emotionalintelligence, have been utilized to influence the development of a leadership initiative toempower faculty to enact positive change. To address identified leadership gaps, the ADVANCEFaculty Leadership Initiative was established to empower faculty to enact positive change.Program goals include defining campus leadership roles, building essential skills, leveragingindividual strengths, navigating implementation challenges, and fostering communityengagement through action-learning projects. The inaugural cohort consists of 21 faculty from 10departments and seven academic ranks (Full Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor,Professor of Practice, Instructor, Senior Lecturer, and Research Scientist). The group includeseight gender minorities
Paper ID #45250Work-in-Progress: Development of an HBCU/Research 1 Collaborative toIncrease African American Semiconductor Manufacturing ResearchersDr. Laura Sams Haynes, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Laura Sams Haynes is faculty and Director of the Office of Outreach in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. Laura is passionate about developing and launching various outreach initiatives for K12 Atlanta Public Schools (APS) partners, including students and school counselors, as well as fostering HBCU partnerships, collaborations, and pathways, often with a focus on NSF
proceedings were extracted and analyzed for this purpose.These proceedings constitute a significant portion of current scholarly research in engineeringeducation and offer a robust foundation for examining trends in language use over this three-yearperiod. To identify biased language, we utilized a keyword-based model, drawing keywords fromthe language guidelines of the APA 7th edition, which emphasize the importance of inclusiveand bias-free language. We identified 85 keywords that could potentially induce bias,categorizing them by subject area in engineering education, as detailed in Table 1. This approachled to the initial identification of 5,134 potential instances of language bias. A subsequentmanual review was then conducted to exclude
research success. In the summer of 2023, this collaborative vision came to fruition with the launch of a jointresearch program. The inaugural ECHS cohort, consisting of four high school students, took partin a five-week research program alongside the GCSP-REU scholars. This initiative aimed toprepare these high school students for undergraduate engineering studies, while fosteringinterdisciplinary and inter-institutional collaboration. The program’s initial success was evidentin its ability to challenge stereotypes and facilitate meaningful interactions between high schoolstudents and undergraduate scholars. Feedback from the first cohort in 2023 prompted improvements for future iterations of theprogram. Program leaders applied the engineering
anopportunity for those on the ground to infuse their ideas and inform leadership on the issues. TheGrainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign has recognizedthe importance of having both approaches working together and has invested in a program thatempowers individuals within the engineering community to significantly contribute to inclusion,diversity, equity, and access (IDEA). The Grassroots Initiatives to Address Needs Together(GIANT) program awards seed funding of up to $13,000 to teams led by students, postdocs,staff, and faculty to propose and implement research-based initiatives that address issues inIDEA. Teams are expected to collaborate with a specific population (e.g., the general public, K-12 students of
undergraduate level or in earlier stages of higher education.Development of academic, social, and research self-efficacy within undergraduate students eachplay a key role en route to graduate school enrollment.MentoringGraduate degree attainment requires guidance which can be derived from an approachencompassing intervention and integrated support strategies led by experienced people.In Assessing the Effectiveness of the GradTrack Virtual Mentoring Program, Arinze et al.provide a survey-driven GradTrack program evaluation. The purpose of the paper is to provide aprogram evaluation of the current state of Purdue Engineering’s GradTrack program. While stillin the initial stages of development, Purdue Engineering’s GradTrack program has proven
thebroader institution.Women are still significantly underrepresented in engineering—making up only about15% of engineers in 2019. Many of us have encountered the ‘chilly climate’ ofengineering, where the culture often feels unwelcoming or even hostile. Althoughwe’ve seen initiatives to increase participation, research has yet to fully examine thedifference in women’s belonging within engineering compared to outside of it. Myresearch aims to address this gap and understand the factors that shape women’sbelonging in these different contexts.To analyze belonging, I relied on two frameworks. First, Bronfenbrenner’s EcologicalSystems Theory, which explores how we’re influenced by different layers of ourenvironment, from our immediate surroundings to
Paper ID #45139Using Strategic Planning Processes to Promote Success for UndergraduateCS Students at a Systemic LevelDr. Jamie Huber Ward, NCWIT Jamie Huber Ward is a social scientist and Associate Director of Higher Ed for NCWIT at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on organizational change in higher education; collaborative pedagogy; curriculum reform; post-secondary student experiences; and the experiences of faculty and staff in academic computing workplaces. Jamie’s work includes implementing and analyzing research projects designed to enhance all students’ success and sense of belonging post
Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case StudyIntroduction Integrating Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) into engineering education isincreasingly recognized as essential for fostering transformative change. By highlighting thesocial and political dimensions of engineering practice and design, DEIJ initiatives addresslongstanding challenges in the field. Scholars have recently prioritized embedding social issuesacross various curricular contexts [1] - [3], underpinned by research that demonstrates howinclusive curricula enhance students' comprehension of engineering problems by situating themwithin real-world contexts [4
field research, leading over 70 interviews and 18 focus groups across 7 disciplines. She has also delivered more than 46 unique asynchronous higher education courses across 8 disciplines—driving measurable outcomes in student success and institutional growth. Her research focuses on disrupting cycles of inequality, such as the school-to-prison pipeline and homelessness, through targeted research and actionable policy recommendations. With extensive experience in program management, she leverages data-driven strategies to improve stakeholder engagement and drive systemic change. Rebeca collaborates with educators, policymakers, and non-profits to amplify the impact of STEM education initiatives, fostering pathways
in Research and Development (R&D), alongside theSBA the National Science Foundation (NSF) initiated the Innovative PostdoctoralEntrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF) program. Designed to address theunderrepresented researchers in STEM fields, IPERF offers these fellows invaluable experiencewithin technology startups to bolster their professional development and give them valuable toolsin the entrepreneurship area, as well as for the authors to create new knowledge aboutpostdoctoral STEM entrepreneurship which might be reused at university levels in the future.The program aims to enrich diversity within the STEM high-tech startups and entrepreneurialspheres, thereby enhancing opportunities for marginalized groups. As
instructions for how students should respondwhen unsure of the survey prompt.Conclusion While the think-aloud interviews were initially intended to help us modify and finalize the survey for the larger study, the findings provided an avenue for students’ voices to be heard outside of numerical values and in the research and data collection protocol design. Through these interviews, students expressed their experiences, revealing the different forms of capital used throughout their undergraduate studies. The interviews also allowed for participants to contribute their feedback on the survey design that was part of the stages of survey development. By incorporating the QuantCrit emphasis on elevating marginalized voices within the research process, we
Brady STEM Academy (SEBA). SEBA is an educational intervention aimed at exposing underrepresented fourth and fifth-grade students and their families to hands-on STEM experiences. Henderson’s research interests are in engineering identity development among Black men and engineering student success. He was most recently recognized by INSIGHT Into Diversity Magazine as an Inspiring STEM Leader, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (LAS) Outstanding Young Alumni Award, and Career Communications Group with a Black Engineer of the Year Award for college-level promotion of engineering education.Cheery Chukwukelu, University of HoustonDr. David Horton Jr., University
interventions through iterative processes inreal-world settings [8]. DBR integrates the collaborative efforts of researchers and practitioners,allowing them to work together to address complex educational challenges and create practicalsolutions that can be directly applied in classroom or program settings.A key feature of DBR is its cyclical nature, where initial designs are tested, evaluated, andrevised based on empirical evidence. This approach allows for continuous improvement,ensuring that interventions are not only theoretically sound but also practically effective infostering student engagement and learning. By involving educators in the research process, DBRensures that the interventions are grounded in the realities of the classroom, making
education, capital, networks, and rolemodels/mentors. To address these challenges, we developed the STEM Racial Equity andEntrepreneurship (STEM-RAEE) program, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF),aimed at recruiting and supporting racially minoritized students, particularly Black/AfricanAmerican students, from Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). STEM-RAEEprovides a holistic support system, including workshops, mentorship opportunities, and businesscoaching, to empower racially minoritized students to pursue entrepreneurship and contribute to amore equitable STEM ecosystem. The survey conducted as part of this research initiative seeks tounderstand the unique barriers and motivations of Black/African American
differences observed suggest thatsuch programs might be differentially effective across genders, potentially requiring tailoredapproaches to maximize their impact. These findings are crucial for curriculum designers andeducators aiming to integrate intercultural competence into pre-college programs, therebypreparing students for the globalized workforce they will enter. This study highlights the needfor ongoing research into tailored intercultural training that addresses specific needs andchallenges encountered by different genders. The insights gained from both quantitative scoresand qualitative experiences provide an initial understanding of how cultural immersion impactsstudents, guiding future enhancements in study abroad initiatives.Keywords
]. Initial efforts produced adaptive technologies like screen readers and Brailledisplays/input devices, which allowed blind users to access digital content more effectively,helping bridge gaps with sighted peers, especially in computer science. Despite theseadvancements, challenges persist in areas heavily reliant on visual content, such as datavisualization and STEM applications [7, 8].The prevalence of visual disabilities highlights the ongoing need for accessible educationaltechnologies. In the United States, as of 2016, 7.7 million individuals aged 16 and older reportedvisual abilities, representing 2.4% of the population [9]. Researchers like Blaser and Ladnerhighlight the complexities of data collection and interpretation concerning
ask the PI to initiate engineering bridge program leader meetings to share ideasand foster potential collaboration. Although the survey was also distributed via professionalassociations like ASEE and NAMEPA, most current responses were from direct email invitationsand communications in the ASEE conference. This phenomenon aligned with findings fromliterature [40].The list of engineering bridge and success program includes programs from different institutionsizes and types such as public/private, doctoral research universities/liberal arts colleges/religionsaffiliated colleges, Predominantly White Institutions (PWI)/Minority Serving Institutions (MSI)from all 50 states with different funding sources such as federal, state, cooperation
categories that captured broader themes. Therelationships between the initial codes were examined to understand how different conceptswere interlinked. For example, codes related to recognizing personal biases were grouped, whilethose about actionable strategies against systemic racism were categorized separately. 3)Development of Final Themes. In the final phase, the categories developed during axial codingwere synthesized into overarching themes. These themes represented the core insights derivedfrom the data, reflecting students’ understanding and personal engagement with the issues ofsystemic racism and hostile design. The iterative process of developing and refining themesfollowed best practices in qualitative research, ensuring a rigorous and
in their programming abilities, which is often lower than that of theirmale peers [30]. The tool’s private, tailored feedback allows students to learn from mistakeswithout the fear of public scrutiny, supporting incremental learning and mastery experiences.WebTA's ability to reduce anxiety and support gradual skill development can enhanceprogramming self-efficacy, particularly for those who initially struggle with coding tasks.MethodologyWebTA is a web-based tool designed to improve programming self-efficacy by providingimmediate feedback on students' coding practices. WebTA, a code critiquing tool that providesimmediate, formative feedback on programming tasks, was initially developed for use with Javaprogramming. The research team was
, problem solving, and collaborative team-work.7 DiscussionThe data collected from interviews and PD sessions highlighted challenges present in currentmethods of interacting, collaborating, self-representation, and socializing online for ECEstudents. In this section we reflect on the findings in terms of our initial research questions.Particularly, we focus on the existing learner community challenges faced by ECE students at thisHSI. Finally, we begin to reflect on the second research question and critical issues to considerwhen designing future inclusive MR spaces.7.1 Existing Learning Community ChallengesWith respect to our first research question, we identified several existing learning communitychallenges at this HSI. Primarily this
through the principles ofUniversal Design, which benefit all users [83], [84].Gaps in the Literature and Future DirectionsSeveral gaps in the literature warrant attention. First, the lack of long-term studies assessing thesustained impact of these technologies is a significant gap. For example, some studies [24], [25]show initial promise of using technology but do not extend beyond short-term evaluations.Additionally, there is a need for more inclusive design practices that involve the target populationfrom the outset. The tendency of many studies (e.g., [26], [27]), to prioritize technologicalinnovation over user needs, leads to solutions that may not be fully aligned with the experiencesand preferences of the intended users.Future research
: PEER WISE runs five dedicated outreach programs aimed at middle and high schoolstudents, designed to inspire and prepare them for future success in STEM. Theseprograms include: Through these strategic initiatives, PEER WISE is effectively recruiting and nurturing thenext generation of diverse STEM leaders, ensuring that talent from all backgrounds hasthe opportunity to thrive.Recruitment:Recruitment begins with your outreach. A strategic plan builds into that outreach forstructured, intentional recruitment. How do you build relationships? How do youimplement follow-up strategies and connections?Our relationships are so strong with our students that they come back to share theirstories at our PEER WISE Connections. Research shows that seeing a
% In-person 9%Evaluating the Mentoring RelationshipsTo answer our research questions, we examined the participants’ responses to a series of surveysthat included open-ended questions. 14 of the 16 participants (88% response rate) completed theinitial survey at the start of the academic year and 11 (69%) of them completed theaccountability survey which was administered at the end of the fall term. 10 of the 14 (71%)participants who completed the initial survey did the final survey.How do interactions between mentoring pairs affect access to professional resources?At the start of the fall semester, we collected information about the participants’ expectations ofthe program, their knowledge of graduate admission requirements, and topics
Paper ID #45158WIP: Perceptions of Instructional Practices among Engineering College Studentswith Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderMiss Xiaping Li, University of Michigan Xiaping Li is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests encompass faculty development and change, neurodiverse college student learning experiences and outcomes, international students in engineering, and cognitive sciences. She holds a B.S. in Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences.Nolgie O. Oquendo-Col´on, University of Michigan Nolgie O. Oquendo
university-based and consulting efforts have led to over $40M in funding for projects to support initiatives in STEM and changes to policies and practices of global engineering organizations. Pearson is a registered Professional Engineer, an ENVISION® Sustainability Professional, and a Commissioner on ABET’s Engineering Accreditation Commission. Among her awards and honors are ABET’s Claire L. Felbinger Award for Diversity and Inclusion, ASCE’s Professional Practice Ethics and Leadership Award, the Society of Women Engineers’ Distinguished Engineering Educator Award, the UT System Regents Outstanding Teaching Award, and ASCE’s President’s Medal, one of the highest honors awarded in this global organization of over
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Development of a measure of intersectional socioeconomic inequality that extends beyond incomeAbstractIn this research paper, we describe our initial development of a more holistic socioeconomicinequality measure, the Model of Intersectional Socioeconomic Inequality. Our development ofthis model is in response to the urgent need for a more comprehensive understanding of inequalitythat goes beyond income disparities. Traditional socioeconomic measures do not reflect therealities of inequality. Particularly, they do not recognize the complex sociological processes thatimpact low-income students and their access to resources necessary to be successful in STEM.Thus, a
Dean for Research and Faculty Development for the College of Education and Human Development at the University of North Dakota (UND). She is the former department chair for UNDˆa CJinkoo Lee, University of Missouri - ColumbiaDr. Bo Hyun Lee, The Ohio State University Dr. Lee’s research broadly focuses on equity, justice, and access both at work and in pursuit of work. Dr. Lee takes an intersectional approach to understanding the influence of oppression and marginalization on academic achievement and career development among members from oppressed groups. With her focus on cultural and contextual influence on individuals’ career development, Dr. Lee addresses inequities in STEM by investigating a variety of cultural
students within the 21-30-year-old age range, five women and two men, six students from PWI and one from HBCU, andfive first-generation college students.The interview questions aimed to better understand how the students define mentoring, whetherthey have a faculty mentor, what their experiences with STEM doctoral mentoring have beenlike, and whether culture has a role in their mentor/mentee relationships. Each interview tookabout 50 to 60 minutes. During the initial phase in 2018, the research team started the interviewsin person, and during the pandemic, they proceeded virtually on the Zoom platform. Theinterviews were professionally transcribed by Rev.com and reviewed by the researchers toensure accuracy.Data analysisAs a qualitative research
Paper ID #45137A narrative study of food insecure students in engineering and computingDr. Justin Charles Major, Rowan University Dr. Justin C. Major (they/them) is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University where they leads ASPIRE Lab (Advancing Student Pathways through Inequality Research in Engineering). Justin’s research focuses on low-income students, engineering belonging and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and connects these topics to broader understandings of student success in engineering. Justin completed their Ph.D. in