sizableinvestment.Innovative approaches have been adopted to accommodate the number of students in order toprovide each student with a hands-on experience. The traditional approach to laboratoryexercises required a scheduled lab period during which the class, or part of the class, met with theinstructor or lab assistant and completed the exercise. This approach requires a large number ofworkstations or lab periods to accommodate the enrollment. Second, the time each studentspends in lab is limited to the duration of the lab period. In “Sensors and Transducers”laboratory-type homework requiring students to use laboratory equipment to complete theassignment has been used as an alternative to scheduled lab periods. This arrangement increasesthe time the student has
activities are essentially nolonger possible. Mechanical Engineering Design (i.e., Machine Design) at California StateUniversity Chico normally facilitates a semester-long design and fabrication project to givestudents a real-world engineering experience. As an alternative, this paper considers theeffectiveness and benefit of focusing on the documentation and presentation of engineeringanalysis and design work rather than hands-on projects. In a series of activity assignments,students are required to compose short technical reports which document their engineeringanalysis in professional form. Each subsequent assignment had an increased level of analysiscomplexity and documentation which related to the course material. A mid-semester survey
psychrometrics in cooling units-understanding the implications involved in converting salt water into freshwaterWith the goal of encouraging creativity the performance of each design was minimallyweighted in the grading and the design aspect was completely open-ended. Theinstructor was available for questions and to help recognize potential issues but refrainedfrom offering suggestions during the design phase. As heat transfer or fluid mechanicscourses typically follow thermodynamics the project was not intended to be a capstone,but did provide valuable experience from which a student could build from in a futuresenior design project. The project also provided an opportunity to present a qualitative
‚" Signal analysis ‚" Data visualization/presentation One of the main criteria for the choice of software was the ease of interfacing and communicating with data acquisition hardwares. The duration for this project was only 13-weeks, careful decision on the choice of software had to be made prior to the start of the course. To reiterate, one of the main objectives of this project design was to allow students to write software codes for data acquisition, measurements and perform some fundamental signal processing, namely the FFT etc. The students were expected to have a hands-on learning experience with regard to issues such as A/D conversion, sampling, signal processing implementation etc and a firm grasp of those mentioned. It was not the
the programmingskill and knowledge related to the project of all team members before the project. We found thatall team members also have had experiences with HTML language, JavaScript, VBScript, Perl,C/C++, and Visual Basic for developing Web-based applications. All members had MicrosoftAccess database experience. One team member has extensive IBM DB2 experience and isfamiliar with Erwin database design and modeling tools.Database and Web Server Selection. There was also a great deal of uncertainty as to whetherthe Omni Web server running on a Windows 98 PC, that also served the lab activities of the WebProgramming Application course could satisfy this need. Windows 2000 was released but wasnot a mature platform at this time.Since there is
research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Exploring the Nature of Students’ Collaborative Interactions During a Hands-On Ill-Structured Engineering Design TaskIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper explores the nature of engineering students’ interactions during ahands-on design task. Engineering education is experiencing a shift in curriculum format towardmore emphasis on collaborative design work; indeed, collaborative problem
concepts, operation, programming, interfacing, andapplication developments of industrial robots, robotics kinematics, control theory, sensory, andvision systems. Robotics Interfacing Engineering is taught as a 300 level course to introducerobot actuators, sensory, fundamentals of control theory, and the integration of robot systems.This course integrates the engineering design of a specific robotics problem and implementationin the laboratory. The problem involves industrial engineering techniques, hardware interfacing,software interfacing, and control devices for designing and building an autonomous robot. Aninterdisciplinary approach is used. Recently, vision system technology has been introduced inthis course as a new component for students to
of essential notions of intellect, drive, and self-discipline thatcenter on bodily ‘normalcy’” [8]. Notions of engineering skill have assumptions about “capable”bodies and minds built into them [12]. For example, to be seen as proficient at circuit design andtesting in an electrical engineering lab, one is expected to have the manual dexterity tomanipulate centimeter-long resistors and capacitors and the visual acuity to see small details upclose. A students’ demonstration that they understand the workings of a circuit is often conflatedwith the physical act of circuit-making in the laboratory. In such instances, lack of physicaldexterity or visual sharpness may be interpreted as lack of proficiency at engineering tasks.Because of the
Aerospace Engineering in 2009, both from Texas A&M University. He currently holds an Assistant Professor position at Texas A&M in his home department, and his work bridges the topics of advanced multifunctional material systems and their integration into aerospace platforms. After over three years as a Research Assistant Professor at Texas A&M, Dr. Hartl accepted joint appointments working at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in the Materials and Manufacturing Directorate and Aerospace Systems Directorate. At Texas A&M, Dr. Hartl maintains a large and active research team consisting of graduate, undergraduate, and postdoctoral researchers. Darren has over 17 years of experience working with shape
Paper ID #36479Work in Progress : Faculty Perceptions of STEM Student andFaculty Experiences during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Fall2020 Qualitative study.Mehdi Lamssali (Doctoral Student) Doctoral Student at North Carolina A&T State UniversityAlesia FergusonAndrea Nana Ofori-boadu (Dr.) Dr. Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu is an Associate Professor of Construction Science and Management with the Department of Built Environment within the College of Science and Technology at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Her passion is to utilize her God-given talents to advance sustainability in construction
be interested infinding out if you can implement a complete project within your existing introductory course inengineering. Typically, your existing first course in engineering involves graphics, or statics, ormechanics of some kind and you feel that a project is needed. Otherwise, 2) It may be that yourdepartment chair or dean has made it clear that your course MUST have a design project addedin order to satisfy some broader aims of the educational curriculum. Either way, you need to Page 22.787.2quickly become comfortable with a new teaching model.The paper is based on experience acquired in teaching PBL courses in Engineering Design
feel free to make our cases to become 'living documents' reflecting the changes in the way your team thinks and solves problems.)• To design and conduct physical and / or virtual laboratory experiments, as well as analyze and interpret real measured data.• To design and integrate systems, built of components and objects, to perform a desired process for a set of defined needs, or customer requirements within time, quality and cost constraints.• To understand the total quality rules and implications within and beyond the boundaries of the selected case.• To understand, evaluate, test, learn and apply various software packages for the sake of learning problem solving methods, versus just clicking on buttons offered
, Arizona. He has a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical engineering from Northern Arizona University, and a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Northern Arizona University. He is the faculty advisor for the student section of ASME. His experience includes various engineering po- sitions at Raytheon, M.C. Gill Corporation, Royal Plastics Engineering, SouthWest Windpower, and the Naval Research Laboratory. He is a practicing professional mechanical engineer in the state of California, and Nebraska.Theodore A. Uyeno, Northern Arizona University Dr. Uyeno is an adjunct professor of comparative biomechanics in the department of biological sciences at Northern Arizona University. His specialty is the analysis of
Mechanics and Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering Science from the Univ. of CO at Boulder. His industrial experience includes Texas Instruments (mechanical design), Naval Research Labs (computational dynam- ics), NASA Langley funded post doc (finite elements), consulting at Lockheed and Lawrence Berkeley National Labs (computational mechanics) MSC Software Corporation (educational multimedia develop- ment) and Creo Consulting (Mechanical Engineering Consulting). He taught at Univ. of the Pacific for 4 years and is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering Mechanics at the U. S. Air Force Academy. He has published approximately 100 technical publications and generated approximately 2 million dollars of research
Engineering Education”[8] Savadogo and F. Kadirgan Electroanalytical Study of Methanol Crossover Through Nafion 117 Membrane, Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology ASME Conference June 14-16, 2004[9] ASTM tables, www.astm.comBiographical InformationDR. SHELDON JETERHas more than 25 years experience in graduate and undergraduate engineering education. Supervised more than ten Ph. D.thesis students, more than twelve M. S. thesis students, more than twenty M. S. special research project students, andnumerous undergraduate students engaged in research and design projects. Has published more than forty refereed papers andover fifty major research reports along with numerous other papers and reports. Holds several patents.MAJ DAWSON
, splines, numericalmethods), with programming as a means to an end (14, 18-20, 29)? Or should the coursebe designed to learn a specific computer language, such as MATLAB, as an example ofan engineering tool (5, 6, 10, 22, 26, 28)? Alternatively, the course could be structured toteach algorithmic thought processes (10, 14, 20, 31-34). No one way is best and anycomputing course should address all three to some extent. The implementation of acomputing course, however, does need to be tailored to the objectives and backgroundsof the students. For example, the lecture-homework-test progression may be excellent ataddressing an applied math objective, while short programming assignments may addressthe learning of syntax. Here we present a semester-long
, hand written feedback forms and a quantitative survey. The pre-and post-experiment tests are designed to assess if the students understand the key concepts. Thepre-test is given before the laboratory module to gauge their basic understanding of the subject.The same test is given at the end of the laboratory module (post-test) to measure their hopefullyincreased level of understanding. We also have a feedback form that each student fills outthroughout the laboratory module. The feedback form encouraged the students to provide theircomments and suggestions at each major step of the process (e.g. objectives clearly defined,usefulness of the pre-lab questions). The final assessment was a survey designed by theinstructor and the Mentors. Ten to
Paper ID #19974The Impact of Professional Communications Training on Teamwork and Lead-ership Skills for Engineering Capstone TeamsDr. Todd W. Polk, University of Texas, Dallas Dr. Todd Polk is a Senior Lecturer in the Bioengineering Department at the University of Texas at Dallas. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University. He received his Master of Science and Doctoral degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Dallas. Todd has over 25 years of industry experience in design, test, applications, sales and management. After joining UT Dallas in 2013
AC 2011-1279: COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH PROJECT IN WIRE-LESS COMMUNICATIONMohammad N Amin, National University Mohammad Amin received his Ph.D. and MS degrees in Electrical Engineering and MS degree in Solid State Physics from Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and M.Sc. and B.Sc. Honors degrees in Physics from the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. He is currently working as a Professor at National University, San Diego, California. He has published and presented 60+ papers in the areas of electri- cal engineering applications, computer applications and biotechnology. He has 20+ years experience in teaching engineering, science, and math. He received an R&D award in 1996 from the R&D Magazine 100
are the types of experiences that allow for more real-worldconnections and have less of an emphasis on getting a specific correct answer. Similarly, gradedexams, which are explicitly focused on extrinsic performance outcomes, had the lowest ratingsfor curiosity. It was interesting that homework assignments were not rated more negatively, asthey typically involve similarly structured activities designed to elicit a correct answer. This mayindicate that students sometimes see homework as an opportunity to dive deeper into what waslearned in class, and as more of a learning opportunity than a summative assessment. Studentsseemed to favor homework assignments where multiple possible answers would be accepted,potentially putting more priority on
on how to use the lab equipment and calculate the results. This approach is notthe best way to prepare the students for the reality of professional engineering practice.It can be difficult for faculty to devote time in providing exceptional design and appliedexperiences to undergraduates while also trying to develop their research. Often facultymembers find that these priorities compete for their time. This is particularly difficult for youngfaculty. Further, young faculty members increasingly have extremely limited work experience inthe engineering profession. This has led to a gap between what universities are teaching, andwhat engineers are expected to know in industry.1 Engineers in industry spend much timeworking on complex system
university education. Perhaps this is most clearly evident in the type ofengineers certain companies employ and perhaps the statistics on employment may show a biastowards employing graduates from particular institutions in specific industry sectors. Educators have reported on the benefits of experiential, hands-on, student-directed learning[1-4] and the effects of design courses in engineering [5]. Engineering educators have used field Page 24.1198.2trips, laboratory investigations, and interdisciplinary activities that enrich and extend thecurriculum [6, 7]. Such designing of authentic experiences into courses and curricula are
Engineer) 2 Learning Objectives: - Apply foundation in design thinking to tackle - Gain new understanding of designing in systems open ended problems - Apply design thinking process for iteration on - Decide how to scope down problems and previously made prototype choose clients through research and empathy - Combine previous background and experience work with new skills to work in collaborative teams to
projects that include the layout optimization for wind farms, array design for novel wave energy conversion devices, optimization of collaborative power systems, the sustainable redesign of commuting bicycles, and the quantification of sustainability during the early de- sign phase. Dr. DuPont completed her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 2013 in the Integrated Design Innovation Group, and her projects are currently funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Oregon State University, and Oregon BEST/Bonneville Power Association.Dr. Christopher Hoyle, Oregon State University Dr. Christopher Hoyle is currently Assistant Professor and Arthur Hitsman
Industrial Engineering Students1 Introduction1.1 Introduction to capstone design project workshopsThe classical senior capstone design course consists of establishing an environment wherestudents are given the experience in solving a substantial problem while working in a teamenvironment. The engineering design problems to which Canadian engineering students areexposed must be open-ended, and require the integration of curriculum elements1. In theIndustrial Engineering (IE) program at the University of Windsor, industrial sponsors from avariety of sectors (automotive, food, recycling, hospitals, and so forth) are engaged to providereal open ended projects to the industrial engineering students over a two term period. Withrealistic ill defined opened
affective and pedagogy measures. Therefore, given theconsistency in the evaluations for our course with the other course evaluations, we maintain theoutcomes were likely consistent with the larger population. Given the justified inference we speculate that the nature of the explorations that took placein the Materials World course, the inquiry and design structure, the presentations of content, theaccess to materials, and discussions, all contributed to a positive learning experience for theparticipants. The positive learning experience in turn influenced their comfort for teachingSTEM, the efficacy for teaching STEM, their pedagogical discontentment associated withSTEM, and their inquiry implementation. These are critical considerations because
Stand: Students See Further in Their ConceptsFor their final design projects, students in the freshman signature course at UT invent andprototype a product to solve a problem encountered in their daily life experiences. To presenttheir designs, they tell their own experiences as an inventor – from conception to realization.Within their stories of innovation, we ask them to describe their choice and use of the historicalinnovator technique in the midst of the CG suite. Indeed, we coached them to be inspired by theresources we provide for them (Appendix A) and also supported them in finding another notableperson whose principle(s) may inspire more and better novel ideas for their design.Certain teams applied principles from historical innovators
Electronics Laboratory”, 31st North American Power Symposium, California, 1999, pp 247-254.[5] T.V. Sivakumar, “Object-Oriented modeling of PE systems with an emphasis on education and design”.PhD thesis IIT Madras 1999.[6] H. Elmqvist S.E. Mattsson, M. Otter, “Modelica- A Language for Physical System Modeling, Visualizingand Interaction ”, Proc. IEEE CACSD 1999, pp 630-639.[7] I Bausch-Gall, F. Breitenecker, H. Fischer, G. Grubel, M. Otter, A. Prinz, G. Schuster, “An ACSL-ModelTranslator to the neutral Fortran Dsblock-Model Format”, Proc. CACSD 1994, pp 143-148.[8] P. Fritzson, J. Gunnarsson, M. Jirstrand, “ MathModelica- An Extensible Modeling and SimulationEnvironment with Integrated Graphics and Literate Programming”, Proc
need forSIVs as a tool in their courses.ReferencesReferences[1] Belo, R., Ferreira, P., and Telang, R. (2014). "Broadband in School: Impact on StudentPerformance." Management Science, 60(2), 265–282.[2] Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). “Achievement and Satisfaction in BlendedLearning Versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal for theScholarship of Teaching and Learning. V.3 I.1.[4] Adhikari, S., Mosier, R and Langar, S.. (2021). “Challenge of Delivering Constructioncourses in an Online Environment Based on Faculty Experiences.” Conference Proceedings,Associated Schools of Construction April 2021.[5] Edgcomb, A. D., Vahid, F., Lysecky, R., Knoesen, A., Amirtharajah, R., and Dorf, M. L.(2015
manyof the items from the posted material, but they were not just copies of it. The students seemed tounderstand the difference between the wiki content format and that of a formal report.It was beneficial to the students to create web-based technical content. Many of them did nothave experience editing wikis before this course and their technical writing was most likely inthe form of traditional laboratory reports. Many companies are now using this type of toolinternally for project management, so it is helpful that the students be exposed to collaborativewriting and understand the differences between the different types of technical communication.The biggest highlight of using this technology was seeing the creativity of the students. The