School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs. His educational research interests include developing techniques for enhancing engineering design education, innovation in design, teaching technological entrepreneurship, global product design, and systems design.Mr. Andras Gordon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andras Gordon is an instructor of engineering design in the School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional programs. He is interested in applications of systems thinking in introductory engineer- ing design classes. He is also involved in optimizing ways of collaboration in virtual teams of engineering and other students in culturally diverse and geographically
evaluated using a survey developedbased on the major goals of the program. These are related to the successfulness of the bootcamp, improvement in student communication skills including interviewing, improvement inself-confidence, and improved research skills. The survey includes eleven questions that stu-dents answered on a six-point Likert scale with 1 indicating the internship had no impact on theskill, and 6 indicating that the internship helped them to improve that skill greatly. The greatestimpact areas indicated from this assessment in the 2010 class were in the students’ ability to askquestions, their verbal communication skills, and their ability to present data verbally. Each ofthese questions received an average student rating over five
, and mathematics (STEM) faculty at institutions of highereducation is a requirement of all MSP grants. The PISA program presents a novel approach toaccomplishing MSP goals by integrating the use of exemplary, research-based elementaryengineering curricula, engineering explorations and problem-based activities to strengthenteachers’ science learning. An intensive summer institute, followed by in-class mentoring andcoaching support, and online help, represent key program components.Partnership GoalsThe overarching aim of the three-year PISA program is to: (a) demonstrate and institutionalizewithin participating schools a methodology, supporting curriculum materials, and otherinstructional resources and strategies to increase student interest
interested in developing critical understandings of the culture of engineering education and, espe- cially, the experiences of underrepresented undergraduate engineering students and engineering educators. In addition to teaching undergraduate engineering courses and a graduate course on entrepreneurship, she also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at ASU. She is deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Suren Jayasuriya, Arizona State University Suren Jayasuriya is an assistant professor jointly between the School of Arts, Media and Engineering (AME) and the School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering
a visiting research scientist in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, visiting faculty in the Center for Entrepreneurship, and a visiting Fellow in the Center for Education and Research in Information Security at Purdue University.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Justin L. Hess received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education along with his Master’s of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher in the STEM Education Research Institute at IUPUI. Justin’s research interests include developing pedagogical strategies to improve STEM students’ ethical reasoning skills; exploring the role
Paper ID #33568BME Career Exploration: Examining Students’ Career PerspectivesCassandra Sue Ellen Woodcock, University of Michigan Cassandra (Cassie) Woodcock is a PhD Candidate at the University of Michigan. She is pursuing a PhD in Biomedical Engineering (BME) with an Emphasis in Engineering Education. Her research interests involve experiential engineering out-of-class experiences and the professional, personal, and academic outcomes of students engaged in these experiences. She is also involved in student outcomes research in the BME Department and with the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education Office, College of
, utilizing theKSBA model, by examining the experience of the inaugural cohort of students in UPRMSustainability Engineering (ISOS) Minor program. Participants for the Minor were selected fromfirst year students entering one of UPRM’s engineering degree programs in Fall 2023. Studentswere then selected through an additional application process designed to identify talentedstudents motivated to study sustainability and effect change, improvement, and renewal in theworld through engineering. Key requirements included maintaining a minimum GPA of 2.50;attending a 1-week summer camp in July, prior to the start of classes; completion of an approvedcollege course, equivalent credit from the Advanced Placement Test, or completion of a summercourse prior to
to campus, the selected participants are involved in team building exercisesfollowed by collaborative hands-on laboratory research experiences in one of many engineeringdisciplines. SEI participants also engage in computer science programming classes, engagingdiscussions about entrepreneurship and engineering disciplines with graduate students, faculty,and invited speakers. Field excursions and tours of the historical campus were also incorporatedinto the schedule to allow participants to become acclimated to the campus. Additional highlightsof LEAD-SEI are the interactive chemistry laboratories, evening fireside chats with industryexecutives, late night laboratory collaborations, and guided site visits to corporations such asGoogle and NASA
addition to the highschool courses that all students take. Students attend the Academy (a separate physical campus)by starting their classes earlier during the morning hours. Students return to their base schoolsafter their morning at the Academy. During the three-hour timeframe that students are at theAcademy, students take courses in the content and practice of engineering fundamentals, variousblended fields of engineering, with an instructional focus on the practical design based problemsolving approach. These courses are aligned with science and math courses that are gradeappropriate. With access to a precision machine shop and 3-D prototyping technology, thestudents also gain valuable hands-on experiences not found in the traditional
have experience mentoring and tutoring”, “I was part of a similar program in high school”, “I like working with kids as I have already been a mentor in a school”, “I would like to get out and actually do engineering instead of studying all the time”, “Teaching would be a new experience that I am excited about”, “teaching is a fantastic opportunity for a project to have real-world impact”, and “I think showing kids how fun engineering can be is a great idea”. In addition, new engineering fields such as renewable energy, health, sustainability and engineering entrepreneurship are popular for young students and their university student mentors, which may attract more participants.4. Assign groups of 4 or more engineering students
and video).It also offers internships with over 30 business/industry partners and an Innovation LeadershipHonors Program with training in innovation, entrepreneurship, leadership, and sustainability.Broward College (BC) serves more than 67,000 students annually of which 35% are identified asHispanic in academic year 2015 – 2016. The percentage of enrolled students eligible for Pellgrants in 2014 – 2015 was even higher—55%. BC has made its mission to serve students withlimited means who can choose from among 132 Bachelor's, Associate's and certificate programsand classes offered online and on-campus. BC boasts a student body representing more than 175countries and 37% of BC's student body was born outside of the United States. BC is one of
(fully confident). Scores for the various constructs within the survey werecalculated for each student by averaging the responses to the multiple survey items that mappedto that area. On the 7-point scale, average scores below 3.5 were considered negative (ordisagree) responses, averages between 3.5 and 4.5 were considered neutral, and averages above4.5 were considered positive (or agreement).The survey was given to incoming first year students at the University of Colorado Boulder infall 2014. The survey was administered in class on the second day in the Introduction toEnvironmental Engineering course. The survey was also administered in class on the first day inan Introduction to Civil and Architectural Engineering course. Responses were
theimportance of capital investment: I think one of the biggest things is always like save us money. That’s one of the biggest things. Money and politics, there’s always that and I think those are the big challenges.To a certain extent, his contributions were influenced greatly by his focus on business and howto create investments. He had previously been involved in an entrepreneurship class at school.Therefore, the production of knowledge and creation of new knowledge varies depending on theDiscourses of every individual. Nonetheless, they were able to decide on one specific project andwork on automatic doors for the students with disabilities. Perhaps most important is the feelingthey shared regarding the need for help observed in their
: · Product Dissection were students examine the way in which products and machines work: their physical operation, the manner in which they are constructed, and the design and societal considerations that determine the difference between success and failure in the marketplace. · Technology-Based Entrepreneurship: focuses on the starting, financing and managing a new business in a highly competitive and technological based environment (developed in conjunction with the Business School). · Concurrent Engineering: the origin and meaning of the term concurrent engineering and discuss its role in modern engineering companies.Due to the success of this program [2]which has been highlighted in the New York
Center which promote innovation and entrepreneurship among engineering students and in collaborations with other colleges on campus and partnering with other institutions across the country.Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University Donna Crystal Llewellyn received her BA (major in Mathematics and minor in Economics) with High Honors from Swarthmore College in 1980. She went on to earn an MS in Operations Research from Stanford University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1984. After 30 years at Georgia Tech in a variety of roles, Donna became the Executive Director of the new Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives at Boise State University in January 2015. Donna’s current
expert 40.7 qualitative 35 self-efficacy 45 problem-based learning 40 interactive 38.1 model 36.1 methodology 33.5 gender 44.5 engineering historical 35 knowledge 34 essay 36 meta-analysis 31 education 40.5 First Year collaboration 33.5 class design 30 engineering 36 pedagogy 30.5 faculty 37 concept 33 entrepreneurship 30 satisfaction 33.5 development 28 concept 32
skillsmay also be a positive predictor of long-term intentional persistence. We providerecommendations to educators to meaningfully discuss ML/AI ethics in classes and encouragethe development of interpersonal skills to help increase diversity in the field.IntroductionArtificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have demonstrated tremendous capacityand promise to revolutionize data analysis and decision-making across sectors, includingengineering [1]–[3]. Global ML/AI hiring continues to rise, and the world’s top universities haveincreased their investment in AI education. In fact, from 2017-2021, the number of ML/AIcourses at the undergraduate level has increased by 100%, and at the graduate level by 40% [3].While the shift towards ML/AI
: Entrepreneurship education in engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Characteristics of Engineering Learning in Communities of Practice: An Exploratory Multi-case StudyAbstract: The Emerging Engineering Education (3E) transformation has been implemented in China tomeet the society’s needs of high-quality talents in science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM) fields. The transformation has stimulated some new forms of engineering learning which wereorganized in communities of practice such as engineering studio, engineering laboratory in someuniversities. However, little is known about
his or her proposal towin the grant, the project, or the sponsor. Considering this, games and contests become a naturalway for engineering students to engage in critical thinking, problem-solving, and information-seeking skills, which will all be of service to them in their future careers. In an earlier library contest at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, called Project Shhh!, welearned that while students showed gains in information literacy skills and enjoyed the challengeof the competition, other factors contributed to whether students would participate in a librarycontest [4]. One of the biggest concerns was time: both the timing of the contest within thesemester, in regard to classes and exams, and the duration of the contest. In the
, but, due to the technical curriculum requirements for students, disagree on the bestmethod for implementation24-26 or ignore its development.18 A small number of colleges anduniversities have developed programs that include leadership in their curriculum e.g.27; Bayless,Mitchell, & Robe28 found seven, which is only a small fraction of the over 300 ABET accreditedengineering colleges and universities across the United States. More often, faculty perceiveleadership development as a by-product of student in-class teaming experiences or co-curricularactivities.24; 25 This disagreement in leadership development strategy for undergraduate engineersis particularly concerning due to the wide body of research that has linked leadership to
optimal, innovative solutions to real ratherthan theoretical problems” [27, pp. 10-11]. These examples emphasize how particular ways ofthinking that are valued in engineering; however, how engineering students prefer to think isequally important as how well they think like engineers.For example, Boaler and Greeno [30] found that students who saw themselves as creativethinkers and identified with this characteristic tended to have lower interest in traditionallytaught math classes. They perceived these traditionally taught classes to inhibit their ownthinking and agency. These students had higher levels of satisfaction in reformed math courseswhere students worked together to solve math problems. In contrast, students who identified asgood rule
), and ambiguity (what does it mean thatethics is covered, anyway?). These are all important limitations and we caution the reader toconsider these when interpreting the results. Another limitation is the source of evidence: coursedescriptions available on-line may not be the most updated descriptions of the courses as they arecurrently taught, and we have no way to know whether how accurate the description truly is. Athird limitation is the ambiguity of what “ethics” may entail when written in the coursedescription or course title. This does not tell us anything about the ethics-related content taughtor covered. It simply tells us whether ethics is something that a student may expect to see atsome point in that class. While a coarse signal, we
. Xu, and D. Prajapati, “Pathways to entrepreneurship (PAtENT) program: Reimagining STEM doctoral programs,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. ASEE Conferences, 2021.[21] F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and É. Duchesnay, “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, no. 85, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.[22] DataCamp, “DataCamp: Learn R, Python & data science online,” https://www.datacamp.com/, 2022, accessed: 2022-2-9.[23] harlfoxem, “House sales in King County, USA,” 2016.[24] R. A. Fisher, “The use of multiple measurements
include epistemic cognition in the context of problem solving, researcher identity, and pre-service K-12 teacher preparation.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP
2006-1617: A CASE STUDY TO EXPLORE LEARNING DURING A FACULTYDEVELOPMENT WORKSHOPDonald Elger, University of Idaho DONALD F. ELGER is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho. Dr. Elger teaches “how to learn,” entrepreneurship, design, and fluid mechanics. Dr. Elger has co-authored a nation-ally-recognized text in engineering fluid mechanics, has won the ASEE best paper award at the regional and national level, and has led the Enriched Learning Environment Project at the UI. Present research and practice areas, funded by the NSF, involve theory of learning, transformational leadership in higher educa-tion, and design of effective organizations and learning
education, and extracurricular involvement. During college, engineering ethical developmentoccurs, catalyzed by formal education, extracurricular involvement, and broader factors such asinstitutional culture. Ethical development also should continue to grow in the workplace via aprocess of lifelong learning. Engineers may encounter different situations that cause them todraw on previous experiences and in hindsight view those experiences differently. For example,learning a framework for ethical reasoning in a required engineering ethics class that seemedunimportant at the time may be perceived as meaningful when the individual realizes itsusefulness in confronting a situation in the workplace.Figure 1. Visualization of how engineering ethical
year engineering classes because they need to know what weare doing. They can do their ABET process. They need to better understand what we aredoing. That is the opportunity for us to share with them for them understanding what ourstudents learn in the class.”Teaching and LearningProgram accreditation still brings change of teaching technology, teaching philosophy,teaching method and learning method. Amongst them, teaching philosophy may be directlyimpacted by accreditation. For instance, Mr. Smith argued, “the biggest impact of ABETaccreditation is starting conversation about students’ learning outcomes, the conversationabout what can students do. For years and years and years, the engineering education wasrecovered with these topics. What
. Borges is treasurer and co-chair of the Northeastern Association for Science Teacher Education (NE-ASTE) where faculty, researchers, and educators inform STEM teaching and learning and inform policy.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education
materials, while also showing that they needed to learn more about how to quantify the effects of each variable and how the many variables they listed were related to each other. After completing this exercise, the class was introduced to a mechanics of materials concept map3 that included many of the variables that they listed. Figure 4. Dr. Glenn Ellis of Smith College leads a discussion about the structural strength and Page 15.430.7 stability of a beam bridge. A lesson in concept mapping followed. 6Day 2 – Basic
.1977-2000: Adjustment during reformAfter a decade of the Cultural Revolution, China's modernization suffered seriouslosses and the gap between China and the world widened once again. The Chinesegovernment realized the importance of science and technology in modernization andbegan to prioritize it [17 . Deng Xiaoping stressed that "science and technology are thefirst productive forces" and emphasized the need to innovate ways to discover andcultivate outstanding talents; the country needed to "train a group of science andtechnology experts of world-class level as soon as possible". The status and role ofengineering education once again received nationwide attention. And at this stage,China's HEE was constantly adjusting in response to the