What helped people to be prepared to take the course was life experience of working at a real job or a lot of
to professional development: “It gives you so much freedom. I haven’t goneto IR in maybe two or maybe one rounds just because right now I already have it all lined up….While everyone else was trying to find jobs, I’m getting experience…I already have an offerbasically every semester and then I can just work on other soft skills while I’m working…. Sothat sounds like a win-win to me.” Non-co-op students also associated a co-op with commitment,but they described this commitment in different terms from co-op students, as the followingsection explores.RQ2: What reasons do students give for not pursuing co-op participation? A. While non-co-op students list characteristics of co-ops and internships in similar ways as co-op students, non-co
rate of their students (of some 50% countrywide);developing the students’ soft skills; tightening the relationship with industry; forming engineersthat could better fit the demands of their future employers (in industry) or of innovation andentrepreneurship.Formative initiatives aimed at forming grassroots engineersSo far, we have briefly: presented grassroots engineering (GE) and its theoretical legitimacy;derived from some Freire’s works the four complementary skills an educator/grassroots engineermust possess in addition to the conventional mainstream (or “technical”) ones; sketched someaspects of the Brazilian regulation of both higher education in general and engineering educationin particular that either make it possible or limit this
a one-unit Research Methodscourse in either Physical or Biological Sciences. The goal of this initial tier is the development ofneeded research skills, including soft skills, such as working in a team, communicating within agroup, how to problem solve using critical thinking, and what it takes to be a professionalscientist. During these course-based instruction experiences, students will also be introduced toSTEM specific skills needed in chemistry, biology, physics or biology projects. This training inboth soft and hard skills using a more active learning approach increases excitement for science,promotes scientific literacy and prepares students for the rigor inherent in the STEM academicpathway.Over the past five years, students at PCC
alack of understanding during classroom activities [11]. Other studies have suggested that there isno significant differences in the learning outcomes of students in traditional lecture coursesversus flipped courses and that those in less affluent areas may have difficulty with accessing thetechnology needed to complete the course [10].The studies identified above are relevant to engineering education and to specific engineeringdisciplines. As engineering education requires soft-skill development to meet industry needs, thequestion arises as to the effectiveness of the flipped classroom technique in engineeringleadership courses. However, the exploration of a flipped classroom strategy implemented in anengineering leadership course is not found
Curriculum Guidelines [2], the task of coveringsoftware engineering is still daunting. These guidelines define 18 Knowledge Areas three ofwhich, Software Development Fundamentals (SDF), Software Engineering (SE), and SocialIssues and Professional Practice (SP), contain knowledge that falls into the software engineeringrealm. Guideline comments identify the SE and SP knowledge areas as specific curricula areaswhere teamwork and communication soft skills will be learned and practiced. The SoftwareEngineering Knowledge Area, which at 14 pages is the longest non-cross-cutting KnowledgeArea in Computer Science 2013, identifies 60 Core topics with 69 Learning Outcomes, and 54Elective topics with 56 Learning Outcomes. It will be a difficult syllabus design
credit and not graded as a quiz led to anenvironment of low or, no risk, and probably lowered the barriers of reluctance. Students whoscored better gained leadership skills, reinforced their own mastery, and felt some sense ofaccomplishment via contributing to the success of a fellow student. In addition, the higherscoring students were probably motivated by the fact that since their extra credit score wascoupled with a lower scoring one, a positive remediation extra credit score could make adifference between a plus or minus on their overall semester grade. In absolute terms, it alsoelevated their soft-skills for job interviews, presentations, etc. as survey results indicate inSection 5. For the PBA, the quizzes included various questions for
interpersonal skills he developed in his previouscareer helped him in his academic work, describing himself as “much more people-based” thanhe had been prior to working, and explained he felt that relationships with others was key tosuccess. However, he contrasted these benefits of his time working with the challenges ofadapting to the academic rigor of a PhD program: I see people that are coming in but also unsure where they want to work […] and they can struggle a little bit because of that. My work experience helped me in terms of that. It's all the soft skills, the external skills, because you get hurt more on the academic side. It's much harder academically, but it's easier in terms of motivation, managing, and stuff like
assess in a mass-production fashion (Hugo, Brennan, 2016). What about teachingnon-technical engineering courses online to hundreds or thousands of students?Of the 11 ABET student outcomes and the 12 Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board’s(CEAB) graduate attributes, about half are “technical / hard skills” and half are “professional /soft skills” (ABET, 2018 & CEAB, 2017). The student outcomes for professional skills arequalitative in nature. Therefore, they require qualitative assessment because of the wide range ofpossible solutions inside the gray zone (Shuman, 2005). How can hundreds of students achievethese outcomes in an online course without sacrificing the quality of teaching and learning andrigour of assessment?In Spring &
. Ourresults show that industry team students had the lowest presentation anxiety among all the otherteams. The fall data states that they were confident to present in comparison to students of theother teams. Soft skills play an equal role in the success of an engineer to the technical skill sets.Industry teams get an extra layer of exposure to overcome presentation anxiety and thus wehypothesize that it does plays a significant role in the overall motivation of the senior capstonedesign students.Thus from the ANOVA analysis performed on the cohorts of senior design students, the industryteams started their senior capstone design course with lower cognition and lower self-regulationthan the non-industry teams. They also started with lower