Session Number 2566 Handicapped Design Projects in a New Engineering Honors Course Wayne Walter, Mark Smith Kate Gleason College of Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 14623AbstractAs part of a new Honors Program within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at theRochester Institute of Technology (RIT), a multidisciplinary design project has been recentlyintroduced as a two-course sequence (1 credit each quarter), taken by honors students during thewinter and spring of their Freshman year. Instead
andEnvironmental, Mechanical, Biomedical, and Materials Science and Engineering. This paperpresents an overview of the implementation of a new framework for inclusive, strengths-basedcourse design standards that were developed by engineering faculty along with experts incurriculum and instruction.Traditionally, universal design standards emphasize aligning course objectives, learningexperiences and assessments, explaining course information clearly, and using varied andaccessible instructional materials. These universal design standards are adequate to providecourses that are accessible to all learners. However, to provide inclusive courses forneurodivergent students, additional standards are necessary to ensure that students can identifyand use their
theinclusion of this type of content into their construction courses or programs.IntroductionPrevious research argued that engineering students have a 'culture of disengagement' aboutsocietal issues [1]. Furthermore, recent work on engineering and technology students'perceptions of using new technology suggests an over-focus on technical aspects within thoseprograms, to the detriment of social implications [2].Considering the societal impact of the built environment on the population, this lag seemsunjustified and concerning. Furthermore, history has several examples that indicate the effect ofpoorly functioning construction and infrastructure on the deployment of unsatisfactory servicelevels, high operation and maintenance costs, and unjustified
teaching that included an emphasis on laboratory experiences, and a willingness to engage undergraduates in scholarship activities. Recent hires (8 in total) have shifted the faculty mix to one that is now predominantly Ph.D. qualified. However, most have some industrial experience, and all have backgrounds that will help in promoting these core values and mission of the department. The old technology programs were effective in their hands-on approach in large part because of a collegial and collaborative environment that existed between faculty and the department’s highly trained technical staff. This was to be maintained in the new programs. The concerns of staff and their role in supporting the new programs was thus a
work to peer review, the students results were presented at the American Society ofMechanical Engineers International Conference (November 2007, Seattle, Washington) 5. 3 3 indentations at 10Figure 1. Indentation of Human teeth enamel Figure 2. Indentation tests on the surface of enamel Summary As future scientists and engineers, students should be prepared to enter a workforce thatrequires knowledge of nanotechnology. Faculty members from two engineering programs areemploying their collective knowledge in nanotechnology to develop new experiments methods thatwill help introduce undergraduate students to this field of
obtainadministrative, academic, and professional development information, and receive guidance onhow to become a successful student. New students discuss this information in small groups withmentors (older engineering students are trained and assigned to lead discussion). Homeworkassignments are reviewed and discussed. Students are introduced to their assigned departments,department assemblies are explained, and advising information is provided in an effort toconnect new students to their college and departments.The NSOS process has been a positive improvement for new students and several importantadministrative changes have been accomplished. The Student Council / Dean’s Officepartnership has produced a focused effort by students, faculty, and administration
EducationBibliography1. Michaelsen, L. K., Black, R. H., and Fink, L. D. What Every Faculty Developer Needs to Know about LearningGroups, To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional and Organizational Development, L. Richlin(Ed.), New Forums Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 1997.2. Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1997.MARILYN BARGERMarilyn Barger is an Associate Professor at Hillsborough Community College and a Research Associate in theCollege of Engineering at the University of South Florida. She has a B.S. in Chemistry from Agnes Scott College andB.S. in Engineering Science from USF as well as a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from USF. She conducts research in thearea of membrane water
). Throughout the semester, we did extensive evaluation of team andindividual performance, as well as assessing the class itself and student reactions to it. Inthis paper, we provide an overview of the course, present some of the assessment results,and review the lessons learned: what worked, what didn’t?IntroductionA course on Creativity and New Product Development has been taught at the Universityof Virginia since 1995. Henry Bolanos and Dave Lewis developed the original version ofthis course. Henry is an independent inventor and has founded several businesses; Daveworked for IBM before joining the faculty of the University of Virginia. He owns a smallbusiness and holds several patents. They proposed a course that would teach the newproduct
addition to Foroudastan’s teaching experi- ence, he also has performed extensive research and published numerous technical papers. He has secured more than $1 million in the form of both internal and external grants and research funding. Foroudastan is the faculty advisor, coordinator, and primary fundraiser for EVP teams entering national research project competitions such as the Formula SAE Collegiate Competition, the Baja SAE Race, the SolarBike Rayce, the Great Moonbuggy Race, and the Solar Boat Collegiate Competition. For his concern for and ded- ication to his students, Foroudastan received MTSU awards such as the 2002-03 Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005-06 Outstanding Public Service Award, and the 2007
participating programs. To complete the minor, all students must earn ninecredits in three core courses and at least nine credits in cluster-based courses, which providemore in depth coverage within the specific content area that interests the student. The first sixcredits of core coursework are earned in two classes that focus on teaching and developing theentrepreneurial mindset and entrepreneurial leadership. Students then complete their cluster-based coursework followed by earning the final three core course credits in the capstone class,which focuses on new venture creation. The cluster-based course sequences were designed by faculty members in their respectivecolleges to address issues directly relevant to entrepreneurship and innovation
education in 2007. He became a Computer Science teacher and Technology Coordinator at St. Catherine of Siena School in the Archdiocese of New Orleans where he also taught English, social studies, and Latin. In 2012, Mr. Taffaro joined the faculty and staff of New Orleans Military and Maritime Academy located aboard Federal City in Algiers, Louisiana, a suburb of New Orleans. He is currently the school’s business and data manager and teaches Creative Writing and Cyber Science.Mr. Marvin Nelson, Benton High School Page 23.967.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
Installing a “Technology Literacy” Course: Trials and Tribulations David F. Ollis Chemical Engineering Department North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-7905 ollis@eos.ncsu.eduAbstract The creation of a new technology literacy course for non-technical students isdescribed. The author, an experienced engineering faculty member, describes his sojournthrough several less-than-familiar landscapes, including the regions of “finding funding”for this non-traditional subject, “and navigating the bureaucracy” of course
%) Moving to a new environment 14 (58.3%) Balancing study and work activities 13 (54.2%) Facing peer pressures (e.g., alcohol, drugs, sex, etc.) 12 (50.0%) Managing conflict resolutions 11 (45.8%) Connecting with a new friendship group 9 (37.5%) General health and well being 7 (29.2%) Becoming self-reliant in managing health/stress 6 (25.0%) Forming positive health habits 4 (16.7%) Breaking problem habits 4 (16.7%) Leaving family 2 ( 8.3%) Other (please specify): (1) girls, (1) “I had a lot of issues dealing with other people” 1 ( 4.2%) DisabilityTable 6 displays the responses to selected items (i.e., 37, 39, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, and 50) aboutestablishing a relationship with mentees. These items
the innovation is to us, how we expect the innovation toaffect the students, both in the short term and in the long run, and how we are going to manage Page 6.971.1Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationand support students under the new working conditions. The next sections of this report addressthese issues. In the final section of the paper we report on results of a survey of students whorecently participated in a course in third semester calculus in which Maple was extensively used.Reasons for the innovationLet
Session 3159 Modernization and Integration of New Technologies in a Thermodynamics Lab Mansour Zenouzi, Anthony Duva, Raymond Tavares Electronics and Mechanical Department1 Wentworth Institute of Technology Boston, MA 02115.Abstract:Significant advances in digital data acquisition and data reduction in industry, enhancement andimprovement in energy system simulation software such as Engineering Equation Solver (EES),recent interest in fuel cells and concern for protection of the global environment are among
Powered by www.slayte.com The role of neoliberalism in the development of the ‘new’ engineer “…children are not the ‘supply’ that meets any ‘demand’ however urgent. They are individual human beings, and the primary concern of the schools should not be with the living they will earn but with the life they will lead” [1].Universities have traditionally been viewed as places which allow students to broaden theirminds, the Latin ‘universus’ meaning ‘the whole, aggregate’. Today, universities can beconsidered to operate as businesses in competition with one another, their primary purposebeing to produce the next generation of workers who aid in maintaining globalcompetitiveness
low tomiddle income families yet sensitive to issues of sustainability and community. The greatest need in the area is the quick resettlement of displaced families. With properplanning and coordination, homes that were devastated by the hurricane can be rebuilt, providingstronger and more comfortable residences. Some families are concerned that in addition to losingalmost all they owned, they will also lose the New Orleans culture that was imbedded in thosedestroyed neighborhoods. It is most important that the designs reflect the personality and cultureof this historic neighborhood and restore the richness that means so much to its residents. Pressing needs in the area may call for an alternative to conventional
AC 2008-1477: A NEW ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS COURSE BASEDON A PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS PROCESSLeslie Potter, Iowa State University Leslie Potter is a Lecturer in the department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at Iowa State University. She has extensive professional engineering experience, including seven years with Deere & Company in various engineering and supervision capacities. She received her M.S. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State University prior to joining the IMSE department at ISU. She is currently teaching her eighth year of the IE capstone design course. Her research interests include capstone design course effectiveness, engineering and
Education”Each year, Vermont Tech hosts two graduations, the traditional graduation day in May, and thePractical Nurse graduation day in June. During these events, most of the campus academicbuildings are locked. This seems to be one of those classical CQI issues: "Why have you beendoing it this way?" With the Recruiting CQI team taking a fresh look at how graduation isconducted, the team put forth recommendations to make graduation day more of an open houseevent with displays and demonstrations in the academic labs. With graduation day possiblybeing the last day students spend on campus, an open campus provides for a much morememorable impression for new graduates, their parents, family, and friends. This leads toimprovement in the word of mouth
curriculum’s focus matched the new human-environment interactions orientation of theLAIS Division, a direction which I established when I who came to CSM in summer 1993 fromthe University of Wisconsin-Madison where I served as Director of the Institute forEnvironmental Studies. This overall direction of LAIS, I argued, better tit the role, scope andmission of CSM. As such, it would enable the Division to better attract and retain faculty with Page 3.313.3 -3-interests that complemented the School, and would allow LAIS eventually to develop anappropriate interdisciplinary graduate degree program in
evolving globaleconomic factors have placed a premium on innovation and innovativeness. Thecompanies that have traditionally invested in professional development through the Ira A.Fulton School of Engineering’s center for Global Outreach and Executive Education(GOEE) at Arizona State University are no exception to this emerging trend.Increasingly they are requesting training and coursework on enterprise innovation as partof their professional development investment. To accommodate this demand GOEE hasdeveloped a new engineering master’s degree program in Enterprise Systems Innovation& Management (ESIM). The new program address some of the concerns enterpriseleaders have expressed about how to nurture and develop the innovation potential in
Session 2550 A New Engineering Degree Program for Secondary School Teachers Thomas G. Johnson Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department California State University, Long BeachAbstract In April 2000, the International Technology Education Association and its Technology forAll Americans Project published Standards for Technological Literacy1. These standards havebecome a major focus in the revision of primary and secondary school curricula across thenation. A renewed emphasis is being placed on teachers to
Paper ID #7529Theme-based Teaching /Learning: A New Approach in Teaching Manufac-turing ProcessesDr. Masud Salimian, Morgan State University Faculty at the department of industrial engineering, Morgan State UniversityMr. Yaseen Mahmud, Morgan State UniversityMs. Avis L. Ransom, Morgan State University School of Engineering Early career engagement as a systems and logistics engineer by Department of Defense contractors, Avis Ransom, applied a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and an M.B.A. in the management and development of technology and in the application of engineering to address DoD requirements. Following fifteen years
, hands-on experiences (eg mini-labs). Page 5.170.23) Day 4: Have students work together in teams to apply the new knowledge in some aspect of design.Bioelectricity: An Example of a Bioengineering Course Designed around ContextualLearning ModulesIn a course on Bioelectricity, the engineering concept of modular design is explicitly introducedfrom an electrical engineering perspective. We cover the topics of sensing, passive devices,information processing, active devices, real time control, discrete logic, output transducers andpower/energy concerns. At the same time, engineering thought processes includingbrainstorming for multiple solutions
, and computer-aided circuit analysis.Mr. Mark J. Scott, The Ohio State University Mark graduated in 2005 from the Ohio State University with a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical and Com- puter Engineer. Afterwards, he worked as a field engineer installing large industrial automated systems and then as a test engineer validating power electronics designed for automotive applications. He returned to Ohio State in 2009 to pursue a Ph. D in the field of power electronics. His research is on implementing wide bandgap (WBG) devices, based on gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC), in new and existing power conversion applications. The focal point of his studies has been on improving power densities of power
should be implemented in order toanswer the new industrial and technological challenges. Several studies concluded that the“Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate approach is beneficial in terms of improving teaching andlearning, motivating students to further their academic progress and faculty to improve theirindustrial experience and to gain more insight into industry3. Laboratory based courses are vitalto ET programs, since they are the backbone of skills-building process, ultimately leadingtowards developing experience-led engineering technology degree 3. Also laboratory activitiesdeveloped should become more and more a place where students can and will be creative, wherethey will be able to develop not only required skills, but also a place
education, exposing students to instruction for specific lengths of time, whereasdigital natives are more concerned with the outcomes of education, learning, and the mastery ofcontent in the manner of games (p. 166)”.Higher education and digital natives slant toward different methods of instruction. This is reflected in a difference between professors and students who approach knowledge in very different ways. Faculty members may be described as hunters who search for and generate knowledge to answer their questions. Digital natives by contrast are gatherers, who wade through a sea of data available to them in the disciplines, focusing on breadth versus depth of knowledge. Digital natives are oriented more toward
AC 2010-586: IT'S THE MANUFACTURING STUPID! THE NEW US INDUSTRIALREVOLUTIONC. Norman, Applied Research Associates, Inc Awards, Professional Activities, Publications Dr. Norman was awarded the Department Of The Army, ACHIEVMENT MEDAL FOR CIVILIAN SERVICE (Jun 1993). He is a graduate of the Department of Defense; National Security Management Course, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University and Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University (April – May, 1996). He received a Special Commendation Award from the US General Accounting Office for service on the Independent Review Panel for the Safety of the
instructor’s family). The change from four to three quizzes was madebecause enrollments in the class are now climbing and we wished to free up more TA time sothey can actively participate in piazza discussions and other new in-class activities we are tryingout. Quiz grading is also as consistent as we can make it. We start with simple grade standards(A: 91-100; B: 81-90; C: 71-80; D: 61-70) and then, if necessary, adjust the ranges down slightly(e.g. use 11 points per grade rather than 10). We do this to correct for any unanticipatedproblems with issues like the wording of questions and use the grades from previous terms as aguide. The students are told that if everyone gets 91 or better, they will all earn an A grade (itnever happens). However, in
will represent a highly effective department. Very similarly,collective actions and decisions are critical, but can only develop from truly collective dialog.In doing so, a chair should not attempt to ‘homogenize’ the members, but rather assemble aneffective mix of skills and expertise, which can contribute to the collective dialog in majorways. Rewarding faculty collectively may seem inappropriate or at times counter to ourindividual senses; however, it simply displays collective ‘attention’.In a typical engineering department, faculty members are most concerned with their owncourses and projects. Therefore, the chair must be able to provide an atmosphere wherefaculty sees their individual goals reached through meeting departmental goals. As