their practice as an educator or renewable energy expert. Thesequestions guided the participants’ informal research while traveling and resulted in short reportsafter travel.Site visit reports: Participants completed reports for each site visited. These forms consisted offive questions prompts and resulted in formative, reflective reports that captured theirexperiences at each visit and also acted as informal journals that they could use in the future toidentify trends, concepts and/or innovations that they found notable. The reports also served as arecord for their continued investigation into their individual inquiry question(s).Sector Reports: Upon return, participants were paired up on teams based on their specific area ofrenewable energy
Scoring Records within Rubric(s) Category Knowledge Assessments 13, 15, 22, 23 Short answer questions (n = 8) 4 50.0 10, 11, 20 Concept Maps (n = 3) 3 100 14 Essays/Reports (n = 2) 1 50.0 Skills Assessments
the unique contribution of the QFT to student achievement and learning.8. References[1] “Fostering doctoral students’ ability to improve their research question formulation skills and advance impactful research,” Adv. Eng. Educ. (in review)[2] D. Rothstein and L. Santana, Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2011.[3] D. Rothstein, L. Santana, and A. P. Minigan, “Making questions flow,” Educ. Leadersh., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 10–75, 2015.[4] A. P. Minigan, S. Westbrook, D. Rothstein, and L. Santana, “Stimulating and sustaining inquiry with students’ questions,” Soc. Educ., vol. 81, pp. 268–272, 2017.[5] H. J. LeBlanc, K. Nepal, and G. S. Mowry
are known, theSTEP Mentor can steer students to appropriate information or resources that may help studentachieve his/her goals. As such, the STEP Mentors are in a position to connect the advisee tofaculty who have professional, research, or service interests compatible with the student’sinterests. The STEP Mentor documents recommendations in a Student Consultation Form during thesemester meeting. The form requires responses to the following: 1) Has student met with her/hisinstructor(s)? 2) Has student met with her/his academic Program Advisor? 3) Issues/TopicsDiscussed, and (4) Recommendation(s). The STEP Mentor and the student agree onrecommendations to continue or enhance academic or professional development and the studentssign this
0 + - 3 One hand required to operate + + - 4 Leaf Storage - - + 5 Angled raking claw - + + 6 Total volume - 0 0 7 Preassembled + 0 0 8 9 10 Sum +'s 3 4 3 Sum 0's 1 2 2 Sum -'s 3 1 2 Score 0 3 1 Rank 3 1 2
Supreme Court. Come to aconclusion, and support it below.Questions:1. What rules are law or precedent for the Yur State Supreme court? In other words, what rules does it HAVE to apply?2. Assume Yur adopts the reasoning of the Moorman Mfg. Co. v. National Tank Co. case. Which case(s) has the Yur state Supreme Court overturned? Can the engineer get the money back it paid out?3. Assume Yur adopts the reasoning of the Yur Appeal Court #2 from the Neighbors case. Which case(s) so far discussed have been overturned?4. Did the appeal court in the Neighbors case decide that the engineer owed the Neighbors money? If not, what did it decide? Page
participants are very valuable and will be incorporatedinto the project and its implementation in the future.Individual Reflections ResultsThe individual reflections from the 112 participants were analyzed following the process forthematic analysis described by Braun and Clark [13]. Two researchers independently reviewedthe data to become familiar with it and then identified themes based on the literature to use as theframework for the thematic analysis to measure student motivation, curiosity, connections, andmaking skills. The two researchers then independently coded the data by labeling excerpt(s) fromeach reflection that reflected a theme and recording it in a spreadsheet. The analysis results fromboth researchers were compared and any
. 2005.[6] R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and K.C. Larkin, “Self-Efficacy in the Prediction of AcademicPerformance and Perceived Career Options,” J. Couns. Psy., vol. 33(3), pp. 265-269, Jan. 1986.[7] A.R. Carberry, H.S. Lee, and M.W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy,”J. Eng. Ed., vol. 99(1), pp. 71–79, Jan. 2010.[8] J.S. Mullin, “Developing Technical Self-efficacy through a Maker-inspired Design Project,”at At Home With Engineering Education: ASEE’s Virtual Conference, June 22-26, 2020.[9] A. Jackson, N. Mentzer, J. Zhang, and R. Kramer, “Enhancing Student Motivation andEfficacy through Soft Robot Design,” at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017.[10] L. Murray, J. Ekong, S. Niknam, and M.J
Other and Law education Universitie Year Institutions Total Universities and Universities s and Colleges and Colleges Colleges 1958 5 21 28 28 791 1959 5 24 33 28 841 1960 9 30 45 28 1289 1961 4 20 38 19 845 1962 3 11 28 2 610 1963 4 10 22 2
surveyinstruments. Through analysis, patterns and themes emerged that the researchers positionedwithin the theoretical concepts of sense of belonging and academic self-concept. Given the smallnumber of women in the computing programs and the number of those students who participatedin the initiatives, the number of potential respondents was low. Future work includes addingqualitative analysis to the research considering the small number of participants in the study.Additionally, this study did not look to identify the impact of each initiative individually, andthereby can be a limitation. However, this study investigated the initiatives in aggregate. Theresults of this study support [12]’s assertion for the need of multi-pronged institutionalapproaches to
/docs/WEF_GGGR_2022.pdf[6] OECD, “Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018, Kazakhstan country note,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_KAZ.pdf[7] Eurostat, “Graduates by education level, programme orientation, sex and field of education,” European Comission, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products- datasets/product?code=educ_uoe_grad02[8] C. L. Hoyt and S. E. Murphy, “Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership,” The leadership quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 387–399, 2016.[9] M. Cadinu, A. Maass, A. Rosabianca, and J. Kiesner, “Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of
instructors’ experiences and perspectives on implementing UDLframework tools in the classroom. Questions are broken down into the two categories of teachingprofile and opinions on UDL features.Teaching profiles were constructed from the following question topics: primary subject area,primary format of course(s), level of students taught, average course enrollment sizes, andexperience in developing digital learning material.Similar to the student survey, instructors’ opinions on UDL features were collected throughLikert-type scale questions. For each UDL feature, instructors rated their experience (novice toexpert) on the feature and the usefulness of the feature for their students. However, unlike thestudent survey, instructors were additionally
Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innoDr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is s Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technologyˆa C™s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education throughJoycelyn Wilson, Georgia Institute of Technology Joycelyn Wilson is an educational anthropologist and assistant professor of Black media studies in the School of Literature, Media, and Communication (LMC) at Georgia Tech. Her current area of inquiry focuses on hip
media and fundamental computer architecture. Dr. Siewert has published numerous research, industry, and educational papers on these topics.Rishab S Shah Currently, student at CU Boulder and graduating with master's in Embedded Systems and IoT this December 2022 Portfolio: https://rishabshah9.wixsite.com/portfolio LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishab-shah/ © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Addressing Learning Objective Gaps Between Rate Monotonic Theory and Practice using Real-Time Simulation Exercises Sam Siewert Associate Professor
. Steinlicht and B.G. Garry, “Capstone project challenges: How industry sponsored projects offer new learning experiences,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15-18, 2014, Indianapolis, IN.[4] B. Allison, S. Ludwick, and W. Birmingham, “A mechatronics capstone project with an interdisciplinary team and an industrial partner,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012.[5] P.K. Sheridan, G. Evans, and D. Reeve, “A proposed framework for teaching team-effectiveness in
curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no.4, pp. 303–313, 2000.[3] M. S. Pritchard, “Responsible engineering: The importance of character and imagination,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, pp. 391–402, 2001.[4] National Academy of Engineering, Practical Guidance on Science and Engineering Ethics Education for Instructors and Administrators: Papers and Summary from a Workshop, December 12, 2012. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18519.[5] C. Mitcham and E. E. Englehardt, “Ethics across the curriculum: Prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics, Science and
thecolleges, take two entries per year. There was much opposition to this from academics incolleges since the colleges would be open throughout the year. Nevertheless, severaldepartments offered end-course. The Birmingham project was established to examine theviability of these courses primarily from the perspective of learning, and the supply ofstudents and industrial places. A comparative study of two structures offered by theDepartment of Metallurgy at Battersea CAT was undertaken by Hornsby-Smith [10].The second objection put forward by G. S. Bosworth was that the curriculum was orientedtoward the needs of academia and not industry. It did not, therefore, produce a different kindof technologist [24]. The opportunity to take up his ideas was not