also want those whoare not involved in the writing, speaking, and research to learn more about engineering andengineering technology, so we have the students present their papers to the other club members.Teachers will then submit the papers to professors at the university for assessment. The authorsof the seven best papers will be invited to the university to present their papers. In this way,many more students will hear speeches by their peers – one of the groups they listen to whendeciding what kind of career they will pursue8.According to Campbell, et. Al8, parents are one of the sources to which students will listen whentrying to make career and college decisions. So, we are organizing and conducting communityseminars for parents. If
inengineering in China take 4 years. At SEU, 150 credits are required for graduation. More than90% of students graduate on time at the end of their 4th year at SEU.There are three semesters per year at SEU as shown in Table 1. Many practical training coursesare arranged in the short semester, such as advanced C++ programming, fundamental Electricand Electronic practice, fundamental of Mechanical fabrication, printed circuit board computeraided design (CAD), introduction to scientific writing, fundamentals of innovation and patentapplication, etc. Table 1. Time schedule for academic year at SEU Short Semester Autumn Semester Spring Semester Semester Name (1st
. Shuayto has contributed significantly to the body of knowledge in business and marketing. Her peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations underscore her expertise in areas such as marketing, management skills, and global branding strategies. Noteworthy among her achievements is the recognition received for her case study ”ELIE SAAB: Growth of a Global Luxury Brand” by EFMD and her Outstanding Research Award at the Global Conference on Business and Finance. Her current research is focused on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. Beyond academia, Dr. Shuayto’s influence extends to consulting and training projects. Her dedication to professional development is evident through her active involvement
-class, student presentations are an effective way to inspire student engagement whilesimultaneously improving communication skills. As part of three different civil engineeringcourses including infrastructure, structures, and sustainability at West Point and MississippiState, the authors have introduced a student presentation concept dubbed “Two-Minute Follies.”This paper discusses and demonstrates with supporting data that Two-Minute Follies are simpleto execute, consume a small amount of time, and engage students more directly in their owneducation while at the same time building the student’s presentation confidence and style. Byengaging the student in a direct way that provides an opportunity to share with their peers, thestudent is
students.BackgroundIt is well established that teaching undergraduate students, particularly engineering students, howto work in teams is important [7], [8], difficult [9], and worth doing because students canimprove [10]. Teamwork assessment tools like CATME (a web-based peer evaluation tool foundat catme.org) can help instructors identify teaming problems amongst students [11], [12].Challenges remain, however, for instructors of large courses who want to address such problemsin getting enough of the right kind of information to effectively intervene to help studentsimprove their teamwork skills, and then knowing how best to coach teams exhibiting evidence ofdysfunction.Researchers have established the outsized burden that minoritized teammates carry
. Observations were made duringclass time, in the last months of the students’ first semester in the program. Using Jonassen’s9seven steps of ill-defined problem solutions to classify the observations and analyze howsuccessfully peer contributions are made by each student, researchers are able to follow howstudents collaborate, organize themselves, and share experiences to conduct their design tasks.Also, one of the authors of this study, who was one of the course instructors, shares his thoughtson the experience of teaching this course for students with varying backgrounds and interests.This paper approaches multidisciplinary problem solving through the lens of socialconstructivism. In this sense researchers assumed that students learn from sharing
using the Fink Model of Backwards Design10 we focused on helping faculty tothink differently about course design and instruction by going to the end of instruction, settingoutcomes, and working backwards to design the course. This faculty development workshop alsoincluded the component of social aspect of learning with other faculty in a learning community,21where they learned new content and strategies, observed demonstrations of new strategies andthen integrated what they learned, and taught a brief excerpt of a lesson to their peers andreceived feedback from the community of learners. Also used as an assessment tool for thisworkshop is an instrument called the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM),22,23 to measurehow workshop participants
offered to replace both semesters of the freshman program fortransfer students. This new course, along with a peer-mentoring program for transfer studentsthat had been initiated the prior year, seemed to offer a much needed support system for thetransfer students. The synergistic impact of the fall 2006 course and the concurrent mentoringprogram led to slating the course for transfers as a summer 2007 offering with the mentoringeffort integrated into the course. This paper provides details on course design andadministration, and on the integration of the peer-mentoring program. Student evaluations of thecourse and the mentoring are provided, as are insights from the summer mentors. This program,tailored for transfer students, is also suitable for
critical resource upon whichmany large research institutions rely. The GSI position also provides a pivotal opportunity fordeveloping the next generation of engineering faculty and industry leaders through training andmentoring. A centrally organized peer mentor program1 is one approach that can positivelyimpact not only the GSIs’ teaching experiences, but the peer mentors’ experiences as well.2 Thispaper evaluates the Engineering GSI Mentor (EGSM) program at the University of Michigan,which is designed to train and empower selected graduate students to provide teaching-relatedservices to their fellow GSIs. EGSMs’ duties range from consultations on a variety ofpedagogical topics to in-classroom services, such as observing a GSI’s teaching and
element is the change in the course form fromdeductive to inductive practice. The second element of our project tests ICT devices(iPod Touches) to facilitate collaborative, conceptual, and peer learning, along with basicknowledge acquisition for individual learners.In the new class format, students complete conceptually targeted problem sets each classmeeting and term-long research papers in collaborative groups. Additionally, there areample opportunities for concept questions, peer learning, case studies, and low stakesquizzes. MSE education applications for the iPod Touch have been built to supportcollaborative as well as peer learning and self-evaluation quizzing. In-class conceptquizzes, mini-lectures, and just-in-time reading assignments are
Meaningful Writing Assignments into TechnicalCourses,” NCIIA Annual Conference, San Diego, 2005.[5] Calibrated Peer Review, http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/ (16 January 2007)[6] LEGO® Mindstorms®, http://mindstorms.lego.com/ (16 January 2007)[7] Indiana School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Indianapolis, IN, http://intra.isbrockets.org/public/ (16January 2007)[8] National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, http://www.nciia.org/ , (16 January 2007) Page 12.235.11Appendix A: ECE361 SyllabusECE 361 Engineering Practice 1R-3L-2C F,W Pre: ECE 200. Creativity, project design specifications,team roles, effective conduct of team
, ageneral engineering class, general chemistry, engineering ethics, and introduction to engineeringdesign. The cluster sequence is designed to integrate the coursework to ensure that during thefirst year students develop a strong foundation in algebra, writing and problem solving skills, andengineering analysis and design. The instructors of the cluster courses meet regularly to shareinsights about the progress of the students and to coordinate activities in ways designed toimprove student learning in all the courses. An assessment team has also developed a writing-based testing instrument to assess the attitudes of the students toward the cluster interventionprogram. This paper reviews the experience with the cluster and the impact of this effort
gains in career competencies by gender, race/ethnicity, and financial aid status.Analyses revealed no significant differences by financial aid status (student receiving need-basedaid = yes/no), and only one item showed significant difference by race/ethnicity. On the itemlearning how to write better, Asian students reported higher value than all others (ANOVAF=4.018, p=.018). Analyses by gender revealed three items with statistically significantdifferences. As shown in Table III, women reported that their WREAs helped them withdeveloping their skills as a leader, learning how to write better, and learning how to work withpeople from diverse backgrounds more than their male peers. Table III
from Northcentral University (2012), as well as a Master’s of Aeronautical Science (2005) and B.S. in Aerospace Studies (2000) from ERAU. He has more than 10 years of experience in defense contracting, supporting several federal-level customers, including the U.S. Postal Service for automated sortation tech- nologies and the U.S. Air Force, Army, and Navy on a wide variety of simulation and training programs. As a tenured faculty member at ERAU, Dr. Terwilliger has authored more than 25 peer-reviewed pub- lications, presented research findings at international venues, and provided unmanned systems expertise across a variety of televised, print, and digital media. He currently serves as a board member of the Asso
network.Experimental ResultsThe wired BMS system was tested with a 12-cell pack. MATLAB was used to connect to theParent BMS Module and preform various read and write operations. The BMS was initialized topreform voltage measurements on each individual cell and the voltage of the block. Testing wasperformed on all four packs simultaneously. All voltages were confirmed by multi-meter. Balancingwas tested and confirmed working with the packs. The Wireless BMS uses a parent childarchitecture. First a request for cell information is made from the parent to the child pack. Theparent now waits for a response. The child communicates with the BMS chip and relays the datarequests back to the parent. This keeps wireless activity at a minimum since the children only
engineering ethics, peer-to-peer learning in the design process has helped her identify the effective approaches to educate engineering students, in order to meet the demands of their profession. She will be starting her PhD in the fall of 2015 at The University of Oklahoma.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Practice in the College of Engineering at University of Oklahoma. Through real-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarova’s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how indi- vidual performance is influenced by aptitudes, spatial skills, personal interests and
. Administering a peerevaluation tool is essential since much of the course grade will depend on the groupproject. CATME45, 46 is an easy-to-use online tool that collects and analyzes self and peerevaluations of team members’ contributions. Ideally some type of peer evaluationinstrument is administered with each major deliverable, and team members receivefeedback on their individual performance compared to the group average. Any lowperforming students should be identified by the instructor, and the team should meet withthe instructor to discuss the issue so that it can be addressed early. Instructors might alsoconsider a mechanism that reflects in individual contribution; for example, students couldbe required to keep a design notebook47 or submit their
. He has published 16 papers in peer-reviewed journals, 28 papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations on various topics including: additive manufacturing, mechatronics, biomechanics, and engineering education. He currently teaches the Engineered Systems In Society, Mechanical Engineering Professional Practice, and Capstone Design I and II courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring the Impact of Study Sheets on Students' Performance in an Engineered Systems in Society CourseAbstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of study sheets on second-year engineeringstudents' performance in an
. With all of the media hype, it is easy to lose sight as towhat Java is, and why it is so interesting. For many people, Java is simply a way to add “flash” tootherwise static WWW pages. However, what is truly exciting about Java is that, for the first time,it is possible to write highly interactive, graphical applications which are platform-independentand can be transported across the WWW. These features, combined with the availability andpervasiveness of the Internet and WWW, make Java an attractive tool for developing anddistributing educational software.BackgroundTo understand the potential benefits of Java for educational software development, it is necessaryto understand some of Java’s main features. First of all, Java is a general purpose
response statements and open responsequestions. This survey contained items about teams, various aspects of changing teammembers frequently, Super Tetris® team project, team projects, and the course format.Once the students completed the survey, they were invited to discuss the items with oneto two of their nearest peers. After a short peer discussion, most of the time was devotedto a facilitated discussion around items in the survey to help clarify responses to surveyitems and for students to elaborate on their responses. The facilitator of the discussionwas not the instructor of the course.Survey ResultsThere were 46 students enrolled in the course. Of the 46 students, 11 volunteered toparticipate in the small group analysis.Choice Response
investigate the development of technology in civil, mechanical,chemical, and electrical engineering in the context of historical case studies. As part of thecourse, students working in groups prepare and present an engineering history case study. Thestudents, working in groups of 3 to 5, write technical papers and present their results on the lastday of class. This allows the student groups to develop and demonstrate their communicationskills as well as their mastery of the course concepts. The student projects provide otherbenefits. Projects that are done well can be incorporated into future offerings of the course. Anexample is how the development and eventual decline of the Ohio canal system influenced thegrowth of the state’s economy, and how the
expanding the inventory ofavailable electrical components and changing the intended client of the device.In the future, we will more formally assess the success of each design experience using thefollowing criteria: 1) percentage of teams that complete successful prototypes, 2) number ofstudents in each team contributing to work (as measured by peer review), 3) student satisfaction(self-reported), and 4) quality of student feedback to other teams. We will also perform aqualitative analysis of the responses to reflective questions teams will answer about the designexperience as part of the lab write-ups.
approximately 700 grant proposals, including co-writing, editing and serving as the Program Manager for 9 awarded STEM educa- tion grants totaling more than $14M. She has collaborated with University offices, faculty and staff in the facilitation of recruitment strategies to increase the quality and quantity of undergraduate and graduate enrollment in STEM programs. Ms. Ward now manages the fundraising and grant writing for CAS- TLE and ExPERTS programs, including assisting with hiring and overseeing awarded projects as well as coordinating program evaluation.Dr. Adam K Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Drexel University, and is the
variants of learning modules thatfacilitate STEM ethics learning for the diverse students in the classroom. This research drawsupon 264 surveys and student-writing samples from students across four institutions, specificallyNotre Dame, St. Mary’s College, Xavier University-Louisiana, and University of Virginia. Theaim of this initial research is to explore the heterogeneity of students in STEM classrooms, whiledemonstrating that STEM students can be described more holistically when personality and othernon-demographic characteristics are recognized as important attributes in a learner-centeredenvironment. This paper supports the notion that, prior to the start of instruction, the mosteffective instructors will critically review and consider a
Paper ID #22886Work in Progress: Transforming a CourseDr. Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. Besides chemical engineering courses, she teaches an engineering course to nonengineering students. Her current research interests include critical thinking evident in student writing and assessing learning in experiential learning activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Work in Progress: Transforming a CourseThird year students at Lafayette College enroll in an Applied Fluid Dynamics and
, undergraduate engineering education should form the basis for a lifetime of learning.And, a little later: Writing can help achieve these goals in unique ways, and we argue that most courses should incorporate writing in some fashion.“Writing” may be too limited a word; “communication” better covers the range of skillswhich can serve engineers well to avoid obsolescence and to maintain a technicalcompetitive edge. Page 8.1059.5Paul L. Ross UW-Madison 5 Teaching Communication Skills OnlineD. The Virtues of the “Classroom” for Engaged ParticipantsThe virtues of the real “classroom” encourage engagement and participation by
be too complex for a student to understand andneed to be augmented by faculty. Writing tutorials of this nature is very time intensive;splitting up the work among collaborating faculty can ease this burden.Even though industrial support and collaborative effort greatly facilitate the ability todevelop and maintain VLSI design and fabrication curriculum, many tenure andpromotion processes tend to emphasize scholarly activity in the form of publications andgrant dollars over teaching activities5 (such as lab development).Another problem is some tenure and promotion committees tend to “bean count” firstauthor publications even though some have recognized that this can lead to faculty notcollaborating.6 (Meaning: It is easier to determine if a
Session 2793 The Style Guide as an Instruction Tool for Structured Programming Scott D. Baldwin Oklahoma State UniversityAbstractStructured programming skills are a must for anyone writing computer software. This paper willpresent to the reader the concept of the style guide as a tool for insuring structured programmingskills are developed by both novice and experienced programmers.A style guide is normally a written document, either hard copy or on-line, that provides rules forformatting, documenting, variable naming and other important skills that are required forinsuring
(Fall & Spring term) Computing and information technology Writing and communication Summer term Ethics in science and technology Entrepreneurship and management of innovation Start of the senior thesis Second year Information systems technology track: Telecommunication networking (Fall & Spring term) Information and network security Relational databases System integration Alternative energy Biotechnology
A&M University in 2002. His research involves Computer Graphics, Virtual Learning/Training Environments, Scientific Visualization, and Computer Network Security. Page 15.737.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Infusing Tablet PCs and Interactive Learning Technology into Computer Science Education to Enhance Student LearningAbstractStudents from the digital age are visual and active learners who prefer strong interaction withtheir peers and instructors. Traditional lecturing styles are insufficient in grasping the attention ofthese students and in supporting their learning needs. Tablet