same time as the CCS revision, the four B.S.-awarding engineeringdepartments also revised their curricula to 1) reduce the total number of courses required forgraduation from 38 to 36 and 2) decrease the number of required science, math, and engineeringcourses to increase student flexibility within the curricula. Both of these initiatives took place inthe context of increasing interest among faculty members and students in interdisciplinary a Lafayette College awards ABET-accredited Bachelor of Science degrees in Chemical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering, each housed in
College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Idalis Villanueva (Dr.) For the past 10 years, Dr. Idalis Villanueva has worked on several engineering education projects where she derives from her experiences in engineering to improve outcomes for minoritized groups in engineering using mixed-and multi-modal methods approaches. She currently is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. In 2019, she received the Presidential
Paper ID #31001A Student Engagement Evaluation Methodology Inspired from UsabilityEngineering for Extracting Course Design RequirementsMs. Sitong Wang, University of Cincinnati Sitong Wang is an undergraduate student from Chongqing University – University of Cincinnati Joint Coop Institution, major in Electrical Engineering. Her academic interest is in the Human-Computer Inter- action (HCI) field. She had internship experience as a research assistant at Computer Science Department, University of Virginia in Fall 2018. She also took the role of being the research assistant in HCI Initiative group at The Hong Kong
Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David B
Paper ID #242722018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29On Becoming a ”Transfer Institution”: Research on a Community Collegethat Supports Diverse Black Students in their Transfer AspirationsDr. Bruk T Berhane, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Mary- land in 2003, after which he was hired by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL) where he worked on nanotechnology. In 2005 he left JHU/APL for a fellowship with the
collaboration, communication, informed decision making, and design of investigationsperform higher in both educational as well as the workforce than peers who have not had a LBDexperience11. As a result, Koldner et al. advocates deliberate reflective practice of targeted skills,such as learning in the context of doing that includes monitoring one’s doing and learning andone’s experience of learning, coupled with frequent, timely, and interpretable feedback. (note:Deliberate, in this instance, means that the skills are practiced in a context that promoteslearning; reflective means that their practice is discussed and lessons drawn out from thatdiscussion12). Figure 2 below summarizes the Learning by Design model
assessment within an engineering academic department [C]//Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. IEEE, 2008.[10] LOUIDOR M G. Quality assurance in engineering education: A systems perspective [D].A thesis presented for the master of science degree, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2010:V.[11] Program self-study report for electrical and computer engineering [R].Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, 2008:25-29.[12] LI J. Student-centered, project-driven and result-oriented in WPI [J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2013(3):115-119.[13] WARD M. Implementing EC 2000: perspectives from both sides of the assessment trench[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for
. Ricco, University of Indianapolis George D. Ricco is an engineering education educator who focuses on advanced analytical models applied to student progression, and teaching first-year engineering, engineering design principles, and project management. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Degree Attainment in Computing: Intersectional Switching TrendsAbstractAlthough efforts have been made to broaden participation in computing, ongoing reports andcounts in the field continue to illustrate the need to improve engagement and retention. Thereremains a minoritization of Black or African American men and women, Hispanic or Latinx menand women, Indigenous men and women, White women, and Asian
Paper ID #33561How COVID-19 Led to Improvements and Adaptations to ExperientialLearning Opportunities for an Increasingly Remote EnvironmentMs. Jessica Britt, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory Jessica Britt is a systems modeling and controls engineer at Argonne National Laboratory; in this role, Jessica oversees many aspects of the EcoCAR Mobility Challenge – a premier automotive collegiate com- petition. Jessica organizes competition activities related to modeling, controls, human-machine-interface, and user experience. Jessica holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in electrical engineering with a focus
AC 2007-439: PROPOSED BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARINGBIOENGINEERING AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMS FORABET ACCREDITATIONSusan Blanchard, Florida Gulf Coast University SUSAN M. BLANCHARD is Founding Director of the U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering and Professor of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University in 1980 and 1982, respectively, and her A.B. in Biology from Oberlin College in 1968. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the Biomedical Engineering Society, and the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering and is an ABET Program
Paper ID #33209The Endeavour S-STEM Program: A Multi-College Collaboration to In-creaseEngagement and Retention in STEMDr. Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston Diana de la Rosa-Pohl is an Instructional Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Houston (UH). She has developed first-year experience programs for multiple STEM organizations and also teaches project-based hands-on courses for those programs. She currently directs the NSF-supported Endeavour S-STEM program which serves students across three UH STEM colleges. Her research interests include
within engineeringeducation have used social media to understand engineering student experiences. Berdanier andcolleagues generated narratives around graduate engineering student attrition from the socialmedia platform Reddit [29]. Another study, by Chen and Gillen, also analyzed forums on Redditto understand engineering students’ learning experiences before and during COVID-19 [30].Both studies used the application programming interface (API) from Reddit to collect posts fromthe Reddit forums. The studies differed in analysis where Berdanier et al. conducted qualitativenarrative analysis while Chen and Gillen used quantitative machine learning, specifically naturallanguage processing tools. Chen and Gillen’s study is the first in engineering
, contemporary issues). The differences comparedto the APPLES study were a much lower percentage of the CE students in the current studyrating communication within the top five most important outcomes (47% CE vs 65% APPLESstudents) and more CE students rating project management (37% CE students vs. 12%management skills among APPLES students) and leadership (28% CE vs. 14% APPLESstudents) in the top five outcomes [14]. The APPLES respondents were primarily majoring inmechanical, computer, and electrical engineering [12].Some outcomes had importance ratings that were very different compared to ratings of seniorcivil engineering students from the same institution in 2011 [12]. A much higher percentage ofthe 2016-2017 students rated teamwork and project
Paper ID #12549A Framework for Measuring the Sustainability of Academic Programs in theTechnical Fields: Initial Validity Study FindingsDr. Issam Wajih Damaj, American University of Kuwait Dr. Issam W. Damaj (Ph.D. M.Eng. B.Eng.) is an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering at the American University of Kuwait (AUK). He is the Chairperson of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His University service experience is focused around assessment, quality assur- ance, program development, accreditation, and institutional effectiveness. His research interests include hardware/software co-design
Paper ID #8825Laboratory Development for Dynamic Systems Through the Use of Low CostMaterials and ToysDr. Benjamin Reed Campbell, Robert Morris University Ben Campbell holds a BS in physics and MS in electrical engineering from Penn State and a PhD in engineering from Robert Morris University. For the first decade of his career, he worked as a laser engineer at the Penn State Electro-Optics Center. In 2011 he joined Robert Morris University as an Assistant Professor of Engineering. He has been supporting RMU’s biomedical engineering program and also teaching dynamics, circuits, and introduction to engineering. Since
work is funded by the National Science Foundation, DUE-0411320 – CCLI Adaptation and ImplementationTrack. Project titled: Adapting Multiple Intelligence Principles to Increase the Number of Quality HispanicEngineering Graduates. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support.† The materials are adapted from materials developed by New Mexico State University (NMSU) with support fromthe National Science Foundation (CCLI-EMD DUE-0089051). The NMSU materials were developed for anundergraduate hydraulics course. We are adapting these materials, and the concept behind them, for use in anundergraduate dynamics class. Page 10.752.1
perspective on the need for a robust engineering education system in society.Dr. Cristina Diordieva, Nanyang Technological University Cristina Diordieva is currently the Project Coordinator for the World MOON Project. She was a Post- doctoral Research Fellow in the joint medical school (LKCMedicine) at Imperial College London in the UK and Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. She is a co-author of a report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in Switzerland. Her research interests include educational technology, online learning, digital health, and language massive open online courses (L-MOOCs).Ribhav Galhotra, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Ribhav Galhotra is a bachelor’s student
Paper ID #33031A Faculty Roundtable on Instructional Challenges during the PandemicDr. Iftekhar Ibne Basith, Sam Houston State University Dr. Iftekhar Ibne Basith is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA. Dr. Basith has a Ph.D and Masters in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of Windsor, ON, Canada with concentration on 3D IC, MEMS and Testing. Dr. Basith has published several IEEE transactions, articles and conference proceedings over the last few years. His research interest lies on Automation and Robotics, Testing of 3D
49%,followed by environmental engineering (EVEN) at 35%. Civil engineering (CVEN) was aboutaverage at 16%. The lowest representation of women was in electrical engineering at 5%. Whataccounts for these differences?It has been postulated that women may not be attracted into engineering because they don’t see astrong human connection of the profession, and desire to positively impact society throughservice.3 For example, students entering the Master’s International Program at MichiganTechnology University to earn an M.S. in civil or environmental engineering were interviewed.The students who had first degrees in engineering, but not in civil or environmental engineering,indicated they were seeking a connection between engineering and social
- quisition boards;E-learning platforms;e-teaching;Experimentation;LabViEW;Learning pro- cess;Remote laboratories;Student-centered learning;.[15] B. Kapralos, A. Hogue, and H. Sabri, “Recognition of hand raising gestures for a remote learning application,” (Santorini, Greece), pp. COST 292; aceMedia; K–Space; Muscle; Eu- ropean Association for Signal Image Processing –, 2007. complex problems;Distance learn- ing (DL);hand gestures;hand motions;International (CO);markov modelling;motion cue- ing;Multimedia interactive services;Omni directional;Remote learning;.[16] J. Dong and H. Guo, “Enhance computer network curriculum using collaborative project based learning,” (Vancouver, BC, Canada), 2011. California State University
doctoral research8. Drawing on experiencesand ideas from multiple contexts, which for returners may include their work context anddoctoral program context, can be a source of innovation9. Further, returners bring anunderstanding of real-world engineering needs to their academic work, and their academic workmay have more immediate applications within the engineering community7. Peters and Daly8shared the example of one retuning student who sought a PhD to address an issue that arose inher industry work experience with the plan to pursue work related to that issue upon completingher degree. One study on adult undergraduate returners suggests that, because of their pastpersonal and work experiences, mature students were highly motivated and goal
you are a part of:[] Mechanical[] Electrical & Computer[] Biomedical[] Engineering Entrepreneurship[] Chemical[] Civil & EnvironmentalQ9 I feel socially connected to other students in my department:[] Strongly Disagree[] Disagree[] Neither agree nor disagree[] Agree[] Strongly agreeQ10 I feel socially connected to other students outside of my department:[] Strongly Disagree[] Disagree[] Neither agree nor disagree[] Agree[] Strongly agreeQ11 I have good relationships with the professors in my department.[] Strongly Disagree[] Disagree[] Neither agree nor disagree[] Agree[] Strongly AgreeQ12 How often do you study/do work in a group setting?[] Never[] Sometimes[] Often[] AlwaysQ13 How often are you assigned group projects in your
actively pursues research in engineering education and assists other faculty in their scholarly projects. She also is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of American Society of Engineering Education and guest co-editor for a special issue of the International Journal of Engineering Education on applications of engineering education research.Matthew Holsapple, University of Michigan Matthew A. Holsapple is a doctoral candidate at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. His research interests include the impact of educational experiences on student moral development and personal and social responsibility, professional
Foundation Engineering Research Center for Compact and Efficient Fluid Power. Dr. Cloutier has over twenty years’ experience in systems engineering & architecting, software engineering, and project management. Prior to Stevens, Cloutier was a Principle Engineer at Lockheed Martin Mission Systems & Sensors where he worked on the Aegis and the LCS programs, and at Boeing Helicopters as an Associate Technical Fellow and a lead avionics engineer on the V-22 Osprey. Rob’s re- search interests are focused on the applicability of patterns to architecting complex systems model based systems architecting, architecture entropy and CONOPS development using new technologies. Previous roles included lead systems engineer
]. Comparisons between treatment and WLC participants revealed that participants in boththe written-only and the written plus simulation treatment groups were shown to have astatistically superior ability to describe how they would apply interpersonal communication skills(p <0.01). Further support for the results was provided via the positive effect sizes (Cohen’s d,.51 and .35 for Questions 1 and 2 respectively) associated with the analysis comparing the twotreatment and the wait-list control groups. Other studies assessing the application of skills reportsimilar medium effect sizes.55 More specifically, Katz et al. (2008)56 reported a 0.42 effect size(using Cohen’s d) when comparing the scores between first year and second year
receiveself-reflection relevance writing prompts throughout the course. The writing prompts aredesigned to facilitate students’ self-regulatory skills in cognition, metacognition, and motivationin a way that cultivates students’ learning and application of entrepreneurial knowledge andskills. Specifically, students self-reflect upon their learning experiences related to the topicstaught in the entrepreneurship course and potentially form entrepreneur identities fromconnecting their real-life experiences and the learning content in the course.Currently, we have started implementing the writing prompts in an introductory entrepreneurshipcourse to test our study materials in Spring 2022. We plan to conduct a full-scale study in Fall2022. Data include
-91. Those committees took him to nearly 100 countries globally. He had nationwide responsibility for US Army Materiel Command Scientific and Engineering computing, 1969-78, pioneering many applications in what has become today’s Internet, and he served as a US Army Officer in the Office of the Chief of Staff, in the Pentagon, 1966-1968. He holds a B.Sc. in Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Maryland. He is the recipient of a Gold Medal from the International Telecommunica- tions Academy for sustained contributions to telecommunications; the Silver Core from the International Federation for Information Processing; and the Founders Award from the
continues to experience atransformation that is responsible for an increased state of complexity and achievement, resultingin national recognition as the 2003 Outstanding Student Section for a medium-sized section.Major restructure of SWE officers: management leadership and a team approach in theLeadership TeamThe major restructure of the SWE officers began in the 2001-2002 academic year. The executiveboard decided that there was too much work for only a handful of officers, and that a largergroup of officers would be more effective in handling the workload of all the SWE projects. Inorder research how other SWE student sections organized their volunteer resources, the currentPresident and Vice President performed a benchmarking analysis using the
byRuhl et. al. (1987).22 Over 40% of respondents said that they asked students to think aloud in anoffice hour setting (45%), asked content questions about a demonstration or lab (45%), hadstudents solve problems with class discussion afterward (43%), and lectured with at least 15minutes for discussion (43%). They were least likely to choose more challenging student-centered activities such as role playing (0%), students-developed questions to lead the discussion(2%), and student presentations individually (2%) or in small groups (5%). It is important tonote, that some of these activities might be less applicable for graduate students who may nothave the autonomy to design such activities.From this list of 23 teaching approaches, eight were
relied on student’s recollections for reasons they left their science,math, or engineering majors, without the availability of extensive data collected prior toswitching out. While Felder, Felder, Maurney, Hamrin & Dietz6 did do a longitudinal study,their entire sample is 124 students in chemical engineering alone; and limited data are collectedfrom them since the major focus was on reaction to differences in classroom procedures.Goodman et al.8 also did a longitudinal study, but their sample, while national, is only of femalestudents; further, because their study was web-based, over 40% of the sample, especially thosewho left engineering, chose not to respond to the study.Therefore, two features position the proposed project to make an