Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Lucy Atkinson, Swarthmore College

- 9830.2010.tb01056.x[2] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning,” Educause review, vol. 27, pp. 1-12, 2020.[3] J. J. Park, M. Park, K. Jackson, and G. Vanhoy, “Remote Engineering Education under COVID-19 Pandemic Environment,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp 160-166, 2020.[4] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R.C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the covid-19 pandemic,” EdArXiv, 2020, doi: 10.35542/osf.io/ursmb.[5] L. A. Gelles, S.M. Lord, G.D. Hoople, D.A. Chen, and J.A. Mejia, “Compassionate

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Statics and Dynamics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paris Weber, University of Washington; Seung-Jin Lee, University of Washington; Heather Dillon, University of Washington

-relevance-to-engineeri ng-careers[11] N. Fang, “Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Dynamics Concepts Through a New Concept Mapping Approach: Tree of Dynamics,” Jun. 2012, p. 25.574.1-25.574.13. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/enhancing-students-understanding-of-dynamics-concepts-through-a-new-concept -mapping-approach-tree-of-dynamics[12] J. P. Moore, R. S. Pierce, and C. B. Williams, “Towards an ‘Adaptive Concept Map’: Creating an Expert-Generated Concept Map of an Engineering Statics Curriculum,” Jun. 2012, p. 25.1365.1-25.1365.13. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/towards-an-adaptive-concept-map-creating-an-expert-generated-concept-map-of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Alexander, California State University, Chico; Michael Kotar, California State University, Chico; JoAna Brooks, California State University, Chico

is the advisor for the Chico State student chapter of ASME, the Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society, and the Alternative Energy Club.Michael Kotar (Professor of Education, Emeritus)JoAna Brooks © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Applying an Entrepreneurial Mindset to Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences in STEMCourse-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CURE) can provide every student in theclassroom with an authentic learning experience. The Cultivating a Culture of EntrepreneurialMindset and Undergraduate Research (CEMUR) project at California State University, Chico(Chico State

Conference Session

LEES Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie Wint

Our Future. London: HMSO, 1980.[30] R. N. Charette, “The STEM Crisis is a Myth,” IEEE Spectrum, September, 2013.[31] J. Heywood, “The Response of Higher and Technological Education to Changing Patterns of Employment,” in Proceedings Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[32] B. Salzman, L. Lowell and D. Kuehn, “Guest workers in the high skill U.S. Labour Market: An analysis of supply, employment and wage trends,” Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper, April, 24, 2013.[33] G. P. Zachary, “Jobless Innovation?” IEEE Spectrum, April, 2011.[34] J. Perkins, Professor John Perkins’ Review of Engineering Skills. London, UK: Department of Business Innovation and Skills

Conference Session

LEAD Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Nagel, James Madison University; Kyle Gipson, James Madison University; Matthew Caulfield, James Madison University

(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02579-x. [6] Oglensky, B. (2008). The Ambivalent Dynamics of Loyalty in Mentorship. Retrieved from SAGE Open Journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018726708089000. [7] Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: a qualitative study. Nurse education today, 34(5), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.020. [8] Lunenburg, F. (2010) From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces. Formal Communication Channels: Upward, Downward, Horizontal, and External. Retrieved from Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools: http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg%2C%20Fre d%20C%2C

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: New and Innovative Technologies in Aerospace

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luke Giunta, Saint Louis University; Henry Wright, Saint Louis University; Siddharth Chandra Shekar, Saint Louis University; Srikanth Gururajan, Saint Louis University

test subjects werequizzed with a questionnaire containing basic questions that define the concepts applied in thevirtual world. The tests were administered by graduate students and included the followingquestions: 1. Please write X, Y, or Z for the following questions: i. The roll angle is defined as the angle around the aircraft’s _______ axis. ii. The pitch angle is defined as the angle around the aircraft’s _______ axis. iii. The yaw angle is defined as the angle around the aircraft’s _______ axis. 2. The stability axis of the aircraft is defined as the projection of the velocity vector into what plane? a. The aircraft’s XY-plane. b. The aircraft’s YZ

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University

Conference (PVSC), 2019.[4] R. C. Brownson, A. A. Eyler, J. K. Harris, J. B. Moore, and R. G. Tabak, “Getting the word out: New approaches for disseminating public health science,” J. Public Health Manag. Pract., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 102–111, 2018.[5] K. Weaver and J. Spiers, “Uplifting voices and images of research participants: Issues in video dissemination,” Nurs. Health (Alhambra), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018.[6] “Sample Dissemination Plan,” Nsf.gov. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/attachments/108143/public/IM_BI_Handouts.pdf. [Accessed: 01-Feb-2022].[7] “Research in the formation of engineers (RFE),” Beta site for NSF - National Science Foundation. [Online]. Available: https

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Knox, State University of New York at Binghamton; Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington; Jungsun Kim, Indiana University-Bloomington; Jing Yang; Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton; Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington; Sawsan Werfelli, State University of New York at Binghamton

. Science Education, 100(1), 153-178.[7] Lee, J., & Shute, V. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 185 –202.[8] Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067-1088.[9] Blanchard, M., Gutierrez, K., Habig, B., Gupta, P., & Adams, J. (2020). Informal STEM program learning. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 138-151). Routledge.[10] Young, J., Young, J., & Witherspoon, T. (2019). Informing informal STEM learning: implications

Conference Session

ERM: Let's Talk about Tests! (Tests Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Mia Minnes, University of California, San Diego; Alex Phan, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego

could use the recording for grading purposes. Video recordings could only be usedfor research if the student actively opted in.The results presented in this paper include a controlled trial in one of the classes. This controlledtrial is described in more depth in the Results Section A and included analysis of performance ona written midterm after some of the students had taken an oral exam and others had not. Anotherportion of this study includes an analysis of the survey data collected from all 6 classes with afocus on self reported student motivation for learning. This portion is described in more depth inthe Results Section B. The results from Section A are used to direct some of the questionsaddressed in Section B.This project is in the

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University; Andrew Bard, Northeastern University; Andrew Sozio, Northeastern University; Samuel Haggans, Northeastern University; Nicholas Tarallo, Northeastern University; Timothy Bennett, Northeastern University

] “Hydropower explained: Hydropower and the Environment.” U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/hydropower/hydropower-and- the-environment.php (accessed Dec. 9, 2021) [5] A. Nazarli. “If You Can Make Energy from Wind, Why Not from Rain?” The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/if-you-can-make-energy-from- wind-why-not-from-rain-1.3530666 (accessed Oct. 8, 2021) [6] B. Brownell. “Pluvia Generates Energy from Rainwater.” The Journal of the American Institute of Architects. https://www.architectmagazine.com/technology/pluvia- generates-energy-from-rainwater_o. (accessed Oct. 8, 2021) [7] A. Levitan. “Rainwater Microturbines Purify Water, Make Some

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Virginia Davis, Auburn University; Joni Lakin, The University of Alabama; Daniela Marghitu, Auburn University; Edward Davis, Auburn University

and staff involved in making this effort possible.References:[1] A. B. Diekman and M. Steinberg, "Navigating social roles in pursuit of important goals: A communal goal congruity account of STEM pursuits," Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 487-501, 2013.[2] A. B. Diekman, M. Steinberg, E. R. Brown, A. L. Belanger, and E. K. Clark, "A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps," Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 142-175, 2017.[3] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, "Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University; Adam Carberry, Arizona State University; Kaela Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott; Sanjeev Kavale, Arizona State University; Caroline Bolton, Bucknell University; Caitlyn Aaron; Madeline Roth, Bucknell University

Adult Skill Acquisition,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 177-181, 2004.[11] R. R. Hoffman, "How Can Expertise Be Defined? Implications of Research from Cognitive Psychology," Exploring Expertise, pp. 81-100, New York: Macmillan, 1998.[12] P. Benner, “From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice.,” AJN The American Journal of Nursing, pp. 84(12), 1480, 1984.[13] L. A. Burke, and M. M. MIller, “Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making,” Academy of Management Perspectives, pp. 13(4), 91-99, 1999.[14] C. Aaron, E. Miskioglu, K. M. Martin, B. Shannon, and A. Carberry, "Nurses, Managers, and Engineers–Oh My! Disciplinary Perceptions of

Conference Session

Utilizing Technology to Train Chemical Engineering Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Liberatore, The University of Toledo; Uchenna Asogwa, The University of Toledo

Paper ID #37018Videos for Project Dissemination: Adopting Student-WrittenYouTube Problems in any CourseMatthew Liberatore Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. From 2005 to 2015, he served on the faculty at the Colorado School of Mines. In 2018, he served as an Erskine Fellow at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. His research involves the rheology of complex fluids

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Technical Session 6: Diversity

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Lester, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Kelly Durkin Ruth

survey of minority and non-minority librarians,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 47–53, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.008.[46] J. B. Reed and A. J. Carroll, “Roles for health sciences librarians at college and university libraries,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 94, Art. no. 94, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.29173/istl42.[47] S. C. Stapleton et al., “Girls tech camp: Librarians inspire adolescents to consider STEM careers,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 92, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.29173/istl22.[48] Y. Chen and C. Brown, “Ensuring Chinese engineering graduate students’ academic success: a study at the University of Oklahoma,” Science

Conference Session

ERM: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Morgan Fong; Hongxuan Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Geoffrey Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Liia Butler, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

recorder.Figure 1: Common participation trends where a) one member does not seem to be participatingas much as the other two and b) where all members seem to be participating equally. Gray ticks indicate at least one code applied to a member during a 30-second increment. Purple dots indicate presence of a role-aligned code (see Table 1).Moments of Team-BondingConversations not explicitly about the assignment’s content were coded as “casual.” Weobserved that the “casual” code usually happened as the group submitted answers to theautograder and at the end of class. These times provided moments for team-bonding. Figure 2shows a group that exhibited this behavior. For example, after their first attempt was correct, therecorder said

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Abdul Syed, University of Massachusetts Lowell

sets on L, C as given in [5] defines the Lsection configuration. Two matching configurations are representative of the block diagram in Fig. 13, asgiven in reference [5] as depicted in Fig. 14. (a) (b) Fig. 14 Matching configurations for complex source and complex load impedances in Fig. 13 (a). First L-network, and (b). Second L-network [5], [8]A. ISMN DESIGN CALCULATIONS From Load-Pull performance characteristics of transistors T1 and T2, as listed in references [6]-[7], For NPT Transistor (T1): First stage design [6]-[7].Large signal source and load impedances are respectively ( ) and ( ) For TGF Transistor

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Okere, University of Cincinnati

provided by the students. The commentsare broken into two groups.The first group of comments focuses on the quality of the lightboard system. All the commentsfrom the students were constructive and a good number of them pointed out that the glassboardwas hard to read sometimes because of: a. light glare and reflection of light on the glassboard covers what is written or drawing on the board, b. the color of the notes would blend too much with the light on the board. c. notes are tiny to read, sometimes when the board gets crowded after going over multiple topics it gets hard to read. Writing slightly larger would help. d. the monitor screen area of the lightboard video is not large enough. If you could, make the light board

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 5: Strategies for Increasing Classroom Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Walz, Madison Area Technical College; Michael Arquin; Joel Shoemaker, Madison Area Technical College; Scott Liddicoat; Gabrielle Temple; Kathleen Alfano, College of the Canyons

worked as a visiting scientist with the University of Rochester Center for Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Dr. Walz is the Director and Principal Investigator for the CREATE Energy Center funded by the National Science Foundation to advance academic programs and provide faculty professional development in energy technology. He is a recipient of the Association of Community College Trustees Faculty Member Award, has been recognized as Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education, as Energy Educator of the Year by the Wisconsin Association for Environmental Education, and as Clean Energy Educator of the Year by RENEW Wisconsin.Michael ArquinJoel B Shoemaker

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miriam Howland Cummings, University of Colorado Denver; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Stephanie Ivey, The University of Memphis; Craig Stewart; David Russomanno, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Danny King, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; James Campbell, The University of Memphis; Tom Altman; Michael Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver; Gregory Simon, University of Colorado Denver

average whencompared with all students. Figure 1 shows the grade distribution for Calculus I in Fall 2019,comparing Scholars with the entire population of students who took Calculus I that semester. Inthat semester, Calculus I had a DFW rate of 27.63%, but no Scholars received grades of D, F, orW in that semester. Performance data for Calculus I is summarized in Table 1.Figure 1. Calculus I Grade Distribution Calculus I Grade Distribution (with 95% Confidence Intervals) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% A B C D, F, W A B C D, F, W Fall 2019 Fall

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Ellis; Ryan Gniadek, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Godmar Back, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kirk Cameron, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

, 2018.[7] J. Smeds, K. Nybom, and I. Porres, “DevOps: A definition and perceived adoption impediments,”Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pp. 166–177, 2015.[8] S. A. I. B. S. Arachchi and I. Perera, “Continuous integration and continuous delivery pipelineautomation for Agile Software Project Management,” 2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference(MERCon), 2018.[9] B. P. Eddy, N. Wilde, N. A. Cooper, B. Mishra, V. S. Gamboa, K. M. Shah, A. M. Deleon, and N. A.Shields, “A pilot study on introducing continuous integration and delivery into Undergraduate SoftwareEngineering Courses,” 2017 IEEE 30th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training(CSEE&T), 2017.[10] Z. Chen, “Applying scrum to manage a senior Capstone

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 3: Measuring Engineering Management

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzanna Long, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Kellie Grasman, University of Michigan; David Spurlock, Missouri University of Science and Technology

% A, 149, 71% A B C D FFigure 3: Final Grade Distribution, Hybrid Course TRADITIONAL COURSE SECTIONS FINAL GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS (GPA = 3.17) D, 1, 1% F, 1, 1% C, 11, 12% A, 32, 34% B, 49, 52% A B C D FFigure 4: Final Grade Distribution, Traditional CourseFigure 5 shows the resulting final grade distribution for the TC sections using the HC gradeelement weighting scheme. Although not an exact match to the actual HC sections final gradedistribution, the recomputed distribution is much closer and clearly demonstrates the impact

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Machine Learning, IoT, Writing Center Peer Tutors, Conceptual Modeling

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University

University, Mankato. After receiving his Ph.D. from University of Minnesota in 2017, he works for the Iron Range Engineering, a project-based learning program. His teaching interests are in areas of materials science, structural analysis, finite element modeling and dynamic systems. His technical research focuses on multiscale modeling on mechanical behavior of nano and granular materials.Lauren Singelmann Lauren Singelmann earned her Ph.D. from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education in 2022. She is a faculty member for Iron Range Engineering through Minnesota State University, Mankato, and she supports instruction of Innovation-Based Learning courses at multiple institutions

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhou Zhang, New York City College of Technology; Yizhe Chang; Sven Esche, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology

devices, desktops, laptops, tablets, and other consoles.The layer will identify, manage and control the IoT devices by interfacing the terminal apparatus.The IoT framework in a senior-level robotics class is shown in Figure 1 (b). The class name is"Robotic Systems Design and Applications" in the department of "Mechanical EngineeringTechnology" at "CUNY New York City College of Technology". This is one of the project-based 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, Conference: June 26 – 29, 2020 Zhang, Z., Chang, Y., Esche, S. K, Zhang, A.,courses for B.Tech program [13]. In this class, the students are required to use vision

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophia Santillan, Duke University; Lupita TeMiquel-McMillian, Duke University; Jennifer Ganley; Stacy Tantum, Duke University

, especially when considering the manner in which the 360 Coach is involvedin their advisees’ first-year design course experience.References[1] K. Bartimote-Aufflick, A. Bridgeman, R. Walker, M. Sharma, and L. Smith, “The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1918-1942, 2016.[2] M. M. Chemers, L. Hu, and B. F. Garcia, “Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 55-64, 2001.[3] R. T. Freeman, K. Gentry, and J. E. Goldberg, “Changing the Advising Model,” in ASEE 123rd Annual Conference and Exposition. New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016.[4] C. L. Smith and J

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia Pickering, Arizona State University; Laurie MiLler McNeill, Westchester Community College; Mara Lopez, Arizona State University; Juan Rodriguez, Westchester Community College; Sarah Belknap, Westchester Community College; Elaine Craft, Florence-Darlington Technical College; Caroline Vaningen-Dunn

PI Conference,HI-TEC and other conference forums.The PI and Co-PI, assisted by their Deans and the Associate Dean/Professional Development, arerecruiting faculty through department and faculty meetings, professional development forums,and web-based communications. A total of 20 faculty (including the PI and Co-PI and 3 adjunctfaculty) in three Cohorts from applied engineering, math, and computing over the three years arebeing recruited as follows: Cohort A (eight members began in Y1), Cohort B (begins Y2), andCohort C (begins Y3). Four participants from each of Cohorts A and B along with the PI andCo-PI (10 total) will advance to Tier 2 in Y2 and Y3; and three from Cohort A (along with the PIand Co-PI, a minimum of 4 total) will advance to

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Technical Session 7: Cybersecurity and Computing

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming; Andrea Burrows, University of Wyoming; Andey Robins, University of Wyoming

underlying concepts inSTEM and CS. Below, the standards and specific learning outcomes are listed: 1. Fostering an Inclusive Computing Culture (a) Include unique perspectives of others and reflect on one’s own perspectives when designing and developing computational products (b) Address the needs of diverse end users during the design and process to produce artifacts with broad accessibility and usability (c) Employ self- and peer-advocacy to address bias in interactions, product design, and development 2. Collaborating Around Computing (a) Cultivate working relationships with individuals possessing diverse perspectives, skills, and personalities (b) Create team norms, expectations

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Technical Session 2: Instruction

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean Bossart, University of Florida; Sara Gonzalez

, vol. 72, no. Spring, pp. 1-13,2013.[6] A. Chen, "3-D printers spread from engineering departments to designs acrossdisciplines," Chronicle of Higher Education, September 17, 2012.http://chronicle.com/article/3-D-Printers-Arent-Just-for/134440/[7] S. R. Gonzalez and D. B. Bennett, "Planning and implementing a 3D printing servicein an academic library," Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, vol. 78, pp. 1-14, 2014.[8] S. Pryor, "Implementing a 3D printing service in an academic library," Journal ofLibrary Administration, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2014,doi:10.1080/01930826.2014.893110.[9] D. Ketchum, "Makerspaces in Libraries," Journal of Academic Services, 2016,doi:10.1080/15367967.2016.1208017.[10] G. Nowlan, "Developing and

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Innovating New Ways to Teach

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth; Scott Hamilton, York College of Pennsylvania; Camilla Saviz, University of the Pacific; Tanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University

shown in Figure 5.The frequency of use of different teaching techniques was compared by class level, class size,and by years of teaching experience as shown in Figures 8, 9, and 10, respectively. Datahighlight the techniques that were used “every class” or “often” by at least 70% of respondents inany category. The total number of responses shown on the three graphs are not the same becausesome respondents left some questions blank.Figure 7. Learning styles most closely identified as aligning with a) step-by-step instructions and b) open ended problems. (N = 26 for both charts)As shown in Figure 8, 421 respondents indicated the class level (introductory, mid-level, upper-level, and graduate) for which they provided data

Conference Session

LEES Session 8: Care and Commitments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Kuryloski, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Amy Baird, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

material; 2) Discuss how weimplemented a socially just community engagement project via Partner Meetings andassignments; 3) Reflect on the project’s challenges and successes; and 4) Offer advice andstrategies for implementing similar projectsThe Proposal Assignment and Context SettingThe Collaborative Proposal Report: Assignment GuidelinesStudents’ first introduction to the proposal project comes in the form of the assignmentguidelines (which can be found in Appendix B). The proposed project needs to contribute to theHRCO’s work toward one of the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals in a practical andmeaningful way. While there are 17 SDGs in total, a smaller subset is relevant to the localTanzanian community. These include: SDG #4: Quality

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Innovative Changes to the Typical Civil Engineering Coursework.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Besser, University of St. Thomas; Anna Roiger, University of St. Thomas; Nick Pawlak; Emma Sullivan, University of St. Thomas

%, of first year introductory engineering design class, IntEngDes  9 of 21, 43% of first year survey class, Survey A  10 of 14, 71% of a separate first year survey class, Survey B  20 of 35, 57% of a third-year construction and engineering economy class, ConEngEcon  Total participation in research = 52 of 92 students, 57%Snapshots of student basic learning needs, motivation responses, and reflections every two weeksyielded a chronological understanding of how student motivation evolved throughout thesemester.Visualizing Situational Motivation and Basic Learning Needs through the semesterSeveral trends are of interest including course comparisons across the semester, individualcourse data changes across the semester and