. Mobility, a corecomponent of boundaryless career theory, refers to interorganizational movement that enhancessubjective career success by fostering autonomy, validating personal accomplishments, andproviding an opportunity to escape toxic work environments, ultimately improving careersatisfaction (Varela et al., 2023). However, the impact of mobility is moderated by the industrysegment, suggesting that the significance of early career movements varies depending on thecontext.Within the context of boundaryless career theory, the scholars emphasized core competency-based perspectives underlining the knowledge-driven nature of faculty careers (Beigi et al.,2018). Identifying the dimensions of (1) know-why (culture), (2) know-how (skills), and (3)know
,additionally centralizes resources and allows you to hold organized and productivemeetings. Respondents stated that “the use of BIM facilitates team engagement byimproving communication, coordination, and access to centralized information,which reduces errors. Increase productivity by automating repetitive tasks andenable informed decision-making. In addition, it contributes to the success of theproject by minimizing delays and cost overruns, generating an efficient andorganized work environment.” It was also noted that this tool “allows for quick anddirect collaboration with the people involved, thus avoiding reprocessing orinterference that could affect both the schedule and the results.” Table 1: Table of Results obtained from the analysis of the
, spanning from 2020 to 2023, propelled the adoption of online education tounprecedented levels. Initially implemented as an emergency measure to address school closures,online modality has since been embraced by numerous higher education institutions due to itsinherent advantages [1, 13], which include enhanced flexibility, increased interactivity, and theability for students to pace their own learning.Historically, online engineering programs have faced skepticism, particularly due to concernsover the lack of hands-on lab experiences. There has been a strong belief that students mustphysically engage with real machines, equipment, and circuits that closely mirror those used inreal-world applications—something simulations alone cannot fully
, it also explains diverseperspectives and roles engineers play in collaborative product development and appreciation forknowledge gained in prior courses like Machining, CAD/CAM, GD&T, and Computing.BackgroundBuilding blocks for utilizing Product Manufacturing Information (PMI) and tolerancerepresentations for Smart Manufacturing (SM) are showing up more and more in researchprojects/literature and industry/product/process specific applications. For example, rapidprototyping, composite structures, robotic assembly, augmented reality, and architecture forincorporating business functions that depend on information from applications and productengineering activities were found [1]. Developers of standards like International Organizationfor
separatepresentation and paper at this conference.These modules can be summarized as: Module 1 (Orientation – concepts and approach): Through foundational readings, discussions, and AI-integrated gamified collaborative activities, participants get to know each other while exploring theories and principles behind course and play the “It Takes a Village” game and reflect on its experience. The key readings for this module include “Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across secondary fields” by Riegle-Crumb, et al.15 as well as several articles from recent periodicals and news sites. Module 2: Reviewing and updating a course syllabus: Exploring AI tools’ limitations against and potential for
cognitive styles and learning needs. Research demonstrates that neurodivergentlearners contribute unique strengths to STEM fields, including innovative problem-solving, exceptionalattention to detail, and advanced pattern recognition capabilities [1]. Despite these strengths, neurodivergentstudents encounter barriers in conventional educational settings. These include sensory overload, challengeswith time management, and limited access to tailored accommodations, often leading to frustration, isolation,and academic underperformance. For instance, the sensory demands of large lecture halls or the unstructurednature of group work can overwhelm students with ASD or ADHD [2]. These challenges highlightlong-standing structural barriers in STEM education
. In response to feedback from undergraduate and graduate programs, industry andgovernment employers of engineers, and professional societies, ABET incorporated leadership inits student outcomes required for accreditation for the first time in 2019 [1]. The new language,shared below, is a move in the right direction, but leaves institutions to figure out how best toteach their students to work together to provide leadership and create a collaborative andinclusive environment. ABET Criterion 3, Student Outcome 5: An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. Empathy is a skill
includedisseminating research through the International Conference on Bio-Mediated and Bio-inspiredGeotechnics (ICBBG), sharing existing curricula through short courses and certificate programs,and continuing as the leader in biogeotechnical engineering.IntroductionThe CBBG EWD program goals include: 1) Aiding students to become proficient in desired skillsets with six core areas: communication, engineering success, career connections, mentorship,technical expertise, and inclusion and diversity, 2) Developing future professionals and scientistsin biogeotechnical engineering who are innovative and creative leaders, 3) Demonstratingdiversity, awareness, knowledge, and positive attitudes toward increasing opportunities andcareers in STEM and biogeotechnics for
printing experience influenced their self-efficacy in the engineeringdomain. Three themes emerged from the qualitative data. Theme 1: Hands-on learning increased engagement Students overwhelmingly reported that the hands-on nature of 3D printing madeengineering concepts more engaging and understandable. Many described the experience as“exciting” and “fun,” emphasizing that physically designing and printing objects helped them seehow engineering applies to real-world problems. “I never thought I would enjoy engineering, but 3D printing made it more interesting. Seeing my design come to life was really cool.” “Usually, I find science and math boring, but when I got to create my own design and see it printed, I
[1], [2], [3]. Over time, researchers have gained a nuancedunderstanding of how international student status affects various dimensions of academic life,including mental health, psychosocial well-being, cultural adaptation, and feelings of belonging[4], [5]. Qualitative studies have added depth to this picture, highlighting how students undergopersonal and identity shifts through their interactions with new social systems, unfamiliarenvironments, and internal reflections on their past and aspirations for the future. These changesdon’t happen in isolation but emerge through a complex web of experiences that unfold acrossdifferent stages and destinations.Much of the existing scholarship has concentrated on individuals pursuing long
the backlog of USinfrastructure projects [6]. Yet, its success depends on having a skilled workforce to design,build, and maintain critical infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics denoted CivilEngineering will grow at 6% between 2023 and 2033. This is faster than the 4% average of alloccupations [11]. In February 2024, 51% percent of engineering firms continued to turn downwork due to workforce shortages [1]. This suggests that Industry needs a skilled and readyworkforce. As one interviewer clearly responded that their firm is “looking for recent graduatesto hit the ground running.” The gap between industry requirements and student preparation impacts companies'productivity. Despite significant work to prepare students to enter
challenges in research-intensive universities where research is valued more thanteaching. However, women teaching faculty also navigate gender-specific barriers, includingpersistent underrepresentation and male-dominated academic cultures, which often lead tolimited recognition for teaching contributions. Non-tenure track teaching faculty nowoutnumber tenure-line faculty in engineering departments [1], particularly in research-intensive university settings. Yet, the roles and experiences of these women teaching facultyremain underexplored from the perspective of teaching faculty.According to Wenger, communities of practice (CoPs) are groups of people who share acommon interest for their practices and develop them through regular collaboration [2
3current formulations of CR: 1) understanding the context of a problem by co-evaluatingrelevance, priorities, and risk with stakeholders, and 2) co-developing solutions that can beimplemented and sustained within the same context. In that respect, the existing literature isalmost unified in highlighting the value of a cross-disciplinary education that prepares studentsto navigate epistemic contexts beyond academia while addressing the competing needs ofstakeholders inhabiting those contexts. It is important to keep in mind that, as Xuelong Hu recently claimed, this shift presents arather instrumentalist view of research that is subject to the short-term demands of externalpartners. Hu adds: interdisciplinarity, associated with
water was causing lead leaching. Additionally, Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha'sresearch identified elevated blood-lead levels in Flint's children. These findings were disclosed inSeptember 2015, leading Michigan’s Department of Health and Human Services to declare apublic health emergency on October 1, 2015, advising residents not to consume the water. By 3late October, Flint reconnected to the DWSD water source, yet the risk of lead leachingremained, prompting the city to recommend lead filters or bottled water for residents.Much of the responsibility or blame was placed on Michigan’s Department of EnvironmentalQuality, as their minimal approach to
---made statements during the attack and in his suicide noteindicating unequivocally his misogynist, antifeminist motives. He entered the classroom with asemi-automatic weapon and ordered the men to leave before opening fire on the women. In hissuicide note, he blamed feminists for ruining his life, and before he opened fire, he calledthe women feminists. Some of them protested, "We're not feminists, we're girls who likescience," and "we're just women studying engineering, and we've never fought against men" [1].Donna Riley and Gina-Louise Sciarra brought the shootings into the engineering educationliterature in 2006, observing that they had to date been taught in social science courses but not inengineering-a textbook case of what science
. Research advisors often control a graduate student’sfunding, research topic, and acceptance to their graduate program [1]. Faculty often have significantinfluence over a student’s career prospects [2]. Additionally, the one-on-one pedagogical approach toPh.D. and research-based master’s programs can leave students vulnerable to faculty harassment andabuse [2]. Graduate students are often under a high level of emotional, physical, and psychological stress[3], [4], [5]. Interpersonal abuse is one of the most common sources of graduate student stress [5].Understanding the power differential between graduate students and faculty offers the STEM communitymultiple opportunities to positively impact the academic journey, professional advancement, health
institutions within West Virginia. The BridgeValley Community and Technical CollegeElectrical Engineering Technology concentration is shown in Table 1. Unless otherwise noted,these courses are three credit hours within sixteen weeks. The courses listed for each semesterare not prioritized. However, all the courses must be completed before moving forward. Thephysics and mathematics courses can be replaced with their bachelor's degree counterparts. Thisflexibility depends upon a student's previous courses or professional experience. The curriculumrequires future
Study)Introduction Colleges and universities need to educate engineering students who are technicallycompetent and ready to contribute to the needs of our increasingly diverse society. In addition toemphasizing graduates’ ability to analyze issues in professional ethics, ABET’s EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) recently added applications of diversity, equity, and inclusionprinciples to the program criteria for civil and similarly named engineering programs [1]. Aftertwo years of optional pilot, EAC adopted the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion intogeneral Criteria 5 Curriculum and Criteria 6 Faculty in their 2025-2026 accreditation cycle [2].However, the ABET Board of Directors approved the removal of all references
network, offering a more versatile and efficient solution. [Source XXIII]LPDA (Log Periodic Dipole Arrays) as a reflector antenna feed offers a wide range ofapplications. However, phase center of the LPDA changes depending on the operationfrequency, which, in turn, leads to defocusing loss as frequency changes. In this study, thedesign of 1-18 GHz printed LPDA antenna is used as a linearly polarized feed for theparabolic reflector which has a 1.2 m diameter. Optimal feed position and f/D ratio are chosenthrough extensive simulations. Performance parameters such as VSWR, gain and half powerbeamwidth are presented. Minimum aperture efficiency was recorded as 0.27 at the targetband. [Source XXIV]This resource discusses various operating principles
develop theuniversity’s first list of benchmark institutions for salary comparison [1, Appendix C]. RIT’sNSF ADVANCE IT-Catalyst project (081107, 2008-2011) was a key motivator to furtherprogress. After a 2008 internal climate survey [2] revealed significant differences in perceptionregarding salary equity by gender, RIT Human Resources (HR) and Institutional Research (IR)launched annual salary equity studies for faculty. After controlling variables such as department,degree earned, years in rank, and terminal degree, gender-based gaps in average salary werefound at each faculty rank [3], [4]. Similarly, the American Association of University Professorsreports lower salaries for women at every faculty rank, a finding that is persistent over time
based on a participant’s experiences in HEPs. Other papers publishedfrom this research study provide reasoning and background for this analysis. The research design is amixed methods approach including quantitative methods via a survey which informed the qualitativemethod via interviews [1]. To study the interactions among professional responsibility, HEPs, and DEI,two existing instruments were combined into a survey provided to engineering students and professionals.The Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment (EPRA) was used to understand the perspectivesof students toward professional and social responsibility with special emphasis on recording participationin engineering service or humanitarian engineering projects (HEPs) [2
diverse students. However, the study also offers insightinto potential approaches for power-building amongst marginalized students, who are the bestexperts in their own experiences.IntroductionThis study takes place at a research-intensive, highly-selective public university in theMidwestern United States. This institution, and its engineering college, serves primarily whitestudents from highly affluent financial backgrounds [1], a similar educational context to eliteinstitutions throughout the United States and the Global North. Despite its legal status as a“public” institution, a previous study of engineering undergraduate student outcomes at thisinstitution found that two-thirds of the undergraduate engineering students came fromhouseholds
significant disadvantage. Many face challenges catching up or may never evenbegin. Research highlights that institutional barriers like these contribute to lower completion ratesamong students from underrepresented gender, racial, and ethnic groups [1]. Similarly, the subjectsof this study i.e., first-generation college students (FGCS) [2] and non-traditional students (NTS)[3] also experience lower rates of degree completion compared to their peers due to the similarreasons. First-generation college students (FGCS) are the first in their immediate families to pursuecollege education (neither of their parents has a bachelor’s degree) [2]. The National Center forEducation Statistics (NCES) identifies seven key traits that distinguish NTS from
current system [1]. Traditionalapproaches to departmental change often emphasize immediate interventions, such asintroducing new courses, adjusting syllabi, or launching short-term faculty developmentworkshops. However, in the absence of deeper shifts, such initiatives can fail to take hold,especially when unanticipated leadership transitions leave newly implemented practices withoutchampions or embedded policies. In this example, the University of Connecticut (UConn) Schoolof Civil and Environmental Engineering (SoCEE), former department of CEE, embraced atransformative vision for engineering education by cultivating a strength-based culture in whichneurodiversity is embraced as an asset [2]. Instead of seeing cognitive variations like
successful collaborativeprogram that positively impacts both the community and partner organizations.IntroductionThe SEECS program has been in operation since the fall of 2009, with NSF S-STEM funding forall but one of those years. The grant activity has always had as a foundational element theuniversity mission which prominently features service to others. This service component hasbeen affected through community-based, engineering-forward projects completed by students inservice of some unmet community need [1],[2],[3]. SEECS has collaborated with variousexternal stakeholders on community-focused projects, engaging with organizations that supportindividuals with disabilities, at-risk youth, veterans, and environmental initiatives
. Leveraging data from a National Science Foundation(NSF) Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) project, we analyzepatterns in graduate student success, retention, and postdoctoral career trajectories in STEMdisciplines at TSU. Our findings reveal differences in faculty development participation,financial support, and degree completion rates, highlighting systemic challenges andopportunities for improvement. This study provides data-driven recommendations for TSUspecifically and for similar institutions, aiming to strengthen research capacity and enhancegraduate student outcomes1. IntroductionThe goal of the NSF’s AGEP program is to “increase the number of historically underrepresentedminority faculty in STEM” [1]. TSU partnered
Department,George Mason UniversityArvin Farid, Ph.D., P.E., Professor, Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityMojtaba Sadegh, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityRafael da Silva, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Organizational Performance and Workplace LearningDepartment, Boise State UniversityScott Lowe, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate College, Boise State UniversityKeywords: Graduate degrees, Engineering, Stakeholders, Support system, Higher Education 1 S-STEM: Challenges Stakeholders Face in Supporting Low-Income, First-Generation, and/or Rural Graduate Students There is a growing need to train
- dered if there was a way to validate and promote these discussions at the intersection of engineering, community, and identity as an integral part of STEM education and practice, when in their experience, they had often remained at the fringe or relegated to courses outside of the technical curriculum.Background and motivationScenario #0 above marks a turning point in the development of a course titled Effective andEnduring Advocacy: Leading with Compassion in STEM, catalyzing its transition from an earlyconcept into a fully supported Pilot Course [1]. We now offer the present work, a CollaborativeAutoethnography (CAE), which explores the impacts of the course on both students andfacilitators.Development of the Pilot Course
). Each measure used a seven-point Likert scale 6from (1) strongly agree to (7) strongly disagree. Questions throughout the scales wereappropriately reversed. Demographic information was collected.PositionalityKatharine Getz is a white lesbian who believes in the expansiveness of self, gender, andsexuality. Her motivation to research the experiences of belonging and identity for LGBTQ+undergraduate engineering students comes from her own experiences and observations of herpeers. Her academic background is in chemical engineering, sexuality and gender studies, andengineering education, and her mentor for this project comes from an experienced
students bolsteredhers. Kayla, in contrast, developed self-efficacy over time through a productive partnership witha supportive engineering student. These cases highlight the complex relationship between partnerdynamics, teaching roles, perceived success, and self-efficacy development. Implications forsupporting PSTs in engineering-integrated experiences are discussed. Introduction Nationwide engineering and coding standards in K-6 curriculum [1], [2] make instructionin these subjects essential for elementary teacher preparation. Along with content andpedagogical knowledge, preservice teachers (PSTs) need a belief in their ability to teach, alsoknown as teaching self-efficacy [3], [4]. Accordingly