. Sandra Cheng, New York City College of Technology Sandra Cheng is an Associate Professor of art history at New York City College of Technology, City Uni- versity of New York. She has served as a Faculty Leader for City Tech’s First Year Learning Community (FYLC) program, and she continues to teach FYLC courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using Natural Language Processing Tools on Individual Stories from First Year Students to Summarize Emotions, Sentiments and Concerns of Transition from High School to CollegeAbstractResearch indicates striking disparities in college completion rates between students who are first-generation and come from low-income
potential issue.4 Legal IssuesPreviously the capabilities of cloud based systems and the impact upon campus IT departmentshave been discussed. These issues, however, are not the only issues faculty members must beconcerned about when using cloud computing systems.4.1 FERPAFrom a faculty standpoint, the largest area of concern is FERPA. FERPA, the FamilyEducational Rights and Privacy Act, governs what information may be disclosed by facultymembers and to whom it may be disclosed. With certain exceptions, it essentially means afaculty members may not speak directly about a student’s achievement or disclose samplestudent assignments. It also places restrictions on how data is to be stored and who may haveaccess to retained data.The challenge of FERPA
indicative of the newness of Second Life as an academictool with nearly (80%) of the students indicating that they have never operated in the virtualworld environment before. However, that said, at least one in five students have had some priorexperience with Second Life either as a social or academic application. The final statement inthis concept area addresses hardware and software compatibility issues. The results indicate that(19%) of the students had some issue; however, it should be noted here that by the end of thecourse week that this assignment was given, all students indicated that they were able toovercome their technical issues and were able to log into Second Life and complete theirassignment.Second Concept Area - Initial Learning
maintain quality while maximizing university resources.Meeting the Online Growth Demands The research on how educational institutions are handling the growth of onlineenrollments is minimal. Burruss, Billings, Brownrigg, Skiba, and Connors (2009) remarked onclass size and “minimal research at the postsecondary level” (p. 38). The authors go on to saythat the number of online students is increasing and with a shortage of faculty class sizes areincreasing. Colwell and Jenks (2004) added “Faculty can face pressures from administration to“maximize” class sizes in online courses to make them more efficient or profitable” (p. 1). There is concern from educators about the quality of education when class sizes areincreased; however, the
explore these perceptions to understand the reasons behind the lowrate of implementation in engineering programs. In addition, concerns about tool andtechnology issues and their applicability to engineering distance education could play arole. Therefore, the following research questions are proposed to investigate faculty andstudent perceptions of online education: 1. What are the perceptions of engineering faculty and students about online engineering courses? 2. What are the perceptions of engineering faculty and students about different technologies and educational methods employed in engineering courses delivered online?MethodData was collected via an online survey delivered to a convenience sample of
computer,especially if they already have a new desktop or laptop. Another challenge arises in mandatorytablet PC programs where upper level courses often have one or two students without a tabletPC. These students either transferred into the engineering school, or possibly their tablet PCbroke and they have not replaced it. Konthaneth et al. 16 surveyed the engineering educationfaculty at Virginia Tech to determine what motivated the engineering education faculty to adopttablet PCs. Their results suggest that to successfully diffuse tablets throughout the college ofengineering will require increasing faculty perception of the advantages, compatibility, andobservability of tablet PCs, and at the same time reducing the complexity of tablet
Licensed Profes- sional Engineer in the State of Indiana since 2005. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Online Testing with Blackboard – Lessons Learned (Perspective from 3 Engineering Faculty) Department of Engineering University of Southern Indiana AbstractDuring the past year, faculty managing concerns with COVID–19 have turned to online exams toassist with summative assessment in their courses. As usual, there are benefits to using onlineexams in Learning Management Systems (LMS) and, of course, there are other aspects
interact with people who have disabilities and get their feedback. Page 15.217.6B (University student from Connecticut, participant): In RoboWaiter learning robotics and programming, as well as social, moral, and humane issues take place. These experiences help students realize what their education is leading up to, and how they can end up changing the lives of so many people. It was great to have participation of people with disabilities. There is no downside to them being there and seeing how robots could potentially help. Their participation can also help in coming up with new ideas, as they converse with the builders.C (High school
time abroad in the USA, Spain and Slovenia. Mrs. Schuster leads the research group Didactics in STEM Fields. Her main research interests are virtual learning en- vironments, service-based learning and Open Innovation for University Management. In her dissertation (finished in 2014), she investigated the impact of immersive user interfaces on presence and learning.Prof. Anja Richert, RWTH Aachen University Prof. Dr. phil. Anja Richert Managing Director of the Center for Learning and Knowledge Management (ZLW), RWTH Aachen Uni- versity; Junior Professorship for Agile Management in Organization and Technology in the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University Anja Richert took up the position of
choiceformats. In our high-enrollment engineering program, we have developed, implemented, andevaluated a six-week cross-disciplinary Assessment Digitization Innovation (ADI) Workshop thatsupports engineering faculty interest in developing computer-based examinations that areresponsive to best practices. Authentic assessment formats and topics of focus includeincremental solutions, multiple answers, design-by-selection, declarative statement formats, andquestion cloning practices. Further, the remediation of computer-based exams using digitizedformats also enables new opportunities to enhance learner engagement, metacognition, and softskills, which are highly amenable to faculty edification and are integral faculty developmentcomponents of the ADI
answered but critical to the debate as towhether and how to best integrate Internet technology into a classroom setting.2. Background LectureTools was built largely because of an interest to extend Mazur’s Peer Instructionapproach the field of climate studies. It began as an exploration of how clickers could be used toinvite student responses on issues of concern to global change. However, we quickly discoveredthat clickers, while an excellent first step, allowed for only a limited range of questions. The firststep in the evolution of the tools described here was to develop a simple web-based tool wherestudents could answer multiple choice questions, as has been done with clickers, but also withimage-based questions that were not possible with
- ing, online design catalogs, and web-based collaboration.El-Sayed Aziz, Stevens Institute of Technology Dr. El-Sayed Aziz holds a faculty position as assistant professor in the Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department at Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Egypt. Currently, he is working as research scientist at Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Mansoura University, Egypt, in 1991 and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology in 2003. His research interests include knowledge-based engineering systems, computer-integrated design and manufacturing, Finite Element Analysis
professional certification.One of his arguments in support of his position is that certification provides credibility, but healso notes that it does not provide the same level of credibility at that obtained through licensureor accreditation.Through the use of certification material one raises the issues of professionalism and life-longlearning. Those who go into one of the IT fields usually find themselves in an ever-changingenvironment, as the languages and technologies experienced as an undergraduate quicklybecome obsolete. As a consequence, in order to survive and prosper in the corporateenvironment, one must be able to learn new languages and technologies essentially on their own.Exposure to certification books provides an insight to a systematic
. Our concern was notthat the computer programming issues were not important, but that too much time wasbeing cannibalized from DP modeling issues (such as choosing between the availableequipment replacement models described above) in order to discuss computer science issues.Specifically, the objectives of our developing the framework was to assist in the instructionof dynamic programming by: 1. Standardizing the Representation of Dynamic Programs: The versatility of dynamic programming is highlighted by the various ways in which one can “write a DP down.” A systematic approach is devised for a user to define a DP in order to proceed towards a solution. 2. Developing Dynamic Programming Solver Software: Given a standard form of
can expandtheir knowledge and skills for CS in the way their initial motivations and interests sustain andtransfer to the applications of programming in the real world. The course structure begins withlow-agency, simple and well-structured assignments and then builds toward higher agency andmore open-ended assignments; this is appropriate for students who are the first in their familiesto attend college. These students may also benefit from one-on-one support or interactions in thesmall group setting from peer tutors, teaching assistants, or faculty who could accommodate theknowledge gap in programming skills for those students who are relatively new to programming.Among our consented students, 53% reported being Latinx, Chicana/o, or
investigates fundamental questions critical to improving undergraduate engineering degree pathways. . She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. In 2013, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh was honored as a promising new engineering education researcher when she was selected as an ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Literate Programming Approach for Hardware Description Language InstructionINTRODUCTIONDigital devices are ubiquitous in modern life. Over the last several decades, nearly all aspects ofsociety are dependent on digital devices from entertainment devices to convenience
new technology into the classroom. This will most likely happen dueto a combination of deep academic traditions, budgetary issues, and/or a lack of skilled facultyand staff. This will be problematic as the next generation of college students will grow up withand become comfortable with VR technology while expecting the use, acceptance, and/or at leastthe visibility of it at their place of study. Even today, as mobile smart phones have become anintegral part of our lives, some instructors deny or limit their use or even visibility in theclassroom. Chances are that classroom acceptance of VR will be similar.Purdue PolytechnicPurdue Polytechnic, which is one of Purdue University’s 10 colleges, is a transformationalcollege unbounded by tradition
Paper ID #17618The essence of computational thinking and tools to promote itProf. Osman Yasar, State University of New York, Brockport Osman Yasar is an endowed professor and director of the CMST Institute at The College at Brockport, SUNY. He established the first undergraduate degree program in computational science in the United States and developed a computational pedagogical content knowledge (CPACK) framework for teacher education. His research interests include engineering and science education, computational pedagogy, computational and scientific thinking as well as fluid dynamics, engine ignition modeling, and
–Madison. Contact him at oyasar@brockport.edu.Dr. Peter Veronesi, The College at Brockport Peter Veronesi is program coordinator and lead faculty for the secondary science education programs at The College at Brockport.Dr. Jose Maliekal, The College at Brockport, SUNY Jose Maliekal is the Dean of the School of Arts and Sciences at The College at Brockport, State University of New York. He is an atmospheric scientist and have been teaching meteorology and climatology courses. His research interests include climate change and computational pedagogy. Address: School of Arts and Sciences, The College at Brockport, Brockport, NY 14420 Phone: 585-395- 5598 Email: jmalieka@brockport.eduDr. Leigh J. Little, SUNY Brockport
regarding power outletavailability in classrooms. One faculty member explained, “Students are saying that Tablet Page 22.1030.8batteries aren’t lasting long enough to get them through the various classes. There are very few 7classrooms that have outlets for students really to be able to plug in." This issue also detersstudents from using their Tablet PCs during class, explaining, “I would go to an engineeringclass and by the end the battery would die.”Another area of concern was compatibility of the technology course material and with
/Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs & Diversity at UTRGV. He is also a full professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Qubbaj received his Ph.D. from the University of Oklahoma with specialization in combustion and energy system. His research has been sponsored by NSF, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense.Liyu Zhang, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Liyu Zhang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. He received his Ph. D. in Computer Science from the State University of New York at Buffalo in September 2007. Before that he received his M. S. (2000) and B. S. (1997) from
OK if I use it as a template for my work this fall? • What kind of information can I use from a website and how can I use it? • There is a lot of programming code available for free on the Internet. May I use it for this project?Review of the LiteratureRecent literature addresses numerous concerns and indicates that academic honesty continues tobe an issue for faculty and students alike, and it reports on the impact of technology and existingperceptions.Technology and Academic Honesty Academic honesty is a pervasive issue for educators suchas reported by Jordan & Elmore,12 Bikowski and Broeckelman,1 and Cordova and Thornhill. 4Indeed, Whitley 21 reported on more than 100 research studies on cheating in a 30 year
colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education.Mr. Cory Brozina, Virginia Tech Cory Brozina is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He has his B.S. and M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering also from Virginia Tech. His research interests are in Learning Analytics, Engineering Education Assessment, and Educational Technology.Eric M Stauffer, Virginia TechChris Frisina, VT PHD Student at VTDr. Troy D Abel, Virginia Tech Dr. Troy Abel received his PhD in Human Computer Interaction and MFA in Graphic Design from Iowa State University. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Visual Communication Design at Virginia Tech and is also the director of the new Eye Tracking
the design experience. Green et al. 7 talk in depthabout the issues related to implementing an interdisciplinary senior design capstone experience,focusing on the need for faculty specific roles as well as appropriate team composition on thebasis of technical skills and knowledge. Teng and Liu8 discuss the managerial models which canbe applied to capstone projects with industry collaboration. Fries et al.9 discuss the importanceof working directly with a practicing engineer in industry on a routine basis.The ConceptIn industry, it is often required that a project undergo an independent review. When a project isindependently reviewed, an outside expert is brought in to the project to examine the materialand determine the quality of the work
suite of tools in question allow for automated digital rubric generation, collection fromstudents, return to students, and most notably, analysis. Features include the ability to condenseseveral files submitted by one student into a single PDF for review, the ability to executesubmitted code in three programming languages (Python 3, MATLAB, and ANSI C) whilecapturing the output into a PDF, and the ability to track error conditions such as late submissionand incorrect file names and automatically assign penalties.Statistical reports are generated for each assignment automatically, providing a window intostudents’ performance and possible areas of concern. Automated warnings alert the teachingteam to potential errors in grading, equity issues
opportunities, and to make the available service more visible to student consumers. ≠ In general, best results are achieved when advanced planning is conducted prior to adding support for a course. The planning includes tutor preparation and attention to technical issues. In addition, faculty concerns and special needs can be considered. If a student seeks tutoring and finds it lacking due to technical difficulties or unprepared tutors, the student is not likely to seek help again. The student may also broadcast negative information about the tutoring service to peers or faculty members. Once the reputation of an innovation is damaged in this way, it may be difficult to regroup and recover.Software/Technical
placement of the projection screen, and fixingcommon computer issues, among a few others. Some of these concerns can be easily overlookedwhen priority is on integrating state-of-the-art technology rather than the actual needs of the end-users. When overlooked, these basic issues can considerably hinder the teaching and learningexperience, even on a brand new classroom with all the bells and whistles. Fixing these commonproblems, as a first step in the process of the initial design, is the essence behind the scalingdown before scaling up idea brought forth in this paper. With the scale down approach, one canmore accurately and effectively integrate new technologies to enhance the learning environmentand complement the teaching strategies of
at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a traditional university program as well as the new online learning model, which he utilizes in his current position consulting with faculty about the design of new learning experiences. His experience in technology and teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the
curriculum and inadequatetraining of teachers.” A faculty member wrote, “We have a hard-enough time to teachfundamentals in our disciplines. I am concerned we may not have enough time to incorporate AIappropriately.” How to integrate AI into school settings and the curriculum is a concern. Onefaculty stated that it is “haphazard at the high school level, while overly focused on machinelearning in our universities.” Another offered more specifics by sharing “there is not enoughfocus on problem formation and epistemology.” Student preparedness for AI is an ongoingdilemma and is due to issues such as the “lack of sufficient mathematical education (foundation)to understand AI algorithms.” For faculty, there is some concern about “attempts to
thatone user does not break or corrupt a computer for another user. Further, IT asks departments toprovide them software five months before the semester begins.Due to the nature of Division courses, faculty members have issues with these restrictions,notably the space for student work, the ability to configure software, and the advance notice forsoftware installation. This paper discusses the Division’s motivation and steps to create a 1:1laptop policy. The next section briefly details the Division’s motivation for the policy. Section 3 Page 11.883.2discusses the study performed by the Division to understand options for the policy. Section