have led to positiveoutcomes, there remain significant challenges and institutional roadblocks when it comes toimprovement of the overall culture climate at WWU. Due to rising concerns, a team of facultyand staff formed together in the summer of 2023 to identify the problem(s) and work towardplausible solutions that could improve overall culture in the department. This team dedicatedthemselves to the “Engineering a Culture Overall” (ECO) initiative, which is an effort focusedon improving the culture in the department by focusing on accessibility, diversity, equity, andinclusion (ADEI). In the Fall of 2023, undergraduate students joined the ECO team with theintention of amplifying the student voice to help enact change that would benefit the
and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of theUnited States Military Academy, Department of the Army, DoD, or U.S. Government.References[1] S. Nicholson, “Creating Engaging Escape Games for the Classroom,” Child. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.14203.[2] E. Ozcelik, N. E. Cagiltay, and N. S. Ozcelik, “The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments,” Comput. Educ., vol. 67, pp. 12–20, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009.[3] R. Garris, R. Ahlers, and J. E. Driskell, “Games , motivation , and learning : A research and practice model,” Simul. Gaming, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 441–467, 2002, doi: 10.1177
. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (NSF CAREER#2045392). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewersfor their constructive feedback, which helped us to sharpen the paper. References[1] S. A. Bjorklund, J. M. Parente, and D. Sathianathan, “Effects of faculty interaction and feedback on gains in student skills,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 153-160, 2004.[2] E. K. Briody, E. Wirtz, A. Goldenstein, and E. J. Berger, “Breaking
#1915615, titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results andconclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] F. Commodore, M. Gasman, C. Conrad, and T.-H. Nguyen, “Coming Together: A Case Study of Collaboration Between Student Affairs and Faculty at Norfolk State University,” Front. Educ., vol. 3, May 2018, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00039.[2] O. S. Tan, Problem-based Learning Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Thomson, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com
result of achieving the stated learningobjectives for transportation concepts, ECP has positively impacted transportation engineeringstudents' understanding of transportation concepts. ECP has demonstrated that students betterunderstand the modules' expected learning outcomes.AcknowledgmentThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #1915615, titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results andconclusion or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. Zhu, F. Xie, and D. Levinson
outside of the US educational system.The instances in which the authority figure refused to discuss theories and class materialshappened during his time in Saudi Arabia, within the ME education system. A similar experiencewas mentioned by Student 102: Interviewer: “You mentioned that there was a difference between studying back home and then studying here in the us. When it comes to the professors back home and the professors here, what do you think is the main difference? Student 102: “You won't be given the opportunity to ask questions there … Back home, if you are allowed to ask a question, that question would be either answered with yes or no, and that's it.”Student 102’s experience with questioning
Wu, Sheryl Ehrman, Lilia Abron, David Sul, Julianne Jones,Paloma Beamer), contributing members of the ADVANCE SPACES grant External AdvisoryCommittee (Junko Munakata-Marr and Susan Powers), and collaborators on the CER task forceat the AEESP (Justin Hutchison, Jose Cerrato, Mira Olson). The first author gratefullyacknowledges early partners on her learning journey about SL and CE, including BernardAmadei, Kurt Paterson, and Chris Swan.References[1] T.K. Stanton, D.W. Giles Jr., N.I. Cruz, Service-Learning: A Movement’s Pioneers Reflect on Its Origins, Practice, and Future, Jossey-Bass, 1999.[2] M. Natarajarathinam, S. Qiu, W. Lu, “Community engagement in engineering education: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Engineering
a group of ... (select only one) 22. In this course, I learn how to use ANSYS mostly from (select only one) 23. In this course, I learn how to code the FE method mostly from (select only one) 24. In the future, the number of mini projects should be (select only one) 25. The difficult issues of the teamwork are (you may select more than one) 26. The most difficult part of the course to learn is (select only one) ... 27. When working on mini projects, I prefer to work with (select only one) ... 28. My favorite task(s) in mini projects have been ... 29. In the future, I would like to study FE simulation for the following topics (you may check more than one)Results and DiscussionQuestions 1 to13 are relevant to the
mentorscounts as mentoring when she shares, “…part of their recommendation as a mentor is that[classroom strategy] increases your [student evaluations] a lot… so, I guess that's a form ofmentorship." She recalls times of receiving help and affirmation, stating, “ [Another] professorjust in passing [said], ‘yeah, I have lab get-togethers,’ and I said, ‘yeah, I do that too.’” Here shecontinues to be uncertain whether these interactions were mentorship when she adds, “I don’tknow if that counts.” Blake seems more confident identifying non-relational forms ofmentorship, saying that she “Google [s] about it a lot, so it’s like the hive mind of mentorship(laughs), and [she goes] to workshops [that are] not really like one-on-one, but kindaprogrammatic
race and racial discrimination with computing department 0.932 faculty and/or staff who: - Do not have the same racial identity as me. I am comfortable discussing topics related to race and racial discrimination with computing department 0.689 faculty and/or staff who: - Have the same racial identity as me. Factor 7: Personal advantage(s)/pressure based on race (α = 0.437) I feel like people assume my performance in class reflects my racial group. 0.584 How much do you agree with the following statement: “My race advantages me in the field of 0.542 computing in terms of internships and job opportunities.” I feel like I must suppress aspects of myself to be successful in my computing department
counterparts, as marginalized faculty “socialized for success” may createpatterns of inequality [17]. Blair et al.’s study showed that STEM faculty members were notequipped to help disrupt current patterns of gender inequalities in STEM majors [17]. In relationto the Summer 2022 REU, we used interviews with women-identifying students to examinewhether faculty and graduate student mentor interactions contributed to or took away from asense of belonging in the Summer REU. Not only do negative student/faculty relationships playa role in determining the success of women STEM majors, but also women STEM major’spositive or negative interactions with their men-identifying peers. Another barrier to success that women majoring in STEM fields experience
characteristics of preparedness levels?To answer our research questions, we qualitatively analyzed semi-structured interviews with fiveundergraduate chemical engineering students at two different universities. We situated our studyin the Professional Pathways Model (PPM), which uses Sampson et al.’s Cognitive InformationProcessing Theory [24] as a lens for Eccles et al.’s Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) of studentachievement motivation [25]. EVT has now become Situated Expectancy Value Theory (SEVT)which keeps the core concepts of EVT but recognizes situations within context [26]. However,PPM preceded SEVT so we retain EVT terminology. The PPM provides a comprehensive viewof the knowledge, values, and ability beliefs that students bring to bear in making
master’sthesis students were more concentrated above the mean. As such, master’s thesis students aremore likely to associate with this factor when considering their ideal mentor. While the samplesize for the master’s student population is small, this finding still may hold true, and warrantsfurther analysis with larger samples to ensure its validity. Figure 2: Mann-Whitney U Test Independent-Samples Histogram comparing Graduate Degrees to Value me as a person and my professional goalsRace/Ethnicity: In the demographics, students were asked to select the race(s) that they mostidentified with. Of the responses obtained, students identified as either African American orBlack (n=4), Asian (n=18), White (n=26), and Other
] K. L. Gunckel and S. Tolbert, "The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 938- 961, 2018.[6] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, R. Pan, and C. A. Wachter Morris, "Insights from industry: a quantitative analysis of engineers' perceptions of empathy and care within their practice," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1128-1153, 2017.[7] R. C. Campbell, K. Yasuhara, and D. Wilson, "Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility," in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012, 2012, pp. 1-6: IEEE.[8] J. Strobel, J. L. Hess, R. Pan, and C. A
facultyencouraged them to think creatively, and how they did not believe faculty went through classmaterial too fast [18]. Boone argues that first-generation students’ belongingness in reference tothese factors were higher than they were for continuing-education students. On the contrary,Benson et al.’s account of one white, male, first-generation student’s perspective on classroombelonging described how he felt faculty only resonated with how some students solved problemsand not all students, particularly those with access to skills and knowledge the student felt helacked [12].Socioeconomic background is often referenced alongside studies on first-generation collegestudents due to the general correlation between low socioeconomic background and first
Science Foundation (NSB 03-69), ed.).; 2003.3. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century:An Agenda for American Science and Technology. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. National Academies Press; 2007.4. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2004.5. Cady SH, Valentine J. Team Innovation and Perceptions of Consideration What Difference Does Diversity Make? Small Gr Res. 1999;30(6):730-750.6. Fila ND, Wertz REH, Purzer S. Does diversity in novice teams lead to greater innovation? In: Frontiers in Education
STEM topics, Very few are more familiar with LEGOs and robotics and so it was very new to them… you know low socioeconomic[s]... It's not surprising because they do not have that type of exposure and so it's really important and I think was fascinating for them to have that exposure to see what STEM is all about and they seem to really enjoy it.It appears taken for granted that Jill’s and Bob’s students are familiar with LEGOs, and someeven Mindstorms. In contrast, Deborah’s consideration of the social and economic inequities thather students face does not allow her to make such assumptions.Teachers found the STEM connections educationally important in and of themselves, but alsoarticulated hopes that they inspire
transferring in the fall semester following participation in theprogram. Students in the program work with researchers from San Francisco State University,UC Merced, and NASA Ames Research Center.Implementation of the Summer Group and Individual Research Internship Programs showssuccess in helping students in solidify their choice of major, improving preparation for transfer,enhancing student self-efficacy in pursuing careers in engineering, and acquiring knowledge andskills needed to succeed in a four-year engineering program. As a result of their researchexperience, the participants have also expressed that they are now more likely to apply for otherinternships and consider pursuing advanced degrees in engineering [27].F. NSF S-STEM Scholarship
born afterthe mid 1990’s, are acutely aware of their privileged place in the world and are looking tomake a difference. The rise in student outreach clubs, study abroad, service learning andcommunity based learning all demonstrate that students are more attune to social justiceissues. In fact, biomedical engineering programs have been early adopters of includingvalue thinking, most especially through Devices for the Disabled (Enderle, 1999),Engineering World Health (www.ewh.org), e-NABLE (enablingthefuture.org), and theproliferation of programs that specifically consider design for the developing world.Strategic Thinking and Design ChallengesStrategic Thinking was born out of the business literature. It also has been a hallmark ofengineering
reports on three specific themesthat have emerged from our initial analysis of two interviews with a single research subject. Assuch, our account uses a single case approach, following in the footsteps of groundbreakingscholarship such as Foor et al.’s “ethnography of the particular” which recounts the livedexperiences of one female, multi-minority student pursuing an engineering degree.10 Our dataanalysis is ongoing, and in separate publications we will report results more specificallyconcerned with boundary spanning, including types of boundaries, boundary spanning roles andactivities, and competency demands experienced by early career engineers. Our larger objectivefor this paper is to explore the utility of investigating the realities of
of Engineering Education , 3 (2).9. Karataş, F. Ö., Bodner, G. M., & Unal, S. (2015). First-year engineering students' views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education , 1-22.10. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.11. Katehi, L.; Pearson, G.; Feder, M. A.; Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.12. Dym, C. L. (2007). Engineering Design
*** AMR of college/university personnel before college -0.07 0.03 * Perception of Future 0.19 0.06 ** Connectedness -0.15 0.06 * Being a Female -0.35 0.15 * College expense provided by parent(s), guardian(s), or family -0.13 0.05 ** College expense provided by oneself -0.18 0.06 ** R2=0.23, p-value=3.91e-07 Legend: * = <0.05, **= <0.01, ***= <0.001The entire model is significant
) family arrangement. This assumption appears in theuse of ‘mother’ and ‘father’ as identifiers throughout questions about parents and guardians.Problems with typical approachThe shift of traditional family structures has been well documented31, as has the changing shapeof the modern family30. However, documentation of the shift in familial demographics has notalways been adapted to quantitative instruments seeking to understand more about collegestudents’ parents/guardians. Items seeking information about parent(s)/guardian(s) are used tounderstand students’ family life, to understand their access to education in the form of socialcapital32, and as a proxy for SES. Such items often assume a traditional familial structure: Onefather or male