. [Accessed: 10- Oct-2018].[7] E. Litzer, C.C. Samuelson, J.A. Lorah, “Breaking it down: Engineering student STEM confidence at the intersection of race and gender,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 55 no. 8, pp. 810-832. Aug. 2010. [Online.] Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014- 10344-001. [Accessed: 10-Oct-2018].[8] R.M. Marra, B. Bogue, Women Engineering Students’ Self-Efficacy – a Longitudinal Multi- Institution Study: WEPAN-Women in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network, June 11-14, 2006, Pittsburg, PA. [Online.] Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f84/886cc65b183dfd8eae13dcd7bb19b749fa08.pdf. [Accessed: 10-Oct-2018].[9] R.M. Marra, B. Bogue, D. Shen, “Engineering
of three classes ofontological variables: function, behavior, and structure plus a design description (Gero, 1990;Gero & Kannengiesser, 2014). The goal of designing is to transform a set of functions, driven bythe client requirements (R), into a set of design descriptions (D). The function (F) of a designedobject is defined as its intended purpose. The behavior (B) of that object is either a behaviorderived from the structure (Bs) or the design itself or an expected behavior (Be) from the design.Structure (S) represents the components of an object and their relationships. Different functionsfor the same design produce different expected behaviors that generate different structures. Anexample of two different functions invoking different
recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] E. W. Kimball, R. S. Wells, B. J. Ostiguy, C. A. Manly, and A. A. Lauterbach, "Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research," in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. vol. 31, M. B. Paulsen, Ed., Switzerland: Springer, Cham, pp. 91-156, 2016.[2] U.S. Department of Education and National Center for Education Statistics. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study: Major Field of Study of Undergraduate by Disability Status. [accessed 2019 1/28]; Available: https://www.nsf.gov
country or a new institution)VariablesThree dependent variables were constructed in this study: engineering students’average scoring in the dimension of knowledge, skills, and attitudes respectively. Theindependent variables referred to engineering students’ multiple prior internationallearning experiences, including a) international tourism, b) second language course, c)other international summer program, d) international service learning program, e)study abroad, f) international conference, g) course with a global focus, h)international internship. Descriptive statistics are shown in Table 3. This study alsoincluded three control variables: gender (0= male, 1= female), degree (0=undergraduate, 1= graduate) and school ranking (0= outside top 150
Paper ID #27138Adding the Extra 5 Percent: Undergraduate TA’s Creating Value in the Class-roomMrs. Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University Ali Baumann received her master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming before working as senior systems engineer at General Dynamics C4 Systems. She is now part of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity. Currently, she focuses on enhancing the curriculum for the freshman engineering program to incorporate industry standards into hands-on design projects. She is an instructor for the
that were non-compliant did not meet one or more of following requirements: a. timelysubmission, b. completeness of information, c. acknowledgement of addendums, and d. othermistakes and errors typically found on bids which results in disqualification.Although the teams had a strong compliance results, more teams submitted an incomplete bids(33 teams) than a complete bids (39 team). Based on a debriefing session with students followingthe competition, students commented the time commitment for the project was not adequateenough to finish off the submission completely.The teams’ estimate to the target price was very impressive with the 58 compliant bids in ouranalysis for this criteria (Figure 1). Note that 83% of the compliant bids were within
final grade calculations.(A) (B) How helpful was the TRAC Fellow, TA, or Section How helpful was the TRAC Fellow, TA, or Section Instructor towards your understanding of Instructor towards your understanding of the content of the project? how to communicate? TRAC Fellow 24 TRAC Fellow 21 TA TA Section Instructor 19 19
] P. A. Laplante, Technical Writing: A Practical Guide for Engineers and Scientists. CRC Press, 2016.[14] E. Tebeaux and S. Dragga, The Essentials of Technical Communication. Oxford University Press, 2017.[15] B. J. Barron, B. J., D. L. Schwartz., N. J. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech, & J. D. Bransford, “Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project- based learning,” J. of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 271-311, 1998.[16] J. Norback & J. Hardin, “Integrating Workforce Communication into Senior Design,” Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 413–426, 2005.[17] iFixit, retrieved from https://www.ifixit.com.[18] iFixit EDU, retrieved from edu.ifixit.com.[19] S
withturbulence development and test chambers, where students will access a 2-dimensional laminarair flow to test the effectiveness of their design; b. A computer generated model (using any 3dsoftware selected by the student) where a 3-dimensional airflow will be overlaid onto theirdesign and projected in the 6-sided CAVE. Students will visually see air as it flows around andin their spaces); and 4. Document both processes in a report for handout and prepare a graphicaloral presentation.• Module Two: (THERMAL COMFORT) – Visually Experiencing HEATTypical areas that affect the human thermal comfort or thermal performance of spaces are visibleto the naked eye. However through the application of VR and other technological apparatus thefollowing fundamentals
Paper ID #27601Examining the Differences in Student Motivation for Industry Projects andNon-Industry Projects in Senior Capstone DesignDevanshi Shah, Florida Institute of Technology I am a graduate student pursuing M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Florida Institute of Technology with specialization in Structures, Solid Mechanics and Materials. I graduated with B.E. in Mechanical Engineering in India in May 2016. My research is focused on Student’s Motivation in Engineering under the advisement of Dr. Beshoy Morkos.Elisabeth Kames, Florida Institute of Technology Elisabeth Kames is a graduate student working on her Ph.D. in
presented at The Annual Meeting of the International Reading Association, Atlanta, Ga, 1990 (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 319039.)[5] L. B. Gambrell and R. J. Bales, “Mental Imagery and the Comprehension-Monitoring Performance of Fourth and Fifth Grade Poor Readers,” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 21, pp. 454, 464.[6] S. Long, P. N. Winograd, and C. A. Bridges, “The Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics on Reports of Imagery during and after Reading, Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 353-372.[7] F. L. Clark, D. D. Deshler, J. B. Schumaker, G. R. Alley, and M. M. Warner, “Strategies to Improve Comprehension of Written Material,” Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 17, pp
be used in FEM to make the errors minimum. Throughthe minimum potential energy principle, we can establish the relationship among internal forcesat nodes, nodal deformation, material property and element geometry. This relationship istypically called as element properties. We used a 1D element with two nodes during lecturing toshow this process. This example is displayed for the reference in Appendix B.4) Assembling the global equationsNow that the object has been divided into many independent finite elements. It should beemphasized that the shared nodes on adjacent elements are joined together and the shared nodeson adjacent elements have the exact same deformation. So, the FEM does not analyze anoriginal object but analyzes the assembly of
is part of the NSF IUSE: RevolutionizingEngineering and Computer Science Departments (RED) program. Any opinions, findings andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Ghorbani, M., Maciejewski, A., Siller, T... Atadero, R. (2018). Incorporating Ethics in Electrical & Computer Engineering. ASEE Conference. Salt Lake City: ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/306452. Grosz, B., Grant, D., Vredenburgh, K... Waldo, J. (forthcoming). Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics Broadly Across CS Education. Communications of the ACM. Retrieved from https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/376223013. Dubey, A., & Rozovsky
manufacturing processes course were asked about their search for asummer internship or co-op opportunity. The students were specifically asked about how theywere able to get their experience and whether or not it was with a manufacturing company. Thedetailed internship/co-op questions can be found in Table 7 below.Table 7: Internship/Co-Op Survey Question Given to Students in Manufacturing ProcessesCourse 11. Internship/Co-Op (A) Did you search for an internship or co-op for Summer XXXX? Y or N (B) If yes in (A), were you successful in securing an internship or co-op? Y or N (C) If yes in (B), how did you get the internship? (circle only one) University Wide Fall/Spring Industrial Engineering
modeling on the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA,” Struct. Equ. Model., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 186–203, 2009.[11] J. Honaker, G. King, and M. Blackwell, “Amelia II: A program for missing data,” J. Stat. Softw., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1–47, 2011.[12] S. A. Latif, O. M. Shukri, B. Y. Hussin, and Z. Awang, “Environmental problems and quality of life: Situational factor as a predictor of recycling behaviour,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 35, pp. 682–688, 2012.[13] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.[14
freshmen at the institution, with lessaccess to student supports such as housing, orientation, retention efforts, or scholarships, as theytransition to the four-year institution [1]. Transfer students also have fewer opportunities toparticipate in high-impact learning experiences such as undergraduate research and internshipsthan first-time freshmen [2]. STEM transfer students can have challenges as they adjust tocampus life [3], [4], including course credit loss [5], which can delay graduation or lead toattrition, perception of lack of advisor support or misinformation [6], or perception of “stigma”as a transfer student [3]. Providing resources, supports, and access to select activities in the earlytransfer period thus is a critical time to
students who are prepared. In order to better motivate the students to completethis out-of-class work on time, quizzes were built for most of the videos and students wererequired to complete these on the Learning Management System (LMS) before a particular classsession. While these were scored for performance, students received participation points simplyfor completing the quiz on time.As mentioned above, two other sections of this course were delivered simultaneously by twodifferent instructors. Section A (with 60 students who received a final grade at the end of thesemester) was delivered in the traditional A B Cmanner, while Section B (47 students)provided optional Reading Guides for students
Paper ID #25905The Shift from the Two- to Four-Year Institute: How Research ExperiencesImpact Community College StudentsMrs. Megan Patberg Morin, North Carolina State University Megan Patberg Morin is a third year Ph.D. student at North Carolina State University. She is currently studying STEM education with a focus in Technology, Engineering, and Design. Her undergraduate de- gree is in Middle Childhood Education focusing on Math and Science from the University of Dayton, and her Master’s is also from NC State in Technology and Engineering Education. She currently works as Graduate Assistant in the Education and Workforce
measures after they saw the deformation of the J-beam in Figure 7.Figure 7: Screen shot from J-beam bending animationStudents were able to see on the screen thatthe points A and B had moved closer to thelocked midsection of the beam. After themoment of inertia demonstrations, studentsvolunteered that the shorter AC would bendmore than the longer BD. This animationdemonstrated that points A, B, C, and Dwhich were all in plane when the J-beam wasundeformed were no longer all planarafterwards. This experience gave somecontext to the homework question shown inFigure 8 where students were asked tocalculate the product of inertia for the beam. Figure 8: Homework problem to find product ofSuch an animation
. International Journal ofResearch, 7.[12] Meadows, L. A., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The influence of gender stereotypes on roleadoption in student teams. In Proc. 120th ASEE Annual Conf. Exposition (pp. 1-16).Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.[13] Linder, B., Somerville, M., Eris, Ö., & Tatar, N. (2010, October). Work inprogress—Taking one for the team: Goal orientation and gender-correlated task division. InFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010 IEEE (pp. F4H-1). IEEE.[14] Fowler, R., & Su, M. P. (2018). Gendered risks of team-based learning: A model ofinequitable task allocation in project-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61( 4),312-318. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2018.2816010.[15] VandeWalle
Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 26-29, 2017. 8. H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, "Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens," Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 44, pp. 1187-1218, 2007. 9. Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M. C. Shanahan," Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 47, pp. 978-1003, 2010. 10. A. Patrick, M. Borrego, L. Martins, N. Choe, C. Seepersad, and M. Kendall, "Constructing a Measure of Affect Towards Professional Practice: What matters for Engineers?" in Research in Research
, persistence, and the attainment of a Bachelor of Science (B.S.) engineering degree forBlack students who begin their post-secondary careers in community colleges. In this paper, wedescribe findings from interviews conducted with two populations that we plan to explorethroughout the project: A) Undergraduates who have recently transferred to a four-yearengineering college, who likely have at least two additional semesters of coursework to completebefore earning their B.S.; later in this article we refer to this undergraduate population as CohortA. B) Undergraduates who have earned a substantial number of credits at the four-yearinstitution, and are now preparing to receive their B.S. in engineering relatively soon. We referto this population as Cohort
to the other. There are, indeed, lower cost textbook and software available, as a searchat Amazon.com will uncover. These materials were selected (a) in consultation with our IndustryAdvisory Board as to the typical software and topics of concern in the practice and (b) without aconsideration of cost (as a primary factor). This course material cost is comparable to the costsconsidered for engineering courses, as discussed in the “Background” section.Table 1. Typical course material costs for CON 357 – Quantity Surveying and Costing. Resource Cost Textbook Construction Estimating Using Excel, 3rd $164.48 (via Amazon.com [31]) Edition by Steven Peterson Software (for
teams and cancollaboratively obtain solutions. The reflection questions are:Question 1 (Rail Car) (Analyzed for 29 students): Let us think of a simple design. If you have a1kg car (in a rail gun experiment) and would like to cause an acceleration of 0.01 m/s2. Knowingthat you can create a B field of 0.0001 T, how much current would you need? Examine your answerand discuss what you think? Is it realistic, what would you change to make it more realistic? Youmay also include sketches to help readers understand your views.Question 2 (MHD Boat) (Analyzed for 26 students): This is a conceptual design problem. Ourgoal is to design a practical boat that operates on the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) principle.Let us assume that the boat is in a reasonably
) in anticipation of seeking ABET accreditation.MET Associate DegreeAccording to ABET-ETAC requirements, the following student outcomes and curricular topicsare required in an associate degree:Student Outcomes (a) an ability to apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to narrowly defined engineering technology activities (b) an ability to apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require limited application of principles but extensive practical knowledge (c) an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements, and to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments (d) an ability to function
another career of study mightadd to the depth of exploration of experiences.Students’ experiences from this study suggest that professors should be mindful when assigninggroup work, to ensure women, and women of color in particular, are not relegated toadministrative tasks. Institutions should be more inclusive of their representations of “whois/can be an engineer” in all courses and academic clubs, not just affinity based ones. It isimportant for all students, especially White males, to be exposed to an academic engineeringenvironment that is diverse and inclusive.References1. M. Estrada, M. Burnett, A. G. Campbell, P. B. Campbell, et al., “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM,” CBE- Life Sciences Education
again, to review someone else's work, so we all had standardized numbers. If we didn't agree with something, we all looked at it….Most of the research we did individually, but then we had weekly meetings where we all came together and talked about them all. Then, when we asked [the physician] to meet with us, we were all there, and he talked us through it. Then, using his expertise and our discussion, some people would go to observe whether a need was actually viable. We would synthesize all that information to decide which needs to follow through on.”Although survey respondents indicated that they already possessed these skills prior to theirinvolvement in the CPM program (Appendix B), they still reported
four suspension/frame mount locations. Parallel uniformly distributed loads are appliedvertically on both sides. Based on the resulting Von Mises stress distributions of the frame underthe applied constraints and loadings, students continue to modify the frame architecture byintroducing another cross member at appropriate locations for strength and stiffnessreinforcement, see Figure 2(b). (a) (b)Figure 2 (a) FE model of the original light-duty truck frame; (b) FE model of the reinforced truck frame by introducing more cross members at appropriate locations. This project challenges students to adopt advanced ANSYS functions in their FE models.For instance
write and executive summary. Ottawa University Press: Ottowa.Johns, A. M. (2015). Moving on from genre analysis: An update on the tasks for the transitional student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.005Kakh, S. Y., Mansor, W. F. A. W., Zakaria, M. H. (2014). Rhetorical analysis tasks to develop audience awareness in thesis writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98.Markel, M. (2016). Technical Communication (Washington State University ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.Paltridge, B. (2014). Genre and second-language academic writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 303-318. doi: 10.1017/S0261444814000068Parkinson, J. (2017). The student
supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-1657509and Grant No. DRL-1657519. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] E. Iversen, “Engineering Outreach on Campus,” Washington, DC, 2015.[2] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698– 716, 2012.[3] L. Archer, J. DeWitt, and B. Wong, “Spheres of influence: what shapes young people’s aspirations at age 12/13 and what are the implications for education policy?,” J. Educ. Policy