introduces students to the notion of inclusion and equity inengineering and has them reflect on the importance of these elements to their development, bothas students and professional engineers. By building awareness of inclusion, equity, andprofessionalism early in students’ academic career, the authors aim to create more inclusive andequitable learning environments that lead to a more diverse engineering student body andultimately, engineering workforce, by increasing student sense of belonging. This paper includesa detailed description of the orientation session, a summary of student feedback, and a discussionon how the orientation has been adapted for online participation.Introduction & BackgroundImpact of Freshman Orientation
, engineering has a diversity problem in terms of who is in the workforce andwhose voices are being heard at the engineering table. Because of the largely homogeneousengineering population, the designs the field produces also fail to reflect a wide range of culturaland linguistic competencies. When not confronted with diversity, the training of engineers tendsto leave out broader social issues [5], [6], [7], [8]. And to be clear, these issues are not simplymatters of social justice; researchers have argued that the inclusion of traditionallyunderrepresented voices and the development of sociocultural competency in engineering is aneconomic and national security imperative [1].The importance of considering various perspectives and broadening
University, San Luis Obispo Claire Anovick is a fourth-year civil engineering undergraduate at the [Institution] with interests in geotechnical engineering and geology. She currently serves as the co-founder of the SBSC, an organiza- tion comprised of civil and environmental students engaged in critical reflection on justice in engineering initiatives within engineering academia. Additionally, Claire serves as President of Cal Poly CalGeo and as a geotechnical engineering research assistant, developing course modules infusing social justice, sus- tainability, and equity within geotechnical engineering curricula. She is involved in the community as an intern at Earth Systems Pacific and as an amateur runner and rock
implicit. Operationalrules delineate how to play the game, what is illegal or legal actions within a game and overallshape or constrain what actions a player can take. Constituative rules refer to the mathematical orlogical abstractions of the operational rules and may be shared between similar games. Implicitrules are unwritten or agreed upon rules, often in the form of player etiquette. The middle level,experiential system places an emphasis on the immediate experience of one or more game players.Finally, the third level, cultural system, focuses on the larger cultural context in which the gamesexist, the broader themes, discourses, or symbols it connects to and/or is reflected in the gamestructure itself. More accurately we can consider games
addition to theBuilding Bridges conferences, this organization offers a range of conferences aimed at celebrating, promoting, andimproving diversity in STEMM in K-12 education, higher education, and industry.3 According to the Association of Women in Science, making the academy and industry spaces where more womencan thrive will require, “implementing innovative approaches to systemic change” [AWIS, n.d.,https://www.awis.org/intersectionality/]. We maintain that Building Bridges, with its attention to difficultconversations and real-time activities designed to facilitate self-reflection and commitment to nurturing sisterhood isone such innovative approach.Our theoretical framework draws from literature in several areas, including literature
discussions and incorporate that into classexamples. For example, I start every class by playing music from a playlist that contains all thestudents’ favorite songs and we promote discussions around that. I try to incorporate as much oftheir experiences as I can and to demonstrate that there are no good or bad examples, there arejust different examples.I think it is also important to help students learn how their own development of racialconsciousness is linked to mastery of professional competency. For example, if they weredesigning cars, I ask them to think about what problems they will face if they design the car forpeople that are exactly like them.All these practices also demand for me to work on myself. I need to actively reflect on my race
critical reflection is a reasonable approximation of evaluation given the moremodest goal of this research—to serve as an example of how computer science researchers andeducators could integrate justice-centered approaches within an undergraduate curriculum.Given these methods, this research makes no claims about how students or faculty receive thecourse plan. Future evaluations would be largely qualitative, surveying students’ capacitybuilding and reception of the course through interviewing.4. Course DesignTitled “Power, Equity, and Praxis in Computing” (PEPC), the course plan is discussed throughthree facets: the course’s purpose, its content, and its (intended) learning environment. Thepurpose of the course is to make space for undergraduate
without implicitly placing theonus for change on students” [8, p. 576]. A focus on student success within institutions thatweren’t built with them in mind is important for reframing the narrative regarding “achievementgaps,” but this theory can also be helpful for illuminating misalignment between assets possessedby students from groups systemically marginalized in STEM fields and the capital valued byacademic institutions. In doing so, we can identify levers for institutional transformation thatcould help elevate the value of community cultural wealth beyond counterspaces/ethnic enclaveswithin the university setting.By identifying areas of misalignment between student assets and institutional values reflected inpolicies, we can illustrate the
AbstractIn this research paper, we explore student responses to Utility Value Interventions in staticscourses. Introductory engineering mechanics courses (e.g., statics, dynamics) are critical pointswithin a curriculum, and student performance in these courses can have a strong influence onfuture success. And while these courses are often thought of as “weed out” courses, the ubiquityof these courses for engineers is what makes them an important place for students to develop themotivation to persist through their engineering education. One particularly promising tool for thisdevelopment has been Utility Value Interventions (UVIs) in which students are given opportunitiesto reflect on how their coursework aligns with their lives through short writing
engineering studentsrecounted and reflected on their experiences from a brainstorming session. We emphasize theirinsight on obstacles encountered and recommendations to overcome these challenges. Thisresearch therefore offers a student-centered viewpoint on the issues in engineering education thatmight hinder students’ brainstorming abilities or prevent full exploration of the design space. Byexploring these topics, we hope to offer recommendations for more effectively incorporatingbrainstorming practices into engineering education in ways that better suit student needs.In the following sections, we review literature concerning various design processes, ideationchallenges, and recommendations for increasing creative output. Next, we outline our
-aligned practices in another, and effective communication andconsideration of social and cultural context in the third. The structure and activity of each club wasfundamental to the learning that occurred [10]. Another study focused on the co-curricularexperiences of African-American students reported gains in teamwork and reflective behaviorthrough involvement in engineering clubs compared with their non-participating peers [11]. Theyalso found that more engagement led to higher gains [11].Other co-curriculars that are not necessarily limited to engineering, like makerspaces, have beenshown to provide important educational benefits. Co-curricular activities, including non-engineering activities, that involve multidisciplinary design elements can
,departments, and backgrounds. Ultimately, we began the study with eleven cadet participants andfive faculty participants, who logged their activities and hours with our spreadsheets reflected inAppendix 1D and Appendix 2 at the end of each week of the study. As a reminder of how the weekwas structured, we added to each worksheet tab a snapshot of the USMA academic calendar forthat week as shown in the table below.Table 5. USMA Academic Calendar for Week 1 of Study (Fall Semester) We also classified participants into only the two groups of cadets or faculty. Even though somefaculty are more senior than others, some studies demonstrate that the time effects of teaching donot tend to vary significantly between faculty experience levels (Moore
practices and the differentinfrastructures of educational technologies we tend to use in response to these various oppressive-isms.The presentations we took account of during the virtual conference offered robust contributionsof scalable scholarship that address, albeit in a different context, Michael Mascarenas’sprovocation in “White Space and Dark Matter: Prying Open the Black Box of STS.”[7] Reflectingon Sheila Jasanoff’s plenary address for “Where has STS Traveled,” the forty-yearcommemoration of the inaugural meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S) atCornell University, Mascarenas encourages us to “interrogate the society’s contribution to socialpolicy or enduring social problems... our collective need for reflection and
was seed-funded by an internal two-year university Strategic Initiative Award and advances four of USD’sEnvisioning 2024 goals: 1) enhancing student learning and success, 2) strengthening diversity,inclusion, and social justice, 3) elevating faculty and staff engagement, and 4) amplifying localand global engagement and reputation. Our Strategic Initiative funding concludes in 2021, and weare moving into a financial model that includes a combination of external and donor funding.The Engineering Exchange for Social Justice (ExSJ) FrameworkWhen we reflect on the critical questions inspired by materials engineer and socio-technical expertUrsula Franklin [14], who decides what is engineered and why? and who benefits and who pays?,in the ideal
students to discuss, critically analyze, and reflect upon the hands-on activitieswith their peers, it was necessary for students to complete the hands-on activities, to the best oftheir ability, before the live HOLD session. Each week, students were given a list of suppliesneeded for that week’s activities and a set of instructions. Students took selfies of completedactivities to document their individual work. They then attended the in-person HOLD sessionsand began by sharing their selfies and discussing their setups. They would reflect upon differentchallenges that arose and the pros and cons of different supply choices. Groups were givenchallenge questions to help them think beyond the activity and better understand the underlyingphysics within
minor, ENGR 195E, can befound in Table 1. The table reflects data for all students who have completed the minor to date,as well as a subset of students who completed the exit survey. At SJSU, as well as nationwide,social science students tend to be more diverse than engineering students [13], [14]. This patternis reflected in the demographics of students completing the minor, such that a higher percentageof Applied Computing students are women and underrepresented minorities relative to studentsin the College of Engineering, in which 19% are women and 22% are URM [13]. The mostpopular major among Applied Computing students is Psychology, followed by Economics. Lesscommon majors include Business, Sociology, Behavioral Science, Communication
Approach to Web Programming ● CSc 698a: Topics in Computing I (Project-based Learning) Spring (Year 2, Semester 4) ● CSc 698b: Topics in Computing II (Project-based Learning) Since its launch in Fall 2016, three cohorts have graduated. The cohort size has been 15students, on average. In the 2020 graduating cohort, the graduating cohort of students was 85%women, 37% Latinx, and 11% Black/ African-American - starkly different from the typicaldemographics of a traditional CS major program, and also those of Biology/Chemistry majorprograms. We have made efforts to have these demographics reflected in the mentors selected forthe program: 77% of the mentors recruited to date have been female or URM.2. PINC Peer Mentoring
do nontraditional engineering students encounter at MSIs? • How do nontraditional engineering students engage with MSI support structures and resources or respond to misaligned university infrastructure?3. Research Method3.1 Institutional ContextFlorida International University is a public, research-intensive, Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) thatgraduates both the highest number of Hispanic students overall and the higher number of Hispanicengineering graduates of any college or university in the country (Gamarra, 2019). The diversityrepresented by institutions like Florida International University is particularly important because thesedemographics reflect the diversity that will likely be reflected throughout the US in the coming
underrepresentedbackgrounds that I worked with over two years as they engaged in engineering work through anout-of-school community engineering program. Designed by a team containing the author, theprogram engages youth in defining a community engineering problem of interest, researchingthat problem, and developing a solution. I led the programming multiple times over three yearswithin an afterschool and summer context. 75% of sessions were video-recorded, resulting in atleast ten hours of clearly visible video per youth. I interviewed youth via focus groups at the endof each project and collected all youth-produced artifacts. To conclude data collection, Iconducted reflective, stimulated-recall interviews with each youth. Per qualitative best practices,I member
Collection PlanData SourcesThe two sources of data for this project will be surveys and follow-up interviews. Each will becarried out during both of the phases of the study referenced above. Below, we describe thesetwo data sources in greater detail.Survey MeasuresSurvey data collection will include eight measures carried over from our previous study [16] andone new measure (the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, or MFQ). These instruments wereselected for our research because they reflect a wide variety of complementary constructs andmeasurement domains and include both general and engineering-specific measures. We addedthe MFQ to our plan for this study to acknowledge an increasingly “pluralist” view of moraldecision-making which involves not only
foundationalengineering concepts and EML [9]. In particular, incorporating entrepreneurship and businessconcepts together with a design experience when training lower division engineering studentscan lead to higher retention rates and GPAs [10].Emphasizing the EM concept of curiosity among first year engineering students may be welltimed [11]. Design projects at this stage enable students to explore their creativity and practicetheir engineering skills early in the curriculum [12]. Additionally, reflective practice activitiesrevealed that first year engineering students resonated most with the concept of curiosity whenreflecting on themselves as learners, relating it most frequently as a motivator of their learning,part of their learning identity, and a path to
be fully committed toeliminating all forms of oppression.Moral Courage:Building upon psychologically safe work environments, the Coast Guard must create a morallycourageous workforce, where all members have an immediate bias for action to intervene againstany culture or practice that inhibits the safety of any of our members. “Managers who treat ethicsas a routine activity, by holding people accountable, encouraging reflection and discourse aroundethical issues, and responding to challenges with moral courage, can help prepare felloworganizational members to identify and address similar issues before they become full-blownproblems [5].” Coast Guard members must have the moral courage to intervene againstviolations of laws, policies, or the
]. Oehlberg, Willett, andMackay suggest this may also provide an entry point for new makers, who can dissect and buildupon other’s work to kickstart their own making practice [6].3 MethodologyIn this study, 31 semi-structured interviews with 14 different participants were conducted at twopublic U.S. universities (Big City U & Comprehensive U). Each university has campusmakerspaces with rapid prototyping equipment (e.g. 3D printers) and typical manufacturingequipment. Interviews were conducted on the campuses in 2019 prior to the move to remotelearning, and thus, reflect students’ more “typical” use of online activities in their learningexperiences. All interviewers were audio-recorded and later transcribed. There was a total of fourinterviewers
awareness of public sector employmentopportunities on Public Interest Technology discipline—a high demand field and currentlyfocusing its effort in supporting universities and colleges across the country to implementtechnology curriculums with Public Policy training to better serve the public sector in advancingits services for the good of society as a whole. QCC Students expressed strong desire to serve asagents of change by visiting public works to train and consult customers on the benefits ofProject Management and MS project software tools.Lastly, our PM assessments will be evaluated as they are a direct reflection of our modulequality, but given the program importance on the student awareness, attitudes, and knowledge(42 questions), we will
elements. Public health restrictions on in-person gatherings due to the globalCOVID-19 pandemic shifted many courses that were previously not considered appropriatecandidates for e-Learning to an online platform. This was one of those courses.Anecdotal evidence from the teaching team suggested that students preferred this onlineapproach to the more traditional class setting. Written reflections and Likert scale survey datawere collected from students in the class that transitioned from in-person to online-delivery todetermine their course preference, and indicated positive attitudes towards the online-deliverymode. Additionally, test scores from two previous years were compared to current exams todetermine if the change in lecture delivery mode
and persistent gap between the demand for STEMskills and the supply include, “the low quality of basic education in Science and Maths withinSSA; (and) a higher education system skewed towards disciplines other than STEM such asthe Humanities and Social Sciences” (p. 4). This finding indicates that reforms in educationshould likewise be geared towards STEM literacy. 2Since then, many recommendations have been made to improve STEM literacy in SSA [11],[14], [15]. International agencies that support governments in the implementation ofeducational reforms (e.g. development banks, donors, NGOs, philanthropic organizations,etc.) urge such governments to reflect a shift in priorities in their policies
are likely to continue to have long and substantial effects onengineering students [1]. Such effects will likely be reflected in student perceptions of theirlearning experience as well as their well-being, mental health, and retention in engineeringprograms [10] [11] [12]. In a spring 2020 survey of nine public research universities (30,725undergraduates), 35% of students screened positive for a major depressive disorder and 39%screened positive for generalized anxiety disorder based on the PHQ-2 and GAD-2 screeningtools [4]. Such results are consistent with the reported loss of motivation by students incompleting coursework reported in other national surveys and disengagement with classes anduniversity activities [2]. These relatively high
. The middle survey was focused on student reactions toward the newmaterials we prepared to accommodate the student-centered learning model. The final surveywas focused on student perceptions about how much they know and reflection of their ownapproach to learning.3.1. Cognitive outcomesIn this section, we summarize cognitive assessment by reviewing formative and summativeassessment grades. As we shifted to student-centered learning, we were wondering if this willhave an effect on student performance. In the following, when available, we use data fromprevious semesters for comparison. Because instructors used slightly differentiated classmanagement and surveys, we present outcomes for each course separately.3.1.1. SEE courseIn Figure 3, the
of ally development created by Broido[19]: 1. Students are given information needed to understand the purpose of their work as allies within the COE, including why the issue of retaining women and URMs in engineering is relevant to their work and to the field. 2. The students are then given the opportunity to reflect and make meaning of the content, how it impacts them personally, and how it impacts their peers in the COE. 3. The students then have the self-confidence to act as allies in an academic setting.Since the original goal was to develop men as allies for women in engineering, the course wasonly offered to students who identified as men in the first year (2015). An analogous
of this Enhanced InnovationSchema. These models include the Renaissance Foundry Model (herein the Foundry) [1], [4] forCollaboration and for Teamwork, Sawyer’s [2] group genius guidelines and the Functional-BasedApproach [5] that guides the organization of teams for a given target academic activity. Section 3will describe the key aspects involved in the Enhanced Innovation Schema. Section 4 will offerselected illustrative examples where the approach has been successfully applied. Section 5 willoverview selected lessons learned, and reflection pieces of the co-authors involved in theseexamples. Finally, Section 6 will highlight key pieces of additional research needed to advance thedevelopment and implementation of the approach.(1) Motivation