careerpath instead of completely dropping out of school. Therefore, the course pedagogy combinedlecture-type sessions with a learning activity. The learning activities could vary fromconstruction or industry site visits, lab practices, experiential learning, role-model activities,among others [37]–[41]. In general, the learning activities throughout this course aimed toprovide students with the opportunity to have hands-on experience with laboratories, connectwith the industry through site visits and role playing, understand the application of their theorylessons and their involvement with academic student chapters to connect with upper-levelstudents—tutoring and mentorship.ResultsThe following sections presents the outcome of the course design
work represents learningtools for IoT concepts that were intended for a traditional (non-remote) course. Although at thetime of its publication the laboratory was not yet implemented, its content shows hands-onexercises for the laboratory. Jones describes the design of a hardware kit and laboratoryexercises to offer students hands-on experiences with embedded systems as well as IoT [6].Remote learning was not targeted in this application. In their 2021 survey paper on IoT ineducation, Ronoh et al. recommend that IoT courses should have practical skills as one of thelearning outcomes, which can be successfully achieved via problem-based learning (PBL) [7].The authors’ findings support that IoT is conducive to cooperative learning, and can
year after the submitted request for a visit. A team is formed through a CEABconsisting of a chairman, a deputy, and several members to carry out specific tasks. Anotherteam of visitors is also formed by CEAB with the approval of the university. The Universitymust send CEAB an integrated file regarding the program for which accreditation is requested.This file is submitted not less than six weeks prior to the specific visit. The visit lasts 3 full days.The first day is dedicated to meet the visiting team and check the files that have been deliveredfor accreditation. Each course of the developed curriculum has an integrated file that includes thecourse contents of the material, lectures, assignments, examinations, laboratories, learningexpected
experiences focusingspecifically on the characteristics that are related to students’ curiosity and motivation. The datacollection of this study was conducted in the 2021-2022 academic school year, consisting ofthree measures: interviews, surveys, and observations. Differentiated interviews were conductedwith both professors and students in the Engineering School including questions regarding classand lab experience, curiosity, uncertainty, and motivation. Observations were conducted in boththe class and laboratory settings, with observation notes focused on curiosity and uncertaintypromotion and suppression. This paper analyzes data from the student interviews from fall 2021.All authors developed the interview, survey, and observations measures
. Applicants were required to submit theirtranscript, resume, and a brief (1 paragraph) personal statement. Participants were selected basedon their performance in relevant introductory engineering courses—Computer-aided Design(CAD), Statics, and Mechanics of Materials—and their previous laboratory/research experience.Priority was given to those students without any previous laboratory/research experience orexposure to 3D printing in order to provide new opportunities. As an extra curricular activity,careful attention was paid to the student’s ability to take on additional obligations in what isalready a demanding semester (18 credit hours). Each participant was paid hourly for their effortsup to 10 hours per week.The 3D3 Competition comprises four 3
and failure (DFW) was noted for the freshman level Introductionto Chemical Engineering Laboratory course based on the Fall 2020 semester. Although listed as ahybrid course, all lectures were delivered through Zoom video conferencing with activities such asexams having an option of in-person or virtual delivery. Prior to the Fall 2020 semester, coursecurriculum changes were made to provide more active and experiential learning opportunities in thecourse. However, the switch to online learning limited the impact of the experiences during virtuallearning. A review of submissions revealed a high number of students who did not attemptassignments. This paper analyzes student performance on similar assignments during the fallsemesters of 2019 – 2021
Program at Texas Woman's University AbstractWomen remain sorely under-represented in mathematics, computer science, and thephysical sciences. As a result, researchers have attempted to profile female students thatchoose these majors and to explain why others do not. Several studies suggest that maledomination of classrooms and laboratories and the lack of female role models contributeto the disparity. At Texas Woman’s University, a majority of faculty members arefemale, as are over 90% of students. Using a data set that contains information about allcurrent Texas Woman's University undergraduates, the authors have a unique opportunityto explore other variables that often differ
,and practice and offers a 60/40 mix of theory and laboratory experience. Programsinclude specialized technical courses that emphasize rational thinking and applyingscientific principles to find practical solutions to technical problems, as well as courses inapplied redesign, mathematics, and science. Prairie View A&M University is known forthe nation’s top producers of African-American engineers in a diverse student body. InASEE’s (American Society for Engineering Education) Profiles of Engineering andEngineering Technology Colleges 2002 Edition, Prairie View A&M University is listedas the 31st highest enrollment in Engineering Technology and tenth in degrees awarded towomen. The department of Engineering Technology at PVAMU has
completion. In the past, these senior design activities took place at differentinstructional laboratories, thus, limiting opportunities for industry-sponsored projects asstudents work as interdisciplinary teams within various Engineering Technology fields. The CIDallows project activities in one facility, so that student teams are able to conduct applied designprojects and applied research involving industry partners focusing on real-life projects.Therefore, project activities are not influenced by laboratory schedules in instructionallaboratories. Further, having these activities in one place promote more interdisciplinary workamong design/project teams. The Center advances applied research, design projects, andfosters innovation.The mission of the
forms of interdependence. These views of how expertise operates in team5settings treat expertise as something that is both easily identifiable within individuals and roles,and something that can be applied discretely to a particular task or problem. Indeed, over timedisciplines, professions and roles become affiliated with particular forms of expertise and assertjurisdiction over particular tasks and work roles (Abbott, 1988). However, these frameworks regarding the utilization of expertise in group settings relyupon assumptions about the practice of expert work that may not match how individuals operatein STEM laboratory settings. These perspectives start from a common fundamental assumptionthat experts know and/or have the tacit
constant and cyclic marine environment to determine thecorrosion performance of materials and coatings. The ACT chamber is light weight, table-top,fully programmable, and safe to operate in laboratory environment, and therefore, preferred overcommercially available ACT chambers.IntroductionCorrosion of metal components in infrastructure, automobiles and aircraft is estimated to cost theglobal economy $2.5T annually [1]. It is estimated that by properly applying corrosion testingand protection this preventable deterioration could be reduced by up to 35% or $875B [1].Failure to identify the root cause of corrosion, or even how a specific material corrodes can resultin ultimate failure of the material during service. This could lead to catastrophic
Throughout the Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online . 10.18260/1-2--35548Boettger, R.K., & Lam, C. (2013, December 1). An Overview of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Technical Communication Journals (1992–2011). IEEE Transactions On Professional Communication 56(4), 272 - 293.Carnasciali, M., & Dieckman, E. A., & Orabi, I. I., & Daniels, S. D. (2020, June), A Three-course Laboratory Sequence in Mechanical Engineering as a Framework for Writing in the Discipline. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—34077.Deng, Z., & Jalloh, A. R., & Mobasher, A., & Rojas
from PUIs forenrollment in graduate programs in bioinformatics, bioengineering, or related fields; (4) fosterexisting collaborations and develop new research collaborations between the PI at the Universityof San Diego (USD) and scientists at the Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) in Sweden;and (5) develop a diverse cohort of globally engaged scientists/engineers that seek careeropportunities and collaborators throughout the world. This paper reports on the first year of thegrant.Program preparationsThe first year of this program took place during the summer of 2021 from March-August.Program activities included a 6-week virtual training series (March-May), a 1-week in-personpre-departure symposium (June) and a 10-week research experience
students and professors alike.Specifically, in terms of engineering courses, access to resources such as laboratories, institution-specific software, and classroom technologies are severely limited and difficult to replicate forremote settings. New and revised classroom structures have been created to accommodate publichealth concerns while continuing to deliver effective education. Universities have adapted curriculum to be completely virtual or a combination of virtualand in-person learning. The combination of remote and traditional face-to-face learning,sometimes referred to as a hybrid or blended structure, integrates online discussion with limitedin-person class times [1]. Due to reduced capacities in classrooms, groups of students in
Paper ID #37123Dean’s Racial Justice Curriculum Challenge (WIP)Paula Rees (Assistant Dean for Diversity) Assistant Dean UMass Amherst.Scott A Civjan (Professor)Erin Baker (Professor)Promise MchengaHannah WhartonJacqueline E Thornton (Software Developer)Lia Marie CiemnyEsha Ayman UddinSamantha WojdaShannon Roberts Dr. Shannon C. Roberts is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department and the co- director of the Human Performance Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Amherst (UMass). Prior to joining UMass, she was a technical staff member at MIT Lincoln Laboratory in the Cyber
in mind. Finally, ourstudy design included an emphasis on technical communication development (3).MethodsThree undergraduate Bioengineering courses, covering a range of topics and academic levels, wereselected. These courses included 1 sophomore core course (Bioengineering Fundamentals andFundamentals of Systems Physiology), one junior core laboratory course (BiomedicalInstrumentation) and one senior elective laboratory course (Troubleshooting for Clinically-Relevant Biomedical Equipment). Students enrolled in these courses were offered extra credit tocomplete an educational video assignment, which consisted of: 1. independently selecting and researching a course content-related topic, 2. developing a script and visuals that communicates
, especially thesquirrel cage type. According to DoE, electric motors consume more than 50 % of all electricalenergy in the USA and more than 85 % of electrical energy used for industrial production [4] We asked students to imagine themselves in an industrial environment where all thingsand people are running in a rush, time is precious, and they don’t have all the informationrequired for the best analysis, nor the best instruments, as in a laboratory setting [5]Motors running at nominal load (load = 100 %) offer their best efficiency and hence consume theleast energy. Underloaded (load < 100 %) motors run at lower efficiency and at lower powerfactor, contributing to the increase of losses and operating costs. To quickly find thoseperforming
Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education6. Haque, M.E. “Interactive animation and visualization in a virtual soil mechanics laboratory” the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, session T1C, Reno, NV, (2001)7. Kocijancic, S. and O’Sullivan, C. “Integrating virtual and true laboratory in science and technology education” the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, session T2E, Boston, MA, (2002)8. Tatum, C. B. Balancing engineering and management in construction education. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 113, 10-17 (1987).9. AbouRizk, S. M., & Sawhney, A. Simulation and gaming in construction engineering education. Paper presented at the
, nondestructive materials evaluation and optical copying. Image processing, including image enhancement, analysis and compression. Student specialization through assignments and project. (3-0) Course Content SelectionComputer applications are characteristically of interest to engineering students, so an imagingcourse has a lot going for it right away. Associated with that, images are inherently visual andnaturally compatible with computer manipulation and storage. They naturally have the potential forinterest, even fun, for students.On the other hand, many engineering students are more interested in hardware and laboratories thanthey are in mathematics (even computer-based math) and computational manipulation
not theintention of the laboratory exercise to train the students to become lab technicians. Rather, the © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35748principal purpose in putting our students in the laboratory setting is to enhance and supplementtheir understanding of the concepts and principles being taught within the classroom.”For engineering curriculum, impact analysis is typically first introduced in a physics orengineering dynamics course. More in-depth analysis and practical applications are typicallycovered in a mechanics of materials course for all engineering majors, and/or a machinecomponent design course for mechanical
discussion of solids and gases as they pertain toenvironmental topics. The environmental sequence also includes two laboratory classes. Underthis construct, students interested in environmental engineering earn a degree in civil engineeringbut have a concentration of required courses in environmental themes providing a broadeducational experience.As an ABET-accredited major, the environmental engineering program at West Point hasdesignated a course (or courses) to address each of the Program Criteria. EV301 (EnvironmentalScience for Engineers and Scientists) is the first environmental course taken by environmentalengineers and introduces several important environmental topics; therefore, EV301 is listed inTable 2 as covering numerous criteria
], but ECE students rarely take these courses from technology departments. A survey ofthe courses offered in the ECE curriculum by the four year universities in Virginia list no coursesin PLC based control. However, there are numerous reports on innovative approached to teachPLC in engineering technology programs [11-12]. To offset these missing skills in ECEgraduates, a capstone project as a pilot course was introduced in this work. The PLC basedcontrol can effectively be taught in a hands-on laboratory setting which is the focus of this paper.. Hardware and software integration using PLCs, and active lab-based learning is more effectivein these types of courses for engineering students [13], [14].Use of industrial robots in manufacturing
engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Faculty Responsibility for Student Safety, Health, and Welfare?AbstractMany engineering codes of ethics state that engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health,and welfare of the public. As engineering educators should we extend this responsibility to ourstudents? And if so, how? Each of these three elements are distinct in some ways. Faculty areresponsible for student safety in experimental laboratory and hands-on design/build settings, forexample. Unique safety concerns may arise during study abroad
community by specificallylooking at mentoring strategies, laboratory culture, and Faculty management styles informed byqualitative interviews. Further, we are examining if mentors approach each student individuallyand are adaptable to each student's needs to promote neurodivergent students thriving.Potential LimitationsSurvey models for undergraduate research do exist, and several researchers have applied thesemodels to assess the impact of undergraduate research in the underrepresented minoritycommunity [12], [14]. There are very few survey models, if any, that have been applied to assessif neurodivergent students thrive in undergraduate research. The neurodivergent communitytypically attributes itself as a non-visible difference that isn’t always
more freedom to explore alternative/out-of-the-box designs, circumventing the link between students’ designs and their graded assessments,and to encourage students to engage the activities for the primary purpose of learning [8].In the Fall terms of 2017, 2018, and 2019, the CivE Design Days event was offered as asynchronous in-person two-day design event. Students were briefed on the event by way of ashort presentation that was delivered approximately one week in advance to provide pre-exposure and background to answer general operational questions (e.g., the laboratory location,what to bring, etc.) and to prepare students with background on the specifics of the designactivities. As shown by Lynch et al. [9], pre-exposure to content and
communication.While these actions were able to be implemented during the summer in which an issue arose,actions were also able to implemented for subsequent summers. For example, all faculty mentorswere required to reach out to REU students 3-4 weeks before the program began. The intentionwas to set expectations for both faculty and students as well as to establish rapport. In thiscommunication, faculty mentors include details on the student project, including a rough outlineof research tasks for the summer, and a handful of articles that can orient the students within theresearch area. Other pertinent information to help with student preparation were also included,such as recommended clothing to pack for field work and any online laboratory safety
background is in mechanical engineering with a focus on manufacturing. Prior to joining MIT, she worked at an original equipment manufacturer.Nicholas Xuanlai FangJohn Liu (Dr.) Dr. John Liu is the principal investigator of the MIT Learning Engineering and Practice (LEAP) Group, which applies design and systems principles to solving challenges in learning and develops learning experiences to better meet the increasing demand for STEM skills in tomorrow’s workforce. He is a Lecturer in MIT's Mechanical Engineering department and Scientist of the MITx Digital Learning Laboratory. Dr. Liu's work includes engineering education, mixed reality and haptic experiences, workforce solutions to address the nation-wide manufacturing
soil sampling and mapping efforts on the selected field todocument the anticipated gradual decline of phosphorus levels in the corn, soybean, and wheatcrop rotation and harvest cycle. Kolb’s experiential cycle paradigm has provided a meaningfulframework to involve student teams, advance the project goals, and promote educational outcomesfor the students in both field and laboratory settings covering all aspects of the overall project. Thispaper is largely focused on the grid soil sampling efforts that have been undertaken by UMESstudents over the past several years. Over the years several improvements have been made withthe hardware and software tools utilized by the team to improve the efficiency of the labor-intensive grid soil sampling
the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), theAdvanced Manufacturing Partnership 2.0 highlighted the need for universities to provide engineerswith appropriate manufacturing education to sustain emerging technologies, a need which persiststo this day. This Student Paper proposes the adoption of a laboratory course at university-levelmechanical engineering programs in which undergraduates would learn and practice the basics ofcomputer-aided manufacturing and apply that knowledge to CNC milling machines. Themotivation for this course is to better prepare students for design and manufacturing careers byreconciling mechanical engineering curricula with the hiring need in the industry for engineerswho understand common
Paper ID #35845Implementing strategies for virtual engineering educationMs. Hashmath Fathima, Morgan State University My name is Hashmath Fathima, a research assistant and a PhD student at Morgan State University. I am currently working on my dissertation, and my research is based on Social Media and Cyber harassment. My interests are ML, AI, and Cyber Security.Dr. Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University Dr. Kofi Nyarko is a Tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Morgan State University. He also serves as Director of the Engineering Visualization Research Laboratory (EVRL