Conference Session

OMCED Topics

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Simpson, United States Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine

AC 2009-233: TEACHING SHIP STRUCTURES WITH SHEET METALWilliam Simpson, United States Coast Guard Academy Dr. William M. Simpson, Jr. is a faculty member in the Engineering Department at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. He has a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Maryland, a Masters in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a Bachelor of Science from the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut. He served on active duty in the U.S. Coast Guard from 1965 to 1992 and had assignments in Marine Safety, Naval Engineering, Acquisition, and Research and Development

Conference Session

Curriculum in Mechanical and Power Engineering Technology

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University; Ryan Beasley, Texas A&M University; Jay Porter, Texas A&M University; Joseph Morgan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

: dI (t ) 1 R 1 = ea (t ) − I (t ) − eb (t ) dt L L L Tm (t ) = K i I (t ) eb (t ) = Kω (t ) d ω (t ) 1 1 = Tm (t ) − TL (t ) Page 14.321.7 dt J Jwhere • Ki is the torque constant (Nm/A); • K is the back emf constant (V/(rad/s)); • I(t) is the armature current (A); • R is the

Conference Session

Preparing Engineers for the Global Workplace & Successful Graduates for a Flat World: What Does It Take?

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aisling O'Sullivan, University of Canterbury; Thomas Cochrane, University of Canterbury

Tagged Divisions

International

by supervisors and chosen by students, while many projects were integrated into thecommunity making them service learning challenges. Furthermore, most projects were funded byindustry partners and thus, the University incurred little or no research costs. Anecdotal feedbackfrom students indicated that most were inspired in their project selection by a particular pre-requisite course (and/or associated faculty member). Usually, students demonstrated a strongaptitude in the research discipline of their project indicating that they perform better in topicswith which they enjoy. We are unsure how students chose their team mate(s) as some of thegroup members had very different aptitudes, work styles and attitudes. We speculated thatstudents

Conference Session

Develop Course / Materials / Topics for a Global Engineering Education / International Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

International

to best fulfill the assignment’s outcomes within the given timeframe, while teaching students about the writing process and self-help strategies. It is also wellcited in the literature that since the 1980’s, US undergraduate writing centers have been serving agrowing population of ESL graduate students, which is the case at UI as well.77 This isproblematic because most peer tutors are undergraduates trained to meet undergraduate writingneeds and so graduate students who visit writing centers may not receive the kind of targetedassistance they need. In this study, GA’s generally rated a graduate writing center’seffectiveness in addressing the identified challenges lower than faculty did. Although notspecifically mentioned, perhaps GA’s who

Conference Session

Measuring Success of Graduate Program Components

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lokesh Padhye, Georgia Institute of Technology; Gretchen Goldman, Georgia Institute of Technology; Nadia Szeinbaum, Georgia Institute of Technology; Scott Rogers, Georgia Institute of Technology; Recep Goktas, Georgia Institute of Technology; Zohre Kurt, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

Environmental Engineering (GT EnvE) ≠ Jenny Eaton, Administrative Coordinator for GT EnvE ≠ Kuo-Jen Liao, GT AEES Dialogue for Academic Excellence Committee (DAEC) ≠ Emily Lantrip, GT AEES DAECLast, but certainly not least, the authors would like to sincerely thank the entire GT EnvE studentpopulation and the GT EnvE faculty and staff who have been supportive in understandingstudent needs and concerns. Page 14.1237.15References1. Rogers, S., Noonan, J., Baek, J., Lee, S., Tezel, U., Michalski, G., Hou, C.-H., A successful student-initiated assessment method for an environmental engineering graduate program. Proceedings from ASEE's

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denny Davis, Washington State University; Steven Beyerlein, University of Idaho; Phillip Thompson, Seattle University; Jay McCormack, University of Idaho; Olakunle Harrison, Tuskegee University; Michael Trevisan, Washington State University; Robert Gerlick, Washington State University; Susannah Howe, Smith College

Conference Session

Solar, Wind, and Novel Energy-System Initiatives

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

(hrs) * Time (one day/hrs) (4)Where, W: Overall energy stored; Joule (J) = unit of energy (5) P: Number of people a day; 1J=1N.m=1kg.m2/s2 =1V.C =1W.s E: Energy recovered from one person; Watt (W) =unit for power (6) T: Time taken to store energy; and 1W= 1J/s =V.C/s=V.A Time: Time span for one day.In order to calculate the total energy stored in a day (24hrs), it was considered that 1mJ energycould be recovered per person according to the equations 5 and 6. In this case the total energystored in a battery can be calculated for 50 people as

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University; James Corkins, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University

, phasediagrams and microstructures.AcknowledgementThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF CCLI Grant #0737146.Bibliography1. Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models in science education, in Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.2. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silverstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64–66.3. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (1999). How People Learn: Bridging research and Practice. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.4. Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers' conceptions and misconceptions

Conference Session

International Aspects of Civil Engineering

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Hill, United States Military Academy; Scott Hamilton, United States Military Academy; Eric Crispino, United States Military Academy; Andrew Bellocchio, United States Military Academy; Stephen Ressler, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

improved instructors.References1. Newborn, Timothy. (2009). “National Military Academy of Afghanistan host 1st graduation ceremony.” CSTC-A News, Combined Security Transition Command Afghanistan, Kabul.2. Photo taken by LT. Cmdr. John Gay, CSTA-photographer, 2009.3. Hamilton, S., “NMAA Command Brief,” Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, Kabul,Afghanistan, May 2008.4. Epstein, J., Masters: Portraits of Great Teachers. New York: Basic Books, 1981, p. xiii.5. Ressler, S., Gash, R., Conley, C., Hamilton, S., Momand, F., Fekrat, Q.and Gulistani, A., (2008) “Designing aCivil Engineering Program at the National Military Academy of Afghanistan”, American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.6. Ressler, S

Conference Session

Design Projects in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophoria Westmoreland, University of Maryland; Ashley Grenier, University of Maryland; Linda Schmidt, University of Maryland

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

relationship between two randomvariables are linear, and, therefore correlated instead of random. R1’s and R2’s correlation onthe coding of McGown level sketches is statistically significant (p-value = 0.048). R1’s andR2’s correlation on the coding Yang level sketches is also statistically significant (p-value =0.006). The relationships between R1 and R2 coding with McGown and Yang sketch codingschemes are strong, 0.881 and 0.972 respectively. Page 14.1063.9The results of the coding indicate that the vast majority of the 418 sketches were coded in thelowest 2 levels of both sketch-coding schemes. The average number of sketches in level 1 forMcGown’s

Conference Session

DELOS Best Paper Nominations

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Keska, University of Louisiana, Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Churn Cv (-) Churn 2 0.5 Dispersed Dispersed 2 0.4 Slug Slug 2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Time (s) Figure 3: Column with a Slug Flow (top left), ELVIS Digital Oscilloscope View of aSignal from the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Assessment and Integrating Entrepreneurship into the Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hak Tam, University of California, Santa Barbara; Gary Hansen, University of California, Santa Barbara; Sally Blomstrom, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Peter Robinson, Utah Valley University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

0.032 0.337Innovation 0.010 0.087 0.744Personal Control 0.009 0.088 0.749Self-esteem 0.400 0.010 0.133 Attached to the post-test survey is a set of open ended questions which began with thequestion: Does taking the TMP course(s) change your attitude toward entrepreneurship? 88students responded while 11 did not answer any questions. 73 out of the 88 responses were yes(82.95%), punctuated with emotive remarks such as “absolutely”, “it makes me even moreinterested”, “very much so”, “a lot more excited about starting business” and “motivates me”.Four responses were

Conference Session

Robots in Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Meuth, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Paul Robinette, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Donald Wunsch, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

competition requires the team to design and build a medium-sized robot to autonomously traverse an outdoor obstacle course. Obstacles normally consist of colored barrels, construction netting, white lines and trees. The team uses stereovision cameras as the primary obstacle detection sensor. The team is currently exploring several algorithms for path planning. Paul recently become a member of the UMR Applied Computational Intelligence Lab. He recently spent the summer developing adaptive user-interfaces as part of a research partnership with Boeing.Donald Wunsch, Missouri University of Science and Technology Donald C. Wunsch II (S’87–M’92–SM’94–F’05) received the B.S. degree

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seamus Freyne, Manhattan College; Micah Hale, University of Arkansas; Stephan Durham, University of Colorado, Denver

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 20033 Brent, R., Felder, R., and Rajala, S., “Preparing New Faculty Members to be Successful: A Radical Concept,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 20064 Soukup, R. J., “Guidance for New Faculty,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 19995  Minerick, A. R. and Keith, J. M., “Culture Shock: Acclimating as a New Faculty Member,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 20056  Brent, R., and Felder, R. M., “Helping New Faculty Get Off to a Good Start,” Proceedings of the American Society for

Conference Session

Innovation in Construction Engineering Education II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Hildreth, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Bruce Gehrig, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Construction

. However, incorporating asimulator requires a substantial capital investment and consideration should be given to otherpedagogical techniques that may be used to achieve the learning objective, the financial positionof the program, and whether the simulator could serve other functions, such as a recruiting toolto generate interest in construction education.1 Caterpillar Equipment Training Solutions – Virtual Training Systems, (2008), Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria IL.2 Schneider, M., and S. Kiesler, (2005), “Calling while driving: Effects of providing remote traffic context,” Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005): Technology, Safety, Community: pp. 561–569.3 Bullough, J. D., and M. S. Rea, (2001

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oscar Nespoli, University of Waterloo; William Owen, University of Waterloo; Colin Campbell, University of Waterloo; Steve Lambert, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

specific course topics”Q7. “The case study, and its activities, consistently provided sufficient background informationand data for the activities (e.g. calculations, discussions, etc.)”Q8. “The graphics or multimedia content of this case study, and its activities, consistentlyhelped me to understand these specific course topics”Q9. “Are there sections of this case study, and its activities, where your understanding of thecase material could be enhanced by adding graphics and/or multimedia?Q10. “In addition to reading this case study, what case-related activities (e.g. calculations,discussions, etc.) did your class carry out to help you understand these specific course topics?Q11.”Small group discussion(s) of the case, its activities, etc., helped

Conference Session

Gender and Minority Issues in K-12 Engineering

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiffany Iskander, University of Utah; Paul Gore, University of Utah; Cynthia Furse, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

of Education 2 Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, College of Engineering University of UtahThis study examines gender differences and historical trends of high school studentinterest in engineering based on ACT data on expressed interest compared with that ofstudents’ and ability. Changes have been observed in the interest in engineering fieldsover time most likely because of societal influences. These influences are especially seenin computer related fields causing speculation that both males and females wereinfluenced by the dot com era but that only male interest was piqued due to the rise ofcomputer games in the late 1990’s. Another interesting observation is the number

Conference Session

Student Learning

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Prince, Bucknell University; Margot vigeant, bucknell; Katharyn Nottis, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

a turbine? Stream 1: Steam flow rate = 10 kg/s. Temp. = 200C Pressure = 2 atm Stream 2: Steam flow rate = 100 kg/s Temp = 190 C Pressure = 2 atm. Page 14.469.8 a. Stream 1 has the potential to produce more electricity b. Stream 2 has the potential to produce more electricity c. Either stream has the potential to produce the same amount of electricity d. Not enough information given Explain your reasoning.This question was somewhat easy, with 71% of students being able to answer it correctly.However, it was a poor discriminator with a discrimination index of only 0.02

Conference Session

Novel Measurement Experiments

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amit Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Silas Bernardoni, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Tyler Lark, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Andrew Watchorn, National Instruments; John Webster, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/get/bme/310/webster/2. Medical Instrumentation, http://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/get/ece/462/webster/ Page 14.734.83. Biomedical Engineering Design, http://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/get/bme/200/webster/4. Supplemental Training Curriculum 2008-09, http://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/get/bme/200/webster/7.suppleme/5. Introduction to Engineering, http://www.engr.wisc.edu/interegr/courses/interegr160.html6. Bernardoni S., Nimunkar A. J., Murphy J. and Courter S., “Student-initiated design and implementation ofsupplemental hands-on fabrication training curriculum in an introduction to engineering design course: A TQMapproach

Conference Session

Laboratory Development in ECE Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mustafa Guvench, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

“design” is emphasized in this course. As a matter of fact the juniorelectronics courses (ELE342 and ELE343) constituting prerequisites for this course alsoemphasize design but at a smaller scale and using discrete BJT and off-the-shelf ICs rather thanat the chip level using CMOS technology. This emphasis on “design” in our electronics sequence Page 14.888.2of courses has been implemented starting with an NSF grant to establish and develop a“Computer-Integrated-Electronics” Laboratory (C.I.E. Lab) in the early 1990’s. The concept of“Computer-Integrated-Electronics Laboratory” simply brings computers into the electronics labwhere designs

Conference Session

Software and Hardware for Educators III

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carole Goodson, University of Houston; Susan Miertschin, University of Houston; Barbara Stewart, University of Houston; Marcella Norwood, University of Houston; Luces Faulkenberry

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.2. Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (Writer) (2004). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Comparison Using Meta-Analysis [Article], Journal of Communication.3. Aragon, S. R., Johnson, S. D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 227- 244.4. Bernard, R. M., Abram, P. C, Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al, (2004). How

Conference Session

Using Classroom Technologies

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University; Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University; Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University; Mieke Schuurman, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

effective in teams attributes as compared to the architecturaland civil engineering students. Table 2: Rubrics for assessment of MDL dimensionsKnowledge: Pts.Level Awarded Description Student does not have an understanding of the characteristic, e.g., does not A 0 mention any of the attributes related to the characteristic. Provides a good understanding of the characteristic or provides A 1 evidence/artifact(s) that suggest a good understanding of the characteristic. Provides evidence/artifact(s) and a good understanding of the characteristic A 2 but does not connect the two together

Conference Session

Teaching Mechanics of Materials and General Mechanics Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ing-Chang Jong, University of Arkansas; William Springer, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

) 6EClearly, the distortion energy per unit volume is ud= u − u vWe obtain that 1 +ν  (σ 1 − σ 2 ) 2 + (σ 2 − σ 3 ) 2 + (σ 3 − σ 1 ) 2  ud =   (10) 3E  2 Note that ud = 0 if σ= 1 σ= 2 σ 3 ; i.e., no distortion exists in hydrostatic state of stress.For simple tensile test of a ductile material, we have σ 1 = S y , σ= 2 σ

Conference Session

Innovations in ECE Education I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron St. Leger, United States Military Academy; Anthony Deese, Drexel University; Chikaodinaka Nwankpa, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

://power.ece.drexel.edu.5. C. Nwankpa, A. Deese, Q. Liu, A. St.Leger, and J. Yakaski, "Power System on a Chip (PSoC)," Proceedings of International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 739-742, 2006.6. R. Fried, R. S. Cherkaoui, C. C. Enz, A. Germond, and E. A. Vittoz, "Approaches for analog VLSI simulation of the transient stability of large power networks," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I-Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 46, pp. 1249-1263, OCT 1999.7. J. Yakaski, Q. Lui, and C. Nwankpa, "Analog Emulation Using a Reconfigurable Classical Generator Model for Load Flow Analysis," Proceedings of Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 2005.8. A. St.Leger and C. O. Nwankpa, "Reconfigurable

Conference Session

ELD Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Strife, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

this endeavor. Her experience ininterior design and with focus groups was invaluable to us.Students and faculty are very willing to tell you what they think, especially when treated withrespect.Bibliography1. Beacham, C. (2009). Evansdale library improvement study. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University.2. Bennett, S. (2006). The choice for learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 3-13.3. Bennett, S. (2007). First questions for designing higher education learning spaces. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 14-26.4. Bennett, S. (2007). Designing for uncertainty: Three approaches. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 165-179. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Fleisig, McMaster University; Harry Mahler, Ontario College of Art and Design; Vladimir Mahalec, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, “Are Designers The Enemy Of Design?”, BusinessWeek, March 18, 2007.7 A Tan and TC McAloone, “Understanding and Developing Innovative Products and Services: The EssentialElements”, International Design Conference – Design 2006, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 15-18, 2006.8 W Buxton, “Innovation vs. Invention”, Rotman Magazine, University of Toronto, Fall 2005, pp. 52-53.9 Ibid.10 C Owen, “Design Thinking: Notes on its Nature and Use”, Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 2007, pp. 16-27.11 Ibid.12 N Cross, “Expertise in design: an overview”, Design Studies, 25(5), 2004, pp. 427-441.13 K Kazerounian and S Foley, “Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors andStudents’ Perceptions”, ASME Journal of Engineering Design

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University; Samuel T Hunter, Pennsylvania State University; Gul Kremer, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Active Learning: A Study of its Impact on Freshman Engineering Students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1051-1061.5. Liu, Z. and Schonwetter, D. (2004), “Teaching Creativity in Engineering,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No.5, 2004, pp. 801-808. Page 14.419.106. Okudan, G., Ogot, M., Zappe, S., and Gupta, S. (2007), “Assessment of Learning and its Retention in the Engineering Design Classroom Part A: Instrument Development,” (CD) Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition, 2007.7. Okudan, G. Ogot, M. and Gupta, S. (2007), “Assessment of

Conference Session

ECE Pedagogy and Assessment II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dale Buechler, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Phillip Sealy, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; David Drury, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Mesut Muslu, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

of Poor grasp of Errors in applying in applying underlying underlying science (e.g., underlying science. underlying science. science (e.g., mechanics, Maxwell’s eqs., electromagnetism). energy-band diagrams).Name(s) of student(s) who score a one:_____________________________________________________________Explanation of grading:Figure 1. Rubric (a): Ability to apply science, engineering science, and mathematics to solveengineering problems in the EE Dept at the

Conference Session

Pedagogical Developments in BME

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Cawthorne, Purdue University; Osman Cekic, Purdue University; Monica Cox, Purdue University; Melissa Stacer, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, G., Liu, S. Q., Smith, H. D., & Hirsch, P. (2006). Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based on the “How People Learn” Framework. BEE-j , 7.4. Birol, G., McKenna, A. F., Smith, H. D., Giorgio, T. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002). Integration of the "How People Learn" Framework into Educational Module Development and Implementation in Biotechnology. Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference (pp. 2640-2641). Houston: IEEE.5. Barr, R, Pandy, M, Petrosino, A, Austin, B and Goldberg, E. (2004). Classroom Testing of VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Session 1109: 20 pages (2004).6. Greenberg, J.E., Smith, N.T. and Newman, J.H. Instructional Module

Conference Session

Software Engineering Teaching Techniques

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janusz Zalewski, Florida Gulf Coast University; Andrew Kornecki, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Jerzy Nogiec, Fermi National Accelerator Lab

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

, char **argv)#endif { int content_length = 0; char *p_request_method = NULL; char *p_user_input = NULL; char *p_content_length = NULL; printf("\n" "\n" "CGI\n" "\n" "\n" "\n"); if((p_request_method=getenv("REQUEST_METHOD")) != NULL) { printf("REQUEST_METHOD = %s\n", p_request_method); printf("DOCUMENT_ROOT = '%s'\n", getenv("DOCUMENT_ROOT")); if(strncmp(p_request_method, "GET", 3) == 0) { printf("CONTENT_LENGTH = %s\n", getenv("CONTENT_LENGTH")); printf("USER_INPUT = '%s'\n", getenv("QUERY_STRING")); } else if(strncmp(p_request_method, "POST", 4) == 0) { if((p_content_length=getenv