Education, 2016 Perception of Academic Integrity among Students and Faculty: A Comparison of the Ethical Gray AreaAbstractAs long as there is schooling, there will be cheating. At times, it may be a front page scandal suchas recent willful fraud by administrators and teachers on high stakes testing in primary schools.At other times, a cheating incident may provide a teachable moment with regards to the ethicsand integrity that are so critical to the engineering profession. As with many complex issues,cheating exists on a continuum of sorts: what is acceptable to one may be highly unacceptable toanother, with a wide range of perceptions given a particular scenario. This work addresses relatedaspects of academic
. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering
had introduced. The second theme concerned how the participants expected theirstudents to respond to the introduction of SETI technologies and instructional methods. Thethird theme was about feedback and ideas, asking what participants liked about SETI, how aSETI community could be developed and sustained, and what could be done to strengthen thenext iteration of SETI.Several participants identified as their next steps organizing and testing the new resources,preparing kits for fall semester circuits and introductory courses, and practicing applications ofCamtasia, PDF Annotator and AutoCAD. Several participants also planned to spend part of thesummer experimenting with video production. Some participants spoke more about integratingexisting
out what is really going on with a student. Faculty advisor should be proactive and support students with difficult issues. Skipping class is a symptom of the real problem. Intentional contact with students with the goal of developing a caring and beneficial relationship typically leads to increased academic motivation and persistence. 2. When Engineering and Engineering Technology students faces academic challenges, sometimes they are hesitant to visit the faculty as they see it as a failure on them. What is intuitive to faculty is new to students. They may not see the relevance or meaning in the content or courses they have to take. Explaining it to them in a way that relates understanding is key to
in faculty status such as new faculty being hired,tenure status, past positions being held and term limits on various committees. Depending on thecomplexity of each institution’s governing document (which states the stipulations for eachcommittee’s required representation), making certain nominations and elections are carried out ina fair and equitable manner can prove to be a fairly daunting task.To streamline this yearly task and ensure continuity between former and current electioncommittees, the authors of this paper developed a technology-based system which automates thenomination/election process. This paper presents an overview of this on-line, database-drivencommittee nomination and election system. This paper also points out several
Professors AAUP. Contingent Appointments and the Academic Profession, AAUP Policy 10th Edition, 2006, http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/contingent/ (Accessed September 2011).4. Daryl G., Smith D G., Turner C.S., Osei-Kofi N., Richards S. “Interrupting the Usual: Successful Strategies for Hiring Diverse Faculty”. The Journal of Higher Education, 75:2, March/April 2004.5. Kezar A.J., Sam C. “Understanding the New Majority of Non Tenure Track Faculty in Higher Education: Demographics, Experiences, and Plans of Action”. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36, November 2010.6. Waltman J., Hollenshead C., August L., Miller J., Bergom I. “Contingent Faculty in a Tenure Track World”. Center for the Education of Women, University of
members; and aVisiting Scholars Program to bring scholars to the UW campus. This paper focuses on itsmentoring programs for women faculty.Mentoring Women Faculty at UWBecause multiple and group mentoring have proven to be successful in that mentees benefit fromhearing multiple perspectives on career development,11, 21, 25 the UW ADVANCE programprovides group mentoring to its women faculty. Its mentoring programs include a junior facultymentoring program; Professional Development Consultants in each College who are available todiscuss promotion and tenure concerns; a mentoring-for-leadership program; and the TransitionalSupport Program.It should be noted that these programs were created in response to focus group feedback whichwas collected at the
program information sheet/flyer and update Website with new program offerings ● Meet with Lead Faculty to discuss issues, changes or areas of concern ● Organize CGE sponsored workshop/orientation/information sessions ● Participate in various campus resource and study abroad fairs and make classroom presentations Admissions and Logistics: ● Review applications on a rolling admissions basis (and interview, if appropriate) ● Communicate any program-specific information to students ● Confirm study abroad course section(s) and descriptions ● Arrange group flight arrangements (per program
may not be factuallyaccurate although this study is concerned with participants’ perceptions rather than factualaccounts4.ConclusionWe have illustrated how oral history and participatory methods may be used to shed light onwomen’s career paths into STEM faculty, identify ways women’s career experiences compare tochilly climate and leaky pipeline models, discover new metaphors, identify critical juncturesalong women’s paths to STEM faculty careers, and discover new information about women’spath into STEM faculty careers.These innovative research methods may lead to new ways of thinking about theunderrepresentation of women among STEM faculty by developing groundwork needed maketheoretical advances. New metaphors will highlight the lived
Fellow. As a former electrical engineer, she is concerned with sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and participation among historically marginalized students of color. Her research focuses on the role of racialized experiences and biases in STEM educational and career attainment, problematizing traditional notions of academic achievement and what is mean to be successful yet marginalized, and STEM identity and identity development in high-achieving students of color. She is currently the PI on two studies funded by NSF, the first of which investigates the causes behind why African Americans remain one of the most underrepresented racial groups in engineering faculty positions. The
groups tend to limit or discourage publication and focus more ondevelopment than ideas,” which could hinder the training and profile of doctoral students. Othersexpressed concerns about whether industrial partners would be interested in collaborating “onprojects that have zero practical or economic applications.” In addition, one participant indicatedthat “intellectual property issues are the biggest obstacle in establishing academic-industrycollaboration.” Nevertheless, there are other issues that discourage faculty members fromengaging in collaborative research with non-academic partners. These pertain to the highlytheoretical nature of their research, or their belief that doctoral training should focus onfundamental research without any
enlisted his former graduate advisor in a joint venture towrite a paper, and possibly a chapter in a book. The former advisor welcomed theopportunity, and the efforts were successful. As his former advisee, Johnson posed no threatto the quality of work that the advisor is accustomed to producing. He was a tenured,associate professor; therefore, his primary goal was to have an opportunity to work with thewriter as a colleague, rather than a student. Since the former advisor was already establishedin the field, it was to the writers’ advantage to sign on as a co-author.Too often as new faculty members, we immediately set our sights on publishing a book. Thisawesome task requires a great deal of commitment, time, and hard labor. Junior facultymembers
workshop participants to conceptualize and discuss career issues in a novel,representative way and allowed other participants to see their struggles and accomplishmentsthrough their eyes. Thus, visual representation of positive and negative aspects of being a part ofthe engineering academy may be a useful strategy for men and women in engineering to discusstheir career issues and to find community support.I. IntroductionIt is well known that women are under-represented in the engineering workforce nationwide [1].In colleges and universities, fewer women than men become engineering faculty members andfewer women than men make rapid progress up the academic ladder [2]. There are many andvaried explanations for these disparities including that there
presentationwill also focus on the challenges of conducting such collaborative projects and recommend dosand don’ts for faculty teams that plan to conduct interdisciplinary student projects in engineeringtechnology.Relevance of Interdisciplinary Projects and Fostering Student CollaborationIn recent decades there has been an increasing demand on manufacturers to reduce the cycle timefor new product development. At the same time, we continued to see that the life cycle of newproducts became increasingly shorter. In this era of a free global market economy that fostersand nurtures creativity as well as innovation, engineering technologists can rest assured thatthese observations define a trend that will continue into the coming decades at an even morefurious
be in non-tenure track science and engineering positions than weremen.A study of science graduate students at the University of California, Davis revealed that womenstudents’ interest in pursuing academic careers declined at a significantly higher rate than didthat of their male colleagues. One of the major factors they cited was concern about integratingfamily responsibilities with a tenure track position.26Using qualitative and quantitative data derived from a survey of both tenure and non-tenure trackwomen faculty, this paper focuses on the experiences of engineering and technology womenfaculty, both on and off the tenure track, who are attempting to balance the demands of work andtheir personal lives. At issue is whether or not tenured
analyze how faculty provide support amidstthe challenges faced by international students in their roles as educators. Our main objective is tocomprehensively understand faculty perceptions and practices regarding the support ofinternational students in engineering programs. By delving into their experiences, we aim touncover valuable insights that can inform and enhance institutional efforts aimed at fostering asupportive environment for international students in the United States. Through our research, weseek to contribute to the ongoing discourse concerning the needs of international students andoffer practical recommendations for enhancing their academic and extracurricular experiences,as well as outcomes, within engineering
engineering that included four faculty from differentdisciplines, civil engineering, economics, education, and sociology. The authors addressed somefactors that contributed to the process of the research collaboration such as sharing knowledge,collective understanding, and facing with distant geographic locations.Overall, although there have been some discussions on the process of research collaboration andsome important aspects such as trust and power issues in engineering education literature, notonly there is a gap of empirical studies in this area but also it appears that research collaborationas an important area of research has not gained enough attention. The studies concerned withresearch collaboration in engineering education literature
. Todd et al. observed that, “Manydepartments involved in Capstone-type courses believe that obtaining industry sponsoredprojects is an excellent way to bring industry and academia closer together” (p.171).19 Industrysupport usually helps by providing viable projects and the necessary funding to give hands-onexperience to students. Occasionally, such strong emphasis on industry engagement places aneed for faculty themselves to have such experience or to integrate partners from industry orelsewhere who can provide insights.20 Such a strong focus on working with industry canhowever restrict the course projects to solving known real-world problems in the industry, ratherthan focusing on creating innovative solutions and capitalizing on new market
require careful calibration of new algorithms created withinTranscriptto and other AI APIs that would allow us to perform that complex functionality.References[1] F. Martin, A. Ritzhaupt, S. Kumar, and K. Budhrani, “Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 42, pp. 34–43, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001.[2] M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–29, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0047239516661713.[3] C.-S. Li and B. Irby, “An Overview of Online Education: Attractiveness
. Michigan State University, 2015.[6] R. Wells, “International faculty in U.S. community colleges,” New Dir. Community Coll., vol. 2007, no. 138, pp. 77–82, 2007, doi: 10.1002/cc.284.[7] K. E. Foote, W. Li, J. Monk, and R. Theobald, “Foreign-born Scholars in US Universities: Issues, Concerns, and Strategies,” J. Geogr. High. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 167–178, May 2008, doi: 10.1080/03098260701731322.[8] N. P. Rita and M. Karides, “‘I have an accent, so people know I’m not from here’: a racial and ethnic analysis of international STEM faculty in Hawai‘i,” Ethn. Racial Stud., pp. 1–23, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/01419870.2021.1981965.[9] J. H. Lawrence, S. Celis, H. S. Kim, S. K. Lipson, and X. Tong, “To stay or
by their individual department chairs/search committeechairs. Some college-level search committee members were more proactive in supportingpreparations for their department interviews than others.Discussion in the college-wide search committee early in the process revealed that there waswidespread concern about inadequate mentoring of new faculty, and that faculty who providedmentoring felt that their efforts were not recognized when they were themselves evaluated. Inresponse to these issues, we asked all departments to submit their mentoring plans for candidatesfrom this search to the Dean. We also asked them to submit to the Dean their policies that wouldensure that contributions faculty make to the college’s inclusion goals—including
expertise in continuous manufacturing, and an awareness that these skill sets are in very short supply.Mr. PATRICK JAMES DIXON PE, PMP, DPAS https://www.linkedin.com/in/dixonpatrick/ American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Faculty and Industry Led Workshop to Prepare Students for Successful Internships in Process Control and AutomationJason A. Berberich1, Douglas W. Coffin1, Gary R. Rudemiller1, Pat J. Dixon and Keith L. Hohn11 Department of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 450562 Dixon Process Automation Services Inc., Lago Vista, TX, 78645AbstractIndustry demand for engineers with skills in
education process on Lean+ for its employees. Boeing would like to apply lean principles in areas other than the assembly line. 7. Boeing is faced with the same workforce issues that other aerospace companies are seeing, an aging workforce and possible age gaps in technical expertise. Boeing is working on ways for technology to transfer from senior, experienced people to the new employees. More effort should be given to this important topic.Teaching Style/Curriculum Adjustments/Other ApplicationsThe obvious application from this summer program is that I have more experiences toincorporate into the classroom. This past fall I taught Introduction to Aeronautics and wasable to directly apply in the classroom what
ways to addressthis issue as they worked to develop mentoring structures. Several early career faculty remarked about the benefits of cluster hiring. In addition tohiring large cohorts of faculty together, institutions who implemented cluster hiring, they alsoensured there were events to enable the new hires to meet one another and that there were otherculturally-relevant supports on the campus to sustain the faculty. Faye shared, [Campus C] did a very good job with mentoring, inviting me to several events for faculty of color. I made great connections with the director of [Latinx Office], and he introduced me to several others, Latinx community in the university. We came here as a big cohort, so there are two
certainly necessary,only one faculty without prompting highlighted attending to the cultural racialized aspects oftheir students. A couple talked about moving beyond science to include more personal issues aspart of their mentoring approach, but only one named race as a salient factor without prompting.This suggest that hegemonic science identity development is the primary concern of the facultyinterviewed. It also highlights color-blindness as part of the default approach to thinking aboutmentoring, they mentor toward the idea of universal STEM identity. They do not see color, theyonly see science. It was only with prompting later in the interview when asked about the role ofculture in mentorships that some discussed the issues of difference based
, and through a camera directed at a whiteboard. Notethe previously mentioned issues are thus resolved for the that the PC or Document Camera can be used simultaneouslyupcoming year well in advance. For faculty, this meeting with the camera/whiteboard since distance students have 2contains training sessions on blended classrooms, to take screens available to them. The result is that any lectureadvantages of the strength of online asynchronous content content provided on PowerPoint or whiteboard in a typicaldelivery, and encourage as much student interaction as live classroom can be easily duplicated in the distancepossible during the class period. As noted in previous format. As a
(participant selection described in detail in following sections). In addition to the surveys developed by Martin, Stefl, and Slaton, we also collected pre-workshop assessment surveys where participants answered questions such as “How do you define STEM faculty development?” and “What do you see as the main issues or concerns surrounding STEM faculty development?” We used the participants’ responses to inform discussions throughout the workshop, and attendees participated in directed discussions about the three separate workshop threads in separate breakout session rooms. Before the workshop, we gave attendees the option to select which thread discussions they would prefer to
institutions. The fellows brought their own laptops and arranged theirown housing. Hiring was accomplished under the title “Part-Time Visiting Faculty” whichprompted downstream actions like office assignments, key requests, being added to theinstitutional computing system with @rose-hulman.edu emails, and other integration details. Thepart-time designation also reminded all individuals concerned that the fellows were fulfillingmultiple roles that included their academic progress and not just working for RHIT. The timing of the experience was a major consideration for the fellows. Since VT is onthe semester schedule, it was possible for a fellow to participate in RHIT’s quarter-basedschedule (focusing on Fall Term for a single term/one semester
; Phillips, M. (2022). Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset Into the Engineering Classroom. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3101360• Cooper, J. E., & Stevens, D. D. (2002). Tenure in the Sacred Grove: Issues and Strategies for Women and Minority Faculty. SUNY Press.• Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Mayer, P. S. (2016). Developing a new measure of entrepreneurial mindset: reliability, validity, and implications for practitioners. Consulting Psychology Journal, 68(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000045 40References• Diggs, S. N., Bharath, D. M. N., Roberts-Lewis, K., & Bailey
to advanced STEM courses during K-12 education, insufficient mentorshipopportunities, and a lack of representation in STEM faculty and leadership roles can createbarriers for these students are all barriers for these students (Dias, 2017). In addition to the lack of diversity concerning race and ethnicity, engineering educationhas continued to conserve a gender gap. Although women are enrolling in college at higher ratesthan men, engineering education is still largely homogeneous and heavily dominated by men(Camacho & Lord, 2013). Expanding upon the pre-existing gender disparity, it is noteworthy toacknowledge that women encounter implicit bias within the engineering pathway and may alsocontend with stereotype threat, creating an