. Engineers Without Borders is an example of this type of format.Research Abroad Students conduct research in an abroad laboratory under the guidance of a faculty member or post doc, etc.5.2 Programs in 2006A summary of our first programs is given in Table 2.13 Prior to 2006 we had one study abroadprogram in the college run essentially by a single faculty member working on his own. He wascontemplating shutting the program down because it was not clear that the huge effort involvedwas valued by his department or the college. Table 2. Study Abroad Programs in 2006Country Focus Format Time No. Observations
include electrokinetics, predominantly dielectrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach ac- tivities in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Prof. Tom J Waidzunas, Temple University
teacher (7-12) and taught in public schools and museums from 2003-2013.Dr. Marci S. DeCaro, University of Louisville Marci DeCaro is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Louisville. Her research focuses on the role of cognitive factors such as working memory in learning and performance situations. She studies these topics with adults and children in laboratory and educational contexts.Dr. Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville Jeffrey L. Hieb is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Univer- sity of Louisville. He graduated from Furman University in 1992 with degrees in Computer Science and Philosophy
. degrees from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China and Ph.D. degree from University of Strathclyde, UK. Prior to joining UBC in 2008, she worked as a research scientist at Ryerson University on various projects in the area of CFD and heat and mass transfer. Dr. Yan has taught a variety of courses including fluid mechanics, fluid machines, mechanics of materials, calculus, and kinematics and dynamic. She has also developed undergraduate fluids laboratories and supervised many capstone projects. Her interest in SoTL is evidence-based teaching strategies, student engagement, faculty development, and teaching and learning communities. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with APEGBC and has served as reviewer for various
Paper ID #16813Student Proposals for Design Projects to Aid Children with Severe Disabili-tiesDr. Steve Warren, Kansas State University Steve Warren received a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 1989 and 1991, respectively, followed by a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 1994. Dr. Warren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the
-Mona, I. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Argumentative discourse in a high school chemistry classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 106(8), 349–361. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949- 8594.2006.tb17755.x18. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). An anthropologist visits the laboratory. In Labor life: The construction of scientifc facts (pp. 43–103). Princeton University Press.19. Fink, F. K. (2001). Integration of work based learning in engineering education. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual. Reno, NV: IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2001.96374720. Jonassen, D. & Shen, D. (2009). Engaging and supporting problem solving in engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 235
Paper ID #15772Summer Bridge Program Structured to Cover Most Demanding STEM Top-icsMs. Megan McSpedon, Rice University Megan McSpedon is the Associate Director of the Rice Emerging Scholars Program. She has been with the program since it was founded in 2012. Megan received a B.A. in English from Rice University.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice University Ann Saterbak is Professor in the Practice in the Bioengineering Department and Associate Dean for Un- dergraduate Education in the School of Engineering at Rice University. Saterbak was responsible for developing the laboratory program in Bioengineering. Saterbak introduced problem
19 Laboratory Tours 3.47 19 Poster Session 3.47 19 Faculty Meetings 3.44 18Respondents were also asked to provide suggestions for improvement of the event activities.Feedback suggested categorized faculty presentations, more activities outside the building, andbetter attention to time constraints on visitors. Some representative comments include: “Although some students would like a breadth of background on research, most if not all have a major field (imaging, cellular engineering) that they would like to work in; so different, separate groups for each field would allow each presenter to
data. By engaging in these practices, the researchers were able to acknowledge – and to theextent that it was possible – separate their biases from the data they analyzed. Afterwards, theresearchers compiled their findings, and came to consensus with regards to this study’s findings.Findings Findings from this study illustrate that Black men in engineering graduate programsengage with their faculty advisors in various educational spaces, including communication inone-on-one meetings, interactions in the laboratory, and occasional casual conversations.Through these interactions with faculty advisors, students described encountering both positiveand negative experiences that shaped how they valued the advisor-advisee relationship
led energy conservation research projects for Argonne National Laboratory. He has a BS in civil engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University and an MS in civil engineering with an emphasis in regional planning from Northwestern University. Wayne is a frequent speaker and author on continuing education for engineers, and is a member of the College of Engineering’s Education Innovation Committee.Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell is the Vice Provost for Lifelong Learning and Dean of the Division of Continuing Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In his role as Vice Provost, he is striving to make UW- Madison a global leader in the service to lifelong learners. He
Importance Satisfaction 1 Industrial Engineering courses at SIUE 2.94 2.19 2 Industrial Engineering courses at ITU 2.81 1.69 2 Industrial Engineering facilities at SIUE 2.81 2.56 3 Industrial Engineering technical elective choices at ITU 2.75 1.56 4 Industrial Engineering technical elective choices at SIUE 2.69 1.50 5 Industrial Engineering laboratories at SIUE 2.56 1.93 6 General Engineering courses at SIUE 2.12 2.13 7 General Education courses at SIUE
twoareas namely (i) those that have “simulations” and (ii) those that have “authenticinvolvement.” Simulations consist of contrived situations that are carefully designedto meet selected learning objectives and are under close faculty control. The authenticinvolvement activities expose the student to real situations with totally open-endedprojects, although the faculty may influence the selection of the situations and setperformance criteria to assure that positive learning objectives are met. Authenticinvolvements use outside clients while simulations use experimental laboratories,guided design, or case studies. In an article in 2006, Davis et al. [6] defines “thepurpose of the capstone engineering design course is to provide students
day the students were given a brief lecture showing how engineers use thetechnologies they were working with and were introduced to the state of the art including videoclips from work being done by researchers at various universities and tours of laboratories atECU. They then had to put this knowledge together to build a robot that could navigate a linedcircular path while determining how far it had traveled along that line, avoid running into otherrobots on the line, and determine what the depth was of some artificial terrain designed tosimulate the ocean floor. The students worked in pairs and in some cases groups of three toaccomplish the daily tasks
Learning and Development, Prentice Hall.18. Abdulwahed, M. and Nagy, Z. K. (2009), Applying Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98: 283-294. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x19. Sharp, J. E., Harb, J. N. and Terry, R. E. (1997), Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes. Journal of Engineering Education, 86: 93-101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00271.x20. Stice, J. E. (1987), Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering Education, 77.21. Brown, A. O. (2004), Undergraduate Finite Element Instruction using Commercial Finite Element Software Tutorials and the Kolb Learning Cycle. Proceedings of the
courses in thermodynamics, heat transfer, energy systems laboratory, cryogenics, and vacuum technology.Mr. David J Gagnon, University of Wisconsin - Madison David J. Gagnon (University of Wisconsin, Madison) is a Discovery Fellow and program director of the Mobile Learning Lab in the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery at University of Wisconsin, Madison. He directs a team of educational researchers, software engineers, artists and storytellers that explore the inter- sections of learning science and media design, specializing in mobile media, video games and simulation. David is also the Director of the ARIS project, a free and open tool that allows anyone to produce mo- bile games, stories and tours. He is also active
qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 178.8. McCuen, R.H., Akar, G., Gifford, I.A., & Srikantaiah, D. (2009). Recommendations for improving graduate adviser-advisee communication. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(4), 153-160.9. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.10. Raoul Tan, T. L. & Potocnik, D. (2006). Are you experienced? Junior scientists should make the most of opportunities to develop skills outside the laboratory.” EMBO Reports. 7, pp. 961–964.11. Tomazou, E. M
Institute of Technology in 2000. Currently, she serves on the Editorial Board of the Springer Wireless Networks Journal and formerly on the editorial boards of IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing and Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal. Her engineering education research interests are the status of under- represented minority groups and women in engineering as well as the impact of online learning on student proficiency in engineering laboratory courses. Page 26.862.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How the Pathway to Engineering Affects Diversity in the
manufacturing activities at Yale’s academic makerspace. His professional interests in Mechanical Engi- neering are in the areas of data acquisition/analysis and mechanical design. He is the Co-Chair of the Executive Advisory Board of the FIRST Foundation and is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechan- ical Engineering. Previously, he was the Dean of Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and has had fellowships at the MIT Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, the Harvard School of Public Health and with the American Council on Education. He has also served as the Vice President of Public Awareness for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and was the 2001 Baccalaureate College Professor of the Year by the Carnegie
Women < Men Medium Laboratory, Research, and Studio Space Women < Men Eldercare Policies Women < Men Stop the Clock Policies Women < Men Page 26.162.7RIT included an additional question: How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the quality of the long-range career map/plan that you have created? Of the 404 respondents to this particular question (thisexcludes the 18 who did not respond), 52% of men and 55% of women respondents were very satisfiedor satisfied with the quality of
that the team confronted a varietyof challenges, many of which are common to faculty and students seeking to pursue research ordesign endeavors in a small college. We now provide a more detailed explanation of thechallenges of the experience, explaining how they applied to this case in particular:-Small college facilities: Compared to large research universities, the laboratory space,equipment, and other resources were quite limited.-Limited budget: In line with the above, financial resources were modest as well.-Multidisciplinary team and project: With a professor of electrical engineering mentoring astudent with a mechanical engineering concentration, both student and instructor would need tobranch out beyond their comfort zone to tackle the
heart of our e-pedagogy is to provide opportunities for learners to think about new questions or work with newinformation. An effective way to increase the likelihood of this kind of thinking is to havelearners write about their ideas, which occurs throughout the Rio’s Brain learning adventure. Page 26.475.7Figure 3: Sample screenshots from the introductory graphic novel in the Rio’s Brainlearning adventure. They show Rio coming to Sadina’s house for help; Rio telling thebackstory of his camping trip; Rio telling about falling off a cliff; Rio in bed in theSCARE laboratory; Rio looking at his own brain in a vat; and Rio and Sadina
electrokinetics, predominantly di- electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice UniversityDr. Jennifer Cole
., assistant, associate, full). Examples ofthe differential treatment that Black faculty face: not being given access to an ample sizelaboratory space (or no laboratory), having their office spaces downsized, being ignored inmeetings, being seen as the “Diversity” person, not being chosen to chair search committees,being denied tenure, etc. Faculty are often forced into silence due to being pre-tenure or notwanting to be perceived as an “Angry Black Woman or Man.” Program Directors state thatengineering departments are stuck in a color-blind ideology, which engenders a lack of comfortin discussing critical issues of race or ethnicity. The reality of being a change agent isexhausting, thus White allies are desperately needed to help advocate and
2013. In general, in these evaluations we received relatively minor observationsoriented to reinforce the admission and tutoring programs so that the graduation rates wereenhanced and the failures rates on Basic Science courses were reduced. In particular, we haveweaknesses in the field of Mathematics, this a common problem in Latin American engineeringprograms12 that in our opinion does not receives enough attention. In our case, since 2005 wehave put in place a collaboration with a French University (INSA-Lyon), oriented at reinforcingteaching and learning practices on Engineering Mathematics. Another important recommendationwas to establish a program to update and renew the laboratory equipment as well as put in place amaintenance program
, perceptions of the present (perceived instrumentality), and the interconnections between future goals and present actions. The results of this work indicated three unique student profiles based on their FTPs and have been described previously.18 For the quantitative portion of this work, engineering students at a western land grant institution in fall of 2014 who were enrolled in a first year engineering course required of all engineering majors (except computer science and engineering) were invited to participate (n=682). Students completed the optional survey (n=360, 52.8% response rate) during the first week of class in laboratory sessions of the course. Instrument Motivation was assessed using the Motivations and Attitudes in Engineering that had
Page 26.951.2support research activity at an internationally competitive level for a top 100 university.Coordinating two courses for 300 or more students is normal, with support from teachingassistants for tutorials and laboratory classes. (In Australian universities, each course isnormally 25% of a full-time student’s study load for a semester.) In view of its importance,the capstone design course has a slightly higher level of teaching resources than most othercourses.The second challenge is students’ lack of practical knowledge. Practical knowledge amongstudents entering our engineering courses is usually limited to basic domestic repairs andassembling flat-packed furniture. Almost all the prior courses completed by students focuson
Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton): Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension and Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study.Dr. Philip Michael Sadler, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Philip Sadler holds a B.S. in Physics from MIT and an Ed.D. from Harvard. He co-authored the first integrated computer and laboratory introductory calculus course in 1975. He has taught middle school mathematics, engineering, and science and both undergraduate science and graduate teaching courses at Harvard. His research
Societyof Engineering Education (the acronym “IGIP” is derived from the society’s originalGerman/Austrian name, “Internationale Gesellschaft für Ingenieurpedagogik”), accredits trainingcenters to offer this certification. Centers exist in Germany, Russia, Austria, Brazil, Switzerland,Czech Republic, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Estonia, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia,Slovenia and Ukraine. The curriculum requirements are modular and extensive, requiring 600hours total, across eight areas, including: Theoretical and Practical Engineering Pedagogy (180hours), Laboratory Methodology (60 hours), Psychology and Sociology (90 hours),Ethics/Intercultural (30 hours), Communication Skills (90 hours), Project Work (30 hours),Electronic Technologies (60