Accreditation Commission. www.abet.org11. Jaeger, B., E. LaRochelle. 2009. EWB^2 – Engineers Without Borders: Educationally, A World of Benefits.American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference Proceedings.Paper AC 2009-740, 23 pp. Page 25.546.1512. Duffy, J., L. Barrington, M. Heredia. 2009. Recruitment, Retention, and Service-Learning inEngineering.American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference Proceedings.Paper AC 2009-2138, 27 pp.13. Bielefeldt, A.R. 2006. Attracting Women to Engineering that Serves Developing Communities.AmericanSociety for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference
Saying Innovation: When words lose all meaning", 2011, pp. blob.10 Fagerberg, J., "Innovation: A Guide to the Literature", The Many Guises of Innovation: What we have learnt and where we are heading, Ottawa, Canada, 2003.11 Osorio, C., "Design Thinking-based Innovation: how to do it, and how to teach it", BALAS Annual Conference, Santiago, Chile, 2011.12 Revell, J., C. Bigda, and D. Rosato, "The Rise of Freelance Nation", Money Magazine, 2009.13 Rover, D.T.," New Economy, New Engineer", ASEE Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 94, No. 4, 2005, pp. 427-428.14 Olds, B., B. Moskal, and R. Miller," Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations", Journal of Engineering Education Vol
. Suzanne Scott(sscott@pi.ac.ae). References1. Saunders-Smits, G.N., and E. de Graff, “The development of integrated professional skills in aerospace engineering through problem-based learning in design projects.” (CD) Proceedings, 2003 ASEE Annual Conference @Exposition, American Society for Engineering Educaiton.2. Carnegie Mellon Engineering CIT Website, “Leaders in a global environment,” http://www.cit.edu/global/index.html, Accessed November 11 2011.3. R. C. Jones and B. S. Oberst, “Quality engineering education for the Arab states region,” www.worldexpertise.com, Accessed Oct 16, 2011.4. G.L. Downey, J. Lucena, B. Moskal, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B.K. Jesiek, L. Kelly, J
AC 2012-3826: THE 2012 STATE OF MANUFACTURING EDUCATIONDr. Hugh Jack P.Eng., Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is a professor of product design and manufacturing engineering at Grand Valley State Univer- sity in Grand Rapids, Mich. His specialties include automation, design projects, and internet application development. Page 25.1276.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The 2012 State of Manufacturing EducationAbstractThe paper describes the 2012 results of a third annual survey on the state of manufacturingeducation. The survey respondents
Management Education. EcoBuild Proceedings of the BIM-Related Academic Workshop, Washington D.C.[15] Clevenger, C., & Carey, S. (2010). Industry-Academia Collaboration to develop a BIM-based MEPF Coordination Educational Module, EcoBuild Proceedings of the BIM-Related Academic Workshop, Washington D.C., Video material.[16] Azhar, S., Sattinei, A., and Hein, M. (2010). “BIM undergraduate capstone thesis: Student Perceptions and Lesson Learned. Retrieved form ascweb.org on January 4th, 2011: http://ascpro.ascweb.org/chair/paper/CEUE200002010.pdf[17] Barison, M., B., & Santos, E., T. (2010). BIM teaching strategies: an overview of the current approaches. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and
engineering career choice Page 25.543.2while Southern Europe, New European countries (ex. Latvia, Estonia) and China show anincreased take-up. These further studies have forced a change in orientation of engineeringeducation studies to a recognition of the need to: a) make engineering educational opportunitiesand careers more visible to the public – especially at in schools and at an age level before careerdecisions are made; b) develop an understanding about personal experience and choice regardingengineering education courses and careers which consider the role of pedagogy and teachersupport; and c) move to an ‘engineering education research
previous academic year. Many were employed or in graduateschool at the time of their interviews. These former students were invited by capstone faculty toparticipate in the interview (and offered an incentive gift card); those agreeing to participate wereincluded in a pool from which four were selected from each of the seven schools. A graduatestudent conducted the interviews by: (a) sending students interview questions and copies ofassessments they had completed in their class, (b) interviewing at times convenient to theinterviewee, and (c) sending transcribed responses to interviewees to confirm their accuracy.Evaluation around Classroom Use of AssessmentsData from the Team Member Citizenship assessment gave valuable insights about student
consistencydelineate the differences in the first two categorizations. Further examination of the twoassessment tools (StrengthsFinder and MBTI), along with the language and descriptorssummarized in the two tables, has led the authors of this paper to propose a connection betweenStrengthsFinder themes and MBTI typing.IV. b) COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIESIt is possible, then, that one might consider associations between the MBTI preferences and theStrengthsFinder themes as follows in Table 1. The descriptors used by Yokomoto and Ware4 aswell as the engineering attributes provided by Veenstra et al.20 were used to create this mappingof the MBTI dichotomies to the StrengthsFinder themes.It should be noted that there will not be a completely one to one mapping since
AC 2012-4255: STEPPING OUTSIDE THE BOX: EDUCATION OF GLOBALENGINEERSDr. Samuel P. Clemence, Syracuse University Samuel P. Clemence, P.E., Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor for Teaching Excellence, L.C. Smith College of Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, is a Fellow in the American Society of Civil Engineers, a member of Chi Epsilon and Sigma Xi, and was elected to Tau Beta Pi as an Eminent Engineer in 1977. He has received Outstanding Teacher awards at the University of Missouri, Rolla (1974-75, 1976-77) and at Syracuse University (1988-89). The Division of Higher Education and Ministry of the Methodist Church selected him as the 1990 Scholar/Teacher of the Year at Syracuse
follows: A. Easy-to-use – user-friendliness of software in terms of creating the simulation model, visualization, preparing animations, cooperation with Excel, preparing presentations, distinguishing various competence levels of users, B. Direct cooperation with a 3D model – students are very enthusiastic about working with 3D models, C. User-friendliness in terms of optimization possibilities D. Easy-to-create statistical distributions, E. Free access to the so called viewer, which makes it possible to start simulation without changing the model and input data, F. Elasticity, positive attitude of the software distributor towards the idea of cooperation between a university, industry and software distributor
-290.12 Finelli, C. J., Klinger, A., and Budny, D. D. (2001). Strategies for improving the classroom environment. Journalof Engineering Education, 90(4), 491-497.13 Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-basedpractices. Journal of Engineering Education, January, 87-101.14 McCombs, B. L. and Whistler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies forincreasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.15 Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.16 Granitz, N., Koernig, S., and Harich, K. (2009). Now it's personal: Antecedents and outcomes of rapport betweenbusiness faculty and
baased ‘brain ddrain’ that coompromises thegoal of hiring h and rettaining the best b and brightest in STE EM fields, w whether in acaademia orindustry.Given thaat the male dominated d cuultures of research univeersities and iindustry possitions havecontributted to barrierrs to womenn’s success in n STEM fiellds, WiSE prrogramming operates at thepersonal level of thesse political teensions to prrovide suppoort to womenn as they forrmulate a caareerpath that furthers their professionnal and perso onal aspirations. Thus, w while the perrsonal is poliiticalmantra iss applicable to an undersstanding of th he status of women in STEM; the effforts of theWiSE pro ogram
”, Page 25.489.10 J. Physiol. 197, (1968), 551-566. 6. Demirkaya, O., Asyali, M., H., Sahoo, P.K., Image Processing with MATLAB-Applications in Medicine and Biology, CRC Press, Florida, (2009). 7. Gonzalez, R.C., &Wintz, P., Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., MA. (1987). 8. Jain, A., K., Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, NJ, (1989) 9. Kalanad, A. and Rao, B., N., Detection of Crack location and size in structures using improved damaged finite elements, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 10, (2010), 1-10. 10. Lim, J., S., Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing, Prentice Hall, NJ, (1990). 11. Mannan, M.,A
the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.10 Denick, D., J. Bhatt, and B. Layton. 2010. Citation Analysis of Engineering Design Reports for InformationLiteracy Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition.11 Wertz, R., M. Ross, M. Fosmire, S. Purzer, and M. Cardella. 2011. Do Students Gather Information to InformDesign Decisions? Development of an Authentic Assessment Tool of Information Gathering Skills in First-yearEngineering Students. In Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE National Conference.12 Head, A. and M. Eisenberg. 2010. Truth Be Told: How College Students Evaluate and Use Information in theDigital Age. Project
. Page 25.650.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Framework to Address Ethical Issues in Multiple-Authored and Mentor- Supervised Engineering Publications1. IntroductionThis paper utilizes an interdependent five-step methodology to discuss ethical issues in multiple-authored and mentor-supervised engineering publications. First, the authors present differenttypes of co-authorship relationships and their possible effects on the research community.Second, the authors provide a historical overview of the evolution of ethical standards inacademic research and publication. Third, the authors demonstrate how the increasing pressureswithin the academic environment pressures impacted co
each teachingmodule must be better integrated into the course so students know they must complete them.Second, librarians must be seen as teaching partners for the course, rather than occasional guestspeakers. Instructors must show support of the librarians as part of the course teaching team.Third, the Information Literacy content was added to the curriculum and nothing was removed.Therefore, some of the classes seemed rushed at the end of the semester in order to get all theoriginal content covered. Suggestions for addressing this issue include: (A) reducing thenumber of in-class session to two and implementing on-line teaching modules with presentationcontent, quizzes and assignments; or (B) using a combination of one in-class session, one
. BSME Working in Iowa company as an engineerCollings M Mech.Eng.Tech. BSCiv.E Employed with Jacobs (Civil Engineering firm) Diaz M Elec. Eng. BSEE Hired by Deloitte-Touche (Attending Kellogg B-School) Renee F Elec. Eng. WFS WFSStephanie F Civil Eng. BS Civ.E. BS/MS ChE LDP Employee at Raytheon Co. PepsiCo LDP/Deloitte Consulting LLP/Harvard B-School Sergio M Mech. Eng. BSME and Kennedy School of GovernmentStephen F Comp. Eng. BSComp.E. WLS Tariq M Comp. Eng. BSComp.E. N/A
instructors in hardcopy). The students worked in groups comprised of five students each;each student in the group had a distinct and specific role: one student served as a Senator on theEnergy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee; two students served as staffers to the Memberand the remaining two students served as witnesses. Each group drew a) their state affiliation, b)whether they were members of the minority or majority party and c) their seniority on thecommittee). Each group had two witnesses with one witness invited to provide up to 3 minutesof testimony and both witnesses available to answer questions. Each senator had up to eightminutes to question witnesses. States were selected for the exercise based on their specificenergy
some engineering technology programs convert to engineering programs. Is there a place for engineering technology in the engineering education spectrum? If so, what should it look like as an educational experience?Responses to these questions were as follows. (a) Engineering technology’s applied focus could serve as the first two years of a four- year engineering degree (e.g., two year ET plus two year Engineering program). (25) (b) In a CDIO style implementation, e.g., Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate, engineering technology’s role would be to place emphasis on Implement-Operate content (25) (c) Four-year engineering technology programs should be ABET-accredited under the same criteria as engineering programs but retain the
involve veterans in the workforce, researchers have developed aprogram to help integrate veterans into electrical and computer engineering degrees. The initialtechnical focus will be in the renewable energy and energy distribution systems areas, which hasbeen identified as a critical area where there is a large projected shortage of trained technicalpersonnel. A 2008 NSF Workshop on the Future Power Engineering Workforce2 indicated “a serious need is emerging for more power and energy engineers to: a) replace retiring engineers so that critical expertise is maintained; b) meet rising infrastructure construction needs; c) modernize the grid as communications, computing, and electric energy technologies converge; d
attest to study results by signing the paper. Page 25.864.5 In sum, the study seeks to explore how interdisciplinary a body of engineering educationresearch is in terms of diversity (SCs distribution), network coherence (co-authorship), andauthorship trends across research typologies, using bibliometric methods.MethodsData Collection of Lifespan-related Engineering Education Research In this study the authors used two bibliometric methods, (a) Web of Science SubjectCategories (SCs) analysis and (b) co-authorship analysis, to investigate the interdisciplinarychanges in engineering education research during 1980-2009. As in
tPA Time to Death tPA Recovery Percentage tPA Survival PercentageFigure 3-a. Systems Dynamics model for Stoke Care Pathway.Figure 3-b. Population density in NC with overlaid stroke care center locations and 1-hour driving distanceradii
patents (2011) http://www.google.com/patents14 Animated Engines (2011) http://www.animatedengines.com/index.shtml15 de Camp, L. Sprague (1962) The Ancient Engineers, Doubleday16 Delatte, N. (2001), “Lessons from Roman Cement and Concrete,” ASCE Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, Vol. 127, No. 3, July 200117 Vitruvius (1914 translation) The Ten Books on Architecture, Project Gutenberg eBook18 Kalabon, A., Loescher, E., Sommerville, A., and Delatte, N. (2011) “The Rise and Fall of the Ohio and ErieCanal,” manuscript in preparation to be submitted to the ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation and Practice19 Francis, James B. (1868) Lowell Hydraulic Experiments20 Rouse, H
AC 2012-4279: THE ICOLLABORATE MSE PROJECT - 2012Prof. Kathleen L. Kitto, Western Washington UniversityDr. Debra S. Jusak, Western Washington University Debra S. Jusak has been employed at Western Washington University for 24 years. During most of that time, she was a professor in the Computer Science Department with interests in distributed systems, operating systems, computer architecture, and formal models of computing. She is now Vice Provost for Academic Resources. Jusak directed the group of computer science students that implemented the materials science iPod Touch applications. Page 25.1304.1
, 23 (2), 117-136.[9] Chambred, P., Bonbin, D., Izaute, M., & Marescaux, P.J., (2002). Metacognition triggered by social aspect ofexpertise. Metacognition Process, Function and Use, Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 153-168.[10] Chan, L. K. S. & Moore, P. J., (2006). Development of attributional beliefs and strategic knowledge in years 5to 9: A longitudinal analysis. Educational Psychology, 26 (2), 161-185.[11] Graves, D. H., (1983). Writing, teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann Educational Books.[12] Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C.B., (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons forengineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), 139-151.[13] Ross, M. E., Green, S. B., Salisbury
identifying engineering roles such as: engineersproduce products, engineers help improve lives, design systems, work for non-profitorganizations. The post survey was given during the last week of classes after completion of thedesign project and was developed to measure the student’s changes in perceptions of engineeringin part on the basis of the project spectrum (Appendix B). Responses and statements that wereevaluated can be seen in the tables to follow.Survey Data and Analysis: Pre- and Post-Survey ResultsThe first step taken was a pre- and post-assessment in most sections of the course. Students weregiven a survey early in the semester (Appendix A) that focused on their perception of engineersin society and familiarity of human service
Gold: Business talking to Business about theEnvironmental Revolution. HarperCollins, Toronto, ON.; Charter, M. and Polonsky, M.J. (1999). Greener Market-ing: A Global Perspective on Greening Marketing Practice. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK.; Hoffman, A.J.(2000). Competitive Environmental Strategy: A Guide to the Changing Business Landscape. Island Press, Washing-ton, DC.; Holliday, C.O., Schmidheiny, S., and Watts, P. (2002). Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustaina-ble Development. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK.; Nattrass, B. and Altomare, M. (1999). The Natural Step forBusiness: Wealth, Ecology, and the Evolutionary Corporation. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC.;Ottman, J.A. (1998). Green Marketing
, instructors can demonstrate that they care about students’general well-being and welfare.According to Jones16, the more that instructors can do to address all of the components in acourse, the more likely that they will be at successfully motivating all of their students. For thepurposes of the present study, we focused on the usefulness component of the model because: (a)this component is not well understood and “deserves more attention” (p. 64) 28, and (b) valuessuch as usefulness can be especially important in predicting engineering students’ desires topursue a career in engineering 15. As noted previously, the usefulness component involves theextent to which students believe that coursework (e.g., assignments, activities, and readings) hasutility
assessing 13 specificnoncognitive constructs, was developed based largely on existing instruments. The SASI isdesigned to provide data on noncognitive characteristics for incoming engineering students (a)prior to the onset of the first year and (b) for which higher education institutions may have aninfluence during students’ first year. Data collected from this instrument have been found to besuitable for use in the development of predictive models of student retention and/or graduation,which is the definition of success in this model. The SASI is used to provide information aboutthe academic preparation and affective characteristics of incoming first-year engineeringstudents. Such systematically gathered information helps us assess the impact of
oral and 7 4.79a 0.52 4.75ab 0.51 4.49a, b 0.92 4.50b 0.84 written form The broad education necessary to understand the 8 impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, 4.49a 0.74 4.44a 0.70 4.14a, c 0.97 4.06b, c 0.92 environmental, and societal context A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage 9 4.79a 0.45 4.74a 0.54 4.31b 0.99 4.52b 0.71 in life-long learning 10 A knowledge of