both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict engineering students’ success outcomes, such as retention, academic performance, and grad- uation.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes
Paper ID #9496Comparisons of Faculty and Student Definitions of EntrepreneurshipMr. Philip M. Reeves, The Pennsylvania State University Philip Reeves is a graduate student in the Educational Psychology Department at Penn State. He is work- ing with faculty to evaluate a new university-wide entrepreneurship and innovation minor as a graduate assistant for the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of
faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Page 24.337.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Creative Go-Getters: Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Activities in Engineering UndergraduatesAbstract:The purpose of this study is to examine characteristics of incoming engineering students aspossible predictors of later participation in entrepreneurial activities. Four characteristics wereexamined: 1) locomotion, 2) self-evaluation, 3) creative self-efficacy and 4
Paper ID #9605Deconstructing the Innovator’s DNAMr. Paul David Mathis, Engineering Education Paul Mathis is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education and a council member for ASEE student chapter at Purdue University. He has a bachelors degree in Physical Science and a Masters in Education Curriculum. His areas of interest are design, innovation, creativity and improving skills of future engineers. pmathis@purdue.edu.Mr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. His research interests
of Defense and private industry where she led multidisciplinary design teams to be innovative and creative in developing and implementing advanced technologies for US and Foreign Navies. Now in her academic role, she explores methodologies to develop and foster design creativity and innovation to prepare the next generation’s leaders in engineering.Prof. Gene Hou, Old Dominion University Dr. Gene Hou is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering of Old Do- minion University (ODU). He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University of Iowa in 1983 and joined Old Dominion University since then. His expertise is in computational mechanics, mul- tidisciplinary design optimization
engineering design, machine design, statics, advanced dynamics, biomechanics, and computer modeling in biomechanics.Dr. Darrell K. Kleinke, University of Detroit MercyProf. Rebecca P. Blust, University of Dayton Professor Blust has been the Coordinator for UD’s Innovation Center and Design and Manufacturing Clinic since 2009. Professor Rebecca Blust has served as the Equity Advisor for the School of Engineering at the University of Dayton and is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology. As equity advisor, Prof. Blust facilitates bias-free faculty searches; reviews annual scorecard data for her college, alerting the department chair and/or dean of inequities based on salary, space and professional
, Page 23.217.3especially if the research process manages to foster deep discussion within both the immediatedesign team and the broader community. Asking “What wellbeing objectives are designers tryingto help a community achieve?” may encourage more thorough analysis of values that motivatedesign activities. Particular wellbeing objectives undergird the expressed social mission of socialenterprises and inform strategies for social innovation.9, 12, 132. Critical knowledge to understand wellbeing objectives rests in diffuse communities.Identifying wellbeing objectives requires gathering information within the target community ofusers. The international development scholars who have pioneered the wellbeing definition arguefor participatory
approach aims to provideappropriate guidance and relevant training, not only to the instructor, but also the student learner.These ideas lead us to the design and development of innovative instructional techniques asdescribed below.Assessment Implementation & Methodology Assessment was carried out by utilizing sample quizzes, homework assignments,examinations, written essays, laboratory reports and project binders. All these documents weregraded on a holistic basis using likert scale principles. Later the data collected were recorded ina tabular form using an excel spreadsheet. A matrix was generated to document grading andanalysis. A sample excel table for one student’s single homework assignment report is shown inAppendix E
definition by Tim Brown, President andCEO of IDEO, provides a relevant framework. Brown describes design thinking as: “…a discipline that uses the designer’s sensibility and methods to match people’s needs with what is technologically feasible and what a viable business strategy can convert into customer value and market opportunity.” 12The pedagogical goal of design thinking is innovation. It is achieved by finding the intersectionof what is feasible (typically the domain of engineering), with what is viable or profitable(typically the domain of business schools) with what is desirable. Design innovation is theintersection of these activities13, as shown in Figure 1
Paper ID #6758”The Influence of Culture, Process, Leadership and Workspace on ”Dr. Leo E. Hanifin, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Leo Hanifin is a Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy, and has been the PI of UDM KEEN Entrepreneurship Grants for over five years, studying innovation and entrepreneur- ship. He was Dean of the College of Engineering and Science at UDM for the past 21 years August 2012.Dr. Ross A. Lee, Villanova University Ross Lee is a professor at Villanova University where he teaches Engineering Entrepreneurship, Sustain- able Industrial Chemistry, Sustainable
”Engineering Creativity” that was designed to bring out the creative side of engineering and business students. Well over 1000 students passed through this course. Because of this background, he was selected to be part of a team to teach the ”Innovations and New Ventures” class on entrepreneurship that began in the summer of 2006, with him concentrating on the innovation side of the course. To date, over one hundred and eighty students have learned how to develop a product and put together a basic business plan. He led a team to develop ”Entrepreneurship Across the Curriculum” at Kettering University where faculty members attended workshops designed to help put innovation projects into their classrooms. This effort resulted
courses in management and entrepreneurship.Abby Lammons Thompson, Mississippi State University Page 22.976.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 iPhone Entrepreneurship Class: Bridging the Gap Between Engineering and Business to Create an Entrepreneurial CultureDiscovering ways to engineer innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship in a university settingis a constant focus of many entrepreneurial-focused researchers. The Entrepreneurship Center atMississippi State University (MSU) seeks to create an entrepreneurial
quests forentrepreneuring success are qualitatively analyzed using the following two questions: 1) How do we introduce and measure the predictive engagement aspect of vulnerability in successful entrepreneurial storytelling? And, 2) How do we develop a procedure for applying the storytelling results to the start-up phases of entrepreneurial work and illuminate its effectiveness for delivering innovation.Increasingly, academic and industrial collaborations begin as entrepreneurial expectations fordelivering something novel. Defining the first steps of start-ups results in discussions of a seriesof related concepts: innovation, empathy, and storytelling. While the media is rich
goal/s.”7A further goal for the student teams is to make explicit that innovation and meeting the needs ofthe adopters of the technology developed in the projects is required to achieve project success.This moves the emphasis from a social business to the development of a social entrepreneurialactivity. Definition of what is meant by social entrepreneurship is widely debated, but there aresome core elements and qualities that are frequently recognized, for example: Page 25.366.3 “Social entrepreneurs are society’s change agents, creators of innovations that disrupt the status quo and transform our world for the better. By
AC 2012-3938: DEVELOPING AN ENTREPRENEURIAL CONSULTINGPRACTICUM WITH A LARGE, ESTABLISHED COMPANY AT THE UNI-VERSITY OF MARYLANDDr. James V. Green, University of Maryland, College Park James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech at the University of Maryland as the Director of En- trepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Di- rector with Mtech, Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. He leads Mtech’s international entrepreneurship education initiatives to include establishing and
instructor assumes the role of a facilitator andeffectively utilizes modern technology to experiment on innovative ideas that can lead tonew classroom instructional strategies (Tozman, 2004). Authors, Alexander W. Astin,Trudy W. Banta, K. Patricia Cross, Elaine El-Khawas, Peter T. Ewell, Pat Hutchings,Theodore J. Marchese, Kay M. McClenney, Marcia Mentkowski, Margaret A. Miller,E. Thomas Moran and Barbara D. Wright developed a document in 1996 under theauspices of the AAHE (American Association for Higher Education) Assessment Forumwith support from the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education withadditional support for publication and dissemination from the Exxon EducationFoundation. The literature supports our intuitive belief
Emmy Award for technical achievement in the development of the Skycam, an aerial robotic control camera system. In 2008, he was given the Philadelphia IEEE Member Award for his contributions to technology. Dougherty has 13 US Patents.Prof. Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit MercyProf. Pritpal Singh, Villanova UniversityDr. Kenneth F. Bloemer, University of Dayton Ken Bloemer is currently Director of the Innovation Center at the University of Dayton’s School of En- gineering. Here he recruits industry sponsored innovation challenges to be solved by multidisciplinary student teams who tap into the vast resources of the University. In addition, Bloemer teaches courses on innovation and is a frequent guest lecturer
Manager, Large Caliber Ammunition, at General Dynamics, Inc., served as guestjudge for the 2011 Case Study Competition.Leadership Workshop SeriesThis series brings students together to explore specific leadership topics and to further developtheir leadership skills. The 2011-12 Series consists of three workshops: An interactive team leadership workshop led by Dr. Jason Winkle, CEO of WinkleCorp, a leadership development and coaching company. A workshop on Leadership, Innovation & Career Coaching, co-presented by National Instruments and Rose-Hulman faculty and staff And a Rose-Hulman alumni panel discussion on the topic of leadership.We initiated the LAP in the summer of 2008, with the first Leadership Academy
entrepreneurship, and sustainability. He is spearheading Technology Entrepreneurship education at SLU via Innovation to Product (I2P), iChallenge, and entrepreneurship competitions and funded research. He is the Principal Investigator for the KEEN EntrepreneurshipProgram Development Grants to foster the spirit of innovation in all engineering students.Condoor authored several books. The titles include Innovative Conceptual Design, Engineering Statics, and Modeling with ProEngineer. He published several technical papers on topics focused on conceptual design, design principles, cognitive science as applied to design, and design education. VayuWind, a hubless wind turbine for urban environments, is one of his inventions. VayuWind
. Jordan, Baylor University William Jordan is the Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in metallurgical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, a M.A. degree in theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A&M University. He teaches materials related courses. He does work in the areas of entrepreneurship and appropriate technology in developing countries. He also writes and does research in the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education.Dr. R. Radharamanan, Mercer University R. Radharamanan is currently working as professor of industrial engineering and Director of Mercer Cen- ter for Innovation and
businesses. Reimer has served as an adjunct faculty member at Lawrence Technological University for more than 20 years. He has taught courses in entrepreneurship, management, and corporate entrepreneurship and innovation for engineers. Reimer has operated his own consulting company, the Small Business Strategy Group, for 27 years. He published numerous articles on small business, entrepreneurship, and strategic thinking. Reimer conducted work- shops and seminars for trade associations, chamber of commerce organizations, and private companies. He has received several awards and recognition by local, state, and federal agencies for his work in en- trepreneurship and minority business development. Reimer served as member of
multi-disciplinary curriculum provides students a better opportunity international opportunity to learnand grow. Page 22.72.3Many obstacles arise when creating a study abroad program, from curriculum to funding torecruitment. This paper describes how we face these obstacles and have created a successfulprogram in Rome, Italy. We will address the following: Multi-Disciplinary Curriculum and Partnerships Marketing and Recruitment Creative Private Funding Solutions Innovative Mentorship ProgramWe are using this entrepreneurial and multi-disciplinary approach to studying abroad as a way toenhance international
AC 2010-2012: CROSS-DISCIPLINARY TRAINING OF RESEARCHERS INENTREPRENEURIAL DISCOVERYRobert Keynton, University of LouisvilleJames Fiet, University of LouisvillePankaj Patel, Ball State University Page 15.336.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Cross-Disciplinary Training of Researchers in Entrepreneurial DiscoveryIntroductionThe work presented in this paper are the outcomes from an NSF-sponsored Partnership forInnovations program which involved the development of a new training paradigm in an attemptto:(1) stimulate the transformation of knowledge created by the nationally-renowned researchand education enterprise at the University into innovations to
University and has mentored more than 30 undergrad- uate and graduate business plan teams since 2002. In 2010, Carol’s teams won more national business plan competitions than teams from any one university in the 25 year history of the competitions. Carol has won two national awards for innovation in entrepreneurship pedagogy and won the prestigious University of Arkansas Alumni Association Faculty Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching in 2009. She earned a Ph.D. in Strategic Management with an Entrepreneurship Concentration from the University of Georgia in 1988. Page 22.944.1 c
AC 2011-19: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENT COMPETITIVE AC-TIVITIES AND THE ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETDonald M Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald Reimer is a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering and Director of Entrepreneurial Pro- grams, College of Engineering, at Lawrence Technological University. He teaches Corporate Entrepreneur- ship for Engineers and Structured Approaches to Innovation in the Lear Entrepreneurial Program. Mr. Reimer is the faculty advisor for the Lawrence Tech Chapter of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organi- zation. He serves as a Kern Fellow in the Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network. Mr. Reimer also serves as the Program Director for the Coleman Foundation Faculty
rich.First, we begin with an overview of the relationship between the individual and the community,including a review of the literature, focusing on the transition from personal characteristics ofentrepreneurs to the broader understanding of the entrepreneur in situ. Second, we propose anew way to think of the innovation cycle, based on the virtues of creativity, diligence, andwisdom, which are informed by other virtues, such as compassion, justice, and stewardship.Finally, we consider practical pedagogy and case studies (including experiences of our studentauthor) to teach entrepreneurship using the virtues, which may help faculty to move beyondsimple teaching of skills towards a positive influence to increase student entrepreneurialbehavior.2
operations, with rapid development, prototyping, and validation of client technology. AllIntellectual Property generated during the project is owned entirely by the client. This modelremoves many of the constraints of industry partnerships and technology transfer, and iscurrently being used by the University as both an incubator for student/faculty/staff innovation aswell as a means to acquire solid, industrially relevant projects for Senior design students.Problem-Based Learning within a Multidisciplinary, Industrial Project-Based ContextProblem-Based Learning (PBL) has been an extremely successful model for both medical andtechnology education;1,2 our experiences with multidisciplinary student teams working onindustry-provided challenges in a