to receive an incomplete aslong as the class is completed within one semester. That is, a fall semester student has until theend of the spring term to complete the class. Moving from a lecture based course to a lecture based tutoring course has beenastonishingly effective. From Fall 2011 to Spring 2014, 97 students enrolled in IMSE 680. Ofthese students, only 26 students (27%) finished the class on schedule and a total of 77 (79%)finished the class by the deadline of the second semester. In contrast, since Summer 2014through Fall 2015, 39 students enrolled in this class, 26 (67%) finished the class on schedule and35 (90%) completed the class by the deadline. These mark a dramatic improvement in students’ability to complete the class
Engineering classes. Her research is in the area of Human Work Design and Environmental Design. Page 24.1201.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Effect of Active Collaborative Learning on Instructor Evaluations: An Observational StudyAbstractThis paper describes an ergonomics lab course that was initially redesigned utilizing Bloom’sTaxonomy to align lab report results with a depth of student knowledge. Student feedbackelicited the need for clarity and change in the classroom methods to improve teachingeffectiveness. Small changes requiring very little
valuable practice that helps students assess and improve theirteamwork skills, especially in project-based learning (PBL) courses. While popular peerevaluation tools like CATME collect both quantitative ranking and qualitative comments,qualitative peer comments often lack objective, helpful feedback due to several potential biases.In this paper, we describe the implementation and impact of a 30-minute interactive presentationintended to teach first-year engineering students to give and receive quality feedback.To further investigate the effectiveness of the in-class intervention on peer feedback quality, arubric was adapted to measure the quality of peer feedback comments. Preliminary findingsshow significant improvement in all criteria for
proven teaching and learning strategies to improve students’ spatial skills. Everyday Examples in Engineering (E3s): Involve faculty who teach 1st and 2nd year courses in efforts to use and develop examples that are familiar and engaging to students to illustrate theoretical concepts. Faculty- Student Interaction: Involve engineering faculty who teach 1st and 2nd year courses in efforts that build faculty knowledge and skill to better engage and interact with undergraduate engineering students inside and outside of the classroom. Page 22.819.3This paper will focus on the Spatial Visualization Skills strategy including: the
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering Education and Quantified Self: Utilizing a Student-Centered Learning Analytics Tool to Improve Student SuccessAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper assessed the implementation of a quantified-self learninganalytics tool, called Pattern, and how it impacted study behaviors across multiple sections ofengineering courses at Purdue University. The goals of the implementation of Pattern andsubsequent research was to explore: (a) student study activities that correlated with success, (b)student study behavior change from exam-to-exam, and (c) whether the use of Pattern impactedstudy habits. Results indicated that simply studying longer does not correlate with
Session 2115 AIM for Better Student Learning: Using Instant Messaging to Facilitate Improved Instructor-Student Communication Dr. J. Ledlie Klosky, COL Stephen J. Ressler, CPT Jared Erickson United States Military AcademyIntroductionThis paper describes an experiment in which the instructors in two different undergraduateengineering mechanics courses used America Online Instant Messenger (AIM) as the principalmeans of communication with their students outside the classroom. Following a brief summaryof current trends in instant messaging, we
Group (left) and Control Group (right)V. ConclusionsSignificantly better final course grades and improvement in the course scores were observed forstudents in the experimental group. The effect size for course grade (CG) differences between thetwo groups was 0.42. This is considered a moderate significant effect16, 21, 22. When the students’achievement was benchmarked with respect to their previous performance (PAP), the effect sizefor improvement (IC) in the experimental group was 0.65, indicating that an average student in theexperimental group improved as much as the 74th percentile student in the control group. Themain hypothesis that hypermedia-instruction enhances academic performance was
into the ABE mission and vision statements, educational objectives, programoutcomes (PO), performance criteria (PC), and, ultimately, the curriculum. The inner loop of theprocess focuses on course level evaluations and analysis of student and graduate performancefollowed by an assessment of gaps between the expected and actual student achievement levels.The loop is closed with a mechanism for instituting change to improve the program. Page 6.558.1“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2001, American Society for Engineering Education” ABE
assisted me in performing and teaching aspects of data analytics and data science. My diverse research background has allowed me to learn about different areas of engineering and I can use everything I have already learned and apply it to the next job, project, or task. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Investigating the effects of course modalityon student performance and satisfaction in online learning.AbstractThe objective of engineering education is to explore and establish effective instructionalstrategies in higher education that can enhance student learning outcomes. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous students have had to transition from traditional in-person learning
answer is that the “intrusive advising” or personal attention of SuccessCoach worked as suggested by the Guided Pathways model. Unfortunately, the data in the firsttwo rows of table 4 do not support this answer. The Success Coach was hired in March of 2017and so had no effect on the students taking courses in the fall of 2016 and only minimal effect ofthe students taking courses in the spring of 2017. And yet during those two terms there is still adifference between the success rate of the two groups for both all courses and for just STEMcourses. While the support provided by the Success Coach may have positive effects notdocumented here, it does not totally explain the difference in success rates. Another possible answer is that there is
-level courses, and he has conducted educational research on the effect of various learning techniques on improving students’ self-efficacy and overall learning experience.Dr. Rouzbeh Amini, University of Akron Dr. Amini completed a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Minnesota in the field of ocular biomechanics and biotransport in 2010. He then continued his research work on the mechanics of soft tissue as a postdoctoral trainee at the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Bioengineering, where he held the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NIH F32). He conducted his postdoc- toral research on the biomechanics of cardiac valves. Dr. Amini has served as an assistant professor in
established: 1. It must result in a substantial improvement in the teaching effectiveness of TA’s. 2. It must be useful to the TA’s themselves in their own graduate studies and for their professional growth. 3. It must be sustainable as a yearly program with a minimum cost to the Department. The first principle points towards creating a training program that would be quite demanding from theTA’s perspective in terms of both time and effort. However, we believe that TA’s must be motivated to acceptthe demanding program whole-hearted before a genuine improvement in their teaching skills can be expected.This belief underlies the second guiding principle. The third guiding principle is added for the continuity of theprogram in a ever
validation tool. Assessment procedures toverify the success of the project were developed and data has been analyzed. The resulting classstructure, which was tailored to meet the needs of nontraditional students, has improved thequality of learning for all students. The study found a modest increase in average studentlearning with a significant reduction in the class standard deviation. Successful portions of thisproject have been incorporated into the day section of this course over the past 3 semesters,which consists of three 50-minute lectures taught by faculty and one 2-hour discussion sectionled by a teaching assistant per week. The use of these techniques in additional courses is beingevaluated within the department and college.I. Overview of
AC 2011-736: IMPROVED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN MATERIALAND ENERGY BALANCES USING PERSONALIZED ONLINE HOME-WORKMatthew W Liberatore, Colorado School of Mines Matthew W. Liberatore is as an assistant professor of chemical engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. In addition to creating and applying active learning in his courses, his current research involves the rheology of complex fluids especially traditional and renewable energy fluids, entangled polymer solutions and polymer films
into their courses. Additionally, these extended student outcomes have been mappedto ABET outcomes. To date, project-based learning (PBL) activities have been implemented orare planned in most of the second and third year Bioengineering integrated core classes, as well asseveral of the track-specific courses and upper level elective courses. As we move forward,establishing an effective assessment mechanism to measure student outcomes will be a keycomponent of our continuous curriculum improvement plan.Introduction:The concept of “Vertically Integrated Projects” and “Connected Curriculum” in university settingsis not new. The concepts were originally conceived at Georgia Institute of Technology and theUniversity College of London, respectively
to make curricular improvements.Specifically, there is an interest in improving how design is taught throughout the curriculum ofthe 4-year mechanical engineering program.A preliminary study was previously conducted to assess the current state of how the designprocess was being taught in several courses across the mechanical engineering curriculum. [3]An important finding of the preliminary study was that students reported learning differentdesign processes in their courses than they had previously seen. This showed a lack ofcontinuity and consistency in how the design process is taught across the curriculum.Additionally, a review of different design processes was conducted to determine what modelmight be best suited for adoption as a
2006-706: A STUDY OF 3D STEREO VISION SYSTEM FOR IMPROVINGVISUALIZATION SKILLSChunxia Pan, Iowa State UniversityShana Smith, Iowa State University Page 11.127.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Study of 3D Stereo Vision System Effectiveness for Improving Visualization SkillsAbstractThis study compared the effectiveness of a Head Mounted Display (HMD) and anaglyphicglasses on students’ learning of 3D designs. The two stereo display systems were used in anintroductory design and graphics class. Data related to students’ subjective perceptions and theirobjective performance were collected and analyzed. Results of the study reveal
the average score in Exam 1 from 2018 to 2019, when Ifirst introduced the digital tools of Kahoot! and MATLAB Grader. This data indicated that these digitaltools had an immediate effect on the improvement of student understanding on the course materials andtheir performance in the exam. The impact became marginable for the following two exams, whichmight be due to the reason that students were getting used to the programming class setting. Introductionof these tools could engage the students on the hands-on programming at the beginning of the semesterand prepare them for the significant challenges that were present in this class due to unfamiliar classsetting and new demanding programming skills. Next, I compared the correction rate for one
conduct active-learning activities, such as in-depthproblem solving, project-based learning, in-class discussions, and team collaborative learning.The flipped classroom model relies on that students actively manage course requirements andpre-/in-class learning activities. Therefore, the pre-class activities and in-class attendance aremandatory.Here, we developed the video lectures using Camtasia Studio software package by TechSmithCorporation. The reason to choose Camtasia Studio is due to its following key capabilities:(1) two channels of recording: screen recording and an additional webcam recording, (2)powerful video editing capabilities, such as multi-track timeline, visual effects, and noise-cancellation, (3) the capability of embedding
Paper ID #13802Using online and hands-on activities to improve self-efficacy in mechanicsDr. Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, Stanford University Dr. Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf is a postdoctoral research scholar in the Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. Her research interests lie at the intersection of solid mechanics and engineering education, particularly in the areas of a new paradigm in teaching introductory, fundamental engineering mechanics courses (statics, mechanics of materials, and dynamics).Prof. Sarah L. Billington, Stanford University Sarah L. Billington is Professor of Structural Engineering and Associate
homeworkassociated with the course module. One student inferred that game modules dealing with morecomplicated subjects would be even more effective, and stated that this game would be veryuseful in an introductory course on Transportation Engineering.III. Research Objectives and the Cyclic ModelThe overall goal of this project is to improve students’ learning outcomes and engagement intransportation engineering. There are two major objectives: 1. Develop five interactive learning tools for CEE-Transportation courses that are common to almost all CEE-Transportation college programs. 2. Develop associated instructional tools, including assignments and assessment tools, that shows impact of multimodal (traditional mixed with new media tool
evaluation used to informteaching practices rather than to assign grades19 (p. 25). Formative assessment also works as a Page 26.932.13tool for learning because of how it embeds periodic student reflection on course content. It maybe that the effect of consistent improvement in vignette test scores across our lab designs was a 12result of how the question process focused student attention on the processes of knowledgetransfer. In other words, the short vignette quizzes contextualized how concepts move from oneproblem to another, and therefore helped students learn how to answer learning transferquestions
retention and graduation rates of transfer students fromcommunity colleges in computing and engineering majors, especially women and students fromunderrepresented racial minority (URM) groups, and increase inter- and intra-institutionalcollaboration for longer-term change and improvements for transfer students. Two keystudent-focused aspects of the program were: 1. an innovative, holistic model of individualpre-and post- transfer success advising (TSA) and 2. a first-year experience course designed as atransfer seminar (TRS) for post-transfer students in computing and engineering.This paper focuses on the efficacy of the PTP program supports offered to transfer students (TSAservices and the TRS course) at mitigating transfer student attrition and
Mathematical Association of America. She is a member of Tau Beta Pi and Phi Kappa Phi as well as the MAA.Dr. Tamara Pearson, Clayton State University Dr. Tamara Pearson is currently an Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education at Clayton State Uni- versity in Morrow, Georgia. She received her bachelors of science in Mathematics from Spelman College in 1996 and a Ph.D. in Curriculum and instruction from the University of Florida in 2003. Page 23.720.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Improving Student Understanding and Efficiency
interests include improving the representation of young women in engineering fields and the development of Generation Z students.Dr. Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho Dr. Beyerlein has taught at the University of Idaho for the last 27 years. He is coordinator of the college of engineering inter-disciplinary capstone design course. He is also a co-PI on a DOE sponsored Industrial Assessment Center program in which several of the student authors have been involved. Dr. Beyerlein has been active in research projects involving engine testing, engine heat release modeling, design of curricula for active , design pedagogy, and assessment of professional skills.Mr. Dan Cordon, University of Idaho, Moscow Clinical faculty
process, butoftentimes engineering technology students have few opportunities to develop their skills in thisarea as they matriculate through their chosen degree program. Many programs require only oneor two writing courses outside of the major. In addition, courses that require communication inthe form of laboratory reports often provide minimal feedback regarding appropriate writingstyle, the effective support of results with analysis, and maintaining efficiency in writing.In this paper, a new approach is presented that unburdens some of the responsibility from theinstructor to peer tutors outside of the engineering technology major who are skilled writers.Although this effort has been ongoing, with engineering technology students required to
Statics courses toengage and motivate students, to make real-life connections of the material delivered in thecourse, to improve the depth of concept understanding, and to improve passing rates andretention. In recent years, challenges, hands-on activities, online assessments, and engagingcollaborative learning activities during recitation sessions and in class have been added to theStatics course in the Mechanical Engineering Department at UTPA through implementation ofchallenge-based instruction2 and guided discovery modules3. In this paper, a description ofonline assessments and recitation sessions developed for the Statics course are presentedincluding promising preliminary results; additional results will be presented in the future
students to join the physics and mathematics has shown the importance ofSTEM disciplines. Improving the scientific self-reflective activities in science courses [e. g., 2-3].knowledge, attitude toward science and teaching skills One way of engaging in reflective activities is throughof prospective teachers must be critical goals for self-corrections of homework and exams [4-5].Conceptual Physics course. In [4], Henderson and Harper described a few In spite of using active-engagement pedagogical physics classroom experiments where self-correctionstechniques in our classes, we still find a big percentage have been
students to join the physics and mathematics has shown the importance ofSTEM disciplines. Improving the scientific self-reflective activities in science courses [e. g., 2-3].knowledge, attitude toward science and teaching skills One way of engaging in reflective activities is throughof prospective teachers must be critical goals for self-corrections of homework and exams [4-5].Conceptual Physics course. In [4], Henderson and Harper described a few In spite of using active-engagement pedagogical physics classroom experiments where self-correctionstechniques in our classes, we still find a big percentage have been
of a student, a plan was designed to integrate and advance what students are learning from the first common year to their sophomore, junior, and senior year with more emphasis, given to programming/ data science, Bio-inspired engineering design class, and ethics & humanities. To effectively integrate these courses into the upper-level courses, a group of faculty members from different engineering departments, called disciples, were designated. The main duties of these disciples are: 1. providing relevant examples from each engineering major related to computational thinking, bio-inspired design, ethics, and humanities to the faculty members teaching the common first year (FCY). 2. monitoring the advancement and integration of