pressabout Tesla. These are not just technical issues, but ethical violations have been reported as well.A simple Google search can help one find these news items. Students were asked to researchsome of these articles and analyze Tesla’s vehicle electrification effort through the Design Justicelens using answers to the following questions as guides: Who do you think created the originaldesign? Who benefitted/benefits from it? Who were/would be harmed from it? What designjustice principles are being violated, if any?Upon completion of the above tasks, all students were asked to reflect on what they learned byanswering the questions: a. What are some things you learned about Design Justice? b. Name at least three new things you
. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, How LearningWorks: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. Jossey-Bass, 2010.[4] J. P. Dorman, “Using student perceptions to compare actual and preferred classroomenvironment in Queensland schools,” Educational Studies, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp. 299-308,2008.[5] B. J. Fraser, G. J. Anderson, and H. J. Walberg, “Assessment of Learning Environments:Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) And My Class Inventory (MCI),” ThirdVersion, ED 223 649, TM 820 731, ERIC, February 1982.[6] C. Stasz and Others, “Classrooms that Work: Teaching Generic Skills in Academic andVocational Settings,” National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley, CA, andRand
experience. These evaluations tend toinclude both numerical (Likert scale) and open-ended written feedback, although thoroughanalyses of written feedback are rare due to the lack of methods to rigorously analyze the largeamount of content with a teaching-specific lens. In this paper, we create a comprehensive lexiconto measure eight teaching qualities from the written feedback using a combination of naturallanguage processing (NLP) and manual filtering. We refer to this lexicon as “Lexicon forEvaluation of Education Quality” (LEEQ). We then validate LEEQ by analyzing how thefrequency of words in each dimension is correlated with (a) numerical ratings and (b) otherdimensions. Finally, we compare it with other sentiment analysis tools that are less
group and project-based activities at university," in "Research project into the international student experience in the UK (2018-19)," UK Council for International Student Affairs (UKCISA), 2020. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ukcisa.org.uk/Research--Policy/Resource-bank/resources/197/International- students-working-in-group-and-project-based-activities-at-university[9] M. B. Marks and A. H. O’Connor, "Understanding Students’ Attitudes About Group Work: What Does This Suggest for Instructors of Business?," Journal of Education for Business, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 147-158, 2013, doi: 10.1080/08832323.2012.664579.[10] V. Rousseau, C. Aubé, and A. Savoie, "Teamwork Behaviors: A
role of hip-hop celebrities in constructing racial identity on Black Twitter," Information, Communication & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 352-368, 2019.[3] M. Randle and S. Dolnicar, "Does Cultural Background Affect Volunteering Behavior?," Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 225-247, 2009.[4] S. A. Amponsah‐Afuwape, L. B. Myers and S. P. Newman, "Cognitive predictors of ethnic minorities' blood donation intention," Psychology, Health & Medicine, pp. 357-361, 2002.[5] J. A. Youngman and C. Egelhoff, "Best practices in recruiting and persistence of underrepresented minorities in engineering: a 2002 snapshot.," 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, pp. F2D-11, 2003.[6] E. R
andApplying Knowledge to Contemporary Global Context. Refer to Figure 2(b) for details. (a) (b) Figure 2: Bar graph for item frequency by relevance for each item (a) pre-test and (b) post-test.Activities that triggered the relevance of an item were class activities, course content, desire toimprove their professional skills, immigration, curiosity, global challenges, feelings ofinadequacy, real word engineering activity, international academic experience, moving to a newcity, religious engagement, job hunt, socialization, and volunteering opportunities. Finally, goalsset by students include volunteering, learning about global systems that contribute to a
summer camp characteristics (modality, duration,and measured impacts) from 1998 – 2017.Research MethodologyThe research team used three stages of research for this study: sample selection, parameterdevelopment, and descriptive statistical analysis. The team selected a sample of articles foranalysis, guided by predetermined factors, including: a) publishing dates between 1998 – 2017;b) publication in ASEE as it is one of the most prominent education avenues. From a pool of 729identified articles, the research team randomly selected 24 articles relevant to 38 summer campsconducted within the US.In the second stage, the researchers developed a comprehensive list of twelve parameters,including "population, race, gender, age, targeted population
model and its guiding propositions.We developed 11 propositions grouped into five categories, which informed our development ofa conceptual model of student navigation of the engineering learning environment. Thepropositions work together to contextualize student navigation. For example, one of thepropositions is Student decisions are mediated by characteristics they have upon entering thelearning environment, such as (a) their demographic identities and the visibility of thoseidentities; (b) their familial and social networks; (c) their psychological characteristics; (d) theirstudent status classification (e.g., transfer student); (e) their past experiences; and (f) their goalsand desires. This proposition aligns with a specific element of the
future, the project team plans to conductexperiments with other variations of photoperiod. General observation of the trial indicated thatthe longer photoperiod helped the peanut plants to grow more vigorously with the increasedphotoperiod. The seed inoculation was randomized for each zone in Figures 3a and 3b, locationsdesignated as A indicates inoculated seeds, and B indicate non-inoculated seeds. For both trials,gypsum was added to the soil after the flowering of the plants. The peanuts were hand harvestedroughly five and a half months after planting for both FarmBot beds (April/May –September/October timeframe). The harvest from each plant was counted and weighed.4.0 Harvest Data AnalysisIrrigation was discontinued two weeks before the
Paper ID #37687Engineering Management Student Study-Abroad Opportunities: DesignConsiderations for EM Programs and Faculty MentorsCol. James Henry Schreiner, United States Military Academy COL Jim Schreiner has served in various command and staff positions as a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Officer for 27 years and he currently serves as an Associate Professor and Director of the Engineering Management program at the United States Military Academy. He holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Marquette University, a ME in Engineering Management from University of Colorado Boulder, and a PhD in Systems and Enterprise Engineering
. 15, 2022.[7] N. Shevchenko, “Research of Features of Educational-and-Professional Mindset in the Structure ofProfessional Consciousness of Students,” Psychological Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 17-25, 2021.[8] FrameWorks Institute, “Measuring Mindset Shifts and Evaluating Mindset Shift Efforts,”Washington, DC, 2020.[9] A. Lisberg and B. Woods, “Mentorship, Mindset and Learning Strategies: An Integrative Approach toincreasing Underrepresented Minority Student Retention in a STEM Undergraduate Program,” Journal ofSTEM Education, vol. 19, no. 3, 2018.[10] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, 2nd ed.Pearson Education, 2015.[11] Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education Campus Field
/sparkvue[12] Wavefront Labs, Accelerometer Date Pro, Accessed Jan 25, 2023. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/accelerometer/id499629589[13] RWTH Aachen University, phyphox – Physical Phone Experiments, Accessed Jan 25, 2023. https://phyphox.org/[14] A. Savitzky, and M. J. E. Golay, Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures, Analytical Chemistry 36, No. 8, 1627–1639 (1964)[15] G. Bischof, E. Bratschitsch, and M. Mandl, On-Road Aerodynamic Drag Analysis by Simultaneous Linear Inversion of the Equation of Motion, SAE Technical Paper 2005-01- 1456, (2005)[16] R. M. Harris, and B. Clayton, The current emphasis on learning outcomes, International Journal of Training Research
offirst-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors,” Journal of Research inScience Teaching, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 368–383, 2015.[2] “Home,” ABET. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/about-abet/diversity-equity-and-inclusion/. [Accessed: 28-Feb-2023].[3] M. J. Chang, J. Sharkness, S. Hurtado, and C. B. Newman, “What matters in college forretaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups,” Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 555–580, 2014.[4] Pages, A. W. (2022, August 11). Academic web pages. banner. Retrieved May 1, 2023, fromhttps://immigrationinitiative.harvard.edu/topic/first-and-second-generation/[5] Yosso, T. J. (2016). Whose culture has capital? Critical Race Theory in
welded with an overlapping cross section of35.8 by 26.3 mm as seen in Fig. 1. The welder that was used was a model 1-24-20 ACMERocker Arm Resistance Spot Welder, which can be seen in Fig. 2a, and the specifications andinformation can be seen in Fig. 2b. The welding controller was an Enron EN1000-B and was seton schedule No. 12, as seen in Fig. 3. All the welding was done with a clamping force of 2kN,with a current of 12kA, for 1.5 seconds. This type of welder, or one of similar specifications, canbe found in most educational manufacturing laboratories, and the operation of the machine isvery beginner friendly, so instructors can even guide students to operate the welder themselves.Once the machine was set up and ready for use, the Al and Fe were
time spent interacting with the presenters at around 86% byeducators from a diverse rank level (from student to post-doctoral fellow and professor).Moreover, the engagement with the content continued beyond the duration of the synchronousevent, as indicated by the number of times the Share and Learn webpage [22] was visited andhow these number of visits grew over time.a)b) Figure 1: Why we do what we do: a) quantitative results from the Share and Learn analysis and the impact form the educator community to the educator community, b) map depicting the location of the participants who attended the Share and Learn events who resided in the US.The participants were from 55 unique institutes, with most participation from the universities
opportunity to explain their solutions (also referred toas video logs or vlogs for students who add visual components to their podcasts). The podcastassignments aim to: (a) motivate students to submit answers in an enjoyable way, (b) increase timeand effort that the students are encouraged to devote to a project, and (c) improve course outcomes.Background and OverviewThe students in the “Signals and Systems” base course (ECE2714) are enrolled in theundergraduate engineering program in the Bradley Department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering at Virginia Tech [1]. Emphasis was placed on analytical solutions to differential anddifference equations as well as facility in solving problems in both the time and frequency domains.Prior knowledge includes
quizzes (Matthews et al. 2014). Similarly, Javorcik and Polasek (2019a)created a microlearning course from an existing e-learning course and compared the studentlearning outcomes. They found that the students in microlearning courses achieved course learningoutcomes more easily and accessed the course twice the number of e-learning courses. As a follow-up study, the same authors presented two models - Model A and Model B to transform eLearningcourses into microlearning courses in Moodle LMS (Learning Management System), and basedon the pilot study results, they found model B with fewer thematic units is appropriate for first-year university students (Javorick & Polasek, 2019b). Likewise, Skala and Drilk focused on thedidactical design of
MATLAB: (i) code core concepts. (ii) Matrices (5 hours) 2, Matrix Algebra Project 2: Encrypting and Decoding 3, Inverses 1, 2 by 2 & 3 by 3 determinant, cofactor expansion MATLAB: (i)code core concepts. (ii) Determinant (4 2, Properties of the determinant, eg, Project 3: LU Facorizationa and Steady hours) det(AB)=det(A) det(B) State Heat Flow Problem 3, Introduction of Cramer's Rule 1, Subspaces of R^n, 2, Basis and dimension
and Instrument for Assessment and Improvement,” NATO Research and Technology Organization, 2005.[12] B. Franz, K. R. Molenaar, and B. A. Roberts, “Revisiting Project Delivery System Performance from 1998 to 2018,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(9), 04020100, 2020.[13] S. E. Humphrey and F. Aime, “Team Microdynamics: Toward an Organizing Approach to Teamwork,”. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503, 2014.[14] J. E. Mathieu, J. R. Hollenbeck, D. V. Knippenberg, and D. R. Ilgen, “A Century of Work Teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 102:452– 67, 2017.[15] S. E. Seibert, G. Wang, and S. H. Courtright, “Antecedents and Consequences of
female minority STEM students differ from male minority STEM students in terms of a)completing the bachelor STEM degree program within four years at City Tech, b) continuingenrollment in the bachelor STEM degree program at City Tech past the four year timeframe and,c) dropping or stop attending from bachelor STEM degree programs at City Tech beforecompleting the degree?RQ2: Do female and male minority STEM students differ from female and male non-minoritySTEM students in terms of a) completing the bachelor STEM degree program within four yearsat City Tech, b) continuing enrollment in the bachelor STEM degree program at City Tech pastthe four year timeframe and, c) dropping or stop attending from bachelor STEM degreeprograms at City Tech before
Content Access, Jul. 2021.[9] C. L. Colbeck, S. E. Campbell, and S. A. Bjorklund, “Grouping in the Dark: What College Students Learn from Group Projects,” J. High. Educ., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 60–83, 2000[10] L. C. Schmidt, “Engineering Teams: Individual or Group Sport?”.[11] M. B. Nakhleh, “Chemical Education Research in the Laboratory Environment: How Can Research Uncover What Students Are Learning?,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 71, no. 3, p. 201, Mar. 1994[12] A. Hofstein and V. N. Lunetta, “The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century,” Sci. Educ., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 28–54, 2004[13] L. B. Buck, S. L. Bretz, and M. H. Towns, “Characterizing the Level of Inquiry in the Undergraduate
., Nielson, S., D’Alessio, J., Ray, S., Street, S., and Zhou, C.Q., 2020, “On the Impacts of PreHeated Natural Gas Injection in Blast Furnaces,” Process, 8(7), 771 (20 pages). DOI: 10.3390/pr8070771[22] Nielson, S., Okosun, T., Damstedt, B., Jampani, M., Zhou, C. Q., 2021, “Tuyere-Level Syngas Injection in the Blast Furnace: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation” Processes 2021, 9(8), (16 pages). doi:10.3390/pr9081447.[23] Martinez Zambrano, F., Worl, B., Li, X., Silaen, A.K., Walla, N.J., Johnson, K., Fabina, L., and Zhou, C.Q., 2020, “Reduction of Fuel Utilization Through Oxygen-Enriched Combustion in a Reheat Furnace PusherType” Proceedings of ASME 2020 Summer Heat Transfer Conference (7 pages).[24] Liu
engineering is the ability to meet basic needs while not compromisingthe needs of future generations, in a way that incorporates social, economic, andenvironmental perspectives (Mihelcic et al. 2006). If this perspective of “sustainability asa luxury or privilege” is in any way widespread among students at any level, there maybe a need to adjust the approaches used to teach sustainability at the K-12 and universitylevels.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1827251.REFERENCESBell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science
Institute of Technology Edward J. Coyle is the John B. Peatman Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Tech and a Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar. He is the Director of both the VIP Program at GT and the VIP Consortium. Dr. Coyle was aKartik Saigal ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 How “Multidisciplinary” is it? Measuring the Multidisciplinarity of Student TeamsAbstractThe National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine recommend that interdisciplinaryeducation be evaluated against relevant criteria such as the number of students from the generalpopulation (i.e., from outside the instructor’s
[1]. Keysizes should be based on what is commercially available; three suppliers are considered here.McMaster-Carr keystock [2], Huyett [3], and Daemar [4] all offer keystock that correspond toB B W Y r H/2 D S Figure 1: Schematic of keyseat dimensions, redrawn from part of [1].A A
Paper ID #39024Approaches to Evidencing Intra-Team Equity in Student CollaborativeDesign Decision-Making InteractionsDr. Andrew David Moffat, University of Michigan Andrew Moffat is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Michigan, working with the Engi- neering Education Research Unit and Center for Academic Innovation on an NSF-funded project to assess the effectiveness of Tandem, an in-house software platform designed to support and nurture teamwork skills in undergraduate engineering students. Andrew has a background in education research and evalua- tion, having previously worked on a project at the
aregenerally defined as a group of faculty and staff who regularly collaborate in discussions,seminars, and activities to pursue shared goals (Hillard, 2012). This PLC’s shared goal will be touse the findings from this study to actively work toward addressing the obstacles within theMCC-UMKC engineering transfer pathway.The work reported in this paper was supported by two grants from the National ScienceFoundation, DUE-1930402 and DUE-2138074. The views in this paper are those of the authorsand do not necessarily represent the views of the supporting funding agency.ReferencesBlack, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (2002). Leading strategic change: Breaking through the brain barrier. Pearson Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Eddy, P. L. (2010
Group Reports, 2015, pp. 41–63. doi: 10.1145/2858796.2858798.[20] J. Spacco et al., “Analyzing Student Work Patterns Using Programming Exercise Data,” in Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2015, pp. 18–23. doi: 10.1145/2676723.2677297.[21] J. F. Pane and B. A. Myers, “Usability Issues in the Design of Novice Programming Systems,” Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Technical Report CMU-CS-96-132, Pittsburgh, PA., 1996.[22] J. F. Pane, “Designing a Programming System for Children with a Focus on Usability,” in CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998, pp. 62–63. doi: 10.1145/286498.286530.[23] E. Lahtinen, K
in the challenge are available to your audience, so that they might repeat the challenge in their classes. References[1] L. W. Anderson, & Krathwohl, D. R.. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: Arevision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman, 2001.[2] H. Borko, J.Jacobs, & K. Koellner. Contemporary approaches to teacher professionaldevelopment. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Volume 7 International encyclopediaof Education. Oxford, England: Elsevier., 2010, pp. 548-556.[3] L. Darling-Hammond, R.C. Wei, A. Andree, N. Richardson, & S. Orphanos.Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National
granted him access to a guaranteed transfer pathway at a highlyselective engineering university. While at Wright College, he was hired by the EngineeringProgram as a tutor for the Contextualized Bridge, and throughout the academic year. He alsoserved as an elected officer in Wright’s student chapter of the Society of Hispanic ProfessionalEngineers (SHPE). Within two (2) years, he completed an associate degree in engineering,transferred, and is on track to graduate. Without the Contextualized Bridge, student B would notbe currently completing his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from one of the topengineering schools in the country.Self-Efficacy as Contributing Factor to RetentionMost students attribute their success to the structure of