American Institute of Architects (AIA). Invite professionals to campus to discuss the CM industry.ObjectiveWe hope to develop three track options for our AET students within a program accredited byboth the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the NationalArchitectural Accreditation Board (NAAB). The three tracks would include a General Studies(GS) Track, a Construction Management (CM) Track and an Architectural Design (AD) Track.Our approach has always been to prepare our students for all aspects of the construction industry.We plan to continue this, but add an emphasis on specific aspects of the construction industry tobetter prepare our graduates for a very competitive industry.The CM track is an intensive track
technology within the School of Construction. As a practitioner, Ms. Bounds has used Revit and BIM to improve interior design processes. Throughout her career, Ms. Bounds has worked closely with architects, engineers and facility managers and is keenly aware of the extensive data and coordination that large projects require. The aim of her research is to leverage BIM’s capabilities in the interior architectural field and to train a future generation of interior designers to integrate their work with those of the architectural, engineering and facility management professions. Page 26.164.1
evaluation form (without modification) may not produce intended desiredresults when applied in a new institution.MethodologyThe school of Architecture, Civil Engineering & Construction at SPSU includes threedepartments and has an undergraduate student enrollment of about 1100. This specific study isconducted in Construction Management program of about 350 undergraduate students. A simple,yet structured questionnaire was designed to collect information for the analysis. The developedand pre-tested/modified questionnaire contained six student-related socio-academic questions;fifteen faculty teaching and performance related questions, and a final question seeking students’opinion on the three most important characteristics of outstanding faculty. A
program requirements and its curriculum design process.2. Internal Input. Input was gathered from faculty and management in six of Texas A&M’s departments housed in two colleges: a) the College of Architecture – Architecture and Construction Science and b) the College of Engineering – Civil, Electrical, Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution, and Mechanical. These six departments are each represented on the interdisciplinary Program Development Committee, in addition to experts from Texas A&M’s Center for Teaching Excellence.3. Consultation with and review of existing U.S. architectural engineering programs. A comprehensive curriculum review of over 23 existing U.S. architectural engineering
structural engineering leaving them less than fully prepared to take on their future roles inindustry. The California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo is well positioned to fillthis potential gap. The Architectural Engineering (ARCE) Department at California PolytechnicState University, San Luis Obispo is fortunate to be one of five departments located within theCollege of Architectural and Environmental Design (CAED), a college that also includes theArchitecture (ARCH) and the Construction Management (CM) departments. A great benefit ofthis arrangement is that considerable interaction takes place amongst the departments mirroringthe interaction and collaboration that occurs in industry. One of the more successfulinterdepartmental
criteria: • The curriculum must prepare graduates to apply probability and statistics to address uncertainty • The curriculum must prepare graduates to include principles of sustainability in design • The curriculum must prepare graduates to explain basic concepts in project management, Page 26.1001.5 business, public policy, and leadership.This article focuses on the criteria of project management instead of other new criteria.Understanding the criteriaThis provision of the Civil Engineering Criteria includes four components: basicconcepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership.Previously, this
AC 2007-1562: THE EFFECTS OF INTEGRATION OF INDUSTRY FACULTYINTO A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT POSTGRADUATE COURSEWORKPROGRAM IN THE AUSTRALIAN ENVIRONMENTKerry McManus, Swinburne University of Technology Page 12.1416.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007The Effects of Integration of Industry Faculty into a Construction Management Postgraduate Coursework Program in the Australian EnvironmentAbstractA postgraduate construction management program has been offered at SwinburneUniversity of Technology in Melbourne, Australia continually for the last twentynine years. The rationale for the program was to provide a transition from designto construction
A. McLaughlin, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Page 25.1176.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012STRATEGIC PLANNING METHODOLOGY WITHIN ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSIntroduction:Most Engineering Technology Programs will likely, at some stage of their development andmaturation, face the need to develop a strategic plan in order to chart the course of their future.This often places faculty and administrators of these programs on unfamiliar ground as they stepout of their areas of expertise to find suitable methods to structure their visions
National Association of Home Builders scholarship.Sang-Hoon Lee, University of Houston Dr. Sang-Hoon Lee is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management at the University of Houston. His research, teaching and consulting are in the areas of construction engineering and management, quantitative methods, construction finance management, construction safety, and information technology. He has taught courses in Construction Management I & II, Construction Finance Management, Cost Analysis and Bidding, Quantitative Methods for Project Management, Construction Safety, Reinforced Concrete Construction, Soil Mechanics and Foundation, Structural Steel &Timber Construction, and Strength of
four continents. Shall’s work in this arena has been disseminated widely, including presentations at Third and Fifth International Symposia On Service Learning In Higher Education, lectures at Brown University, the University of Maryland, and the New School for Design, publications by the AIA Press and the University of Indi- anapolis Press and exhibitions at the San Francisco Museum of Art in La Paz, Bolivia, the Sheldon Swope Museum of Art, the Goldstein Museum of Design, the Venice Architecture Biennale and MoMA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 REBUILDING: REDESIGNING HOUSING & RETHINKING PROGRAMS THROUGH DESIGN-BUILD
AC 2009-448: DEFINING ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGNJames Mitchell, Drexel University Prof. Mitchell has been Director of Drexel University's Architectural Engineering program since 1988. He was trained originally as an engineer (AB and MS Harvard) and has practiced as a licensed architect. Throughout AY2008-9 he has used a sabbatical year to visit all the US AE programs to explore the teaching of AE Design. Page 14.402.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Defining Architectural Engineering DesignAbstractThe question of what constitutes “Architectural Engineering Design
presented from the previous collection phases. Inthis step of the process, the students will apply all of the goal setting, climate analysis,performance criteria, and HVAC systems research toward solving their design problem. Thecharrette is also an opportunity to get multiple other disciplines involved with the students’projects. The local building community and students from other programs could becomeinvolved and distributed within the student teams. This group could include a wide arrange ofdisciplines such as intended users, financial managers, building construction managers (and evenstudents), landscape architects, civil engineers, interior designers, contractors, etc. This charrettestructure also works extremely well in this particular fast
detailed level and gradually advancing to systems only at the end of aprogram, while architectural programs typically use a studio approach which introduces studentsto the design of full projects at an early stage. Courses involving architecture students withengineering content should ideally recognize these two approaches.The learning outcomes of the two culminating courses described in this paper have been definedto include content with an appropriate level of structural engineering rigor and accommodate thearchitectural and construction management disciplines, by including a balance of architecturaldesign and construction issues. The learning outcomes also provide a balance of detailedengineering skills and big picture design considerations
AC 2007-870: ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMS: FINDINGCOMMON GROUNDAllen Estes, California Polytechnic State University Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the Director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy (USMA). He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. Al Estes received a B.S. degree from USMA in 1978, M.S. degrees in Structural Engineering and in Construction Management from Stanford University in 1987 and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder
AC 2007-1775: DIGITAL DESIGN, BIM, AND DIGITAL FABRICATION:UTILIZATION AND INTEGRATION IN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMSStan Guidera, Bowling Green State University DR. STAN GUIDERA is an Associate Professor of Architecture in the Architectural/Environmental Design Studies Program in the College of Technology at Bowling Green State University. He teaches design studios, advanced CAD courses and computer rendering and animation. He is a registered architect and has used computer-aided design extensively in professional practice. Page 12.545.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
2006-807: COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION IN A DISTRIBUTEDDESIGN STUDIOJeong Han Woo, Western Illinois University Jeong-Han Woo is an assistant professor of the Department of Engineering Technology at Western Illinois University. His research interests include knowledge management in the AEC industry, BIM (Building Information Model), IT( Information Technologies) on the design and construction industry, and construction process simulation. His e-mail address is j-woo@wiu.edu.Mark Clayton, Texas A&M UniversityRobert Johnson, Texas A&M University Page 11.342.1© American Society for Engineering
, building performance modeling, is a new and constantly evolvingtechnology that changes the landscape of design on almost a quarterly basis. Themarriage of these two factors can empower design teams to make astute decisionsabout aesthetics and energy, while providing a framework upon which to manage anintegrated design team. The advancement of these two procedural improvements arefixed and typically segregated within academia, whose structure and programs often failto address the collaborative problems inherent within the professional practices of thebuilding industry. Like the way of other fragmented portions of the design process,building simulation can also be limited by its current siloed nature in the design andengineering disciplines. Further
computer models had an advantage over flat orperspective drawings in 2-dimensions (2D), but add that they were perceived by students as moredifficult to work with than hands-on models. 18 There appears to be research on the spatialability benefits of using physical models and computer generated model images in non-designlecture courses. However there is minimal data on the effects of student-created models on thedevelopment of their spatial intelligence.Course Background:First semester freshmen in our department programs – Architectural Engineering Technologyand Construction Management Engineering Technology – take 2 non-design courses, namelyGraphics I and Material and Methods of Construction I. The Graphics I course is a 2 creditcourse
AC 2010-331: SCHOLARSHIP OF ENGAGEMENT AND PROJECT BASEDLEARNING: EXPERIENTIAL BASED LEARNING PROJECT FORCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT STUDENTS AT WESTERN CAROLINAUNIVERSITYRonald Miers, Western Carolina UniveristyGeorge Ford, Western Carolina University Page 15.1053.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Scholarship of Engagement and Project Based Learning: Experiential based learning project for construction management students at Western Carolina UniversityAbstract The Peggy Crosby Center located in Highlands, North Carolina is a multi-use complex that wasbuilt in the late 1800’s. Originally built as a private dwelling and after many
Paper ID #7404Interdisciplinary Design – Forming and Evaluating TeamsDr. Allen C Estes, California Polytechnic State University Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the Director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy (USMA). He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. Al Estes received a B.S. degree from USMA in1978, M.S. degrees in Structural Engineering and in Construction Management from Stanford University in 1987 and a Ph.D
San Luis Obispo, CA. Professor Nelson came to Cal Poly with over 25 years of structural design and project management experience. She is a registered Professional Engineer and Structural Engineer in the states of California and Washington. Jill Nelson received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno and a M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Washington.Allen C Estes, California Polytechnic State University Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the Director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military
in the date of graduation. The Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering assumes no responsibility for such delays.This will offer more choices for students to select their desired path and result in moreflexibility in terms of course scheduling and course management. This action has also beeneffective in reducing the need for course substitutions. Page 22.222.5 2011 ASEE Annual ConferenceNew Methodology for teaching Architectural Engineering Program at UW:Our objective is to teach design courses, such as HVAC systems and fire protection, orientedspecifically to
, North Dakota. 6. The Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI). 2006. Designing for Earthquakes: a Manual for Practicing Architects, The Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. 7. The National Architectural Accrediting Board. 2005. NAAB Conditions for Accreditation for Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, 2004 edition, The National Architectural Accrediting Board, Washington, DC. 8. The National Architectural Accrediting Board. 2003. NAAB Conditions for Accreditation for Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, 2002 edition, The National Architectural Accrediting Board, Washington, DC. 9. The National Architectural Accrediting Board. 1999. NAAB Conditions for
Design program for Ivy Tech Community College Columbus between 2006 and 2009. His research interests are: temporary shelter systems for post-disaster relief, living and working in extremely small environments, human-product - environment interaction, product development and usability, and human-centered design. Page 22.446.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011DESIGNING STEM KIOSKS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDENT PROJECT TO TEACH ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORSAbstractThis paper explains how sophomore-level Interior Design students in a three-dimensional studioclass were involved in
. Page 12.880.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Independent Student Design Competitions and the Assessment DilemmaAbstractOne of the most difficult assessment problems for faculty is student design competitions whereonly one or maybe two teams participate for independent study. Students are excited andfocused on the possibility of winning. The faculty is usually concerned with process andassessment in the context of a project and program not of their design. The issues are multipliedwhen you combine the problems of team assessment with a small sample pool of participants.This paper presents a case study in process and assessment for a single team of four independentstudy students that entered the 2005-2006 Airport Security
and manufacturing presence in the United States and Stanford’s GraduateSchool of Business and School of Engineering. The program objective is to provide memberswith the latest developments in manufacturing and design. The success of the current industry-sponsored courses has caused interest in the program to spread to other areas of the campus1.Similarly, the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado utilizesthe principles of Hands-on Engineering. In the Integrated Teaching and Learning program(ITL), creative, team-oriented problem-solving skills are emphasized. The curriculum isdesigned to reflect the real world of engineering by being relevant to the needs of society andstudents alike. The ITL also functions
prominence and the line thatseparates the different roles in the construction industry has already become blurred. Thetwo professions are so interrelated that the industry values a background in both fields.Increasingly more universities across the country and the world have an ArchitecturalEngineering curriculum. However, most existing programs emphasize training inArchitectural Engineering with significantly less emphasis placed on structuralengineering. In this report, I devised an undergraduate curriculum(s) at NC StateUniversity to build a professional career in building/bridge design with strong emphasisin both the structural as well as the architectural aspects. This plan may serve as a modelfor programs interested in a similar training path
it is taught by a team of three architects,one of whom specializes in environmental controls, and one structural engineer, and the size ofthe class varies from 30 to 45 students. Both architecture and architectural engineering studentsare required to take this course. The course requirements are somewhat different for the twomajors, and often less than a quarter of the class is AE students. We have come to call this theComprehensive Semester because it not only requires the use of information learned throughoutthe curriculum, but also incorporates a studio, a technology seminar, and a management courseinto a tightly knit whole. Throughout the semester, all students integrate architectural design withmechanical and structural systems design
Paper ID #11266Design for Aging with BIM and Game Engine IntegrationDr. Wei Wu, California State University, Fresno Wei Wu, PhD, LEED AP, CM-BIM, A.M.ASCE, is an Assistant Professor of the Construction Manage- ment Program in Lyles College of Engineering at California State University, Fresno. He received the Bachelor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a focus on Built Environment from Hunan University in China, the Master of Science in Environmental Change and Management at University of Oxford in the UK, and the Doctor of Philosophy in Design, Construction and Planning at University of Florida. He is an associate
. His is actively involved with The Masonry Society, Research in Sustainable Grout for Masonry, Elected Official for Local Community Governance, and Teaching Full Time.Dr. Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the Director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy (USMA). He is a registered Professional En- gineer in Virginia. Al Estes received a B.S. degree from USMA in1978, M.S. degrees in StructuralEngi- neering and in Construction Management from Stanford University in 1987